Loading…
Evaluation of Process Control to Prevent Contamination of Beef with Non-0157 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in U.S. Export Abattoirs in Honduras and Nicaragua
The objectives of this project were to determine (1) the prevalence of non-0157 STEC on beef hides and carcasses in export abattoirs in Honduras (Plant A) and Nicaragua (Plant B) and (2) whether current practices and interventions controlled final carcass contamination. Samples were collected on the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food protection trends 2013-07, Vol.33 (4), p.224-224 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 224 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 224 |
container_title | Food protection trends |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Chaves, Byron D Miller, Markus F Maradiaga, Martha Calle, M Alexandra Thompson, Leslie Jackson, Samuel P Jackson, Tanya Garcia, Lyda G Echeverry, Alejandro Ruiz, Henry Brashears, Mindy M |
description | The objectives of this project were to determine (1) the prevalence of non-0157 STEC on beef hides and carcasses in export abattoirs in Honduras (Plant A) and Nicaragua (Plant B) and (2) whether current practices and interventions controlled final carcass contamination. Samples were collected on the foreshanks from the hides, at pre-evisceration and after application of an antimicrobial treatment In Plant A, 23.3% (7/30) of hides contained at least one STEC serogroup, whereas in Plant B, 90.0% (45/50) tested positive. Pre-evisceration samples had a prevalence of 6.7% (2/30) for Plant A and of 0% for Plant B. No STEC were detected after antimicrobial intervention. Serogroups 026, 045, and 0121 were the most prevalent in plant A, with frequencies of 27/75 (36.0%), 24/75 (32.0%), and 18/75 (24.0%), respectively. In Plant B, 026 and 0121 were predominant, with 47.5% (38/80) and 46.3% (37/80), respectively. STEC were present on the hides, but current hygienic practices and interventions effectively controlled them and reduced final carcass contamination. |
format | magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1428438980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3057153181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p130t-36423e73e03d910eafa7aba83bbd92e231f799026f3e2124a2b04d81c1124c643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj01PwkAQhnvQRET_w8QTHkr2i34ckVQxIWgCnMl0u6Vryi7ubpE_5X-0qPHgafI-75PJzEU0oBNB43ySJlfRtfdvhPCcCjGIPosjth0GbQ3YGl6dlcp7mFkTnG0h2B6pozLhG-Femz_3QakaPnRoYGlNTOgkhVWjdwhre9ImPjhbdVKbHRReNspp2WgEaVsNo9W6mN2DNrAZr8ZQnA7WBZiWGILVzp-LuTVV59ADmgqWWqLDXYc30WWNrVe3v3MYbR6L9WweL16enmfTRXygnISYJ4JxlXJFeJVTorDGFEvMeFlWOVOM0zrNc8KSmitGmUBWElFlVNI-yETwYXT3s7d_4r1TPmydOt_ot1SwTPAsz0gvjf5Je-2lals0ynZnlQtCMyYS_gW4YHa_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1428438980</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Evaluation of Process Control to Prevent Contamination of Beef with Non-0157 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in U.S. Export Abattoirs in Honduras and Nicaragua</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Chaves, Byron D ; Miller, Markus F ; Maradiaga, Martha ; Calle, M Alexandra ; Thompson, Leslie ; Jackson, Samuel P ; Jackson, Tanya ; Garcia, Lyda G ; Echeverry, Alejandro ; Ruiz, Henry ; Brashears, Mindy M</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaves, Byron D ; Miller, Markus F ; Maradiaga, Martha ; Calle, M Alexandra ; Thompson, Leslie ; Jackson, Samuel P ; Jackson, Tanya ; Garcia, Lyda G ; Echeverry, Alejandro ; Ruiz, Henry ; Brashears, Mindy M</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this project were to determine (1) the prevalence of non-0157 STEC on beef hides and carcasses in export abattoirs in Honduras (Plant A) and Nicaragua (Plant B) and (2) whether current practices and interventions controlled final carcass contamination. Samples were collected on the foreshanks from the hides, at pre-evisceration and after application of an antimicrobial treatment In Plant A, 23.3% (7/30) of hides contained at least one STEC serogroup, whereas in Plant B, 90.0% (45/50) tested positive. Pre-evisceration samples had a prevalence of 6.7% (2/30) for Plant A and of 0% for Plant B. No STEC were detected after antimicrobial intervention. Serogroups 026, 045, and 0121 were the most prevalent in plant A, with frequencies of 27/75 (36.0%), 24/75 (32.0%), and 18/75 (24.0%), respectively. In Plant B, 026 and 0121 were predominant, with 47.5% (38/80) and 46.3% (37/80), respectively. STEC were present on the hides, but current hygienic practices and interventions effectively controlled them and reduced final carcass contamination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Moines: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Antigens ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Cattle ; Disease ; E coli ; Escherichia coli ; Feces ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food safety ; Illnesses ; Intervention ; Process controls ; Safety management ; Software</subject><ispartof>Food protection trends, 2013-07, Vol.33 (4), p.224-224</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jul/Aug 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaves, Byron D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Markus F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maradiaga, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calle, M Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Samuel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Lyda G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echeverry, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brashears, Mindy M</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Process Control to Prevent Contamination of Beef with Non-0157 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in U.S. Export Abattoirs in Honduras and Nicaragua</title><title>Food protection trends</title><description>The objectives of this project were to determine (1) the prevalence of non-0157 STEC on beef hides and carcasses in export abattoirs in Honduras (Plant A) and Nicaragua (Plant B) and (2) whether current practices and interventions controlled final carcass contamination. Samples were collected on the foreshanks from the hides, at pre-evisceration and after application of an antimicrobial treatment In Plant A, 23.3% (7/30) of hides contained at least one STEC serogroup, whereas in Plant B, 90.0% (45/50) tested positive. Pre-evisceration samples had a prevalence of 6.7% (2/30) for Plant A and of 0% for Plant B. No STEC were detected after antimicrobial intervention. Serogroups 026, 045, and 0121 were the most prevalent in plant A, with frequencies of 27/75 (36.0%), 24/75 (32.0%), and 18/75 (24.0%), respectively. In Plant B, 026 and 0121 were predominant, with 47.5% (38/80) and 46.3% (37/80), respectively. STEC were present on the hides, but current hygienic practices and interventions effectively controlled them and reduced final carcass contamination.