Loading…

Strategy-policy Mismatch: How the U.S. Army Can Help Close Gaps in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction

Although two successive presidents have determined that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) -- particularly nuclear weapons in the hands of violent extremists -- pose the greatest threat to the American people, and have decided that countering their proliferation is a top strategic priority, neither a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policy File 2014
Main Authors: Bonds, Timothy M, Larson, Eric B, Eaton, Derek, Darilek, Richard E
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Policy File
container_volume
creator Bonds, Timothy M
Larson, Eric B
Eaton, Derek
Darilek, Richard E
description Although two successive presidents have determined that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) -- particularly nuclear weapons in the hands of violent extremists -- pose the greatest threat to the American people, and have decided that countering their proliferation is a top strategic priority, neither administration has made countering WMD a priority when it comes to allocating budgetary resources to that overarching national mission. In the public domain, little analysis exists that assesses the capacity and capabilities required by military forces to conduct WMD elimination (WMD-E) operations. As a result, public discussion of what capabilities the military requires for such operations generally omits or gives short shrift to requirements for the WMD-E mission. The purpose of this report is to address and analyze those requirements, namely, the ground force capacity (force size) and capabilities (force structure) needed to accomplish WMD-E missions and tasks. In particular, these analyses provide an informed description of the types and size of U.S. Army forces required to conduct WMD-E operations in a wide range of situations.
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AOXKD</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1820787068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1820787068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_18207870683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0OgjAQAGAWB6O-w4UdgpoIcTP1h4UJjSNpyAFNSq_2jhjeXgcfwOlbvmVkaglasJ8TT9a0M1SGRy3tcISS3iADwiOtUziFcQalHZRoPShLjHDTnsE4UDQ5wWBcD0_UnhwDdVBpZjgjS5haMeTW0aLTlnHzcxXF18tdlYkP9Jq-rwnoKQg322KX5UWeHYr9X-kDzO1Arw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>1820787068</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>Strategy-policy Mismatch: How the U.S. Army Can Help Close Gaps in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction</title><source>Policy File Index</source><creator>Bonds, Timothy M ; Larson, Eric B ; Eaton, Derek ; Darilek, Richard E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonds, Timothy M ; Larson, Eric B ; Eaton, Derek ; Darilek, Richard E</creatorcontrib><description>Although two successive presidents have determined that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) -- particularly nuclear weapons in the hands of violent extremists -- pose the greatest threat to the American people, and have decided that countering their proliferation is a top strategic priority, neither administration has made countering WMD a priority when it comes to allocating budgetary resources to that overarching national mission. In the public domain, little analysis exists that assesses the capacity and capabilities required by military forces to conduct WMD elimination (WMD-E) operations. As a result, public discussion of what capabilities the military requires for such operations generally omits or gives short shrift to requirements for the WMD-E mission. The purpose of this report is to address and analyze those requirements, namely, the ground force capacity (force size) and capabilities (force structure) needed to accomplish WMD-E missions and tasks. In particular, these analyses provide an informed description of the types and size of U.S. Army forces required to conduct WMD-E operations in a wide range of situations.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>RAND Corporation</publisher><subject>Military strategy ; National security ; RAND Corporation</subject><ispartof>Policy File, 2014</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1820787068?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,4475,43727,72842,72847</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1820787068?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonds, Timothy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Eric B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darilek, Richard E</creatorcontrib><title>Strategy-policy Mismatch: How the U.S. Army Can Help Close Gaps in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction</title><title>Policy File</title><description>Although two successive presidents have determined that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) -- particularly nuclear weapons in the hands of violent extremists -- pose the greatest threat to the American people, and have decided that countering their proliferation is a top strategic priority, neither administration has made countering WMD a priority when it comes to allocating budgetary resources to that overarching national mission. In the public domain, little analysis exists that assesses the capacity and capabilities required by military forces to conduct WMD elimination (WMD-E) operations. As a result, public discussion of what capabilities the military requires for such operations generally omits or gives short shrift to requirements for the WMD-E mission. The purpose of this report is to address and analyze those requirements, namely, the ground force capacity (force size) and capabilities (force structure) needed to accomplish WMD-E missions and tasks. In particular, these analyses provide an informed description of the types and size of U.S. Army forces required to conduct WMD-E operations in a wide range of situations.</description><subject>Military strategy</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>RAND Corporation</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>ABWIU</sourceid><sourceid>AFVLS</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>AOXKD</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0OgjAQAGAWB6O-w4UdgpoIcTP1h4UJjSNpyAFNSq_2jhjeXgcfwOlbvmVkaglasJ8TT9a0M1SGRy3tcISS3iADwiOtUziFcQalHZRoPShLjHDTnsE4UDQ5wWBcD0_UnhwDdVBpZjgjS5haMeTW0aLTlnHzcxXF18tdlYkP9Jq-rwnoKQg322KX5UWeHYr9X-kDzO1Arw</recordid><startdate>20140924</startdate><enddate>20140924</enddate><creator>Bonds, Timothy M</creator><creator>Larson, Eric B</creator><creator>Eaton, Derek</creator><creator>Darilek, Richard E</creator><general>RAND Corporation</general><scope>ABWIU</scope><scope>AFVLS</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AOXKD</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140924</creationdate><title>Strategy-policy Mismatch: How the U.S. Army Can Help Close Gaps in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction</title><author>Bonds, Timothy M ; Larson, Eric B ; Eaton, Derek ; Darilek, Richard E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_18207870683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Military strategy</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>RAND Corporation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonds, Timothy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Eric B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darilek, Richard E</creatorcontrib><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Policy File Index</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonds, Timothy M</au><au>Larson, Eric B</au><au>Eaton, Derek</au><au>Darilek, Richard E</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Strategy-policy Mismatch: How the U.S. Army Can Help Close Gaps in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction</atitle><jtitle>Policy File</jtitle><date>2014-09-24</date><risdate>2014</risdate><abstract>Although two successive presidents have determined that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) -- particularly nuclear weapons in the hands of violent extremists -- pose the greatest threat to the American people, and have decided that countering their proliferation is a top strategic priority, neither administration has made countering WMD a priority when it comes to allocating budgetary resources to that overarching national mission. In the public domain, little analysis exists that assesses the capacity and capabilities required by military forces to conduct WMD elimination (WMD-E) operations. As a result, public discussion of what capabilities the military requires for such operations generally omits or gives short shrift to requirements for the WMD-E mission. The purpose of this report is to address and analyze those requirements, namely, the ground force capacity (force size) and capabilities (force structure) needed to accomplish WMD-E missions and tasks. In particular, these analyses provide an informed description of the types and size of U.S. Army forces required to conduct WMD-E operations in a wide range of situations.</abstract><pub>RAND Corporation</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Policy File, 2014
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1820787068
source Policy File Index
subjects Military strategy
National security
RAND Corporation
title Strategy-policy Mismatch: How the U.S. Army Can Help Close Gaps in Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A13%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AOXKD&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Strategy-policy%20Mismatch:%20How%20the%20U.S.%20Army%20Can%20Help%20Close%20Gaps%20in%20Countering%20Weapons%20of%20Mass%20Destruction&rft.jtitle=Policy%20File&rft.au=Bonds,%20Timothy%20M&rft.date=2014-09-24&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AOXKD%3E1820787068%3C/proquest_AOXKD%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_18207870683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1820787068&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true