Case of Guzmán Albarracín v. Ecuador (Inter-Am. Ct. H.R.)

Only parties to the ACHR may elect judges to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the Court) and participate in the development of the jurisprudence of the Court, which to date comprises approximately 450 judgments. An unintended consequence of the lack of English-speaking judges on the Court,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International legal materials 2022-06, Vol.61 (3), p.374-437
Main Author: Cerna, Christina M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Compliance
Court hearings & proceedings
Evidence
Human rights
International Legal Documents
Jurisdiction
Public hearings
Reparations
School principals
Torture
Violence
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Only parties to the ACHR may elect judges to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the Court) and participate in the development of the jurisprudence of the Court, which to date comprises approximately 450 judgments. An unintended consequence of the lack of English-speaking judges on the Court, given the Court's limited resources, is a time lag in the translation of the Court's judgments into English. The Court's press release of October 6, 2021 indicated that, thanks to the assistance of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, the Court was able to have seven of its judgments translated into English. The judgment in the case of Paola Guzmán Albarracín et al. v. Ecuador, issued on June 24, 2020, the subject matter of this introductory note, is one of the seven cases recently translated.
ISSN:0020-7829
1930-6571
DOI:10.1017/ilm.2022.17