Loading…
A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia
Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a rando...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of obstetric anesthesia 2012-04, Vol.21 (2), p.112-118 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063 |
container_end_page | 118 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 112 |
container_title | International journal of obstetric anesthesia |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Loane, H Preston, R Douglas, M.J Massey, S Papsdorf, M Tyler, J |
description | Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. Methods Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 μg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. Results Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8–10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0–4.3), F [1, 64] = 9.62, P = 0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h ( P = 0.001). Nausea and vomiting ( P = 0.02) and pruritus ( P = 0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. Conclusions In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993102927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959289X12000167</els_id><sourcerecordid>993102927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsGK1TAUDaI4b0Z_wIVk56rPm6RNGxBhGHQUBlyo4C6k6e28dNKmJu3I8wv8bFPe6MKFcCHh5pzDzTmXkBcM9gyYfD3s3RDMngPje8gF1SOyY5XghRB1-ZjsQFWq4I36dkbOUxoAQIlGPiVnnJcMqkbuyK9LGs3UhdH9xI7aMC0xeJ-vS3TG58Y4m-imW-ryi1kOaHN3DHE-uAnpD7ccMtJM6R5jWhM17SY1uURnbzKg9cHe0T5EOoe0FBaTiWgm2qF3mXKkZjL-FpMzz8iT3viEzx_OC_L1_bsvVx-Km0_XH68ubwqbR16KUrWKNxyF7NpOQlOppsIOlAVel5LVAtCWpueVsKJvrSlrW1Ugy7aVUiiQ4oK8OunOMXxfMS16dMmi38YNa9JKCQZc8Toj-QlpY0gpYq_n6EYTj5qB3gLQg94C0FsAGnJBlUkvH-TXdsTuL-WP4xnw5gTA_Ml7h1En63Cy2LmIdtFdcP_Xf_sP3frsd07lDo-YhrDG7GjSTKdM0J-3Fdg2gPGcPpO1-A0GTq8C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993102927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Loane, H ; Preston, R ; Douglas, M.J ; Massey, S ; Papsdorf, M ; Tyler, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Loane, H ; Preston, R ; Douglas, M.J ; Massey, S ; Papsdorf, M ; Tyler, J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. Methods Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 μg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. Results Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8–10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0–4.3), F [1, 64] = 9.62, P = 0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h ( P = 0.001). Nausea and vomiting ( P = 0.02) and pruritus ( P = 0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. Conclusions In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-289X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22410586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdominal Muscles - innervation ; Adult ; Amides ; Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects ; Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Analysis of Variance ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects ; Anesthesia, Spinal - methods ; Anesthetics, Local ; Cesarean delivery ; Cesarean Section ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Intrathecal morphine ; Morphine - adverse effects ; Morphine - therapeutic use ; Nerve Block - adverse effects ; Nerve Block - methods ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - chemically induced ; Postoperative pain ; Pregnancy ; Pruritus - chemically induced ; Spinal anesthesia ; Transversus abdominis plane block ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 2012-04, Vol.21 (2), p.112-118</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22410586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loane, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papsdorf, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, J</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia</title><title>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</title><addtitle>Int J Obstet Anesth</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. Methods Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 μg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. Results Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8–10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0–4.3), F [1, 64] = 9.62, P = 0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h ( P = 0.001). Nausea and vomiting ( P = 0.02) and pruritus ( P = 0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. Conclusions In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate.</description><subject>Abdominal Muscles - innervation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amides</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - methods</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Cesarean delivery</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Spinal</subject><subject>Intrathecal morphine</subject><subject>Morphine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Morphine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Nerve Block - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - chemically induced</subject><subject>Postoperative pain</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pruritus - chemically induced</subject><subject>Spinal anesthesia</subject><subject>Transversus abdominis plane