Loading…

A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia

Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a rando...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of obstetric anesthesia 2012-04, Vol.21 (2), p.112-118
Main Authors: Loane, H, Preston, R, Douglas, M.J, Massey, S, Papsdorf, M, Tyler, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063
container_end_page 118
container_issue 2
container_start_page 112
container_title International journal of obstetric anesthesia
container_volume 21
creator Loane, H
Preston, R
Douglas, M.J
Massey, S
Papsdorf, M
Tyler, J
description Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. Methods Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 μg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. Results Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8–10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0–4.3), F [1, 64] = 9.62, P = 0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h ( P = 0.001). Nausea and vomiting ( P = 0.02) and pruritus ( P = 0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. Conclusions In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993102927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959289X12000167</els_id><sourcerecordid>993102927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsGK1TAUDaI4b0Z_wIVk56rPm6RNGxBhGHQUBlyo4C6k6e28dNKmJu3I8wv8bFPe6MKFcCHh5pzDzTmXkBcM9gyYfD3s3RDMngPje8gF1SOyY5XghRB1-ZjsQFWq4I36dkbOUxoAQIlGPiVnnJcMqkbuyK9LGs3UhdH9xI7aMC0xeJ-vS3TG58Y4m-imW-ryi1kOaHN3DHE-uAnpD7ccMtJM6R5jWhM17SY1uURnbzKg9cHe0T5EOoe0FBaTiWgm2qF3mXKkZjL-FpMzz8iT3viEzx_OC_L1_bsvVx-Km0_XH68ubwqbR16KUrWKNxyF7NpOQlOppsIOlAVel5LVAtCWpueVsKJvrSlrW1Ugy7aVUiiQ4oK8OunOMXxfMS16dMmi38YNa9JKCQZc8Toj-QlpY0gpYq_n6EYTj5qB3gLQg94C0FsAGnJBlUkvH-TXdsTuL-WP4xnw5gTA_Ml7h1En63Cy2LmIdtFdcP_Xf_sP3frsd07lDo-YhrDG7GjSTKdM0J-3Fdg2gPGcPpO1-A0GTq8C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993102927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Loane, H ; Preston, R ; Douglas, M.J ; Massey, S ; Papsdorf, M ; Tyler, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Loane, H ; Preston, R ; Douglas, M.J ; Massey, S ; Papsdorf, M ; Tyler, J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. Methods Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 μg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. Results Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8–10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0–4.3), F [1, 64] = 9.62, P = 0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h ( P = 0.001). Nausea and vomiting ( P = 0.02) and pruritus ( P = 0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. Conclusions In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-289X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22410586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdominal Muscles - innervation ; Adult ; Amides ; Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects ; Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Analysis of Variance ; Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care ; Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects ; Anesthesia, Spinal - methods ; Anesthetics, Local ; Cesarean delivery ; Cesarean Section ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Intrathecal morphine ; Morphine - adverse effects ; Morphine - therapeutic use ; Nerve Block - adverse effects ; Nerve Block - methods ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - chemically induced ; Postoperative pain ; Pregnancy ; Pruritus - chemically induced ; Spinal anesthesia ; Transversus abdominis plane block ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 2012-04, Vol.21 (2), p.112-118</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22410586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loane, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papsdorf, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, J</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia</title><title>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</title><addtitle>Int J Obstet Anesth</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. Methods Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 μg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. Results Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8–10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0–4.3), F [1, 64] = 9.62, P = 0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h ( P = 0.001). Nausea and vomiting ( P = 0.02) and pruritus ( P = 0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. Conclusions In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate.</description><subject>Abdominal Muscles - innervation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amides</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - methods</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Cesarean delivery</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Spinal</subject><subject>Intrathecal morphine</subject><subject>Morphine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Morphine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Nerve Block - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - chemically induced</subject><subject>Postoperative pain</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pruritus - chemically induced</subject><subject>Spinal anesthesia</subject><subject>Transversus abdominis plane block</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0959-289X</issn><issn>1532-3374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UsGK1TAUDaI4b0Z_wIVk56rPm6RNGxBhGHQUBlyo4C6k6e28dNKmJu3I8wv8bFPe6MKFcCHh5pzDzTmXkBcM9gyYfD3s3RDMngPje8gF1SOyY5XghRB1-ZjsQFWq4I36dkbOUxoAQIlGPiVnnJcMqkbuyK9LGs3UhdH9xI7aMC0xeJ-vS3TG58Y4m-imW-ryi1kOaHN3DHE-uAnpD7ccMtJM6R5jWhM17SY1uURnbzKg9cHe0T5EOoe0FBaTiWgm2qF3mXKkZjL-FpMzz8iT3viEzx_OC_L1_bsvVx-Km0_XH68ubwqbR16KUrWKNxyF7NpOQlOppsIOlAVel5LVAtCWpueVsKJvrSlrW1Ugy7aVUiiQ4oK8OunOMXxfMS16dMmi38YNa9JKCQZc8Toj-QlpY0gpYq_n6EYTj5qB3gLQg94C0FsAGnJBlUkvH-TXdsTuL-WP4xnw5gTA_Ml7h1En63Cy2LmIdtFdcP_Xf_sP3frsd07lDo-YhrDG7GjSTKdM0J-3Fdg2gPGcPpO1-A0GTq8C</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Loane, H</creator><creator>Preston, R</creator><creator>Douglas, M.J</creator><creator>Massey, S</creator><creator>Papsdorf, M</creator><creator>Tyler, J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia</title><author>Loane, H ; Preston, R ; Douglas, M.J ; Massey, S ; Papsdorf, M ; Tyler, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Muscles - innervation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amides</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - methods</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Cesarean delivery</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Spinal</topic><topic>Intrathecal morphine</topic><topic>Morphine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Morphine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Nerve Block - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - chemically induced</topic><topic>Postoperative pain</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pruritus - chemically induced</topic><topic>Spinal anesthesia</topic><topic>Transversus abdominis plane block</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loane, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papsdorf, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loane, H</au><au>Preston, R</au><au>Douglas, M.J</au><au>Massey, S</au><au>Papsdorf, M</au><au>Tyler, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia</atitle><jtitle>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Obstet Anesth</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>112-118</pages><issn>0959-289X</issn><eissn>1532-3374</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. Methods Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 μg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. Results Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8–10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0–4.3), F [1, 64] = 9.62, P = 0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h ( P = 0.001). Nausea and vomiting ( P = 0.02) and pruritus ( P = 0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. Conclusions In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22410586</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-289X
ispartof International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 2012-04, Vol.21 (2), p.112-118
issn 0959-289X
1532-3374
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993102927
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Abdominal Muscles - innervation
Adult
Amides
Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects
Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Analysis of Variance
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects
Anesthesia, Spinal - methods
Anesthetics, Local
Cesarean delivery
Cesarean Section
Double-Blind Method
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Injections, Spinal
Intrathecal morphine
Morphine - adverse effects
Morphine - therapeutic use
Nerve Block - adverse effects
Nerve Block - methods
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pain Measurement - methods
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - chemically induced
Postoperative pain
Pregnancy
Pruritus - chemically induced
Spinal anesthesia
Transversus abdominis plane block
Treatment Outcome
title A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A23%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial%20comparing%20intrathecal%20morphine%20with%20transversus%20abdominis%20plane%20block%20for%20post-cesarean%20delivery%20analgesia&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20obstetric%20anesthesia&rft.au=Loane,%20H&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=112-118&rft.issn=0959-289X&rft.eissn=1532-3374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E993102927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993102927&rft_id=info:pmid/22410586&rfr_iscdi=true