Loading…

Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis

Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Usi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2012-05, Vol.60 (4), p.2054-2061
Main Authors: Kim, Hengjun J., Kim, Namkug, Kim, Sehyun, Hong, Seokjun, Park, Kyungmo, Lim, Sabina, Park, Jung-Mi, Na, Byungjo, Chae, Younbyoung, Lee, Jeongchan, Yeo, Sujung, Choe, Il-Hwan, Cho, Seung-Yeon, Cho, Gyunggoo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663
container_end_page 2061
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2054
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 60
creator Kim, Hengjun J.
Kim, Namkug
Kim, Sehyun
Hong, Seokjun
Park, Kyungmo
Lim, Sabina
Park, Jung-Mi
Na, Byungjo
Chae, Younbyoung
Lee, Jeongchan
Yeo, Sujung
Choe, Il-Hwan
Cho, Seung-Yeon
Cho, Gyunggoo
description Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Using an amygdala subregional shape analysis, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and the sex×age interaction on the subregion after controlling for intracranial volume. We found the main effect of age in the subregions and the effect of sex in the superficial nucleus, which showed that men had a larger mean radius than women. We also found a sex×age interaction in the centromedial nucleus, in that the radius of the centromedial nucleus showed a steeper decline with age in women compared with men. Regarding the amygdala volume as a whole, we found only an age effect and did not find any other significant difference between genders. The sex difference in the amygdala subregion and its relevance to the circulating gonadal hormone were discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_992828380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811912002029</els_id><sourcerecordid>1034810763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFDEQgIMo7rr6FyTgQS89Vl7diTd3WR-woKCeQzqpjBn6MSbTi_PvTTOrCx4UClKQr6qo-gihDDYMWPt6t5lwyXMa3RY3HBjfwBrqATlnYFRjVMcfrrkSjWbMnJEnpewAwDCpH5MzzkUnZdedk89f8CcNKUbMOHksNE3UjcdtcIOjZekzbtM8lTf0-jaFlaAxz-P9jxto-e72SF1NjyWVp-RRdEPBZ3fvBfn27vrr1Yfm5tP7j1dvbxovhTw0ba-8CgpDz3gbmdcGuAkBOq2F4kH50AkdRWyZVAGikSpKULoPvVFSta24IC9Pffd5_rFgOdgxFY_D4Cacl2KN4ZproaGSr_5JMhBSM-haUdEXf6G7ecl1s0opaHXHpeSV0ifK57mUjNHuc1WRj7WVXf3Ynb33Y1c_FtZQtfT53YClHzH8KfwtpAKXJwDr7W4TZlt8Wu8eUkZ_sGFO_5_yC2qWpU0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506872442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Kim, Hengjun J. ; Kim, Namkug ; Kim, Sehyun ; Hong, Seokjun ; Park, Kyungmo ; Lim, Sabina ; Park, Jung-Mi ; Na, Byungjo ; Chae, Younbyoung ; Lee, Jeongchan ; Yeo, Sujung ; Choe, Il-Hwan ; Cho, Seung-Yeon ; Cho, Gyunggoo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hengjun J. ; Kim, Namkug ; Kim, Sehyun ; Hong, Seokjun ; Park, Kyungmo ; Lim, Sabina ; Park, Jung-Mi ; Na, Byungjo ; Chae, Younbyoung ; Lee, Jeongchan ; Yeo, Sujung ; Choe, Il-Hwan ; Cho, Seung-Yeon ; Cho, Gyunggoo</creatorcontrib><description>Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Using an amygdala subregional shape analysis, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and the sex×age interaction on the subregion after controlling for intracranial volume. We found the main effect of age in the subregions and the effect of sex in the superficial nucleus, which showed that men had a larger mean radius than women. We also found a sex×age interaction in the centromedial nucleus, in that the radius of the centromedial nucleus showed a steeper decline with age in women compared with men. Regarding the amygdala volume as a whole, we found only an age effect and did not find any other significant difference between genders. The sex difference in the amygdala subregion and its relevance to the circulating gonadal hormone were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22374477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aging ; Amygdala ; Amygdala - anatomy &amp; histology ; Brain ; Centromedial nucleus ; Female ; Gender differences ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Mens health ; Middle Aged ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Sex Characteristics ; Sex difference ; Sex differences ; Sexual dimorphism ; Studies ; Superficial nucleus ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-05, Vol.60 (4), p.2054-2061</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2012. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22374477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hengjun J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Namkug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Seokjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyungmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jung-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Na, Byungjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Younbyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongchan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sujung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Il-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Gyunggoo</creatorcontrib><title>Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Using an amygdala subregional shape analysis, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and the sex×age interaction on the subregion after controlling for intracranial volume. We found the main effect of age in the subregions and the effect of sex in the superficial nucleus, which showed that men