Loading…
Check Clearing and Voidable Preference Law Under the Bankruptcy Code
Every business practice must withstand the critique of federal voidable preference law—an adjunct to the principle that unsecured creditors should be treated equally in bankruptcy. This article surveys how well the check clearing system fares under the voidable preference critique. Check clearing in...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Business Lawyer 2018-06, Vol.73 (3), p.627-710 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 710 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 627 |
container_title | The Business Lawyer |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Carlson, David Gray |
description | Every business practice must withstand the critique of federal voidable preference law—an adjunct to the principle that unsecured creditors should be treated equally in bankruptcy. This article surveys how well the check clearing system fares under the voidable preference critique. Check clearing involves short-term unsecured and secured credit extended to customers by depositary banks. The fate of a bank in its customer's bankruptcy differs, according to which kind of credit is extended. In the case of an overdraft, banks have preference risk, but they also have powerful defenses to muster against liability. Credit advanced against the deposit of checks is secured credit, for which the risk is smaller but still existent. This latter case is the environment in which check kiting operates. This article explores the fate in bankruptcy proceedings of the lucky bank that escapes the kite without loss. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2078756055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A549155551</galeid><jstor_id>27171117</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A549155551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g261t-d304dc81797b14729227577143c62e9dc1703b18b19164a6c3b8d56540071f263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzt1LwzAQAPAiCs7pnyAEfbXSSz-SPs76CQN9cL6WNLl22bp0Jimy_97AfHCwHOS443fHnUQTCkUWA0_5aTRJkoTFBS_L8-jCuVUogfJ0Ej1WS5RrUvUorDYdEUaRr0Er0fRIPiy2aNFIJHPxQxZGoSV-ieRBmLUdt17uSDUovIzOWtE7vPrL02jx_PRZvcbz95e3ajaPO1qAj1WaZEpyYCVrIGO0pJTljEGWyoJiqSSwJG2AN1CGy0Uh04arvMizcDu0tEin0c1-79YO3yM6X1vcDta7miaMs7xI8jyg2z3qRI-1Nu3grZAb7WQ9y7MS8vAgqPiI6tCgFf1gsNWhfeDvj_gQCjdaHh24-zfQjE4bdOFzult614nRuUN-vecr5wdbb63eCLurKQMGACz9BYUHiEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2078756055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Check Clearing and Voidable Preference Law Under the Bankruptcy Code</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Carlson, David Gray</creator><creatorcontrib>Carlson, David Gray</creatorcontrib><description>Every business practice must withstand the critique of federal voidable preference law—an adjunct to the principle that unsecured creditors should be treated equally in bankruptcy. This article surveys how well the check clearing system fares under the voidable preference critique. Check clearing involves short-term unsecured and secured credit extended to customers by depositary banks. The fate of a bank in its customer's bankruptcy differs, according to which kind of credit is extended. In the case of an overdraft, banks have preference risk, but they also have powerful defenses to muster against liability. Credit advanced against the deposit of checks is secured credit, for which the risk is smaller but still existent. This latter case is the environment in which check kiting operates. This article explores the fate in bankruptcy proceedings of the lucky bank that escapes the kite without loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-1838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Bank clearinghouses ; Bank deposits ; Bank overdrafts ; Bankruptcy ; Bankruptcy law ; Bankruptcy laws ; Banks ; Check fraud ; Clearing ; Collections ; Commercial law ; Creditors ; Customers ; Deposit accounts ; Fate ; Federal court decisions ; Foreclosure ; Fraud ; Interpretation and construction ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Liability ; Overdrafts ; Preferences ; Uniform Commercial Code-US</subject><ispartof>The Business Lawyer, 2018-06, Vol.73 (3), p.627-710</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Summer 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27171117$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2078756055?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791,15316,16474,33225,36062,44363,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carlson, David Gray</creatorcontrib><title>Check Clearing and Voidable Preference Law Under the Bankruptcy Code</title><title>The Business Lawyer</title><description>Every business practice must withstand the critique of federal voidable preference law—an adjunct to the principle that unsecured creditors should be treated equally in bankruptcy. This article surveys how well the check clearing system fares under the voidable preference critique. Check clearing involves short-term unsecured and secured credit extended to customers by depositary banks. The fate of a bank in its customer's bankruptcy differs, according to which kind of credit is extended. In the case of an overdraft, banks have preference risk, but they also have powerful defenses to muster against liability. Credit advanced against the deposit of checks is secured credit, for which the risk is smaller but still existent. This latter case is the environment in which check kiting operates. This article explores the fate in bankruptcy proceedings of the lucky bank that escapes the kite without loss.