Trademarks, Press Releases, and Policy: Will Rigorous Research Get in the Way?

[...]because we were interested in examining pretrial days in detention on pretrial outcome, we were forced to exclude a large number of defendants from our sample who were not released pretrial (and thus could not have experienced FTA or been arrested) as well as a large number of defendants for wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Federal Probation 2016-06, Vol.80 (1), p.22
Main Authors: Bechtel, Kristin, Flores, Anthony W, Holsinger, Alexander M, Lowenkamp, Christopher T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Correctional treatment programs
Experiments
Imprisonment
Peer review
Prisons
Recidivism
Researchers
Studies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 22
container_title Federal Probation
container_volume 80
creator Bechtel, Kristin
Flores, Anthony W
Holsinger, Alexander M
Lowenkamp, Christopher T
description [...]because we were interested in examining pretrial days in detention on pretrial outcome, we were forced to exclude a large number of defendants from our sample who were not released pretrial (and thus could not have experienced FTA or been arrested) as well as a large number of defendants for whom key data were missing. [...]this research represents the second study to examine the effect of days in pretrial detention on pretrial outcome, and the first attempt at fostering an organized skepticism about this topic.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1807038566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4129119911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-15e5f032e13f2c7224ba0ba71d462fad7da66bca9100eda264d6d5802a0a6ed73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjM1Kw0AURgdRMLa-w-DawJ2ZzE_ciBRthWJLCXRZbjI3Njo2cSZd9O2t6Lc5HDh8FywTWuscFKhLlgGIIi-FdNfsJqUPOE87m7G3KqKnL4yf6Z6vI6XENxQIE50dD56v-9A1pwe-7ULgm-69j_3xt0mEsdnzOY28O_BxT3yLp8cpu2oxJLr954RVL8_VbJEvV_PX2dMyH0o75kKTbkFJEqqVjZWyqBFqtMIXRrborUdj6gZLAUAepSm88dqBREBD3qoJu_u7HWL_faQ07iINfRzTTjiwoJw2Rv0AHDFJsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807038566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trademarks, Press Releases, and Policy: Will Rigorous Research Get in the Way?</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Bechtel, Kristin ; Flores, Anthony W ; Holsinger, Alexander M ; Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creator><creatorcontrib>Bechtel, Kristin ; Flores, Anthony W ; Holsinger, Alexander M ; Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><description>[...]because we were interested in examining pretrial days in detention on pretrial outcome, we were forced to exclude a large number of defendants from our sample who were not released pretrial (and thus could not have experienced FTA or been arrested) as well as a large number of defendants for whom key data were missing. [...]this research represents the second study to examine the effect of days in pretrial detention on pretrial outcome, and the first attempt at fostering an organized skepticism about this topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-9128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-0303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Administrative Office of the United States Courts</publisher><subject>Correctional treatment programs ; Experiments ; Imprisonment ; Peer review ; Prisons ; Recidivism ; Researchers ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Federal Probation, 2016-06, Vol.80 (1), p.22</ispartof><rights>Copyright Administrative Office of the United States Courts Jun 2016</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1807038566?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791,21496,21514,33614,33772,43733,43814</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bechtel, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Anthony W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holsinger, Alexander M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><title>Trademarks, Press Releases, and Policy: Will Rigorous Research Get in the Way?</title><title>Federal Probation</title><description>[...]because we were interested in examining pretrial days in detention on pretrial outcome, we were forced to exclude a large number of defendants from our sample who were not released pretrial (and thus could not have experienced FTA or been arrested) as well as a large number of defendants for whom key data were missing. [...]this research represents the second study to examine the effect of days in pretrial detention on pretrial outcome, and the first attempt at fostering an organized skepticism about this topic.</description><subject>Correctional treatment programs</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0014-9128</issn><issn>1555-0303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNotjM1Kw0AURgdRMLa-w-DawJ2ZzE_ciBRthWJLCXRZbjI3Njo2cSZd9O2t6Lc5HDh8FywTWuscFKhLlgGIIi-FdNfsJqUPOE87m7G3KqKnL4yf6Z6vI6XENxQIE50dD56v-9A1pwe-7ULgm-69j_3xt0mEsdnzOY28O_BxT3yLp8cpu2oxJLr954RVL8_VbJEvV_PX2dMyH0o75kKTbkFJEqqVjZWyqBFqtMIXRrborUdj6gZLAUAepSm88dqBREBD3qoJu_u7HWL_faQ07iINfRzTTjiwoJw2Rv0AHDFJsg</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Bechtel, Kristin</creator><creator>Flores, Anthony W</creator><creator>Holsinger, Alexander M</creator><creator>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creator><general>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Trademarks, Press Releases, and Policy: Will Rigorous Research Get in the Way?</title><author>Bechtel, Kristin ; Flores, Anthony W ; Holsinger, Alexander M ; Lowenkamp, Christopher T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-15e5f032e13f2c7224ba0ba71d462fad7da66bca9100eda264d6d5802a0a6ed73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Correctional treatment programs</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bechtel, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Anthony W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holsinger, Alexander M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Federal Probation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bechtel, Kristin</au><au>Flores, Anthony W</au><au>Holsinger, Alexander M</au><au>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trademarks, Press Releases, and Policy: Will Rigorous Research Get in the Way?</atitle><jtitle>Federal Probation</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><pages>22-</pages><issn>0014-9128</issn><eissn>1555-0303</eissn><abstract>[...]because we were interested in examining pretrial days in detention on pretrial outcome, we were forced to exclude a large number of defendants from our sample who were not released pretrial (and thus could not have experienced FTA or been arrested) as well as a large number of defendants for whom key data were missing. [...]this research represents the second study to examine the effect of days in pretrial detention on pretrial outcome, and the first attempt at fostering an organized skepticism about this topic.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-9128
ispartof Federal Probation, 2016-06, Vol.80 (1), p.22
issn 0014-9128
1555-0303
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1807038566
source Criminology Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Correctional treatment programs
Experiments
Imprisonment
Peer review
Prisons
Recidivism
Researchers
Studies
title Trademarks, Press Releases, and Policy: Will Rigorous Research Get in the Way?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A21%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trademarks,%20Press%20Releases,%20and%20Policy:%20Will%20Rigorous%20Research%20Get%20in%20the%20Way?&rft.jtitle=Federal%20Probation&rft.au=Bechtel,%20Kristin&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.pages=22-&rft.issn=0014-9128&rft.eissn=1555-0303&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4129119911%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-15e5f032e13f2c7224ba0ba71d462fad7da66bca9100eda264d6d5802a0a6ed73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807038566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true