Loading…
Funding Policies Threaten Excellence
IN spite of resources that are relatively modest for a G8 country, Canadians have made and continue to make more than their share of contributions to the world's science literature. They've made a difference. It is encouraging, therefore, that over the last five to 10 years, the Canadian g...
Saved in:
Published in: | CAUT Bulletin 2005-06, Vol.52 (6), p.A3 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | A3 |
container_title | CAUT Bulletin |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Siminovitch, Lou |
description | IN spite of resources that are relatively modest for a G8 country, Canadians have made and continue to make more than their share of contributions to the world's science literature. They've made a difference. It is encouraging, therefore, that over the last five to 10 years, the Canadian government has increasingly understood the importance of investment in innovation and in research and development to our country's future economic health. The government has shown its commitment by seriously escalating funding and development of new programs. The new funds have had a significant impact on Canada's science environment, attracting world-class scientists from around the globe, including from the United States. Let me explain "co-funding." It's a process in which a funding agency provides only a fraction of the cost of the project. The scientists must then find the other funds from alternative sources. This has the effect of "extending" the apparent funding of the agency, but it doubles the work for the researcher. In some circumstances, it can work well (in, say, industrial partnerships) but it also means that the ultimate decision to fund is based on whether the scientist has secured the co-funding, rather than on the project's scientific merit There's much virtue in policies that promote such initiatives, but where they've become the sine qua non for success in funding, excellence is not well served. We all understand innovation will fuel future industrial competitiveness, but it's less well understood that the nidus of innovation is best catalyzed by allowing scientists to dream. Emphasis on strategic objectives, partnering, and due diligence won't do the trick. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_197513054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>861130021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_1975130543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0sDA20bU0MzThYOAqLs4yMDA0MTA35GRQcSvNS8nMS1cIyM_JTM5MLVYIyShKTSxJzVNwrUhOzclJzUtO5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDIpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXF8YaW5qaGxgamJsbEqAEAsVYsyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197513054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Funding Policies Threaten Excellence</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Siminovitch, Lou</creator><creatorcontrib>Siminovitch, Lou</creatorcontrib><description>IN spite of resources that are relatively modest for a G8 country, Canadians have made and continue to make more than their share of contributions to the world's science literature. They've made a difference. It is encouraging, therefore, that over the last five to 10 years, the Canadian government has increasingly understood the importance of investment in innovation and in research and development to our country's future economic health. The government has shown its commitment by seriously escalating funding and development of new programs. The new funds have had a significant impact on Canada's science environment, attracting world-class scientists from around the globe, including from the United States. Let me explain "co-funding." It's a process in which a funding agency provides only a fraction of the cost of the project. The scientists must then find the other funds from alternative sources. This has the effect of "extending" the apparent funding of the agency, but it doubles the work for the researcher. In some circumstances, it can work well (in, say, industrial partnerships) but it also means that the ultimate decision to fund is based on whether the scientist has secured the co-funding, rather than on the project's scientific merit There's much virtue in policies that promote such initiatives, but where they've become the sine qua non for success in funding, excellence is not well served. We all understand innovation will fuel future industrial competitiveness, but it's less well understood that the nidus of innovation is best catalyzed by allowing scientists to dream. Emphasis on strategic objectives, partnering, and due diligence won't do the trick.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0834-9614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto: Canadian Association of University Teachers</publisher><subject>Competition ; Federal government ; Fiscal policy ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Innovation ; National Programs ; Policy implementation ; Research and Development ; Resource Allocation ; Scientific method ; Scientists</subject><ispartof>CAUT Bulletin, 2005-06, Vol.52 (6), p.A3</ispartof><rights>Copyright Canadian Association of University Teachers Jun 2005</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/197513054?