In re Frenville: A Critique by the National Bankruptcy Conference's Committee on Claims and Distributions

This article is a critique of In re Frenville, which holds that a third-party indemnification claim against a debtor in bankruptcy arising out of a lawsuit filed post-petition is not subject tp the automatic stay.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Business lawyer 1987-05, Vol.42 (3), p.697-714
Main Authors: Mabey, Ralph R., Jarvis, Annette W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Automatic stay
Banking
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy claims
Bankruptcy Code
Bankruptcy courts
Bankruptcy discharges
Bankruptcy laws
Bankruptcy Reform Act 1978-US
Court decisions
Creditor claims
Debtors
Federal court decisions
Payments
State court decisions
State law
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 714
container_issue 3
container_start_page 697
container_title The Business lawyer
container_volume 42
creator Mabey, Ralph R.
Jarvis, Annette W.
description This article is a critique of In re Frenville, which holds that a third-party indemnification claim against a debtor in bankruptcy arising out of a lawsuit filed post-petition is not subject tp the automatic stay.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_228451058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40686864</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40686864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j161t-a774b50a1e9fd1886fce1c71830c4948d58c2640b6ad75e1f9d5d335312734a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj01LxDAURYMoOI7-BCHiwlUh30ndjdXRgUE3ui5pm2Jqm9QkFebfG9GVvMXlwrkPzhFYESxYgRVVx2CFEJKFUGV5Cs5iHHLFRNEVsDsHg4HbYNyXHUdzCzewCjbZz8XA5gDTu4HPOlnv9AjvtPsIy5zaA6y8600eteYm5jJNNiVjoHewGrWdItSug_c2pmCb5Wcez8FJr8doLv5yDd62D6_VU7F_edxVm30xYIFToaVkDUcam7LvsFKibw1uZdZALSuZ6rhqiWCoEbqT3OC-7HhHKaeYSMo0p2tw9ft3Dj5LxFQHM_uQYk2IYhwjrjJz_Y8Z_BKyYqwxRQorwqjM1OUvNcTkQz0HO-lwqBkSKh-j38BIaKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308182437</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In re Frenville: A Critique by the National Bankruptcy Conference's Committee on Claims and Distributions</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Mabey, Ralph R. ; Jarvis, Annette W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mabey, Ralph R. ; Jarvis, Annette W.</creatorcontrib><description>This article is a critique of In re Frenville, which holds that a third-party indemnification claim against a debtor in bankruptcy arising out of a lawsuit filed post-petition is not subject tp the automatic stay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-1838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, Ill: Section on Corporation, Banking and Business Law, American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Automatic stay ; Banking ; Bankruptcy ; Bankruptcy claims ; Bankruptcy Code ; Bankruptcy courts ; Bankruptcy discharges ; Bankruptcy laws ; Bankruptcy Reform Act 1978-US ; Court decisions ; Creditor claims ; Debtors ; Federal court decisions ; Payments ; State court decisions ; State law</subject><ispartof>The Business lawyer, 1987-05, Vol.42 (3), p.697-714</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bar Association, Section of Business Law May 1987</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40686864$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40686864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,33212,58225,58458</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mabey, Ralph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Annette W.</creatorcontrib><title>In re Frenville: A Critique by the National Bankruptcy Conference's Committee on Claims and Distributions</title><title>The Business lawyer</title><description>This article is a critique of In re Frenville, which holds that a third-party indemnification claim against a debtor in bankruptcy arising out of a lawsuit filed post-petition is not subject tp the automatic stay.</description><subject>Automatic stay</subject><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Bankruptcy claims</subject><subject>Bankruptcy Code</subject><subject>Bankruptcy courts</subject><subject>Bankruptcy discharges</subject><subject>Bankruptcy laws</subject><subject>Bankruptcy Reform Act 1978-US</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Creditor claims</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>State law</subject><issn>0007-6899</issn><issn>2164-1838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj01LxDAURYMoOI7-BCHiwlUh30ndjdXRgUE3ui5pm2Jqm9QkFebfG9GVvMXlwrkPzhFYESxYgRVVx2CFEJKFUGV5Cs5iHHLFRNEVsDsHg4HbYNyXHUdzCzewCjbZz8XA5gDTu4HPOlnv9AjvtPsIy5zaA6y8600eteYm5jJNNiVjoHewGrWdItSug_c2pmCb5Wcez8FJr8doLv5yDd62D6_VU7F_edxVm30xYIFToaVkDUcam7LvsFKibw1uZdZALSuZ6rhqiWCoEbqT3OC-7HhHKaeYSMo0p2tw9ft3Dj5LxFQHM_uQYk2IYhwjrjJz_Y8Z_BKyYqwxRQorwqjM1OUvNcTkQz0HO-lwqBkSKh-j38BIaKw</recordid><startdate>19870501</startdate><enddate>19870501</enddate><creator>Mabey, Ralph R.</creator><creator>Jarvis, Annette W.</creator><general>Section on Corporation, Banking and Business Law, American Bar Association</general><general>Section on Corporation, Banking, and Mercantile Law, American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870501</creationdate><title>In re Frenville: A Critique by the National Bankruptcy Conference's Committee on Claims and Distributions</title><author>Mabey, Ralph R. ; Jarvis, Annette W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j161t-a774b50a1e9fd1886fce1c71830c4948d58c2640b6ad75e1f9d5d335312734a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Automatic stay</topic><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Bankruptcy claims</topic><topic>Bankruptcy Code</topic><topic>Bankruptcy courts</topic><topic>Bankruptcy discharges</topic><topic>Bankruptcy laws</topic><topic>Bankruptcy Reform Act 1978-US</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Creditor claims</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>State law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mabey, Ralph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarvis, Annette W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Business lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mabey, Ralph R.</au><au>Jarvis, Annette W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In re Frenville: A Critique by the National Bankruptcy Conference's Committee on Claims and Distributions</atitle><jtitle>The Business lawyer</jtitle><date>1987-05-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>697</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>697-714</pages><issn>0007-6899</issn><eissn>2164-1838</eissn><abstract>This article is a critique of In re Frenville, which holds that a third-party indemnification claim against a debtor in bankruptcy arising out of a lawsuit filed post-petition is not subject tp the automatic stay.</abstract><cop>Chicago, Ill</cop><pub>Section on Corporation, Banking and Business Law, American Bar Association</pub><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-6899
ispartof The Business lawyer, 1987-05, Vol.42 (3), p.697-714
issn 0007-6899
2164-1838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_228451058
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Automatic stay
Banking
Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy claims
Bankruptcy Code
Bankruptcy courts
Bankruptcy discharges
Bankruptcy laws
Bankruptcy Reform Act 1978-US
Court decisions
Creditor claims
Debtors
Federal court decisions
Payments
State court decisions
State law
title In re Frenville: A Critique by the National Bankruptcy Conference's Committee on Claims and Distributions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A00%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20re%20Frenville:%20A%20Critique%20by%20the%20National%20Bankruptcy%20Conference's%20Committee%20on%20Claims%20and%20Distributions&rft.jtitle=The%20Business%20lawyer&rft.au=Mabey,%20Ralph%20R.&rft.date=1987-05-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=697&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=697-714&rft.issn=0007-6899&rft.eissn=2164-1838&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40686864%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j161t-a774b50a1e9fd1886fce1c71830c4948d58c2640b6ad75e1f9d5d335312734a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308182437&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40686864&rfr_iscdi=true