U.S. Overseas Military Posture: Relative Costs and Strategic Benefits

Section 347 of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act called on the Department of Defense to commission an independent assessment of the overseas basing presence of U.S. military forces. As the recipient of that commission, RAND's National Defense Research Institute conducted an independen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policy File 2013
Main Authors: Lostumbo, Michael J, McNerney, Michael J, Peltz, Eric, Eaton, derek, Frelinger, David R, Greenfield, Victoria A, Halliday, John, Mills, Patrick, Nardulli, Bruce R, Pettyjohn, Stacie L, Sollinger, Jerry M, Worman, Stephen
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Budgets/Expenditures
Military strategy
RAND Corporation
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Section 347 of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act called on the Department of Defense to commission an independent assessment of the overseas basing presence of U.S. military forces. As the recipient of that commission, RAND's National Defense Research Institute conducted an independent assessment of the advisability of changes in the overseas basing presence of U.S. forces based on an evaluation of strategic benefits, risks, and costs. The report characterizes how overseas presence contributes to assurance of allies, deterrence, contingency responsiveness, and security cooperation, along with the risks involved with investing in facilities overseas. It breaks new ground in the understanding of the costs associated with overseas presence, including how permanent and rotational presence costs compare, and provides cost models for policymakers to weigh alternative posture options. To support this understanding of costs the report also lays out the conditions of U.S. installations and levels of host nation support.