Loading…
Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic
Background and Objectives Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ova...
Saved in:
Published in: | Lasers in surgery and medicine 2012-04, Vol.44 (4), p.282-295 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393 |
container_end_page | 295 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 282 |
container_title | Lasers in surgery and medicine |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | George, Ronie Michaelides, Michalis Brewer, Molly A. Utzinger, Urs |
description | Background and Objectives
Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
Ovarian biopsies were interrogated over 270–550 nm excitation and fluorescence was collected from 290 to 700 nm. Two hundred forty‐nine measurements were performed on 49 IRB‐consented patients undergoing oophorectomy. Data are analyzed using parallel factor analysis to determine excitation and emission spectra of the underlying fluorophores that contribute to the total detected fluorescence intensity.
Results
Using multivariate normal distribution fits and cross‐validation techniques, sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, are achieved when classifying malignant samples versus others, while 88% and 80%, respectively, are achieved when classifying normal post‐menopausal patients as being either at high‐ or low‐risk of developing ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer. Performance of classifying cancer increases when the normal group does not include benign neoplasm and endometriosis samples. Performance of high‐ versus low‐risk classification decreases when normal samples include both pre‐ and post‐menopausal women. Excitation over 270–400 and 380–560 nm, respectively, have the best diagnostic performance for cancer detection and risk‐status assessment.
Conclusions
Assessing the endogenous fluorescence could be useful in screening women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:282–295, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lsm.22014 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993909192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>993909192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOAzEQRS0EIiFQ8APIHaLYMLY3cVwiHgkiPCRAKa2J10YLzhrsXSB_z0IIHdXc4tyj0SVkn0GfAfBjnxZ9zoHlG6TLQA0zxYBtki6wNo9A8Q7ZSekZAAQHuU06nOcgB5J3ydUdRvTeeurQ1CFSrNAvU5locDS8YyyxotjUwfkmRJuMrYylmChSg22MtCjxqQqpLs0u2XLok937vT3yeHH-cDrJprfjy9OTaWbEkOeZHYE0kqMbKTdwyhXKuZGUUkmrlDAMOOZy7obA5iLnrDCCOWQFGANyLoQSPXK48r7G8NbYVOtF2T7mPVY2NEm3FgWKKd6SRyvSxJBStE6_xnKBcakZ6O_pdDud_pmuZQ9-rc18YYs_cr1VCxyvgI_S2-X_Jj29v14rs1WjTLX9_GtgfNFDKeRAz27GWtyfnU3yi5meiS-PbIdV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993909192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>George, Ronie ; Michaelides, Michalis ; Brewer, Molly A. ; Utzinger, Urs</creator><creatorcontrib>George, Ronie ; Michaelides, Michalis ; Brewer, Molly A. ; Utzinger, Urs</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives
Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
Ovarian biopsies were interrogated over 270–550 nm excitation and fluorescence was collected from 290 to 700 nm. Two hundred forty‐nine measurements were performed on 49 IRB‐consented patients undergoing oophorectomy. Data are analyzed using parallel factor analysis to determine excitation and emission spectra of the underlying fluorophores that contribute to the total detected fluorescence intensity.
Results
Using multivariate normal distribution fits and cross‐validation techniques, sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, are achieved when classifying malignant samples versus others, while 88% and 80%, respectively, are achieved when classifying normal post‐menopausal patients as being either at high‐ or low‐risk of developing ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer. Performance of classifying cancer increases when the normal group does not include benign neoplasm and endometriosis samples. Performance of high‐ versus low‐risk classification decreases when normal samples include both pre‐ and post‐menopausal women. Excitation over 270–400 and 380–560 nm, respectively, have the best diagnostic performance for cancer detection and risk‐status assessment.
Conclusions
Assessing the endogenous fluorescence could be useful in screening women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:282–295, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22407572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Biopsy ; endogenous fluorescence ; excitation emission matrix ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Fluorescence ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Multivariate Analysis ; ovarian cancer risk-status ; Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Ovarian Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Ovary - pathology ; Ovary - physiopathology ; Risk Assessment ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spectrometry, Fluorescence - instrumentation ; Spectrometry, Fluorescence - methods ; tissue optical spectroscopy ; UVC-excitation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2012-04, Vol.44 (4), p.282-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22407572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>George, Ronie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaelides, Michalis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Molly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utzinger, Urs</creatorcontrib><title>Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic</title><title>Lasers in surgery and medicine</title><addtitle>Lasers Surg. Med</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives
Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
Ovarian biopsies were interrogated over 270–550 nm excitation and fluorescence was collected from 290 to 700 nm. Two hundred forty‐nine measurements were performed on 49 IRB‐consented patients undergoing oophorectomy. Data are analyzed using parallel factor analysis to determine excitation and emission spectra of the underlying fluorophores that contribute to the total detected fluorescence intensity.
