Loading…
The FDCPA Takes a New Direction: Federal Review of State Court Litigation Practices
In recent years, debtors have brought suit in federal courts alleging that procedures used by lawyers in state court collection litigation are the type of "abusive debt collection practices" prohibited by the the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the "FDCPA"). As a result, debt...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Business Lawyer 2008-02, Vol.63 (2), p.717-728 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In recent years, debtors have brought suit in federal courts alleging that procedures used by lawyers in state court collection litigation are the type of "abusive debt collection practices" prohibited by the the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the "FDCPA"). As a result, debt collection litigators are now increasingly subject to an additional set of rules imposed by the FDCPA and administered by federal district courts. This survey reviews the existing state law anti-abuse rules, how the additional system of federal law developed, the status of the bona fide error defense, and how debt collection lawyers are being required to change the way they practice in state courts. Taken as a whole, the cases noted in this survey cast doubt on the Supreme Court's suggestion in Heintz that the courts will use the bona fide error defense to avoid the anomalies created by applying the FDCPA to litigating lawyers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-6899 2164-1838 |