Loading…

Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans

This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accounting and the Public Interest 2009-01, Vol.9 (1), p.100-128
Main Author: Asthana, Sharad C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63
cites
container_end_page 128
container_issue 1
container_start_page 100
container_title Accounting and the Public Interest
container_volume 9
creator Asthana, Sharad C.
description This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.
doi_str_mv 10.2308/api.2009.9.1.100
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_235003330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957334131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEURYMoWKt7l-MPmPElaTLJUopf0GIFXYfXzItE2syYTEH_vS114epeLoe7OIxdc2iEBHOLQ2wEgG1swxsOcMImXEmorRRw-q-fs4tSPgF4O9OzCbMrzGP0ccA01sv4XWHqqiUm_KAtpbHqQ_W6w00MkbpqRanEPlWrDaZyyc4Cbgpd_eWUvT_cv82f6sXL4_P8blF7wdVYe7PujPHKYEem5VoYob3VJL3nZIxAVGsEbzBA0IKUD3rWkiWlQ9sGr-WU3Rx_h9x_7aiMLtPQ57E4IRWAlBL2DBwZn_tSMgU35LjF_OM4uIMet9fjDnqcdXw_gvwFW_NYQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235003330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><creator>Asthana, Sharad C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Asthana, Sharad C.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-9320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2308/api.2009.9.1.100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sarasota: American Accounting Association</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Baby boomers ; Beneficiaries ; Compensation ; Defense contracts ; Defined benefit plans ; Dilution ; Earnings per share ; Employees ; Funding ; Hypotheses ; Impact analysis ; Investments ; Labor unions ; Profitability ; Profits ; Public interest ; Qualified pension plans ; Retirement income ; Social security ; Stockholders ; Studies ; Tax rates ; Wages &amp; salaries</subject><ispartof>Accounting and the Public Interest, 2009-01, Vol.9 (1), p.100-128</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Accounting Association 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/235003330?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791,15316,27924,27925,36062,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asthana, Sharad C.</creatorcontrib><title>Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans</title><title>Accounting and the Public Interest</title><description>This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Baby boomers</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Defense contracts</subject><subject>Defined benefit plans</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>Earnings per share</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Qualified pension plans</subject><subject>Retirement income</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><issn>1530-9320</issn><issn>1530-9320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEURYMoWKt7l-MPmPElaTLJUopf0GIFXYfXzItE2syYTEH_vS114epeLoe7OIxdc2iEBHOLQ2wEgG1swxsOcMImXEmorRRw-q-fs4tSPgF4O9OzCbMrzGP0ccA01sv4XWHqqiUm_KAtpbHqQ_W6w00MkbpqRanEPlWrDaZyyc4Cbgpd_eWUvT_cv82f6sXL4_P8blF7wdVYe7PujPHKYEem5VoYob3VJL3nZIxAVGsEbzBA0IKUD3rWkiWlQ9sGr-WU3Rx_h9x_7aiMLtPQ57E4IRWAlBL2DBwZn_tSMgU35LjF_OM4uIMet9fjDnqcdXw_gvwFW_NYQw</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Asthana, Sharad C.</creator><general>American Accounting Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans</title><author>Asthana, Sharad C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Baby boomers</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Defense contracts</topic><topic>Defined benefit plans</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>Earnings per share</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Qualified pension plans</topic><topic>Retirement income</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asthana, Sharad C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting and the Public Interest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asthana, Sharad C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans</atitle><jtitle>Accounting and the Public Interest</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>100-128</pages><issn>1530-9320</issn><eissn>1530-9320</eissn><abstract>This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.</abstract><cop>Sarasota</cop><pub>American Accounting Association</pub><doi>10.2308/api.2009.9.1.100</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-9320
ispartof Accounting and the Public Interest, 2009-01, Vol.9 (1), p.100-128
issn 1530-9320
1530-9320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_235003330
source Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; ABI/INFORM global
subjects Accounting
Baby boomers
Beneficiaries
Compensation
Defense contracts
Defined benefit plans
Dilution
Earnings per share
Employees
Funding
Hypotheses
Impact analysis
Investments
Labor unions
Profitability
Profits
Public interest
Qualified pension plans
Retirement income
Social security
Stockholders
Studies
Tax rates
Wages & salaries
title Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A21%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participant-Mix%20and%20Management%20of%20Qualified%20Pension%20Plans&rft.jtitle=Accounting%20and%20the%20Public%20Interest&rft.au=Asthana,%20Sharad%20C.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=100-128&rft.issn=1530-9320&rft.eissn=1530-9320&rft_id=info:doi/10.2308/api.2009.9.1.100&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957334131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235003330&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true