Loading…

Carbon sink to source: longitudinal gradients of planktonic P:R ratios in subtropical reservoirs

Spatial patterns of planktonic production and respiration in the surface mixed layer were examined in eight Texas, USA reservoirs to test the hypothesis that P:R ratios are lowest in upreservoir inflow zones and highest in downreservoir open-water zones, as predicted by the heuristic reservoir zonat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeochemistry 2012-02, Vol.107 (1/3), p.81-93
Main Authors: Forbes, Margaret G., Doyle, Robert D., Scott, J. Thad, Stanley, Jacob K., Huang, Hui, Fulton, Barry A., Brooks, Bryan W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6b17907fc7937dc36f649b5f435b3720e7c0a9efdcadf2a0b5fecf16efee3ee93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6b17907fc7937dc36f649b5f435b3720e7c0a9efdcadf2a0b5fecf16efee3ee93
container_end_page 93
container_issue 1/3
container_start_page 81
container_title Biogeochemistry
container_volume 107
creator Forbes, Margaret G.
Doyle, Robert D.
Scott, J. Thad
Stanley, Jacob K.
Huang, Hui
Fulton, Barry A.
Brooks, Bryan W.
description Spatial patterns of planktonic production and respiration in the surface mixed layer were examined in eight Texas, USA reservoirs to test the hypothesis that P:R ratios are lowest in upreservoir inflow zones and highest in downreservoir open-water zones, as predicted by the heuristic reservoir zonation model. We measured summer planktonic metabolism with light-dark bottles and physical-chemical conditions in epilimnetic water at 85 sites distributed among sixteen longitudinal transects within the eight reservoirs (2 transects per reservoir). Volumetric production and plankton biomass were lowest in the open-water zones and increased upreservoir; however, that pattern was reversed for areal production due to greater photic depths at open-water sites. Volumetric respiration was similar in the three zones; however, corresponding planktonic P:R ratios in the surface mixed layer were significantly lower at open-water sites, which is opposite than hypothesized. Based on linear regressions of production and respiration rates on chlorophyll a, open-water sites were net heterotrophic during the summer regardless of trophic state; whereas inflow and mid-reservoir zone sites were heterotrophic when chlorophyll concentrations were respectively less than 9.5 and 35 mg m⁻³. Although variation among reservoirs was high, five of the eight reservoirs had inflow zones that were net carbon sinks while seven had open-water zones that were carbon sources. Mean (± standard error) carbon flux rates of inflow, midreservoir, and open-water zones were — 0.22 ± 0.12 (C sink), 0.39 ± 0.44 (moderate C source), and 1.33 ± 0.50 (strong C source) g C m⁻² day⁻¹ respectively. Inflow and mid-reservoir zones comprised approximately 45% of the total reservoir area studied. Therefore, omitting their contribution as often done when a single open-water site is sampled may substantially overestimate reservoir carbon flux.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10533-010-9533-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968176733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41410550</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41410550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6b17907fc7937dc36f649b5f435b3720e7c0a9efdcadf2a0b5fecf16efee3ee93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rFTEUhkNR8Fr7A1wUglC6Gk0mk8lNd3KpH1BQxIK7mMmcXHI7Ta45GcF_b4YpFbpwlcB53odzXkJec_aWM6beIWdSiIZx1ujlI07IhkslGsnlj2dkw3i_bVrZixfkJeKBMaYVExvyc2fzkCLFEO9oSRTTnB1c0SnFfSjzGKKd6D7bMUAsSJOnx8nGu5JicPTr1TeabQkJaaiKeSg5HYOriQwI-XcKGV-R595OCGcP7ym5_XD9ffepufny8fPu_U3jhNal6QeuNFPeKS3U6ETv-04P0ndCDkK1DJRjVoMfnR19a1kdgfO8Bw8gALQ4JZer95jTrxmwmPuADqa6LaQZje63XPVKiEq-eUIe6tH1zgpxzttWt4uOr5DLCTGDN8cc7m3-YzgzS-NmbdzUxs3SuFnEFw9ii7UEn210AR-DtX0uZLetXLtyWEdxD_nfAv-Tn6-hA5aUH6Ud7yoqmfgLyBqbug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911122929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon sink to source: longitudinal gradients of planktonic P:R ratios in subtropical reservoirs</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Forbes, Margaret G. ; Doyle, Robert D. ; Scott, J. Thad ; Stanley, Jacob K. ; Huang, Hui ; Fulton, Barry A. ; Brooks, Bryan W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Margaret G. ; Doyle, Robert D. ; Scott, J. Thad ; Stanley, Jacob K. ; Huang, Hui ; Fulton, Barry A. ; Brooks, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><description>Spatial patterns of planktonic production and respiration in the surface mixed layer were examined in eight Texas, USA reservoirs to test the hypothesis that P:R ratios are lowest in upreservoir inflow zones and highest in downreservoir open-water zones, as predicted by the heuristic reservoir zonation model. We measured summer planktonic metabolism with light-dark bottles and physical-chemical conditions in epilimnetic water at 85 sites distributed among sixteen longitudinal transects within the eight reservoirs (2 transects per reservoir). Volumetric production and plankton biomass were lowest in the open-water zones and increased upreservoir; however, that pattern was reversed for areal production due to greater photic depths at open-water sites. Volumetric respiration was similar in the three zones; however, corresponding planktonic P:R ratios in the surface mixed layer were significantly lower at open-water sites, which is opposite than hypothesized. Based on linear regressions of production and respiration rates on chlorophyll a, open-water sites were net heterotrophic during the summer regardless of trophic state; whereas inflow and mid-reservoir zone sites were heterotrophic when chlorophyll concentrations were respectively less than 9.5 and 35 mg m⁻³. Although variation among reservoirs was high, five of the eight reservoirs had inflow zones that were net carbon sinks while seven had open-water zones that were carbon sources. Mean (± standard error) carbon flux rates of inflow, midreservoir, and open-water zones were — 0.22 ± 0.12 (C sink), 0.39 ± 0.44 (moderate C source), and 1.33 ± 0.50 (strong C source) g C m⁻² day⁻¹ respectively. Inflow and mid-reservoir zones comprised approximately 45% of the total reservoir area studied. Therefore, omitting their contribution as often done when a single open-water site is sampled may substantially overestimate reservoir carbon flux.