In re Frenville: A Critique by the National Bankruptcy Conference's Committee on Claims and Distributions

This article is a critique of In re Frenville, which holds that a third-party indemnification claim against a debtor in bankruptcy arising out of a lawsuit filed post-petition is not subject tp the automatic stay.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Business lawyer 1987-05, Vol.42 (3), p.697-714
Main Authors: Mabey, Ralph R., Jarvis, Annette W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Automatic stay
Banking
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy claims
Bankruptcy Code
Bankruptcy courts
Bankruptcy discharges
Bankruptcy laws
Bankruptcy Reform Act 1978-US
Court decisions
Creditor claims
Debtors
Federal court decisions
Payments
State court decisions
State law
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article is a critique of In re Frenville, which holds that a third-party indemnification claim against a debtor in bankruptcy arising out of a lawsuit filed post-petition is not subject tp the automatic stay.
ISSN:0007-6899
2164-1838