Loading…

The internal rate of return and institutional performance measurement for real estate portfolios

A strong argument is made for why the internal rate of return (IRR) should be required to be reported for closed-end real estate funds and discretionary separate accounts, even though AIMR reporting standards do not currently require such reporting. One of the primary objectives of the standards is...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Real Estate Finance 1998-07, Vol.15 (2), p.63
Main Authors:	Mahoney, Joe, Murphy, Jeanne, Keogh, Sean
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Approximation Cash flow forecasting Commingled funds Financial reporting Institutional investments Internal rate of return Investment advisors Liquidation Mutual funds Portfolio performance Rates of return Real estate Studies Valuation
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue	2
container_start_page	63
container_title	Real Estate Finance
container_volume	15
creator	Mahoney, Joe Murphy, Jeanne Keogh, Sean
description	A strong argument is made for why the internal rate of return (IRR) should be required to be reported for closed-end real estate funds and discretionary separate accounts, even though AIMR reporting standards do not currently require such reporting. One of the primary objectives of the standards is to promote greater comparability among managers. In the case of discretionary accounts, the IRR measure clearly helps to achieve this objective. Unlike the TWR, it is not dependent on the availability of prices at every cash flow, and it is not disproportionately influenced by returns earned while the portfolio is only partially invested. The IRR captures the total performance of the manager, both investment selection and cash flow timing decisions. The information value of the IRR justifies its use as an additional measure of return for discretionary accounts.
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_223056093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32746872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2230560933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzE0KwjAQBeAsFKw_d4gHKKSN1boWxQN04a4GnWCkTeLM5P6m4AFcDbz3vZmJQh12bamr9rYQS6K3UlVdNW0h7t0LpPMM6M0g0TDIYCUCJ_TS-GfuiB0ndmECEdAGHI1_gBzBUEIYwbPMYR5lAMTTjxiQbRhcoLWYWzMQbH53JbaXc3e6lhHDJ2XeI0ya-rrWqtmro9b_mC8JuURy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223056093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The internal rate of return and institutional performance measurement for real estate portfolios</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Mahoney, Joe ; Murphy, Jeanne ; Keogh, Sean</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Joe ; Murphy, Jeanne ; Keogh, Sean</creatorcontrib><description>A strong argument is made for why the internal rate of return (IRR) should be required to be reported for closed-end real estate funds and discretionary separate accounts, even though AIMR reporting standards do not currently require such reporting. One of the primary objectives of the standards is to promote greater comparability among managers. In the case of discretionary accounts, the IRR measure clearly helps to achieve this objective. Unlike the TWR, it is not dependent on the availability of prices at every cash flow, and it is not disproportionately influenced by returns earned while the portfolio is only partially invested. The IRR captures the total performance of the manager, both investment selection and cash flow timing decisions. The information value of the IRR justifies its use as an additional measure of return for discretionary accounts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-318X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Approximation ; Cash flow forecasting ; Commingled funds ; Financial reporting ; Institutional investments ; Internal rate of return ; Investment advisors ; Liquidation ; Mutual funds ; Portfolio performance ; Rates of return ; Real estate ; Studies ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Real Estate Finance, 1998-07, Vol.15 (2), p.63</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institutional Investor Systems, Inc. Summer 1998</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/223056093?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791,15316,36062,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Sean</creatorcontrib><title>The internal rate of return and institutional performance measurement for real estate portfolios</title><title>Real Estate Finance</title><description>A strong argument is made for why the internal rate of return (IRR) should be required to be reported for closed-end real estate funds and discretionary separate accounts, even though AIMR reporting standards do not currently require such reporting. One of the primary objectives of the standards is to promote greater comparability among managers. In the case of discretionary accounts, the IRR measure clearly helps to achieve this objective. Unlike the TWR, it is not dependent on the availability of prices at every cash flow, and it is not disproportionately influenced by returns earned while the portfolio is only partially invested. The IRR captures the total performance of the manager, both investment selection and cash flow timing decisions. The information value of the IRR justifies its use as an additional measure of return for discretionary accounts.</description><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Cash flow forecasting</subject><subject>Commingled funds</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Institutional investments</subject><subject>Internal rate of return</subject><subject>Investment advisors</subject><subject>Liquidation</subject><subject>Mutual funds</subject><subject>Portfolio performance</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>0748-318X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzE0KwjAQBeAsFKw_d4gHKKSN1boWxQN04a4GnWCkTeLM5P6m4AFcDbz3vZmJQh12bamr9rYQS6K3UlVdNW0h7t0LpPMM6M0g0TDIYCUCJ_TS-GfuiB0ndmECEdAGHI1_gBzBUEIYwbPMYR5lAMTTjxiQbRhcoLWYWzMQbH53JbaXc3e6lhHDJ2XeI0ya-rrWqtmro9b_mC8JuURy</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Mahoney, Joe</creator><creator>Murphy, Jeanne</creator><creator>Keogh, Sean</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>The internal rate of return and institutional performance measurement for real estate portfolios</title><author>Mahoney, Joe ; Murphy, Jeanne ; Keogh, Sean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2230560933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Cash flow forecasting</topic><topic>Commingled funds</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Institutional investments</topic><topic>Internal rate of return</topic><topic>Investment advisors</topic><topic>Liquidation</topic><topic>Mutual funds</topic><topic>Portfolio performance</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Sean</creatorcontrib><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Real Estate Finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahoney, Joe</au><au>Murphy, Jeanne</au><au>Keogh, Sean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The internal rate of return and institutional performance measurement for real estate portfolios</atitle><jtitle>Real Estate Finance</jtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>63</spage><pages>63-</pages><issn>0748-318X</issn><abstract>A strong argument is made for why the internal rate of return (IRR) should be required to be reported for closed-end real estate funds and discretionary separate accounts, even though AIMR reporting standards do not currently require such reporting. One of the primary objectives of the standards is to promote greater comparability among managers. In the case of discretionary accounts, the IRR measure clearly helps to achieve this objective. Unlike the TWR, it is not dependent on the availability of prices at every cash flow, and it is not disproportionately influenced by returns earned while the portfolio is only partially invested. The IRR captures the total performance of the manager, both investment selection and cash flow timing decisions. The information value of the IRR justifies its use as an additional measure of return for discretionary accounts.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0748-318X
ispartof	Real Estate Finance, 1998-07, Vol.15 (2), p.63
issn	0748-318X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_reports_223056093
source	ABI/INFORM Global
subjects	Approximation Cash flow forecasting Commingled funds Financial reporting Institutional investments Internal rate of return Investment advisors Liquidation Mutual funds Portfolio performance Rates of return Real estate Studies Valuation
title	The internal rate of return and institutional performance measurement for real estate portfolios
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20internal%20rate%20of%20return%20and%20institutional%20performance%20measurement%20for%20real%20estate%20portfolios&rft.jtitle=Real%20Estate%20Finance&rft.au=Mahoney,%20Joe&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=63&rft.pages=63-&rft.issn=0748-318X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E32746872%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2230560933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223056093&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true