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791,21497,21513,33613,33879,43732,43879</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siminovitch, Lou</creatorcontrib><title>Funding Policies Threaten Excellence</title><title>CAUT Bulletin</title><description>IN spite of resources that are relatively modest for a G8 country, Canadians have made and continue to make more than their share of contributions to the world's science literature. They've made a difference. It is encouraging, therefore, that over the last five to 10 years, the Canadian government has increasingly understood the importance of investment in innovation and in research and development to our country's future economic health. The government has shown its commitment by seriously escalating funding and development of new programs. The new funds have had a significant impact on Canada's science environment, attracting world-class scientists from around the globe, including from the United States. Let me explain "co-funding." It's a process in which a funding agency provides only a fraction of the cost of the project. The scientists must then find the other funds from alternative sources. This has the effect of "extending" the apparent funding of the agency, but it doubles the work for the researcher. In some circumstances, it can work well (in, say, industrial partnerships) but it also means that the ultimate decision to fund is based on whether the scientist has secured the co-funding, rather than on the project's scientific merit There's much virtue in policies that promote such initiatives, but where they've become the sine qua non for success in funding, excellence is not well served. We all understand innovation will fuel future industrial competitiveness, but it's less well understood that the nidus of innovation is best catalyzed by allowing scientists to dream. Emphasis on strategic objectives, partnering, and due diligence won't do the trick.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>National Programs</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Research and Development</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Scientific method</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><issn>0834-9614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0sDA20bU0MzThYOAqLs4yMDA0MTA35GRQcSvNS8nMS1cIyM_JTM5MLVYIyShKTSxJzVNwrUhOzclJzUtO5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDIpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFFqQX5RSXF8YaW5qaGxgamJsbEqAEAsVYsyw</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>Siminovitch, Lou</creator><general>Canadian Association of University Teachers</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Funding Policies Threaten Excellence</title><author>Siminovitch, Lou</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_1975130543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>National Programs</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Research and Development</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Scientific method</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siminovitch, Lou</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>CAUT Bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siminovitch, Lou</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Funding Policies Threaten Excellence</atitle><jtitle>CAUT Bulletin</jtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>A3</spage><pages>A3-</pages><issn>0834-9614</issn><abstract>IN spite of resources that are relatively modest for a G8 country, Canadians have made and continue to make more than their share of contributions to the world's science literature. They've made a difference. It is encouraging, therefore, that over the last five to 10 years, the Canadian government has increasingly understood the importance of investment in innovation and in research and development to our country's future economic health. The government has shown its commitment by seriously escalating funding and development of new programs. The new funds have had a significant impact on Canada's science environment, attracting world-class scientists from around the globe, including from the United States. Let me explain "co-funding." It's a process in which a funding agency provides only a fraction of the cost of the project. The scientists must then find the other funds from alternative sources. This has the effect of "extending" the apparent funding of the agency, but it doubles the work for the researcher. In some circumstances, it can work well (in, say, industrial partnerships) but it also means that the ultimate decision to fund is based on whether the scientist has secured the co-funding, rather than on the project's scientific merit There's much virtue in policies that promote such initiatives, but where they've become the sine qua non for success in funding, excellence is not well served. We all understand innovation will fuel future industrial competitiveness, but it's less well understood that the nidus of innovation is best catalyzed by allowing scientists to dream. Emphasis on strategic objectives, partnering, and due diligence won't do the trick.</abstract><cop>Toronto</cop><pub>Canadian Association of University Teachers</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0834-9614 |
ispartof | CAUT Bulletin, 2005-06, Vol.52 (6), p.A3 |
issn | 0834-9614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_197513054 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Competition Federal government Fiscal policy Government (Administrative Body) Innovation National Programs Policy implementation Research and Development Resource Allocation Scientific method Scientists |
title | Funding Policies Threaten Excellence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A57%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Funding%20Policies%20Threaten%20Excellence&rft.jtitle=CAUT%20Bulletin&rft.au=Siminovitch,%20Lou&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=A3&rft.pages=A3-&rft.issn=0834-9614&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E861130021%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_1975130543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197513054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |