Loading…
Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: Duly Authorized Opinions on Preferred Stock
Purchasers of newly-issued shares of preferred stock typically seek an opinion from the Company's counsel that the shares have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. This article amplifies the discussion in Section 6.2.1 of the 1998 TriBar Report of the me...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Business Lawyer 2008-05, Vol.63 (3), p.921-928 |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 928 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 921 |
container_title | The Business Lawyer |
container_volume | 63 |
description | Purchasers of newly-issued shares of preferred stock typically seek an opinion from the Company's counsel that the shares have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. This article amplifies the discussion in Section 6.2.1 of the 1998 TriBar Report of the meaning of the "duly authorized" part of this opinion when it is given on preferred stock. Modern corporation statutes typically grant corporations the authority to create preferred stock having terms as they may desire, subject only to compliance with the requirements of that statute and the requirements, if any, of the corporation's charter. Opinion recipients sometimes request that the opinion expressly confirm that the terms of the preferred stock do not violate the state corporation statute and the Company's charter. When preferred stock provisions are relatively straightforward, opinion preparers usually have little difficulty giving an unqualified duly authorized opinion. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_228395748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A181897936</galeid><jstor_id>40688517</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A181897936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g308t-c9d220b87f55f0fe7213c1bb0d31af5d6b2cddea1b0a075a89b4e10c33b40ce53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptz01LAzEQBuAgCtbqTxAinleSzX4k3mr9BKFi68nDks1O2tTdzZqkh_rrDVYPQpnDMC_PDMwBGqW0yBLKGT9EI0JImRRciGN04v06jjTlbITe5wMoI1v8CoN1AVuNwwrwwpkb6fBsML2xPZ7arjMhAFzj2027xZNNWFlnvqD5Ix5H9uJAg3MxnQerPk7RkZath7PfPkZv93eL6WPyPHt4mk6ekyUjPCRKNGlKal7qPNdEQ5lSpmhdk4ZRqfOmqFPVNCBpTSQpc8lFnQElirE6IwpyNkYXu7uDs58b8KFyP8_4Ko0_irzMeDSXO7OULVSm1zY4qTrjVTWhnHJRClZElexRS-jBydb2oE2M__mrPT5WA51RexfOdwtrH6yrBmc66bZVRgrOc1qyb7WrhFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228395748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: Duly Authorized Opinions on Preferred Stock</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><description>Purchasers of newly-issued shares of preferred stock typically seek an opinion from the Company's counsel that the shares have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. This article amplifies the discussion in Section 6.2.1 of the 1998 TriBar Report of the meaning of the "duly authorized" part of this opinion when it is given on preferred stock. Modern corporation statutes typically grant corporations the authority to create preferred stock having terms as they may desire, subject only to compliance with the requirements of that statute and the requirements, if any, of the corporation's charter. Opinion recipients sometimes request that the opinion expressly confirm that the terms of the preferred stock do not violate the state corporation statute and the Company's charter. When preferred stock provisions are relatively straightforward, opinion preparers usually have little difficulty giving an unqualified duly authorized opinion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-1838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Bar associations ; Boards of directors ; Business structures ; Capital stock ; Charters ; Commercial law ; Committees ; Compliance ; Corporate power ; Corporate regulation ; Corporations ; Dividends ; Federal legislation ; Issued capital ; Preferred stock ; Preferred stocks ; Provisions ; Shareholder voting ; Statutory law ; Stock shares ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>The Business Lawyer, 2008-05, Vol.63 (3), p.921-928</ispartof><rights>2008 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association May 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40688517$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/228395748?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791,15316,16474,33225,36062,44363,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><title>Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: Duly Authorized Opinions on Preferred Stock</title><title>The Business Lawyer</title><description>Purchasers of newly-issued shares of preferred stock typically seek an opinion from the Company's counsel that the shares have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. This article amplifies the discussion in Section 6.2.1 of the 1998 TriBar Report of the meaning of the "duly authorized" part of this opinion when it is given on preferred stock. Modern corporation statutes typically grant corporations the authority to create preferred stock having terms as they may desire, subject only to compliance with the requirements of that statute and the requirements, if any, of the corporation's charter. Opinion recipients sometimes request that the opinion expressly confirm that the terms of the preferred stock do not violate the state corporation statute and the Company's charter. When preferred stock provisions are relatively straightforward, opinion preparers usually have little difficulty giving an unqualified duly authorized opinion.