Loading…

Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization: Report for Congress

In fiscal year 2012, the Air Force Materiel Command reorganized as one of a number of initiatives to achieve mandated budget reductions. In the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Congress required an assessment of five elements of this reorganization: (1) the effectiveness a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policy File 2013
Main Authors: Snyder, Don, Fox, Bernard, Lynch, Kristin F, Conley, Raymond E, Ausink, John A, Werber, Laura, Shelton, William, Nowak, Sarah A, Thirtle, Michael R, Robbert, Albert A
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Policy File
container_volume
creator Snyder, Don
Fox, Bernard
Lynch, Kristin F
Conley, Raymond E
Ausink, John A
Werber, Laura
Shelton, William
Nowak, Sarah A
Thirtle, Michael R
Robbert, Albert A
description In fiscal year 2012, the Air Force Materiel Command reorganized as one of a number of initiatives to achieve mandated budget reductions. In the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Congress required an assessment of five elements of this reorganization: (1) the effectiveness and efficiency of the reorganization; (2) the extent to which synergies due to collocation among developmental test and evaluation, science and technology, and acquisition can be replicated in the new organization; (3) the reorganization's impact on other commands' ability to meet their responsibilities for operational test and evaluation and follow-on test and evaluation; (4) whether the reorganization is in adherence with 10 U.S. Code Section 2687 (i.e., BRAC law); and (5) the extent to which the Air Force coordinated the reorganization with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and if any concerns raised by OSD were addressed. This document fulfills the NDAA reporting requirements.
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AOXKD</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1820753232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1820753232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_18207532323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZAhwLC5OLS7OTc0rUchPUyjJSFVwzCxScMsvSk5V8E0sSS3KTM1RcM7PzU3MS1EISs0vSk_My6xKLMnMz7MC8gvyi0oU0vKLgEry0ouAJvEwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYlN9cQZw_dgqL8wtLU4pL4IrCm4nhDCyMDc1NjIyAkShEA5i04qQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>1820753232</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization: Report for Congress</title><source>Policy File Index</source><creator>Snyder, Don ; Fox, Bernard ; Lynch, Kristin F ; Conley, Raymond E ; Ausink, John A ; Werber, Laura ; Shelton, William ; Nowak, Sarah A ; Thirtle, Michael R ; Robbert, Albert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Don ; Fox, Bernard ; Lynch, Kristin F ; Conley, Raymond E ; Ausink, John A ; Werber, Laura ; Shelton, William ; Nowak, Sarah A ; Thirtle, Michael R ; Robbert, Albert A</creatorcontrib><description>In fiscal year 2012, the Air Force Materiel Command reorganized as one of a number of initiatives to achieve mandated budget reductions. In the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Congress required an assessment of five elements of this reorganization: (1) the effectiveness and efficiency of the reorganization; (2) the extent to which synergies due to collocation among developmental test and evaluation, science and technology, and acquisition can be replicated in the new organization; (3) the reorganization's impact on other commands' ability to meet their responsibilities for operational test and evaluation and follow-on test and evaluation; (4) whether the reorganization is in adherence with 10 U.S. Code Section 2687 (i.e., BRAC law); and (5) the extent to which the Air Force coordinated the reorganization with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and if any concerns raised by OSD were addressed. This document fulfills the NDAA reporting requirements.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>RAND Corporation</publisher><subject>Budgets/Expenditures ; RAND Corporation</subject><ispartof>Policy File, 2013</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1820753232?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,4490,43748,73096,73101</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1820753232?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Kristin F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, Raymond E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ausink, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werber, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelton, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirtle, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbert, Albert A</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization: Report for Congress</title><title>Policy File</title><description>In fiscal year 2012, the Air Force Materiel Command reorganized as one of a number of initiatives to achieve mandated budget reductions. In the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Congress required an assessment of five elements of this reorganization: (1) the effectiveness and efficiency of the reorganization; (2) the extent to which synergies due to collocation among developmental test and evaluation, science and technology, and acquisition can be replicated in the new organization; (3) the reorganization's impact on other commands' ability to meet their responsibilities for operational test and evaluation and follow-on test and evaluation; (4) whether the reorganization is in adherence with 10 U.S. Code Section 2687 (i.e., BRAC law); and (5) the extent to which the Air Force coordinated the reorganization with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and if any concerns raised by OSD were addressed. This document fulfills the NDAA reporting requirements.</description><subject>Budgets/Expenditures</subject><subject>RAND Corporation</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>ABWIU</sourceid><sourceid>AFVLS</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>AOXKD</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZAhwLC5OLS7OTc0rUchPUyjJSFVwzCxScMsvSk5V8E0sSS3KTM1RcM7PzU3MS1EISs0vSk_My6xKLMnMz7MC8gvyi0oU0vKLgEry0ouAJvEwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYlN9cQZw_dgqL8wtLU4pL4IrCm4nhDCyMDc1NjIyAkShEA5i04qQ</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Snyder, Don</creator><creator>Fox, Bernard</creator><creator>Lynch, Kristin F</creator><creator>Conley, Raymond E</creator><creator>Ausink, John A</creator><creator>Werber, Laura</creator><creator>Shelton, William</creator><creator>Nowak, Sarah A</creator><creator>Thirtle, Michael R</creator><creator>Robbert, Albert A</creator><general>RAND Corporation</general><scope>ABWIU</scope><scope>AFVLS</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AOXKD</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization: Report for Congress</title><author>Snyder, Don ; Fox, Bernard ; Lynch, Kristin F ; Conley, Raymond E ; Ausink, John A ; Werber, Laura ; Shelton, William ; Nowak, Sarah A ; Thirtle, Michael R ; Robbert, Albert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_18207532323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Budgets/Expenditures</topic><topic>RAND Corporation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Kristin F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, Raymond E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ausink, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werber, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelton, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowak, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirtle, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbert, Albert A</creatorcontrib><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Policy File Index</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Don</au><au>Fox, Bernard</au><au>Lynch, Kristin F</au><au>Conley, Raymond E</au><au>Ausink, John A</au><au>Werber, Laura</au><au>Shelton, William</au><au>Nowak, Sarah A</au><au>Thirtle, Michael R</au><au>Robbert, Albert A</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization: Report for Congress</atitle><jtitle>Policy File</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><abstract>In fiscal year 2012, the Air Force Materiel Command reorganized as one of a number of initiatives to achieve mandated budget reductions. In the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Congress required an assessment of five elements of this reorganization: (1) the effectiveness and efficiency of the reorganization; (2) the extent to which synergies due to collocation among developmental test and evaluation, science and technology, and acquisition can be replicated in the new organization; (3) the reorganization's impact on other commands' ability to meet their responsibilities for operational test and evaluation and follow-on test and evaluation; (4) whether the reorganization is in adherence with 10 U.S. Code Section 2687 (i.e., BRAC law); and (5) the extent to which the Air Force coordinated the reorganization with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and if any concerns raised by OSD were addressed. This document fulfills the NDAA reporting requirements.</abstract><pub>RAND Corporation</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Policy File, 2013
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1820753232
source Policy File Index
subjects Budgets/Expenditures
RAND Corporation
title Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization: Report for Congress
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A08%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AOXKD&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20Air%20Force%20Materiel%20Command%20Reorganization:%20Report%20for%20Congress&rft.jtitle=Policy%20File&rft.au=Snyder,%20Don&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AOXKD%3E1820753232%3C/proquest_AOXKD%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_18207532323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1820753232&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true