Results
Using multivariate normal distribution fits and cross‐validation techniques, sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, are achieved when classifying malignant samples versus others, while 88% and 80%, respectively, are achieved when classifying normal post‐menopausal patients as being either at high‐ or low‐risk of developing ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer. Performance of classifying cancer increases when the normal group does not include benign neoplasm and endometriosis samples. Performance of high‐ versus low‐risk classification decreases when normal samples include both pre‐ and post‐menopausal women. Excitation over 270–400 and 380–560 nm, respectively, have the best diagnostic performance for cancer detection and risk‐status assessment.
Conclusions
Assessing the endogenous fluorescence could be useful in screening women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:282–295, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>endogenous fluorescence</subject><subject>excitation emission matrix</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>ovarian cancer risk-status</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ovary - pathology</subject><subject>Ovary - physiopathology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Fluorescence - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>tissue optical spectroscopy</subject><subject>UVC-excitation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOAzEQRS0EIiFQ8APIHaLYMLY3cVwiHgkiPCRAKa2J10YLzhrsXSB_z0IIHdXc4tyj0SVkn0GfAfBjnxZ9zoHlG6TLQA0zxYBtki6wNo9A8Q7ZSekZAAQHuU06nOcgB5J3ydUdRvTeeurQ1CFSrNAvU5locDS8YyyxotjUwfkmRJuMrYylmChSg22MtCjxqQqpLs0u2XLok937vT3yeHH-cDrJprfjy9OTaWbEkOeZHYE0kqMbKTdwyhXKuZGUUkmrlDAMOOZy7obA5iLnrDCCOWQFGANyLoQSPXK48r7G8NbYVOtF2T7mPVY2NEm3FgWKKd6SRyvSxJBStE6_xnKBcakZ6O_pdDud_pmuZQ9-rc18YYs_cr1VCxyvgI_S2-X_Jj29v14rs1WjTLX9_GtgfNFDKeRAz27GWtyfnU3yi5meiS-PbIdV</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>George, Ronie</creator><creator>Michaelides, Michalis</creator><creator>Brewer, Molly A.</creator><creator>Utzinger, Urs</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic</title><author>George, Ronie ; Michaelides, Michalis ; Brewer, Molly A. ; Utzinger, Urs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>endogenous fluorescence</topic><topic>excitation emission matrix</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>ovarian cancer risk-status</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ovary - pathology</topic><topic>Ovary - physiopathology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Fluorescence - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>tissue optical spectroscopy</topic><topic>UVC-excitation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>George, Ronie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaelides, Michalis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Molly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utzinger, Urs</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>George, Ronie</au><au>Michaelides, Michalis</au><au>Brewer, Molly A.</au><au>Utzinger, Urs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Lasers Surg. Med</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>282-295</pages><issn>0196-8092</issn><eissn>1096-9101</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives
Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
Ovarian biopsies were interrogated over 270–550 nm excitation and fluorescence was collected from 290 to 700 nm. Two hundred forty‐nine measurements were performed on 49 IRB‐consented patients undergoing oophorectomy. Data are analyzed using parallel factor analysis to determine excitation and emission spectra of the underlying fluorophores that contribute to the total detected fluorescence intensity.
Results
Using multivariate normal distribution fits and cross‐validation techniques, sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, are achieved when classifying malignant samples versus others, while 88% and 80%, respectively, are achieved when classifying normal post‐menopausal patients as being either at high‐ or low‐risk of developing ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer. Performance of classifying cancer increases when the normal group does not include benign neoplasm and endometriosis samples. Performance of high‐ versus low‐risk classification decreases when normal samples include both pre‐ and post‐menopausal women. Excitation over 270–400 and 380–560 nm, respectively, have the best diagnostic performance for cancer detection and risk‐status assessment.
Conclusions
Assessing the endogenous fluorescence could be useful in screening women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:282–295, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22407572</pmid><doi>10.1002/lsm.22014</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-8092 |
ispartof | Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2012-04, Vol.44 (4), p.282-295 |
issn | 0196-8092 1096-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993909192 |
source | Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Algorithms Biopsy endogenous fluorescence excitation emission matrix Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Fluorescence Humans Middle Aged Models, Statistical Multivariate Analysis ovarian cancer risk-status Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis Ovarian Neoplasms - physiopathology Ovary - pathology Ovary - physiopathology Risk Assessment Sensitivity and Specificity Spectrometry, Fluorescence - instrumentation Spectrometry, Fluorescence - methods tissue optical spectroscopy UVC-excitation Young Adult |
title | Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T03%3A47%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parallel%20factor%20analysis%20of%20ovarian%20autofluorescence%20as%20a%20cancer%20diagnostic&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20surgery%20and%20medicine&rft.au=George,%20Ronie&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=282-295&rft.issn=0196-8092&rft.eissn=1096-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lsm.22014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E993909192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993909192&rft_id=info:pmid/22407572&rfr_iscdi=true |