Money management and views of civil partnership in same-sex couples: results from a UK survey of non-heterosexuals

Recent legislation in the UK has extended many of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities of heterosexual marriage to same-sex couples who register their partnerships. Prior to the Civil Partnership Act (2004) however, little was known about financial arrangements in same-sex couples, no...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Sociological review (Keele) 2011-11, Vol.59 (4), p.685-706
Main Authors: Burgoyne, Carole, Clarke, Victoria, Burns, Maree
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Basic rights
Civil unions
Couples
Economic sociology
Financial management
Financial resources
Heterosexuality
Homosexuality
Legislation
Lesbianism
Majorities
Management
Marriage
Money
Personal finance
Polls & surveys
Rating
Regression Analysis
Rights
Same Sex Marriage
Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations
Sociology
Sociology of economy and development
Sociology of the family. Age groups
Standard of living. Income
Survey data
United Kingdom
Wages
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent legislation in the UK has extended many of the legal and financial rights and responsibilities of heterosexual marriage to same-sex couples who register their partnerships. Prior to the Civil Partnership Act (2004) however, little was known about financial arrangements in same-sex couples, nor the extent to which these mirrored those of married or cohabiting heterosexuals. This paper reports the findings from the first large-scale survey in the UK to investigate finances and civil partnership beliefs in a convenience sample of non-heterosexuals: 510 individuals, of whom 386 were currently in a same-sex relationship, participated in the survey. Our findings showed less merging of finances (such as in pooling, allowance, and whole wage systems) than is typical in heterosexual married couples. The results of a series of multinomial logistic regression analyses showed that rating CP as more important, and having both names on the mortgage, significantly reduced the odds of independent (ie, separate) management of finances. Participants were almost unanimous in their endorsement of CP as a form of legal recognition, with a large majority saying that they would also consider it for themselves.
ISSN:0038-0261
1467-954X
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02032.x