Loading…

Community bank regulatory crossfire

After surveying its Community bank members to learn their top concerns, Community Bank Council meets annually with the regulatory agencies in Washington, DC, to discuss those issues. This year's audio-conference took place in June, and the representatives of the regulatory agencies addressed th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The RMA Journal 2006-09, Vol.89 (1), p.40
Main Author: Foster, Beverly
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 40
container_title The RMA Journal
container_volume 89
creator Foster, Beverly
description After surveying its Community bank members to learn their top concerns, Community Bank Council meets annually with the regulatory agencies in Washington, DC, to discuss those issues. This year's audio-conference took place in June, and the representatives of the regulatory agencies addressed three major topics: 1. credit quality and underwriting standards, 2. proposed guidance on commercial real estate concentrations, and 3. the regulatory burden. As one regulator pointed out, many banks are now pricing for competition -- not pricing for risk, particularly as credit has become more commoditized. A number of banks have reported pushback from their accountants on the allowance for loan loss reserves, said a panelist. During the audioconference, in response to a question from the audience, a panelist said that some banks are not necessarily evaluating the cost/risk trade-off appropriately. Those banks that have had a sea change in their risk profiles should not expect that risk management can be business as usual.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_209776742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A159279264</galeid><sourcerecordid>A159279264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g642-55f347c55914aed383de379d83ed8dd7f95a28ce7b57d48ecbf9c829682c0a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjM1qxCAYAD200O2275DSs2A-NepxCf2DhT2092D0M6TN6lbNYd--LdvTwDDMFdm0kreUSalvyG0pn4wxDgY25LFPx-Ma53puRhu_mozTutia8rlxOZUS5ox35DrYpeD9P7fk_fnpo3-l-8PLW7_b06kTQKUMXCgnpWmFRc8198iV8Zqj196rYKQF7VCNUnmh0Y3BOA2m0-CYBb4lD5frKafvFUsdMp5SrmUAZpTqlPhr6KWZ7ILDHEOq2boJI2a7pIhh_tW7VhpQBjrBfwAkxUi5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209776742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community bank regulatory crossfire</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Foster, Beverly</creator><creatorcontrib>Foster, Beverly</creatorcontrib><description>After surveying its Community bank members to learn their top concerns, Community Bank Council meets annually with the regulatory agencies in Washington, DC, to discuss those issues. This year's audio-conference took place in June, and the representatives of the regulatory agencies addressed three major topics: 1. credit quality and underwriting standards, 2. proposed guidance on commercial real estate concentrations, and 3. the regulatory burden. As one regulator pointed out, many banks are now pricing for competition -- not pricing for risk, particularly as credit has become more commoditized. A number of banks have reported pushback from their accountants on the allowance for loan loss reserves, said a panelist. During the audioconference, in response to a question from the audience, a panelist said that some banks are not necessarily evaluating the cost/risk trade-off appropriately. Those banks that have had a sea change in their risk profiles should not expect that risk management can be business as usual.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-0558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: The Risk Management Association</publisher><subject>Bank compliance ; Bank examinations ; Bank examiners ; Banking law ; Cash flow ; Commercial real estate ; Community banks ; Compliance ; Conferences ; Interest rates ; Loans ; Loss reserves ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Regulatory agencies ; Risk management ; Surveys ; Underwriting</subject><ispartof>The RMA Journal, 2006-09, Vol.89 (1), p.40</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 The Risk Management Association</rights><rights>Copyright Robert Morris Associates Sep 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/209776742?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,777,781,788,15297,36043,44344</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foster, Beverly</creatorcontrib><title>Community bank regulatory crossfire</title><title>The RMA Journal</title><description>After surveying its Community bank members to learn their top concerns, Community Bank Council meets annually with the regulatory agencies in Washington, DC, to discuss those issues. This year's audio-conference took place in June, and the representatives of the regulatory agencies addressed three major topics: 1. credit quality and underwriting standards, 2. proposed guidance on commercial real estate concentrations, and 3. the regulatory burden. As one regulator pointed out, many banks are now pricing for competition -- not pricing for risk, particularly as credit has become more commoditized. A number of banks have reported pushback from their accountants on the allowance for loan loss reserves, said a panelist. During the audioconference, in response to a question from the audience, a panelist said that some banks are not necessarily evaluating the cost/risk trade-off appropriately. Those banks that have had a sea change in their risk profiles should not expect that risk management can be business as usual.</description><subject>Bank compliance</subject><subject>Bank examinations</subject><subject>Bank examiners</subject><subject>Banking law</subject><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Commercial real estate</subject><subject>Community banks</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Loss reserves</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Underwriting</subject><issn>1531-0558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotjM1qxCAYAD200O2275DSs2A-NepxCf2DhT2092D0M6TN6lbNYd--LdvTwDDMFdm0kreUSalvyG0pn4wxDgY25LFPx-Ma53puRhu_mozTutia8rlxOZUS5ox35DrYpeD9P7fk_fnpo3-l-8PLW7_b06kTQKUMXCgnpWmFRc8198iV8Zqj196rYKQF7VCNUnmh0Y3BOA2m0-CYBb4lD5frKafvFUsdMp5SrmUAZpTqlPhr6KWZ7ILDHEOq2boJI2a7pIhh_tW7VhpQBjrBfwAkxUi5</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Foster, Beverly</creator><general>The Risk Management Association</general><general>Robert Morris Associates</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Community bank regulatory crossfire</title><author>Foster, Beverly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g642-55f347c55914aed383de379d83ed8dd7f95a28ce7b57d48ecbf9c829682c0a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bank compliance</topic><topic>Bank examinations</topic><topic>Bank examiners</topic><topic>Banking law</topic><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Commercial real estate</topic><topic>Community banks</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Loss reserves</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Underwriting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foster, Beverly</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The RMA Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foster, Beverly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community bank regulatory crossfire</atitle><jtitle>The RMA Journal</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>40</spage><pages>40-</pages><issn>1531-0558</issn><abstract>After surveying its Community bank members to learn their top concerns, Community Bank Council meets annually with the regulatory agencies in Washington, DC, to discuss those issues. This year's audio-conference took place in June, and the representatives of the regulatory agencies addressed three major topics: 1. credit quality and underwriting standards, 2. proposed guidance on commercial real estate concentrations, and 3. the regulatory burden. As one regulator pointed out, many banks are now pricing for competition -- not pricing for risk, particularly as credit has become more commoditized. A number of banks have reported pushback from their accountants on the allowance for loan loss reserves, said a panelist. During the audioconference, in response to a question from the audience, a panelist said that some banks are not necessarily evaluating the cost/risk trade-off appropriately. Those banks that have had a sea change in their risk profiles should not expect that risk management can be business as usual.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>The Risk Management Association</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1531-0558
ispartof The RMA Journal, 2006-09, Vol.89 (1), p.40
issn 1531-0558
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_209776742
source ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Bank compliance
Bank examinations
Bank examiners
Banking law
Cash flow
Commercial real estate
Community banks
Compliance
Conferences
Interest rates
Loans
Loss reserves
Regulation of financial institutions
Regulatory agencies
Risk management
Surveys
Underwriting
title Community bank regulatory crossfire
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T21%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20bank%20regulatory%20crossfire&rft.jtitle=The%20RMA%20Journal&rft.au=Foster,%20Beverly&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=40&rft.pages=40-&rft.issn=1531-0558&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA159279264%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g642-55f347c55914aed383de379d83ed8dd7f95a28ce7b57d48ecbf9c829682c0a23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209776742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A159279264&rfr_iscdi=true