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1541-9576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNpdj01PwkAQhnvQRET_w8QTHkr2i34ckVQxIWgCnMl0u6Vryi7ubpE_5X-0qPHgafI-75PJzEU0oBNB43ySJlfRtfdvhPCcCjGIPosjth0GbQ3YGl6dlcp7mFkTnG0h2B6pozLhG-Femz_3QakaPnRoYGlNTOgkhVWjdwhre9ImPjhbdVKbHRReNspp2WgEaVsNo9W6mN2DNrAZr8ZQnA7WBZiWGILVzp-LuTVV59ADmgqWWqLDXYc30WWNrVe3v3MYbR6L9WweL16enmfTRXygnISYJ4JxlXJFeJVTorDGFEvMeFlWOVOM0zrNc8KSmitGmUBWElFlVNI-yETwYXT3s7d_4r1TPmydOt_ot1SwTPAsz0gvjf5Je-2lals0ynZnlQtCMyYS_gW4YHa_</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Chaves, Byron D</creator><creator>Miller, Markus F</creator><creator>Maradiaga, Martha</creator><creator>Calle, M Alexandra</creator><creator>Thompson, Leslie</creator><creator>Jackson, Samuel P</creator><creator>Jackson, Tanya</creator><creator>Garcia, Lyda G</creator><creator>Echeverry, Alejandro</creator><creator>Ruiz, Henry</creator><creator>Brashears, Mindy M</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Process Control to Prevent Contamination of Beef with Non-0157 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in U.S. Export Abattoirs in Honduras and Nicaragua</title><author>Chaves, Byron D ; Miller, Markus F ; Maradiaga, Martha ; Calle, M Alexandra ; Thompson, Leslie ; Jackson, Samuel P ; Jackson, Tanya ; Garcia, Lyda G ; Echeverry, Alejandro ; Ruiz, Henry ; Brashears, Mindy M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p130t-36423e73e03d910eafa7aba83bbd92e231f799026f3e2124a2b04d81c1124c643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaves, Byron D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Markus F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maradiaga, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calle, M Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Samuel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Lyda G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echeverry, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brashears, Mindy M</creatorcontrib><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agricultural & Environmental Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Food protection trends</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaves, Byron D</au><au>Miller, Markus F</au><au>Maradiaga, Martha</au><au>Calle, M Alexandra</au><au>Thompson, Leslie</au><au>Jackson, Samuel P</au><au>Jackson, Tanya</au><au>Garcia, Lyda G</au><au>Echeverry, Alejandro</au><au>Ruiz, Henry</au><au>Brashears, Mindy M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Process Control to Prevent Contamination of Beef with Non-0157 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in U.S. Export Abattoirs in Honduras and Nicaragua</atitle><jtitle>Food protection trends</jtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>224-224</pages><issn>1541-9576</issn><abstract>The objectives of this project were to determine (1) the prevalence of non-0157 STEC on beef hides and carcasses in export abattoirs in Honduras (Plant A) and Nicaragua (Plant B) and (2) whether current practices and interventions controlled final carcass contamination. Samples were collected on the foreshanks from the hides, at pre-evisceration and after application of an antimicrobial treatment In Plant A, 23.3% (7/30) of hides contained at least one STEC serogroup, whereas in Plant B, 90.0% (45/50) tested positive. Pre-evisceration samples had a prevalence of 6.7% (2/30) for Plant A and of 0% for Plant B. No STEC were detected after antimicrobial intervention. Serogroups 026, 045, and 0121 were the most prevalent in plant A, with frequencies of 27/75 (36.0%), 24/75 (32.0%), and 18/75 (24.0%), respectively. In Plant B, 026 and 0121 were predominant, with 47.5% (38/80) and 46.3% (37/80), respectively. STEC were present on the hides, but current hygienic practices and interventions effectively controlled them and reduced final carcass contamination.</abstract><cop>Des Moines</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-9576 |
ispartof | Food protection trends, 2013-07, Vol.33 (4), p.224-224 |
issn | 1541-9576 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1428438980 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate |
subjects | Abattoirs Antigens Beef Beef cattle Cattle Disease E coli Escherichia coli Feces Food contamination & poisoning Food safety Illnesses Intervention Process controls Safety management Software |
title | Evaluation of Process Control to Prevent Contamination of Beef with Non-0157 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in U.S. Export Abattoirs in Honduras and Nicaragua |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Process%20Control%20to%20Prevent%20Contamination%20of%20Beef%20with%20Non-0157%20Shiga%20Toxin-producing%20Escherichia%20coli%20(STEC)%20in%20U.S.%20Export%20Abattoirs%20in%20Honduras%20and%20Nicaragua&rft.jtitle=Food%20protection%20trends&rft.au=Chaves,%20Byron%20D&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=224-224&rft.issn=1541-9576&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3057153181%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p130t-36423e73e03d910eafa7aba83bbd92e231f799026f3e2124a2b04d81c1124c643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1428438980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |