Loading…
Examining Federal Pretrial Release Trends over the Last Decade
[...]the report focuses on only those defendants prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys for new offenses in the federal court system and who had a reasonable expectation of bail.6 Data for this study were extracted from the Probation and Pretrial Services Automated Case Tracking System (PACTS), the case manag...
Saved in:
Published in: | Federal Probation 2018-09, Vol.82 (2), p.3-56 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 56 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Federal Probation |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Cohen, Thomas H Austin, Amaryllis |
description | [...]the report focuses on only those defendants prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys for new offenses in the federal court system and who had a reasonable expectation of bail.6 Data for this study were extracted from the Probation and Pretrial Services Automated Case Tracking System (PACTS), the case management system used by federal probation and pretrial officers. [...]the percentage of drug defendants without any record of prior felony arrests released pretrial declined by 10 percentage points from 63 percent in 2008 to 53 percent in 2017, while their counterparts with 5 or more prior felony arrests were released at comparable rates (21 percent in 2008 vs. 20 percent in 2017) during the study coverage period. Specifically, the bail decision is the opportunity for the court system to conserve financial resources, uphold the individual's constitutional right to bail and the presumption of innocence, set a positive, rehabilitative tone for the individual and his or her families, and, in low-risk cases where it is merited, divert individuals altogether from incarceration. [...]perhaps even more importantly, a growing number of research studies have shown pretrial detention being associated with higher rates of failure at the post-conviction stage (Gupta et al., 2016; Heaton et al., 2017; Oleson et al., 2014). [...]the federal judicial district in D.C. is omitted from this analysis. 6 Because of the use of these filters, the pretrial release rates displayed in this report will most likely differ from those published by other federal statistical agencies. 7 Given that these districts are still experimenting with methods that allow for the most beneficial and informative use of the PTRA in their bail decisions, we kept their names out of this report. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2167707999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2167707999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-29ee0491933b2c57d0cfb237adf77ff2d0f8e8f51401e2c9451d12f32b8e5fe43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjE9LwzAAR4M4sG5-h-A9kL-muQgyNxUKivQ-0uYXrdS2JlH8-A7cu7x3emekEsYYxhVX56TiXGjmhKwvyGXOH_yIqW1Fbne__nOYhumN7hGQ_EhfEkoajvGKET6DtglTyHT-QaLlHbTxudB79D5gQ1bRjxlXJ69Ju9-120fWPD88be8atjhbmHQA1044pTrZGxt4HzuprA_R2hhl4LFGHY3QXED2ThsRhIxKdjVMhFZrcv2_XdL89Y1cDgnLnEo-SHFjLbfOOfUHSzFEYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2167707999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining Federal Pretrial Release Trends over the Last Decade</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Cohen, Thomas H ; Austin, Amaryllis</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Thomas H ; Austin, Amaryllis</creatorcontrib><description>[...]the report focuses on only those defendants prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys for new offenses in the federal court system and who had a reasonable expectation of bail.6 Data for this study were extracted from the Probation and Pretrial Services Automated Case Tracking System (PACTS), the case management system used by federal probation and pretrial officers. [...]the percentage of drug defendants without any record of prior felony arrests released pretrial declined by 10 percentage points from 63 percent in 2008 to 53 percent in 2017, while their counterparts with 5 or more prior felony arrests were released at comparable rates (21 percent in 2008 vs. 20 percent in 2017) during the study coverage period. Specifically, the bail decision is the opportunity for the court system to conserve financial resources, uphold the individual's constitutional right to bail and the presumption of innocence, set a positive, rehabilitative tone for the individual and his or her families, and, in low-risk cases where it is merited, divert individuals altogether from incarceration. [...]perhaps even more importantly, a growing number of research studies have shown pretrial detention being associated with higher rates of failure at the post-conviction stage (Gupta et al., 2016; Heaton et al., 2017; Oleson et al., 2014). [...]the federal judicial district in D.C. is omitted from this analysis. 6 Because of the use of these filters, the pretrial release rates displayed in this report will most likely differ from those published by other federal statistical agencies. 7 Given that these districts are still experimenting with methods that allow for the most beneficial and informative use of the PTRA in their bail decisions, we kept their names out of this report.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-9128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-0303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Administrative Office of the United States Courts</publisher><subject>Drug courts ; Imprisonment ; Noncitizens ; Pretrial detention ; Prosecutions ; Rape ; Risk assessment ; State laws ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Federal Probation, 2018-09, Vol.82 (2), p.3-56</ispartof><rights>Copyright Administrative Office of the United States Courts Sep 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2167707999?