Loading…
Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis
Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Usi...
Saved in:
Published in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2012-05, Vol.60 (4), p.2054-2061 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663 |
container_end_page | 2061 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2054 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Kim, Hengjun J. Kim, Namkug Kim, Sehyun Hong, Seokjun Park, Kyungmo Lim, Sabina Park, Jung-Mi Na, Byungjo Chae, Younbyoung Lee, Jeongchan Yeo, Sujung Choe, Il-Hwan Cho, Seung-Yeon Cho, Gyunggoo |
description | Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Using an amygdala subregional shape analysis, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and the sex×age interaction on the subregion after controlling for intracranial volume. We found the main effect of age in the subregions and the effect of sex in the superficial nucleus, which showed that men had a larger mean radius than women. We also found a sex×age interaction in the centromedial nucleus, in that the radius of the centromedial nucleus showed a steeper decline with age in women compared with men. Regarding the amygdala volume as a whole, we found only an age effect and did not find any other significant difference between genders. The sex difference in the amygdala subregion and its relevance to the circulating gonadal hormone were discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.025 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_992828380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811912002029</els_id><sourcerecordid>1034810763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFDEQgIMo7rr6FyTgQS89Vl7diTd3WR-woKCeQzqpjBn6MSbTi_PvTTOrCx4UClKQr6qo-gihDDYMWPt6t5lwyXMa3RY3HBjfwBrqATlnYFRjVMcfrrkSjWbMnJEnpewAwDCpH5MzzkUnZdedk89f8CcNKUbMOHksNE3UjcdtcIOjZekzbtM8lTf0-jaFlaAxz-P9jxto-e72SF1NjyWVp-RRdEPBZ3fvBfn27vrr1Yfm5tP7j1dvbxovhTw0ba-8CgpDz3gbmdcGuAkBOq2F4kH50AkdRWyZVAGikSpKULoPvVFSta24IC9Pffd5_rFgOdgxFY_D4Cacl2KN4ZproaGSr_5JMhBSM-haUdEXf6G7ecl1s0opaHXHpeSV0ifK57mUjNHuc1WRj7WVXf3Ynb33Y1c_FtZQtfT53YClHzH8KfwtpAKXJwDr7W4TZlt8Wu8eUkZ_sGFO_5_yC2qWpU0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506872442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Kim, Hengjun J. ; Kim, Namkug ; Kim, Sehyun ; Hong, Seokjun ; Park, Kyungmo ; Lim, Sabina ; Park, Jung-Mi ; Na, Byungjo ; Chae, Younbyoung ; Lee, Jeongchan ; Yeo, Sujung ; Choe, Il-Hwan ; Cho, Seung-Yeon ; Cho, Gyunggoo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hengjun J. ; Kim, Namkug ; Kim, Sehyun ; Hong, Seokjun ; Park, Kyungmo ; Lim, Sabina ; Park, Jung-Mi ; Na, Byungjo ; Chae, Younbyoung ; Lee, Jeongchan ; Yeo, Sujung ; Choe, Il-Hwan ; Cho, Seung-Yeon ; Cho, Gyunggoo</creatorcontrib><description>Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Using an amygdala subregional shape analysis, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and the sex×age interaction on the subregion after controlling for intracranial volume. We found the main effect of age in the subregions and the effect of sex in the superficial nucleus, which showed that men had a larger mean radius than women. We also found a sex×age interaction in the centromedial nucleus, in that the radius of the centromedial nucleus showed a steeper decline with age in women compared with men. Regarding the amygdala volume as a whole, we found only an age effect and did not find any other significant difference between genders. The sex difference in the amygdala subregion and its relevance to the circulating gonadal hormone were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22374477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aging ; Amygdala ; Amygdala - anatomy & histology ; Brain ; Centromedial nucleus ; Female ; Gender differences ; Humans ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Mens health ; Middle Aged ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Sex Characteristics ; Sex difference ; Sex differences ; Sexual dimorphism ; Studies ; Superficial nucleus ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-05, Vol.60 (4), p.2054-2061</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2012. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22374477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hengjun J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Namkug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Seokjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyungmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jung-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Na, Byungjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Younbyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongchan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sujung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Il-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Gyunggoo</creatorcontrib><title>Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Using an amygdala subregional shape analysis, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and the sex×age interaction on the subregion after controlling for intracranial volume. We found the main effect of age in the subregions and the effect of sex in the superficial nucleus, which showed that men had a larger mean radius than women. We also found a sex×age interaction in the centromedial nucleus, in that the radius of the centromedial nucleus showed a steeper decline with age in women compared with men. Regarding the amygdala volume as a whole, we found only an age effect and did not find any other significant