Loading…

Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic

Background and Objectives Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ova...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2012-04, Vol.44 (4), p.282-295
Main Authors: George, Ronie, Michaelides, Michalis, Brewer, Molly A., Utzinger, Urs
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393
container_end_page 295
container_issue 4
container_start_page 282
container_title Lasers in surgery and medicine
container_volume 44
creator George, Ronie
Michaelides, Michalis
Brewer, Molly A.
Utzinger, Urs
description Background and Objectives Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ovarian cancer. Study Design/Materials and Methods Ovarian biopsies were interrogated over 270–550 nm excitation and fluorescence was collected from 290 to 700 nm. Two hundred forty‐nine measurements were performed on 49 IRB‐consented patients undergoing oophorectomy. Data are analyzed using parallel factor analysis to determine excitation and emission spectra of the underlying fluorophores that contribute to the total detected fluorescence intensity. Results Using multivariate normal distribution fits and cross‐validation techniques, sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, are achieved when classifying malignant samples versus others, while 88% and 80%, respectively, are achieved when classifying normal post‐menopausal patients as being either at high‐ or low‐risk of developing ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer. Performance of classifying cancer increases when the normal group does not include benign neoplasm and endometriosis samples. Performance of high‐ versus low‐risk classification decreases when normal samples include both pre‐ and post‐menopausal women. Excitation over 270–400 and 380–560 nm, respectively, have the best diagnostic performance for cancer detection and risk‐status assessment. Conclusions Assessing the endogenous fluorescence could be useful in screening women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:282–295, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lsm.22014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993909192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>993909192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOAzEQRS0EIiFQ8APIHaLYMLY3cVwiHgkiPCRAKa2J10YLzhrsXSB_z0IIHdXc4tyj0SVkn0GfAfBjnxZ9zoHlG6TLQA0zxYBtki6wNo9A8Q7ZSekZAAQHuU06nOcgB5J3ydUdRvTeeurQ1CFSrNAvU5locDS8YyyxotjUwfkmRJuMrYylmChSg22MtCjxqQqpLs0u2XLok937vT3yeHH-cDrJprfjy9OTaWbEkOeZHYE0kqMbKTdwyhXKuZGUUkmrlDAMOOZy7obA5iLnrDCCOWQFGANyLoQSPXK48r7G8NbYVOtF2T7mPVY2NEm3FgWKKd6SRyvSxJBStE6_xnKBcakZ6O_pdDud_pmuZQ9-rc18YYs_cr1VCxyvgI_S2-X_Jj29v14rs1WjTLX9_GtgfNFDKeRAz27GWtyfnU3yi5meiS-PbIdV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993909192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>George, Ronie ; Michaelides, Michalis ; Brewer, Molly A. ; Utzinger, Urs</creator><creatorcontrib>George, Ronie ; Michaelides, Michalis ; Brewer, Molly A. ; Utzinger, Urs</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ovarian cancer. Study Design/Materials and Methods Ovarian biopsies were interrogated over 270–550 nm excitation and fluorescence was collected from 290 to 700 nm. Two hundred forty‐nine measurements were performed on 49 IRB‐consented patients undergoing oophorectomy. Data are analyzed using parallel factor analysis to determine excitation and emission spectra of the underlying fluorophores that contribute to the total detected fluorescence intensity. Results Using multivariate normal distribution fits and cross‐validation techniques, sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, are achieved when classifying malignant samples versus others, while 88% and 80%, respectively, are achieved when classifying normal post‐menopausal patients as being either at high‐ or low‐risk of developing ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer. Performance of classifying cancer increases when the normal group does not include benign neoplasm and endometriosis samples. Performance of high‐ versus low‐risk classification decreases when normal samples include both pre‐ and post‐menopausal women. Excitation over 270–400 and 380–560 nm, respectively, have the best diagnostic performance for cancer detection and risk‐status assessment. Conclusions Assessing the endogenous fluorescence could be useful in screening women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:282–295, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22407572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Biopsy ; endogenous fluorescence ; excitation emission matrix ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Fluorescence ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Multivariate Analysis ; ovarian cancer risk-status ; Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Ovarian Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Ovary - pathology ; Ovary - physiopathology ; Risk Assessment ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spectrometry, Fluorescence - instrumentation ; Spectrometry, Fluorescence - methods ; tissue optical spectroscopy ; UVC-excitation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2012-04, Vol.44 (4), p.282-295</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22407572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>George, Ronie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaelides, Michalis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Molly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utzinger, Urs</creatorcontrib><title>Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic</title><title>Lasers in surgery and medicine</title><addtitle>Lasers Surg. Med</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ovarian cancer. Study Design/Materials and Methods Ovarian biopsies were interrogated over 270–550 nm excitation and fluorescence was collected from 290 to 700 nm. Two hundred forty‐nine measurements were performed on 49 IRB‐consented patients undergoing oophorectomy. Data are analyzed using parallel factor analysis to determine excitation and emission spectra of the underlying fluorophores that contribute to the total detected fluorescence intensity. Results Using multivariate normal distribution fits and cross‐validation techniques, sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, are achieved when classifying malignant samples versus others, while 88% and 80%, respectively, are achieved when classifying normal post‐menopausal patients as