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787,21475,21493,33591,33749,43709,43790</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Amaryllis</creatorcontrib><title>Examining Federal Pretrial Release Trends over the Last Decade</title><title>Federal Probation</title><description>[...]the report focuses on only those defendants prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys for new offenses in the federal court system and who had a reasonable expectation of bail.6 Data for this study were extracted from the Probation and Pretrial Services Automated Case Tracking System (PACTS), the case management system used by federal probation and pretrial officers. [...]the percentage of drug defendants without any record of prior felony arrests released pretrial declined by 10 percentage points from 63 percent in 2008 to 53 percent in 2017, while their counterparts with 5 or more prior felony arrests were released at comparable rates (21 percent in 2008 vs. 20 percent in 2017) during the study coverage period. Specifically, the bail decision is the opportunity for the court system to conserve financial resources, uphold the individual's constitutional right to bail and the presumption of innocence, set a positive, rehabilitative tone for the individual and his or her families, and, in low-risk cases where it is merited, divert individuals altogether from incarceration. [...]perhaps even more importantly, a growing number of research studies have shown pretrial detention being associated with higher rates of failure at the post-conviction stage (Gupta et al., 2016; Heaton et al., 2017; Oleson et al., 2014). [...]the federal judicial district in D.C. is omitted from this analysis. 6 Because of the use of these filters, the pretrial release rates displayed in this report will most likely differ from those published by other federal statistical agencies. 7 Given that these districts are still experimenting with methods that allow for the most beneficial and informative use of the PTRA in their bail decisions, we kept their names out of this report.</description><subject>Drug courts</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Pretrial detention</subject><subject>Prosecutions</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0014-9128</issn><issn>1555-0303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNotjE9LwzAAR4M4sG5-h-A9kL-muQgyNxUKivQ-0uYXrdS2JlH8-A7cu7x3emekEsYYxhVX56TiXGjmhKwvyGXOH_yIqW1Fbne__nOYhumN7hGQ_EhfEkoajvGKET6DtglTyHT-QaLlHbTxudB79D5gQ1bRjxlXJ69Ju9-120fWPD88be8atjhbmHQA1044pTrZGxt4HzuprA_R2hhl4LFGHY3QXED2ThsRhIxKdjVMhFZrcv2_XdL89Y1cDgnLnEo-SHFjLbfOOfUHSzFEYQ</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Cohen, Thomas H</creator><creator>Austin, Amaryllis</creator><general>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Examining Federal Pretrial Release Trends over the Last Decade</title><author>Cohen, Thomas H ; Austin, Amaryllis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-29ee0491933b2c57d0cfb237adf77ff2d0f8e8f51401e2c9451d12f32b8e5fe43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Drug courts</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Pretrial detention</topic><topic>Prosecutions</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Amaryllis</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Proquest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Federal Probation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Thomas H</au><au>Austin, Amaryllis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining Federal Pretrial Release Trends over the Last Decade</atitle><jtitle>Federal Probation</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>3-56</pages><issn>0014-9128</issn><eissn>1555-0303</eissn><abstract>[...]the report focuses on only those defendants prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys for new offenses in the federal court system and who had a reasonable expectation of bail.6 Data for this study were extracted from the Probation and Pretrial Services Automated Case Tracking System (PACTS), the case management system used by federal probation and pretrial officers. [...]the percentage of drug defendants without any record of prior felony arrests released pretrial declined by 10 percentage points from 63 percent in 2008 to 53 percent in 2017, while their counterparts with 5 or more prior felony arrests were released at comparable rates (21 percent in 2008 vs. 20 percent in 2017) during the study coverage period. Specifically, the bail decision is the opportunity for the court system to conserve financial resources, uphold the individual's constitutional right to bail and the presumption of innocence, set a positive, rehabilitative tone for the individual and his or her families, and, in low-risk cases where it is merited, divert individuals altogether from incarceration. [...]perhaps even more importantly, a growing number of research studies have shown pretrial detention being associated with higher rates of failure at the post-conviction stage (Gupta et al., 2016; Heaton et al., 2017; Oleson et al., 2014). [...]the federal judicial district in D.C. is omitted from this analysis. 6 Because of the use of these filters, the pretrial release rates displayed in this report will most likely differ from those published by other federal statistical agencies. 7 Given that these districts are still experimenting with methods that allow for the most beneficial and informative use of the PTRA in their bail decisions, we kept their names out of this report.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</pub><tpages>54</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-9128 |
ispartof | Federal Probation, 2018-09, Vol.82 (2), p.3-56 |
issn | 0014-9128 1555-0303 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_2167707999 |
source | Criminology Collection; Social Science Premium Collection |
subjects | Drug courts Imprisonment Noncitizens Pretrial detention Prosecutions Rape Risk assessment State laws Trends |
title | Examining Federal Pretrial Release Trends over the Last Decade |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A33%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20Federal%20Pretrial%20Release%20Trends%20over%20the%20Last%20Decade&rft.jtitle=Federal%20Probation&rft.au=Cohen,%20Thomas%20H&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=3-56&rft.issn=0014-9128&rft.eissn=1555-0303&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2167707999%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-29ee0491933b2c57d0cfb237adf77ff2d0f8e8f51401e2c9451d12f32b8e5fe43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2167707999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |