Germany: General Court upholds likelihood of confusion

The latter was in fact initially the case in a previous decision in these proceedings and for this reason the same Board had already revoked its prior decision for an obvious procedural error according to Article 80 EUTMR, and which then led to the further (attacked) decision by the same Board of Ap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Managing Intellectual Property 2017-02
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:English
Subjects:
Infringement
Pharmaceuticals
State court decisions
Trademarks
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The latter was in fact initially the case in a previous decision in these proceedings and for this reason the same Board had already revoked its prior decision for an obvious procedural error according to Article 80 EUTMR, and which then led to the further (attacked) decision by the same Board of Appeal but by different members. [...]the Court rightly held that in view of the reason which led to a revocation pursuant to Article...
ISSN:0960-5002