Loading…

Achieving Food Security and Industrial Development in Malawi: Are Export Restrictions the Solution?

Restrictions on exports of staples or cash crops are frequently imposed in developing countries to promote food security or industrial development goals. By diverting production to the local market, these policies aim to reduce prices and increase the supply of food or intermediate inputs to the ben...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policy File 2016
Main Authors: Aragie, Emerta, Pauw, Karl, Pernechele, Valentina
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Policy File
container_volume
creator Aragie, Emerta
Pauw, Karl
Pernechele, Valentina
description Restrictions on exports of staples or cash crops are frequently imposed in developing countries to promote food security or industrial development goals. By diverting production to the local market, these policies aim to reduce prices and increase the supply of food or intermediate inputs to the benefit of consumers or downstream industrial users. Although export restrictions reduce aggregate welfare, they are attractive to policymakers: Governments gain support when they are seen to keep consumer prices low; likewise, politicians are swayed by industrial lobbyists who promise increased value-addition in exchange for access to cheaper inputs. This study weighs in on the debate around the desirability of export restrictions by simulating the economy-wide effects of Malawi's longstanding maize export ban as well as a pro-posed oilseed export levy intended to raise value-addition in processing sectors. Our results show that, while export restrictions may have the desired outcome in the short run, producers respond to weakening market prospects in the longer run by restricting supply, often to the extent that the policies become self-defeating. Specifically, maize export bans only benefit the urban non-poor, while poor farm households experience income losses and reduced maize consumption in the long run. The oilseed export levy is equally ineffective: Even when export tax revenues are used to subsidize processors, gains in industrial value-addition are outweighed by declining agricultural value-addition as production in the fledgling oilseed sector is effectively decimated. The policy is further associated with welfare losses among rural households, while urban non-poor households benefit marginally.
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AOXKD</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1820837998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1820837998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_18208379983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLsKwkAQRdNYiPoPg72gpnBjI0ETtLAx9mHZnZiBdSfuI-rfa8APsDpcOPeME5WrlrAne4OSWUOFKjoKb5BWw8nq6IMjaeCAPRru7mgDkIWzNPJJW8gdQvHq2AW44KCqQGw9hBahYhOHtZsmo0Yaj7MfJ8m8LK7746Jz_IjfW-1wSPh6JdZLkW6yTKR_SR8EaUAR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>1820837998</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>Achieving Food Security and Industrial Development in Malawi: Are Export Restrictions the Solution?</title><source>Policy File Index</source><creator>Aragie, Emerta ; Pauw, Karl ; Pernechele, Valentina</creator><creatorcontrib>Aragie, Emerta ; Pauw, Karl ; Pernechele, Valentina</creatorcontrib><description>Restrictions on exports of staples or cash crops are frequently imposed in developing countries to promote food security or industrial development goals. By diverting production to the local market, these policies aim to reduce prices and increase the supply of food or intermediate inputs to the benefit of consumers or downstream industrial users. Although export restrictions reduce aggregate welfare, they are attractive to policymakers: Governments gain support when they are seen to keep consumer prices low; likewise, politicians are swayed by industrial lobbyists who promise increased value-addition in exchange for access to cheaper inputs. This study weighs in on the debate around the desirability of export restrictions by simulating the economy-wide effects of Malawi's longstanding maize export ban as well as a pro-posed oilseed export levy intended to raise value-addition in processing sectors. Our results show that, while export restrictions may have the desired outcome in the short run, producers respond to weakening market prospects in the longer run by restricting supply, often to the extent that the policies become self-defeating. Specifically, maize export bans only benefit the urban non-poor, while poor farm households experience income losses and reduced maize consumption in the long run. The oilseed export levy is equally ineffective: Even when export tax revenues are used to subsidize processors, gains in industrial value-addition are outweighed by declining agricultural value-addition as production in the fledgling oilseed sector is effectively decimated. The policy is further associated with welfare losses among rural households, while urban non-poor households benefit marginally.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>International Food Policy Research Institute</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Developing countries ; Food ; Government ; International Food Policy Research Institute ; International trade ; LDCs</subject><ispartof>Policy File, 2016</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1820837998?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,4476,43727,72842,72847</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1820837998?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aragie, Emerta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauw, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pernechele, Valentina</creatorcontrib><title>Achieving Food Security and Industrial Development in Malawi: Are Export Restrictions the Solution?