had a larger mean radius than women. We also found a sex×age interaction in the centromedial nucleus, in that the radius of the centromedial nucleus showed a steeper decline with age in women compared with men. Regarding the amygdala volume as a whole, we found only an age effect and did not find any other significant difference between genders. The sex difference in the amygdala subregion and its relevance to the circulating gonadal hormone were discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Amygdala</subject><subject>Amygdala - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Centromedial nucleus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sex difference</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Superficial nucleus</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUuLFDEQgIMo7rr6FyTgQS89Vl7diTd3WR-woKCeQzqpjBn6MSbTi_PvTTOrCx4UClKQr6qo-gihDDYMWPt6t5lwyXMa3RY3HBjfwBrqATlnYFRjVMcfrrkSjWbMnJEnpewAwDCpH5MzzkUnZdedk89f8CcNKUbMOHksNE3UjcdtcIOjZekzbtM8lTf0-jaFlaAxz-P9jxto-e72SF1NjyWVp-RRdEPBZ3fvBfn27vrr1Yfm5tP7j1dvbxovhTw0ba-8CgpDz3gbmdcGuAkBOq2F4kH50AkdRWyZVAGikSpKULoPvVFSta24IC9Pffd5_rFgOdgxFY_D4Cacl2KN4ZproaGSr_5JMhBSM-haUdEXf6G7ecl1s0opaHXHpeSV0ifK57mUjNHuc1WRj7WVXf3Ynb33Y1c_FtZQtfT53YClHzH8KfwtpAKXJwDr7W4TZlt8Wu8eUkZ_sGFO_5_yC2qWpU0</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Kim, Hengjun J.</creator><creator>Kim, Namkug</creator><creator>Kim, Sehyun</creator><creator>Hong, Seokjun</creator><creator>Park, Kyungmo</creator><creator>Lim, Sabina</creator><creator>Park, Jung-Mi</creator><creator>Na, Byungjo</creator><creator>Chae, Younbyoung</creator><creator>Lee, Jeongchan</creator><creator>Yeo, Sujung</creator><creator>Choe, Il-Hwan</creator><creator>Cho, Seung-Yeon</creator><creator>Cho, Gyunggoo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis</title><author>Kim, Hengjun J. ; Kim, Namkug ; Kim, Sehyun ; Hong, Seokjun ; Park, Kyungmo ; Lim, Sabina ; Park, Jung-Mi ; Na, Byungjo ; Chae, Younbyoung ; Lee, Jeongchan ; Yeo, Sujung ; Choe, Il-Hwan ; Cho, Seung-Yeon ; Cho, Gyunggoo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Amygdala</topic><topic>Amygdala - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Centromedial nucleus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sex difference</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Superficial nucleus</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hengjun J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Namkug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Seokjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyungmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jung-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Na, Byungjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Younbyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongchan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sujung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Il-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Gyunggoo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hengjun J.</au><au>Kim, Namkug</au><au>Kim, Sehyun</au><au>Hong, Seokjun</au><au>Park, Kyungmo</au><au>Lim, Sabina</au><au>Park, Jung-Mi</au><au>Na, Byungjo</au><au>Chae, Younbyoung</au><au>Lee, Jeongchan</au><au>Yeo, Sujung</au><au>Choe, Il-Hwan</au><au>Cho, Seung-Yeon</au><au>Cho, Gyunggoo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2054</spage><epage>2061</epage><pages>2054-2061</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Using an amygdala subregional shape analysis, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and the sex×age interaction on the subregion after controlling for intracranial volume. We found the main effect of age in the subregions and the effect of sex in the superficial nucleus, which showed that men had a larger mean radius than women. We also found a sex×age interaction in the centromedial nucleus, in that the radius of the centromedial nucleus showed a steeper decline with age in women compared with men. Regarding the amygdala volume as a whole, we found only an age effect and did not find any other significant difference between genders. The sex difference in the amygdala subregion and its relevance to the circulating gonadal hormone were discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22374477</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.025</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-05, Vol.60 (4), p.2054-2061
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_992828380
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adult
Age
Aged
Aging
Amygdala
Amygdala - anatomy & histology
Brain
Centromedial nucleus
Female
Gender differences
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Mens health
Middle Aged
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Sex Characteristics
Sex difference
Sex differences
Sexual dimorphism
Studies
Superficial nucleus
Young Adult
title Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A03%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20differences%20in%20amygdala%20subregions:%20Evidence%20from%20subregional%20shape%20analysis&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Kim,%20Hengjun%20J.&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2054&rft.epage=2061&rft.pages=2054-2061&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1034810763%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506872442&rft_id=info:pmid/22374477&rfr_iscdi=true