being either at high‐ or low‐risk of developing ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer. Performance of classifying cancer increases when the normal group does not include benign neoplasm and endometriosis samples. Performance of high‐ versus low‐risk classification decreases when normal samples include both pre‐ and post‐menopausal women. Excitation over 270–400 and 380–560 nm, respectively, have the best diagnostic performance for cancer detection and risk‐status assessment. Conclusions Assessing the endogenous fluorescence could be useful in screening women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:282–295, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>endogenous fluorescence</subject><subject>excitation emission matrix</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>ovarian cancer risk-status</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ovary - pathology</subject><subject>Ovary - physiopathology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Fluorescence - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>tissue optical spectroscopy</subject><subject>UVC-excitation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOAzEQRS0EIiFQ8APIHaLYMLY3cVwiHgkiPCRAKa2J10YLzhrsXSB_z0IIHdXc4tyj0SVkn0GfAfBjnxZ9zoHlG6TLQA0zxYBtki6wNo9A8Q7ZSekZAAQHuU06nOcgB5J3ydUdRvTeeurQ1CFSrNAvU5locDS8YyyxotjUwfkmRJuMrYylmChSg22MtCjxqQqpLs0u2XLok937vT3yeHH-cDrJprfjy9OTaWbEkOeZHYE0kqMbKTdwyhXKuZGUUkmrlDAMOOZy7obA5iLnrDCCOWQFGANyLoQSPXK48r7G8NbYVOtF2T7mPVY2NEm3FgWKKd6SRyvSxJBStE6_xnKBcakZ6O_pdDud_pmuZQ9-rc18YYs_cr1VCxyvgI_S2-X_Jj29v14rs1WjTLX9_GtgfNFDKeRAz27GWtyfnU3yi5meiS-PbIdV</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>George, Ronie</creator><creator>Michaelides, Michalis</creator><creator>Brewer, Molly A.</creator><creator>Utzinger, Urs</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic</title><author>George, Ronie ; Michaelides, Michalis ; Brewer, Molly A. ; Utzinger, Urs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>endogenous fluorescence</topic><topic>excitation emission matrix</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>ovarian cancer risk-status</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ovary - pathology</topic><topic>Ovary - physiopathology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Fluorescence - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>tissue optical spectroscopy</topic><topic>UVC-excitation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>George, Ronie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaelides, Michalis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Molly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utzinger, Urs</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>George, Ronie</au><au>Michaelides, Michalis</au><au>Brewer, Molly A.</au><au>Utzinger, Urs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Lasers Surg. Med</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>282-295</pages><issn>0196-8092</issn><eissn>1096-9101</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives Endogenous fluorescence from certain amino acids, structural proteins, and enzymatic co‐factors in tissue is altered by carcinogenesis. We evaluate the potential of these changes in fluorescence to predict a diagnosis of malignancy and to estimate the risk of developing ovarian cancer. Study Design/Materials and Methods Ovarian biopsies were interrogated over 270–550 nm excitation and fluorescence was collected from 290 to 700 nm. Two hundred forty‐nine measurements were performed on 49 IRB‐consented patients undergoing oophorectomy. Data are analyzed using parallel factor analysis to determine excitation and emission spectra of the underlying fluorophores that contribute to the total detected fluorescence intensity. Results Using multivariate normal distribution fits and cross‐validation techniques, sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 93%, respectively, are achieved when classifying malignant samples versus others, while 88% and 80%, respectively, are achieved when classifying normal post‐menopausal patients as being either at high‐ or low‐risk of developing ovarian cancer based on their personal and family history of cancer. Performance of classifying cancer increases when the normal group does not include benign neoplasm and endometriosis samples. Performance of high‐ versus low‐risk classification decreases when normal samples include both pre‐ and post‐menopausal women. Excitation over 270–400 and 380–560 nm, respectively, have the best diagnostic performance for cancer detection and risk‐status assessment. Conclusions Assessing the endogenous fluorescence could be useful in screening women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 44:282–295, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22407572</pmid><doi>10.1002/lsm.22014</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8092
ispartof Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2012-04, Vol.44 (4), p.282-295
issn 0196-8092
1096-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993909192
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Biopsy
endogenous fluorescence
excitation emission matrix
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Fluorescence
Humans
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Multivariate Analysis
ovarian cancer risk-status
Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis
Ovarian Neoplasms - physiopathology
Ovary - pathology
Ovary - physiopathology
Risk Assessment
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spectrometry, Fluorescence - instrumentation
Spectrometry, Fluorescence - methods
tissue optical spectroscopy
UVC-excitation
Young Adult
title Parallel factor analysis of ovarian autofluorescence as a cancer diagnostic
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T03%3A47%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parallel%20factor%20analysis%20of%20ovarian%20autofluorescence%20as%20a%20cancer%20diagnostic&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20surgery%20and%20medicine&rft.au=George,%20Ronie&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=282-295&rft.issn=0196-8092&rft.eissn=1096-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lsm.22014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E993909192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3624-e807c72af89f5f9fd9ff877797e993c102a47bf601b3421dc31fa1d0cc07b3393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993909192&rft_id=info:pmid/22407572&rfr_iscdi=true