Teflon tax

The Prince, Bunce and Coaker v. HMRC case concerns the ubiquitous P800, the tax assessment that is apparently not a tax assessment, sent out to millions following the recent overhaul of HMRC stems. Around 160,000 taxpayers are challenging underpayment notices, many of them pensioners left with subst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Taxation 2012-07, Vol.170 (4361), p.14
Main Author: Marshall, Tony
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:English
Subjects:
Court decisions
Errors
Tax assessments
Tax underpayment
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4361
container_start_page 14
container_title Taxation
container_volume 170
creator Marshall, Tony
description The Prince, Bunce and Coaker v. HMRC case concerns the ubiquitous P800, the tax assessment that is apparently not a tax assessment, sent out to millions following the recent overhaul of HMRC stems. Around 160,000 taxpayers are challenging underpayment notices, many of them pensioners left with substantial and unexpected tax bills after HMRC had messed up their tax codes, just the sort of people that Extra-statutory Concession A19 was designed to protect. HMRC are claiming that this case closes the question of Extra-statutory Concession A19 in such circumstances. A review of the concession, apparently aimed to improve the clarity of it, has been announced, but the next step for clients will be to refer HMRC to Case Study 5 on the Adjudicator's Office Web site.
format magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1034250232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2739549161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p85B-ea2ed810e7163e5a2018e7ee391d18053ed90a9e5532992c9ac88ffc121f2c873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzL0KwjAUQOEMCrbVdxD3wr03TZqMWvyDgkv3EtKbQYqtTQUfX0Gnw7echUgACsgBC7sSaYz3L43WOhFpw6EfHtvZvddiGVwfefNvJprTsakueX07X6t9nY9GHXJ2xJ1B4BK1ZOUI0HDJLC12aEBJ7iw4y0pJspa8dd6YEDwSBvKmlJnY_bbjNDxfHOd24nGY5tgiyIIUkCT5AWVKLvc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1034250232</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Teflon tax</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Marshall, Tony</creator><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Tony</creatorcontrib><description>The Prince, Bunce and Coaker v. HMRC case concerns the ubiquitous P800, the tax assessment that is apparently not a tax assessment, sent out to millions following the recent overhaul of HMRC stems. Around 160,000 taxpayers are challenging underpayment notices, many of them pensioners left with substantial and unexpected tax bills after HMRC had messed up their tax codes, just the sort of people that Extra-statutory Concession A19 was designed to protect. HMRC are claiming that this case closes the question of Extra-statutory Concession A19 in such circumstances. A review of the concession, apparently aimed to improve the clarity of it, has been announced, but the next step for clients will be to refer HMRC to Case Study 5 on the Adjudicator's Office Web site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Butterworths</publisher><subject>Court decisions ; Errors ; Tax assessments ; Tax underpayment</subject><ispartof>Taxation, 2012-07, Vol.170 (4361), p.14</ispartof><rights>Copyright Butterworths Jul 12, 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Tony</creatorcontrib><title>Teflon tax</title><title>Taxation</title><description>The Prince, Bunce and Coaker v. HMRC case concerns the ubiquitous P800, the tax assessment that is apparently not a tax assessment, sent out to millions following the recent overhaul of HMRC stems. Around 160,000 taxpayers are challenging underpayment notices, many of them pensioners left with substantial and unexpected tax bills after HMRC had messed up their tax codes, just the sort of people that Extra-statutory Concession A19 was designed to protect. HMRC are claiming that this case closes the question of Extra-statutory Concession A19 in such circumstances. A review of the concession, apparently aimed to improve the clarity of it, has been announced, but the next step for clients will be to refer HMRC to Case Study 5 on the Adjudicator's Office Web site.</description><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Tax assessments</subject><subject>Tax underpayment</subject><issn>0040-0149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotzL0KwjAUQOEMCrbVdxD3wr03TZqMWvyDgkv3EtKbQYqtTQUfX0Gnw7echUgACsgBC7sSaYz3L43WOhFpw6EfHtvZvddiGVwfefNvJprTsakueX07X6t9nY9GHXJ2xJ1B4BK1ZOUI0HDJLC12aEBJ7iw4y0pJspa8dd6YEDwSBvKmlJnY_bbjNDxfHOd24nGY5tgiyIIUkCT5AWVKLvc</recordid><startdate>20120712</startdate><enddate>20120712</enddate><creator>Marshall, Tony</creator><general>Butterworths</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20120712</creationdate><title>Teflon tax</title><author>Marshall, Tony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p85B-ea2ed810e7163e5a2018e7ee391d18053ed90a9e5532992c9ac88ffc121f2c873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Tax assessments</topic><topic>Tax underpayment</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Tony</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Taxation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marshall, Tony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teflon tax</atitle><jtitle>Taxation</jtitle><date>2012-07-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>170</volume><issue>4361</issue><spage>14</spage><pages>14-</pages><issn>0040-0149</issn><abstract>The Prince, Bunce and Coaker v. HMRC case concerns the ubiquitous P800, the tax assessment that is apparently not a tax assessment, sent out to millions following the recent overhaul of HMRC stems. Around 160,000 taxpayers are challenging underpayment notices, many of them pensioners left with substantial and unexpected tax bills after HMRC had messed up their tax codes, just the sort of people that Extra-statutory Concession A19 was designed to protect. HMRC are claiming that this case closes the question of Extra-statutory Concession A19 in such circumstances. A review of the concession, apparently aimed to improve the clarity of it, has been announced, but the next step for clients will be to refer HMRC to Case Study 5 on the Adjudicator's Office Web site.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Butterworths</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-0149
ispartof Taxation, 2012-07, Vol.170 (4361), p.14
issn 0040-0149
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1034250232
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Court decisions
Errors
Tax assessments
Tax underpayment
title Teflon tax
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A56%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teflon%20tax&rft.jtitle=Taxation&rft.au=Marshall,%20Tony&rft.date=2012-07-12&rft.volume=170&rft.issue=4361&rft.spage=14&rft.pages=14-&rft.issn=0040-0149&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2739549161%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p85B-ea2ed810e7163e5a2018e7ee391d18053ed90a9e5532992c9ac88ffc121f2c873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034250232&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true