difference between genders. The sex difference in the amygdala subregion and its relevance to the circulating gonadal hormone were discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Amygdala</subject><subject>Amygdala - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Centromedial nucleus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sex difference</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Superficial nucleus</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUuLFDEQgIMo7rr6FyTgQS89Vl7diTd3WR-woKCeQzqpjBn6MSbTi_PvTTOrCx4UClKQr6qo-gihDDYMWPt6t5lwyXMa3RY3HBjfwBrqATlnYFRjVMcfrrkSjWbMnJEnpewAwDCpH5MzzkUnZdedk89f8CcNKUbMOHksNE3UjcdtcIOjZekzbtM8lTf0-jaFlaAxz-P9jxto-e72SF1NjyWVp-RRdEPBZ3fvBfn27vrr1Yfm5tP7j1dvbxovhTw0ba-8CgpDz3gbmdcGuAkBOq2F4kH50AkdRWyZVAGikSpKULoPvVFSta24IC9Pffd5_rFgOdgxFY_D4Cacl2KN4ZproaGSr_5JMhBSM-haUdEXf6G7ecl1s0opaHXHpeSV0ifK57mUjNHuc1WRj7WVXf3Ynb33Y1c_FtZQtfT53YClHzH8KfwtpAKXJwDr7W4TZlt8Wu8eUkZ_sGFO_5_yC2qWpU0</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Kim, Hengjun J.</creator><creator>Kim, Namkug</creator><creator>Kim, Sehyun</creator><creator>Hong, Seokjun</creator><creator>Park, Kyungmo</creator><creator>Lim, Sabina</creator><creator>Park, Jung-Mi</creator><creator>Na, Byungjo</creator><creator>Chae, Younbyoung</creator><creator>Lee, Jeongchan</creator><creator>Yeo, Sujung</creator><creator>Choe, Il-Hwan</creator><creator>Cho, Seung-Yeon</creator><creator>Cho, Gyunggoo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis</title><author>Kim, Hengjun J. ; Kim, Namkug ; Kim, Sehyun ; Hong, Seokjun ; Park, Kyungmo ; Lim, Sabina ; Park, Jung-Mi ; Na, Byungjo ; Chae, Younbyoung ; Lee, Jeongchan ; Yeo, Sujung ; Choe, Il-Hwan ; Cho, Seung-Yeon ; Cho, Gyunggoo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Amygdala</topic><topic>Amygdala - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Centromedial nucleus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sex difference</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Superficial nucleus</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hengjun J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Namkug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Seokjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyungmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jung-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Na, Byungjo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Younbyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongchan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Sujung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Il-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Gyunggoo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hengjun J.</au><au>Kim, Namkug</au><au>Kim, Sehyun</au><au>Hong, Seokjun</au><au>Park, Kyungmo</au><au>Lim, Sabina</au><au>Park, Jung-Mi</au><au>Na, Byungjo</au><au>Chae, Younbyoung</au><au>Lee, Jeongchan</au><au>Yeo, Sujung</au><au>Choe, Il-Hwan</au><au>Cho, Seung-Yeon</au><au>Cho, Gyunggoo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2054</spage><epage>2061</epage><pages>2054-2061</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Each subregion of the amygdala is characterized by a distinct cytoarchitecture and function. However, most previous studies on sexual dimorphism and aging have assessed differences in the structure of the amygdala at the level of the amygdala in its entirety rather than at the subregional level. Using an amygdala subregional shape analysis, we investigated the effects of sex, age, and the sex×age interaction on the subregion after controlling for intracranial volume. We found the main effect of age in the subregions and the effect of sex in the superficial nucleus, which showed that men had a larger mean radius than women. We also found a sex×age interaction in the centromedial nucleus, in that the radius of the centromedial nucleus showed a steeper decline with age in women compared with men. Regarding the amygdala volume as a whole, we found only an age effect and did not find any other significant difference between genders. The sex difference in the amygdala subregion and its relevance to the circulating gonadal hormone were discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22374477</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.025</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2012-05, Vol.60 (4), p.2054-2061 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_992828380 |
source | Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Adult Age Aged Aging Amygdala Amygdala - anatomy & histology Brain Centromedial nucleus Female Gender differences Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Mens health Middle Aged NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Sex Characteristics Sex difference Sex differences Sexual dimorphism Studies Superficial nucleus Young Adult |
title | Sex differences in amygdala subregions: Evidence from subregional shape analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A03%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20differences%20in%20amygdala%20subregions:%20Evidence%20from%20subregional%20shape%20analysis&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Kim,%20Hengjun%20J.&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2054&rft.epage=2061&rft.pages=2054-2061&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1034810763%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6b5c5d5edb126f1c89029dd0788352d5cd738f3f6145d0f945f4058bdb9545663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506872442&rft_id=info:pmid/22374477&rfr_iscdi=true |