An Assessment of Potential Heavy Metal Contaminants in Bivalve Shellfish from Aquaculture Zones along the Coast of New South Wales, Australia

Evaluation of shellfish aquaculture for potential contaminants is essential for consumer confidence and safety. Every three years, between 1999 and 2014, bivalve shellfish from aquaculture zones in up to 31 estuaries across 2,000 km of Australia's east coast were tested for cadmium, copper, lea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food protection trends 2018-01, Vol.38 (1), p.18-26
Main Authors: Farrell, Hazel, Baker, Phil, Webster, Grant, Jansson, Edward, Szabo, Elizabeth, Zammit, Anthony
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:English
Subjects:
Aquaculture
Arsenic
Bivalvia
Cadmium
Coastal resources
Coasts
Consumers
Consumption
Contaminants
Copper
Diet
Dietary guidelines
Estuaries
Food
Food contamination & poisoning
Food safety
Heavy metals
Laboratories
Lead
Mercury
Mercury (metal)
Metals
Mollusca
Nutrition research
Oysters
Seafood
Selenium
Shellfish
Toxicology
Zinc
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Evaluation of shellfish aquaculture for potential contaminants is essential for consumer confidence and safety. Every three years, between 1999 and 2014, bivalve shellfish from aquaculture zones in up to 31 estuaries across 2,000 km of Australia's east coast were tested for cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium and zinc. Inorganic arsenic was included in the analyses in 2002, and total arsenic was used as a screen for the inorganic form in subsequent years. Concentrations of inorganic arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury were low and did not exceed maximum limits mandated in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. As maximum limits have not been assigned to copper, selenium and zinc, accepted international dietary guidelines were used as a benchmark. Dietary exposure assessments for these elements demonstrated that shellfish from the aquaculture areas investigated do not present a food safety risk. Continued surveillance is essential, given increasing pressure on Australia's coastal resources.
ISSN:1541-9576