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-010-9533-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biogeochemistry ; Biogeosciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon ; Carbon sinks ; Carbon sources ; Chlorophyll ; Chlorophylls ; Creeks ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Chemistry ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geochemistry ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Life Sciences ; Limnology ; Mineralogy ; Natural reservoirs ; Plankton ; Rainforests ; Reservoirs ; Respiration ; Silicates ; Surface areas ; Synecology ; Water geochemistry ; Water inflow ; Watersheds ; Zonation</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2012-02, Vol.107 (1/3), p.81-93</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6b17907fc7937dc36f649b5f435b3720e7c0a9efdcadf2a0b5fecf16efee3ee93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6b17907fc7937dc36f649b5f435b3720e7c0a9efdcadf2a0b5fecf16efee3ee93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41410550$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41410550$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25613548$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Margaret G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, J. Thad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Jacob K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Barry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon sink to source: longitudinal gradients of planktonic P:R ratios in subtropical reservoirs</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><addtitle>Biogeochemistry</addtitle><description>Spatial patterns of planktonic production and respiration in the surface mixed layer were examined in eight Texas, USA reservoirs to test the hypothesis that P:R ratios are lowest in upreservoir inflow zones and highest in downreservoir open-water zones, as predicted by the heuristic reservoir zonation model. We measured summer planktonic metabolism with light-dark bottles and physical-chemical conditions in epilimnetic water at 85 sites distributed among sixteen longitudinal transects within the eight reservoirs (2 transects per reservoir). Volumetric production and plankton biomass were lowest in the open-water zones and increased upreservoir; however, that pattern was reversed for areal production due to greater photic depths at open-water sites. Volumetric respiration was similar in the three zones; however, corresponding planktonic P:R ratios in the surface mixed layer were significantly lower at open-water sites, which is opposite than hypothesized. Based on linear regressions of production and respiration rates on chlorophyll a, open-water sites were net heterotrophic during the summer regardless of trophic state; whereas inflow and mid-reservoir zone sites were heterotrophic when chlorophyll concentrations were respectively less than 9.5 and 35 mg m⁻³. Although variation among reservoirs was high, five of the eight reservoirs had inflow zones that were net carbon sinks while seven had open-water zones that were carbon sources. Mean (± standard error) carbon flux rates of inflow, midreservoir, and open-water zones were — 0.22 ± 0.12 (C sink), 0.39 ± 0.44 (moderate C source), and 1.33 ± 0.50 (strong C source) g C m⁻² day⁻¹ respectively. Inflow and mid-reservoir zones comprised approximately 45% of the total reservoir area studied. Therefore, omitting their contribution as often done when a single open-water site is sampled may substantially overestimate reservoir carbon flux.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Carbon sources</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Chlorophylls</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Limnology</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Natural reservoirs</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Surface areas</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Water geochemistry</subject><subject>Water inflow</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Zonation</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rFTEUhkNR8Fr7A1wUglC6Gk0mk8lNd3KpH1BQxIK7mMmcXHI7Ta45GcF_b4YpFbpwlcB53odzXkJec_aWM6beIWdSiIZx1ujlI07IhkslGsnlj2dkw3i_bVrZixfkJeKBMaYVExvyc2fzkCLFEO9oSRTTnB1c0SnFfSjzGKKd6D7bMUAsSJOnx8nGu5JicPTr1TeabQkJaaiKeSg5HYOriQwI-XcKGV-R595OCGcP7ym5_XD9ffepufny8fPu_U3jhNal6QeuNFPeKS3U6ETv-04P0ndCDkK1DJRjVoMfnR19a1kdgfO8Bw8gALQ4JZer95jTrxmwmPuADqa6LaQZje63XPVKiEq-eUIe6tH1zgpxzttWt4uOr5DLCTGDN8cc7m3-YzgzS-NmbdzUxs3SuFnEFw9ii7UEn210AR-DtX0uZLetXLtyWEdxD_nfAv-Tn6-hA5aUH6Ud7yoqmfgLyBqbug</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Forbes, Margaret G.</creator><creator>Doyle, Robert D.</creator><creator>Scott, J. Thad</creator><creator>Stanley, Jacob K.