Loading…
Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans
This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue C...
Saved in:
Published in: | Accounting and the Public Interest 2009-01, Vol.9 (1), p.100-128 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 128 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | Accounting and the Public Interest |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Asthana, Sharad C. |
description | This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2308/api.2009.9.1.100 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_235003330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957334131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEURYMoWKt7l-MPmPElaTLJUopf0GIFXYfXzItE2syYTEH_vS114epeLoe7OIxdc2iEBHOLQ2wEgG1swxsOcMImXEmorRRw-q-fs4tSPgF4O9OzCbMrzGP0ccA01sv4XWHqqiUm_KAtpbHqQ_W6w00MkbpqRanEPlWrDaZyyc4Cbgpd_eWUvT_cv82f6sXL4_P8blF7wdVYe7PujPHKYEem5VoYob3VJL3nZIxAVGsEbzBA0IKUD3rWkiWlQ9sGr-WU3Rx_h9x_7aiMLtPQ57E4IRWAlBL2DBwZn_tSMgU35LjF_OM4uIMet9fjDnqcdXw_gvwFW_NYQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235003330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><creator>Asthana, Sharad C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Asthana, Sharad C.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-9320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2308/api.2009.9.1.100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sarasota: American Accounting Association</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Baby boomers ; Beneficiaries ; Compensation ; Defense contracts ; Defined benefit plans ; Dilution ; Earnings per share ; Employees ; Funding ; Hypotheses ; Impact analysis ; Investments ; Labor unions ; Profitability ; Profits ; Public interest ; Qualified pension plans ; Retirement income ; Social security ; Stockholders ; Studies ; Tax rates ; Wages & salaries</subject><ispartof>Accounting and the Public Interest, 2009-01, Vol.9 (1), p.100-128</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Accounting Association 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/235003330?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791,15316,27924,27925,36062,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asthana, Sharad C.</creatorcontrib><title>Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans</title><title>Accounting and the Public Interest</title><description>This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Baby boomers</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Defense contracts</subject><subject>Defined benefit plans</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>Earnings per share</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Qualified pension plans</subject><subject>Retirement income</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><issn>1530-9320</issn><issn>1530-9320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEURYMoWKt7l-MPmPElaTLJUopf0GIFXYfXzItE2syYTEH_vS114epeLoe7OIxdc2iEBHOLQ2wEgG1swxsOcMImXEmorRRw-q-fs4tSPgF4O9OzCbMrzGP0ccA01sv4XWHqqiUm_KAtpbHqQ_W6w00MkbpqRanEPlWrDaZyyc4Cbgpd_eWUvT_cv82f6sXL4_P8blF7wdVYe7PujPHKYEem5VoYob3VJL3nZIxAVGsEbzBA0IKUD3rWkiWlQ9sGr-WU3Rx_h9x_7aiMLtPQ57E4IRWAlBL2DBwZn_tSMgU35LjF_OM4uIMet9fjDnqcdXw_gvwFW_NYQw</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Asthana, Sharad C.</creator><general>American Accounting Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans</title><author>Asthana, Sharad C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Baby boomers</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Defense contracts</topic><topic>Defined benefit plans</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>Earnings per share</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Qualified pension plans</topic><topic>Retirement income</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asthana, Sharad C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting and the Public Interest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asthana, Sharad C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans</atitle><jtitle>Accounting and the Public Interest</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>100-128</pages><issn>1530-9320</issn><eissn>1530-9320</eissn><abstract>This paper examines if the management of qualified pension plans is affected by the mix of plan participants. Evidence is presented that defined-benefit pension plans that are dominated by highly compensated employees tend to contribute beyond the minimum amount required under the Internal Revenue Code (flow effect), resulting in overfunded plans (stock effect), and then use of aggressive actuarial assumptions to disguise the overfunding to avoid visibility costs (reporting effect). These effects are less likely when the sponsoring firm has an active labor union (monitoring effect). These findings will be of interest to the federal government, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, employees, and labor unions.</abstract><cop>Sarasota</cop><pub>American Accounting Association</pub><doi>10.2308/api.2009.9.1.100</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1530-9320 |
ispartof | Accounting and the Public Interest, 2009-01, Vol.9 (1), p.100-128 |
issn | 1530-9320 1530-9320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_235003330 |
source | Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; ABI/INFORM global |
subjects | Accounting Baby boomers Beneficiaries Compensation Defense contracts Defined benefit plans Dilution Earnings per share Employees Funding Hypotheses Impact analysis Investments Labor unions Profitability Profits Public interest Qualified pension plans Retirement income Social security Stockholders Studies Tax rates Wages & salaries |
title | Participant-Mix and Management of Qualified Pension Plans |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A21%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participant-Mix%20and%20Management%20of%20Qualified%20Pension%20Plans&rft.jtitle=Accounting%20and%20the%20Public%20Interest&rft.au=Asthana,%20Sharad%20C.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=100-128&rft.issn=1530-9320&rft.eissn=1530-9320&rft_id=info:doi/10.2308/api.2009.9.1.100&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957334131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-c8bd88c58ade87162826c96e3cc1e882aa5ba0c8af0f62e5cf647e9e56f77fc63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235003330&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |