Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?

The latest battle for recognition of a federal psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege was won with the Jun 13, 1996 Supreme Court decision in "Jaffee v. Redmond." However, the military has yet to address this privilege.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Air Force Law Review 1997, Vol.41, p.1-82
Main Authors: Zanotti, B J, Becker, R A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Armed forces
Bioethics
Civil Rights - legislation & jurisprudence
Confidentiality - ethics
Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence
Dangerous Behavior
Humans
Mentally Ill Persons
Military Personnel - legislation & jurisprudence
Patients
Privacy - legislation & jurisprudence
Privileges & immunities
Psychiatrists
Psychotherapy - legislation & jurisprudence
Supreme Court Decisions
United States
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 82
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title The Air Force Law Review
container_volume 41
creator Zanotti, B J
Becker, R A
description The latest battle for recognition of a federal psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege was won with the Jun 13, 1996 Supreme Court decision in "Jaffee v. Redmond." However, the military has yet to address this privilege.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_195186021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13559765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p150t-a3177e6f09e23f0ed65a28e93a849beaa2bdee07d93cc27687fe4269786c13a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0EtLxDAUBeAgijOO_gW5btxVkqZNGjcig09GBJmFu3KnuXEqfZmkiv_eguPG1dl8HA5nj81FnmeJKcTrPptzbrKkkIWYsaMQ3jkXXGTqkM2ESoXQeTpn4Ql9ta27N4g9xC3BhjBC7wDB1s6Rpy6C9WPbkr-EOkBbN3VE_w0NfgF2FtpJYANbwiZuoR9j0rskRBoAXSQPjzjVEHxewAvZtu_s1TE7cNgEOtnlgq1vb9bL-2T1fPewvF4lg8h5TFAKrUk5biiVjpNVOaYFGYlFZqaZmG4sEdfWyKpKtSq0oyxVRheqEhLlgp391g6-_xgpxNLT0PsYSmFyUSieismc_zNtHSpqGuyoH0OpjcoM13KCpzs4blqy5eDrdnqh_HtS_gC6NHAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195186021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?</title><source>Nexis UK</source><creator>Zanotti, B J ; Becker, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>Zanotti, B J ; Becker, R A</creatorcontrib><description>The latest battle for recognition of a federal psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege was won with the Jun 13, 1996 Supreme Court decision in "Jaffee v. Redmond." However, the military has yet to address this privilege.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-981X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16211752</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFLRDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Office of the Judge Advocate General</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Armed forces ; Bioethics ; Civil Rights - legislation & jurisprudence ; Confidentiality - ethics ; Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence ; Dangerous Behavior ; Humans ; Mentally Ill Persons ; Military Personnel - legislation & jurisprudence ; Patients ; Privacy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Privileges & immunities ; Psychiatrists ; Psychotherapy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Supreme Court Decisions ; United States]]></subject><ispartof>The Air Force Law Review, 1997, Vol.41, p.1-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright Office of the Judge Advocate General 1997</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,776,780,787,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16211752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zanotti, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, R A</creatorcontrib><title>Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?</title><title>The Air Force Law Review</title><addtitle>Air Force Law Rev</addtitle><description>The latest battle for recognition of a federal psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege was won with the Jun 13, 1996 Supreme Court decision in "Jaffee v. Redmond." However, the military has yet to address this privilege.</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Civil Rights - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Confidentiality - ethics</subject><subject>Confidentiality - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Dangerous Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mentally Ill Persons</subject><subject>Military Personnel - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Privacy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Privileges &amp; immunities</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Psychotherapy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Supreme Court Decisions</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0094-8381</issn><issn>1554-981X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0EtLxDAUBeAgijOO_gW5btxVkqZNGjcig09GBJmFu3KnuXEqfZmkiv_eguPG1dl8HA5nj81FnmeJKcTrPptzbrKkkIWYsaMQ3jkXXGTqkM2ESoXQeTpn4Ql9ta27N4g9xC3BhjBC7wDB1s6Rpy6C9WPbkr-EOkBbN3VE_w0NfgF2FtpJYANbwiZuoR9j0rskRBoAXSQPjzjVEHxewAvZtu_s1TE7cNgEOtnlgq1vb9bL-2T1fPewvF4lg8h5TFAKrUk5biiVjpNVOaYFGYlFZqaZmG4sEdfWyKpKtSq0oyxVRheqEhLlgp391g6-_xgpxNLT0PsYSmFyUSieismc_zNtHSpqGuyoH0OpjcoM13KCpzs4blqy5eDrdnqh_HtS_gC6NHAI</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Zanotti, B J</creator><creator>Becker, R A</creator><general>Office of the Judge Advocate General</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?</title><author>Zanotti, B J ; Becker, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p150t-a3177e6f09e23f0ed65a28e93a849beaa2bdee07d93cc27687fe4269786c13a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Civil Rights - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Confidentiality - ethics</topic><topic>Confidentiality - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Dangerous Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mentally Ill Persons</topic><topic>Military Personnel - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Privacy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Privileges &amp; immunities</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Psychotherapy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Supreme Court Decisions</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zanotti, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Proquest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Air Force Law Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zanotti, B J</au><au>Becker, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?</atitle><jtitle>The Air Force Law Review</jtitle><addtitle>Air Force Law Rev</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>1-82</pages><issn>0094-8381</issn><eissn>1554-981X</eissn><coden>AFLRDA</coden><abstract>The latest battle for recognition of a federal psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege was won with the Jun 13, 1996 Supreme Court decision in "Jaffee v. Redmond." However, the military has yet to address this privilege.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Office of the Judge Advocate General</pub><pmid>16211752</pmid><tpages>82</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8381
ispartof The Air Force Law Review, 1997, Vol.41, p.1-82
issn 0094-8381
1554-981X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_195186021
source Nexis UK
subjects Armed forces
Bioethics
Civil Rights - legislation & jurisprudence
Confidentiality - ethics
Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence
Dangerous Behavior
Humans
Mentally Ill Persons
Military Personnel - legislation & jurisprudence
Patients
Privacy - legislation & jurisprudence
Privileges & immunities
Psychiatrists
Psychotherapy - legislation & jurisprudence
Supreme Court Decisions
United States
title Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A39%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marching%20to%20the%20beat%20of%20a%20different%20drummer:%20is%20military%20law%20and%20mental%20health%20out-of-step%20after%20Jaffee%20v.%20Redmond?&rft.jtitle=The%20Air%20Force%20Law%20Review&rft.au=Zanotti,%20B%20J&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=1-82&rft.issn=0094-8381&rft.eissn=1554-981X&rft.coden=AFLRDA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E13559765%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p150t-a3177e6f09e23f0ed65a28e93a849beaa2bdee07d93cc27687fe4269786c13a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195186021&rft_id=info:pmid/16211752&rfr_iscdi=true