</description><subject>Bar associations</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Capital stock</subject><subject>Charters</subject><subject>Commercial law</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Corporate power</subject><subject>Corporate regulation</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Dividends</subject><subject>Federal legislation</subject><subject>Issued capital</subject><subject>Preferred stock</subject><subject>Preferred stocks</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Shareholder voting</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Stock shares</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>0007-6899</issn><issn>2164-1838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptz01LAzEQBuAgCtbqTxAinleSzX4k3mr9BKFi68nDks1O2tTdzZqkh_rrDVYPQpnDMC_PDMwBGqW0yBLKGT9EI0JImRRciGN04v06jjTlbITe5wMoI1v8CoN1AVuNwwrwwpkb6fBsML2xPZ7arjMhAFzj2027xZNNWFlnvqD5Ix5H9uJAg3MxnQerPk7RkZath7PfPkZv93eL6WPyPHt4mk6ekyUjPCRKNGlKal7qPNdEQ5lSpmhdk4ZRqfOmqFPVNCBpTSQpc8lFnQElirE6IwpyNkYXu7uDs58b8KFyP8_4Ko0_irzMeDSXO7OULVSm1zY4qTrjVTWhnHJRClZElexRS-jBydb2oE2M__mrPT5WA51RexfOdwtrH6yrBmc66bZVRgrOc1qyb7WrhFA</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><general>Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: Duly Authorized Opinions on Preferred Stock</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g308t-c9d220b87f55f0fe7213c1bb0d31af5d6b2cddea1b0a075a89b4e10c33b40ce53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bar associations</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Capital stock</topic><topic>Charters</topic><topic>Commercial law</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Corporate power</topic><topic>Corporate regulation</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Dividends</topic><topic>Federal legislation</topic><topic>Issued capital</topic><topic>Preferred stock</topic><topic>Preferred stocks</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Shareholder voting</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Stock shares</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>LegalTrac</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Business Lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: Duly Authorized Opinions on Preferred Stock</atitle><jtitle>The Business Lawyer</jtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>921</spage><epage>928</epage><pages>921-928</pages><issn>0007-6899</issn><eissn>2164-1838</eissn><abstract>Purchasers of newly-issued shares of preferred stock typically seek an opinion from the Company's counsel that the shares have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. This article amplifies the discussion in Section 6.2.1 of the 1998 TriBar Report of the meaning of the "duly authorized" part of this opinion when it is given on preferred stock. Modern corporation statutes typically grant corporations the authority to create preferred stock having terms as they may desire, subject only to compliance with the requirements of that statute and the requirements, if any, of the corporation's charter. Opinion recipients sometimes request that the opinion expressly confirm that the terms of the preferred stock do not violate the state corporation statute and the Company's charter. When preferred stock provisions are relatively straightforward, opinion preparers usually have little difficulty giving an unqualified duly authorized opinion.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Section of Business Law of the American Bar Association</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-6899 |
ispartof | The Business Lawyer, 2008-05, Vol.63 (3), p.921-928 |
issn | 0007-6899 2164-1838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_228395748 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM global; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】 |
subjects | Bar associations Boards of directors Business structures Capital stock Charters Commercial law Committees Compliance Corporate power Corporate regulation Corporations Dividends Federal legislation Issued capital Preferred stock Preferred stocks Provisions Shareholder voting Statutory law Stock shares Voting rights |
title | Special Report of the TriBar Opinion Committee: Duly Authorized Opinions on Preferred Stock |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A54%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Special%20Report%20of%20the%20TriBar%20Opinion%20Committee:%20Duly%20Authorized%20Opinions%20on%20Preferred%20Stock&rft.jtitle=The%20Business%20Lawyer&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=921&rft.epage=928&rft.pages=921-928&rft.issn=0007-6899&rft.eissn=2164-1838&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA181897936%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g308t-c9d220b87f55f0fe7213c1bb0d31af5d6b2cddea1b0a075a89b4e10c33b40ce53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228395748&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A181897936&rft_jstor_id=40688517&rfr_iscdi=true |