</creator><creator>Huang, Hui</creator><creator>Fulton, Barry A.</creator><creator>Brooks, Bryan W.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Carbon sink to source: longitudinal gradients of planktonic P:R ratios in subtropical reservoirs</title><author>Forbes, Margaret G. ; Doyle, Robert D. ; Scott, J. Thad ; Stanley, Jacob K. ; Huang, Hui ; Fulton, Barry A. ; Brooks, Bryan W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6b17907fc7937dc36f649b5f435b3720e7c0a9efdcadf2a0b5fecf16efee3ee93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Carbon sources</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Chlorophylls</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Limnology</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Natural reservoirs</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Surface areas</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Water geochemistry</topic><topic>Water inflow</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Zonation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Margaret G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, J. Thad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Jacob K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Barry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forbes, Margaret G.</au><au>Doyle, Robert D.</au><au>Scott, J. Thad</au><au>Stanley, Jacob K.</au><au>Huang, Hui</au><au>Fulton, Barry A.</au><au>Brooks, Bryan W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon sink to source: longitudinal gradients of planktonic P:R ratios in subtropical reservoirs</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><stitle>Biogeochemistry</stitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>1/3</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>81-93</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><coden>BIOGEP</coden><abstract>Spatial patterns of planktonic production and respiration in the surface mixed layer were examined in eight Texas, USA reservoirs to test the hypothesis that P:R ratios are lowest in upreservoir inflow zones and highest in downreservoir open-water zones, as predicted by the heuristic reservoir zonation model. We measured summer planktonic metabolism with light-dark bottles and physical-chemical conditions in epilimnetic water at 85 sites distributed among sixteen longitudinal transects within the eight reservoirs (2 transects per reservoir). Volumetric production and plankton biomass were lowest in the open-water zones and increased upreservoir; however, that pattern was reversed for areal production due to greater photic depths at open-water sites. Volumetric respiration was similar in the three zones; however, corresponding planktonic P:R ratios in the surface mixed layer were significantly lower at open-water sites, which is opposite than hypothesized. Based on linear regressions of production and respiration rates on chlorophyll a, open-water sites were net heterotrophic during the summer regardless of trophic state; whereas inflow and mid-reservoir zone sites were heterotrophic when chlorophyll concentrations were respectively less than 9.5 and 35 mg m⁻³. Although variation among reservoirs was high, five of the eight reservoirs had inflow zones that were net carbon sinks while seven had open-water zones that were carbon sources. Mean (± standard error) carbon flux rates of inflow, midreservoir, and open-water zones were — 0.22 ± 0.12 (C sink), 0.39 ± 0.44 (moderate C source), and 1.33 ± 0.50 (strong C source) g C m⁻² day⁻¹ respectively. Inflow and mid-reservoir zones comprised approximately 45% of the total reservoir area studied. Therefore, omitting their contribution as often done when a single open-water site is sampled may substantially overestimate reservoir carbon flux.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-010-9533-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-2563
ispartof Biogeochemistry, 2012-02, Vol.107 (1/3), p.81-93
issn 0168-2563
1573-515X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968176733
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biogeochemistry
Biogeosciences
Biological and medical sciences
Carbon
Carbon sinks
Carbon sources
Chlorophyll
Chlorophylls
Creeks
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Ecosystems
Environmental Chemistry
Exact sciences and technology
Fresh water ecosystems
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geochemistry
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Life Sciences
Limnology
Mineralogy
Natural reservoirs
Plankton
Rainforests
Reservoirs
Respiration
Silicates
Surface areas
Synecology
Water geochemistry
Water inflow
Watersheds
Zonation
title Carbon sink to source: longitudinal gradients of planktonic P:R ratios in subtropical reservoirs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20sink%20to%20source:%20longitudinal%20gradients%20of%20planktonic%20P:R%20ratios%20in%20subtropical%20reservoirs&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Forbes,%20Margaret%20G.&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=1/3&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=81-93&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft.coden=BIOGEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-010-9533-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41410550%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-6b17907fc7937dc36f649b5f435b3720e7c0a9efdcadf2a0b5fecf16efee3ee93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911122929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41410550&rfr_iscdi=true