block</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0959-289X</issn><issn>1532-3374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UsGK1TAUDaI4b0Z_wIVk56rPm6RNGxBhGHQUBlyo4C6k6e28dNKmJu3I8wv8bFPe6MKFcCHh5pzDzTmXkBcM9gyYfD3s3RDMngPje8gF1SOyY5XghRB1-ZjsQFWq4I36dkbOUxoAQIlGPiVnnJcMqkbuyK9LGs3UhdH9xI7aMC0xeJ-vS3TG58Y4m-imW-ryi1kOaHN3DHE-uAnpD7ccMtJM6R5jWhM17SY1uURnbzKg9cHe0T5EOoe0FBaTiWgm2qF3mXKkZjL-FpMzz8iT3viEzx_OC_L1_bsvVx-Km0_XH68ubwqbR16KUrWKNxyF7NpOQlOppsIOlAVel5LVAtCWpueVsKJvrSlrW1Ugy7aVUiiQ4oK8OunOMXxfMS16dMmi38YNa9JKCQZc8Toj-QlpY0gpYq_n6EYTj5qB3gLQg94C0FsAGnJBlUkvH-TXdsTuL-WP4xnw5gTA_Ml7h1En63Cy2LmIdtFdcP_Xf_sP3frsd07lDo-YhrDG7GjSTKdM0J-3Fdg2gPGcPpO1-A0GTq8C</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Loane, H</creator><creator>Preston, R</creator><creator>Douglas, M.J</creator><creator>Massey, S</creator><creator>Papsdorf, M</creator><creator>Tyler, J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia</title><author>Loane, H ; Preston, R ; Douglas, M.J ; Massey, S ; Papsdorf, M ; Tyler, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Muscles - innervation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amides</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - methods</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Cesarean delivery</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Spinal</topic><topic>Intrathecal morphine</topic><topic>Morphine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Morphine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Nerve Block - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - chemically induced</topic><topic>Postoperative pain</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pruritus - chemically induced</topic><topic>Spinal anesthesia</topic><topic>Transversus abdominis plane block</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loane, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preston, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papsdorf, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loane, H</au><au>Preston, R</au><au>Douglas, M.J</au><au>Massey, S</au><au>Papsdorf, M</au><au>Tyler, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia</atitle><jtitle>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Obstet Anesth</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>112-118</pages><issn>0959-289X</issn><eissn>1532-3374</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Intrathecal morphine is an effective analgesic post-cesarean delivery; however, it may be contraindicated or unsuitable in some patients. We compared the efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine with an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary outcome was the morphine equivalents dose used in the first 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and side effects, including pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. Methods Planned recruitment was for 90 women; however, the study was terminated early. Sixty-nine women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were randomized to receive either intrathecal morphine 100 μg plus a sham TAP block or a TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, to each side to a maximum of 20 mL. Women were assessed at 2, 6, 10, 24 h and 3 months post-spinal. Results Sixty-six women completed the trial. The morphine equivalents dose used in the TAP block group was greater at 24 h compared with the intrathecal morphine group (7.5 mg (95% CI 4.8–10.2) vs. 2.7 mg (95% CI 1.0–4.3), F [1, 64] = 9.62, P = 0.003). There was no difference at 2, 6, or 10 h. Pain scores on rest and movement were higher in the TAP block group at all times although this only reached statistical significance at 10 h ( P = 0.001). Nausea and vomiting ( P = 0.02) and pruritus ( P = 0.007) were lower in the TAP block group. Conclusions In this trial, the TAP block was associated with greater supplemental morphine requirements and higher pain scores than intrathecal morphine but fewer opioid-related side effects. The TAP block may be a reasonable alternative when intrathecal morphine is contraindicated or not appropriate.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22410586</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-289X |
ispartof | International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 2012-04, Vol.21 (2), p.112-118 |
issn | 0959-289X 1532-3374 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993102927 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Abdominal Muscles - innervation Adult Amides Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods Analgesia, Patient-Controlled Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Analysis of Variance Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects Anesthesia, Spinal - methods Anesthetics, Local Cesarean delivery Cesarean Section Double-Blind Method Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Injections, Spinal Intrathecal morphine Morphine - adverse effects Morphine - therapeutic use Nerve Block - adverse effects Nerve Block - methods Obstetrics and Gynecology Pain Measurement - methods Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - chemically induced Postoperative pain Pregnancy Pruritus - chemically induced Spinal anesthesia Transversus abdominis plane block Treatment Outcome |
title | A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A23%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial%20comparing%20intrathecal%20morphine%20with%20transversus%20abdominis%20plane%20block%20for%20post-cesarean%20delivery%20analgesia&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20obstetric%20anesthesia&rft.au=Loane,%20H&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=112-118&rft.issn=0959-289X&rft.eissn=1532-3374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E993102927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-49b9282e36dbd6085985ed09c027461730ec4af253c3fbca47c55064bb6639063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993102927&rft_id=info:pmid/22410586&rfr_iscdi=true |