</title><title>Policy File</title><description>Restrictions on exports of staples or cash crops are frequently imposed in developing countries to promote food security or industrial development goals. By diverting production to the local market, these policies aim to reduce prices and increase the supply of food or intermediate inputs to the benefit of consumers or downstream industrial users. Although export restrictions reduce aggregate welfare, they are attractive to policymakers: Governments gain support when they are seen to keep consumer prices low; likewise, politicians are swayed by industrial lobbyists who promise increased value-addition in exchange for access to cheaper inputs. This study weighs in on the debate around the desirability of export restrictions by simulating the economy-wide effects of Malawi's longstanding maize export ban as well as a pro-posed oilseed export levy intended to raise value-addition in processing sectors. Our results show that, while export restrictions may have the desired outcome in the short run, producers respond to weakening market prospects in the longer run by restricting supply, often to the extent that the policies become self-defeating. Specifically, maize export bans only benefit the urban non-poor, while poor farm households experience income losses and reduced maize consumption in the long run. The oilseed export levy is equally ineffective: Even when export tax revenues are used to subsidize processors, gains in industrial value-addition are outweighed by declining agricultural value-addition as production in the fledgling oilseed sector is effectively decimated. The policy is further associated with welfare losses among rural households, while urban non-poor households benefit marginally.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>International Food Policy Research Institute</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>ABWIU</sourceid><sourceid>AFVLS</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>AOXKD</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLsKwkAQRdNYiPoPg72gpnBjI0ETtLAx9mHZnZiBdSfuI-rfa8APsDpcOPeME5WrlrAne4OSWUOFKjoKb5BWw8nq6IMjaeCAPRru7mgDkIWzNPJJW8gdQvHq2AW44KCqQGw9hBahYhOHtZsmo0Yaj7MfJ8m8LK7746Jz_IjfW-1wSPh6JdZLkW6yTKR_SR8EaUAR</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Aragie, Emerta</creator><creator>Pauw, Karl</creator><creator>Pernechele, Valentina</creator><general>International Food Policy Research Institute</general><scope>ABWIU</scope><scope>AFVLS</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AOXKD</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Achieving Food Security and Industrial Development in Malawi: Are Export Restrictions the Solution?</title><author>Aragie, Emerta ; Pauw, Karl ; Pernechele, Valentina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_18208379983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>International Food Policy Research Institute</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aragie, Emerta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauw, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pernechele, Valentina</creatorcontrib><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Policy File Index</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aragie, Emerta</au><au>Pauw, Karl</au><au>Pernechele, Valentina</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Achieving Food Security and Industrial Development in Malawi: Are Export Restrictions the Solution?</atitle><jtitle>Policy File</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><abstract>Restrictions on exports of staples or cash crops are frequently imposed in developing countries to promote food security or industrial development goals. By diverting production to the local market, these policies aim to reduce prices and increase the supply of food or intermediate inputs to the benefit of consumers or downstream industrial users. Although export restrictions reduce aggregate welfare, they are attractive to policymakers: Governments gain support when they are seen to keep consumer prices low; likewise, politicians are swayed by industrial lobbyists who promise increased value-addition in exchange for access to cheaper inputs. This study weighs in on the debate around the desirability of export restrictions by simulating the economy-wide effects of Malawi's longstanding maize export ban as well as a pro-posed oilseed export levy intended to raise value-addition in processing sectors. Our results show that, while export restrictions may have the desired outcome in the short run, producers respond to weakening market prospects in the longer run by restricting supply, often to the extent that the policies become self-defeating. Specifically, maize export bans only benefit the urban non-poor, while poor farm households experience income losses and reduced maize consumption in the long run. The oilseed export levy is equally ineffective: Even when export tax revenues are used to subsidize processors, gains in industrial value-addition are outweighed by declining agricultural value-addition as production in the fledgling oilseed sector is effectively decimated. The policy is further associated with welfare losses among rural households, while urban non-poor households benefit marginally.</abstract><pub>International Food Policy Research Institute</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Policy File, 2016
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1820837998
source Policy File Index
subjects Agriculture
Developing countries
Food
Government
International Food Policy Research Institute
International trade
LDCs
title Achieving Food Security and Industrial Development in Malawi: Are Export Restrictions the Solution?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A25%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AOXKD&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Achieving%20Food%20Security%20and%20Industrial%20Development%20in%20Malawi:%20Are%20Export%20Restrictions%20the%20Solution?&rft.jtitle=Policy%20File&rft.au=Aragie,%20Emerta&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AOXKD%3E1820837998%3C/proquest_AOXKD%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_18208379983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1820837998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true