</description><subject>Bank clearinghouses</subject><subject>Bank deposits</subject><subject>Bank overdrafts</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Bankruptcy law</subject><subject>Bankruptcy laws</subject><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Check fraud</subject><subject>Clearing</subject><subject>Collections</subject><subject>Commercial law</subject><subject>Creditors</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Deposit accounts</subject><subject>Fate</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Foreclosure</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Interpretation and construction</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Overdrafts</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Uniform Commercial Code-US</subject><issn>0007-6899</issn><issn>2164-1838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptzt1LwzAQAPAiCs7pnyAEfbXSSz-SPs76CQN9cL6WNLl22bp0Jimy_97AfHCwHOS443fHnUQTCkUWA0_5aTRJkoTFBS_L8-jCuVUogfJ0Ej1WS5RrUvUorDYdEUaRr0Er0fRIPiy2aNFIJHPxQxZGoSV-ieRBmLUdt17uSDUovIzOWtE7vPrL02jx_PRZvcbz95e3ajaPO1qAj1WaZEpyYCVrIGO0pJTljEGWyoJiqSSwJG2AN1CGy0Uh04arvMizcDu0tEin0c1-79YO3yM6X1vcDta7miaMs7xI8jyg2z3qRI-1Nu3grZAb7WQ9y7MS8vAgqPiI6tCgFf1gsNWhfeDvj_gQCjdaHh24-zfQjE4bdOFzult614nRuUN-vecr5wdbb63eCLurKQMGACz9BYUHiEU</recordid><startdate>20180622</startdate><enddate>20180622</enddate><creator>Carlson, David Gray</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180622</creationdate><title>Check Clearing and Voidable Preference Law Under the Bankruptcy Code</title><author>Carlson, David Gray</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g261t-d304dc81797b14729227577143c62e9dc1703b18b19164a6c3b8d56540071f263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bank clearinghouses</topic><topic>Bank deposits</topic><topic>Bank overdrafts</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Bankruptcy law</topic><topic>Bankruptcy laws</topic><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Check fraud</topic><topic>Clearing</topic><topic>Collections</topic><topic>Commercial law</topic><topic>Creditors</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Deposit accounts</topic><topic>Fate</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Foreclosure</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Interpretation and construction</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Overdrafts</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Uniform Commercial Code-US</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carlson, David Gray</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>LegalTrac (Gale OneFile) - Law</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Business Lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carlson, David Gray</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Check Clearing and Voidable Preference Law Under the Bankruptcy Code</atitle><jtitle>The Business Lawyer</jtitle><date>2018-06-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>627</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>627-710</pages><issn>0007-6899</issn><eissn>2164-1838</eissn><abstract>Every business practice must withstand the critique of federal voidable preference law—an adjunct to the principle that unsecured creditors should be treated equally in bankruptcy. This article surveys how well the check clearing system fares under the voidable preference critique. Check clearing involves short-term unsecured and secured credit extended to customers by depositary banks. The fate of a bank in its customer's bankruptcy differs, according to which kind of credit is extended. In the case of an overdraft, banks have preference risk, but they also have powerful defenses to muster against liability. Credit advanced against the deposit of checks is secured credit, for which the risk is smaller but still existent. This latter case is the environment in which check kiting operates. This article explores the fate in bankruptcy proceedings of the lucky bank that escapes the kite without loss.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub><tpages>84</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-6899 |
ispartof | The Business Lawyer, 2018-06, Vol.73 (3), p.627-710 |
issn | 0007-6899 2164-1838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_2078756055 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Bank clearinghouses Bank deposits Bank overdrafts Bankruptcy Bankruptcy law Bankruptcy laws Banks Check fraud Clearing Collections Commercial law Creditors Customers Deposit accounts Fate Federal court decisions Foreclosure Fraud Interpretation and construction Laws, regulations and rules Liability Overdrafts Preferences Uniform Commercial Code-US |
title | Check Clearing and Voidable Preference Law Under the Bankruptcy Code |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A37%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Check%20Clearing%20and%20Voidable%20Preference%20Law%20Under%20the%20Bankruptcy%20Code&rft.jtitle=The%20Business%20Lawyer&rft.au=Carlson,%20David%20Gray&rft.date=2018-06-22&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=627&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=627-710&rft.issn=0007-6899&rft.eissn=2164-1838&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA549155551%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g261t-d304dc81797b14729227577143c62e9dc1703b18b19164a6c3b8d56540071f263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2078756055&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A549155551&rft_jstor_id=27171117&rfr_iscdi=true |