Loading…

Output Insecurity and Ownership Disputes as Barriers to Technology Diffusion

This paper examines both the desirability and feasibility of technology transfers in a setting where institutions governing the security of output or income are imperfect. Based on a guns-versus-butter model involving two countries (a technology leader and a technology laggard), our analysis charact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policy File 2022
Main Authors: Camacho, Oscar, Garfinkel, Michelle R, Syropoulos, Constantinos, Yotov, Yoto V
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Policy File
container_volume
creator Camacho, Oscar
Garfinkel, Michelle R
Syropoulos, Constantinos
Yotov, Yoto V
description This paper examines both the desirability and feasibility of technology transfers in a setting where institutions governing the security of output or income are imperfect. Based on a guns-versus-butter model involving two countries (a technology leader and a technology laggard), our analysis characterizes how global efficiency and the countries' preferences over transfers depend on the nature of technology, as well as on the initial technological distance between them and the degree of output security. In the case of a general-purpose technology the leader might refuse a transfer, whereas in the case of a sector-specific technology the laggard might have such an incentive. Notably, for both types of technology, our analysis reveals the possible emergence of a "low-technology trap," wherein a technology transfer to the laggard is more likely to be blocked precisely when the laggard's initial technology is sufficiently inferior to its rival. We explore how the degree of output security and the laggard's capacity to absorb state-of-the-art technology affect the range of technological distances that generate such traps for each type of technology.
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AOXKD</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_2747831410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2747831410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_27478314103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPDxLy0pKC1R8MwrTk0uLcosqVRIzEtR8C_PSy0qzsgsUHDJLAbKpxYrJBYrOCUWFWUCxRVK8hVCUpMz8vJz8tMrgUrS0kqLM_PzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxRakF-UUlxvJG5ibmFsaGJoYExUYoAXTs3_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>2747831410</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>Output Insecurity and Ownership Disputes as Barriers to Technology Diffusion</title><source>Policy File Index</source><creator>Camacho, Oscar ; Garfinkel, Michelle R ; Syropoulos, Constantinos ; Yotov, Yoto V</creator><creatorcontrib>Camacho, Oscar ; Garfinkel, Michelle R ; Syropoulos, Constantinos ; Yotov, Yoto V</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines both the desirability and feasibility of technology transfers in a setting where institutions governing the security of output or income are imperfect. Based on a guns-versus-butter model involving two countries (a technology leader and a technology laggard), our analysis characterizes how global efficiency and the countries' preferences over transfers depend on the nature of technology, as well as on the initial technological distance between them and the degree of output security. In the case of a general-purpose technology the leader might refuse a transfer, whereas in the case of a sector-specific technology the laggard might have such an incentive. Notably, for both types of technology, our analysis reveals the possible emergence of a "low-technology trap," wherein a technology transfer to the laggard is more likely to be blocked precisely when the laggard's initial technology is sufficiently inferior to its rival. We explore how the degree of output security and the laggard's capacity to absorb state-of-the-art technology affect the range of technological distances that generate such traps for each type of technology.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>CESifo Group Munich</publisher><subject>CESifo Group Munich</subject><ispartof>Policy File, 2022</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2747831410?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,4487,43746,72866,72871</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2747831410?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Camacho, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garfinkel, Michelle R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syropoulos, Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yotov, Yoto V</creatorcontrib><title>Output Insecurity and Ownership Disputes as Barriers to Technology Diffusion</title><title>Policy File</title><description>This paper examines both the desirability and feasibility of technology transfers in a setting where institutions governing the security of output or income are imperfect. Based on a guns-versus-butter model involving two countries (a technology leader and a technology laggard), our analysis characterizes how global efficiency and the countries' preferences over transfers depend on the nature of technology, as well as on the initial technological distance between them and the degree of output security. In the case of a general-purpose technology the leader might refuse a transfer, whereas in the case of a sector-specific technology the laggard might have such an incentive. Notably, for both types of technology, our analysis reveals the possible emergence of a "low-technology trap," wherein a technology transfer to the laggard is more likely to be blocked precisely when the laggard's initial technology is sufficiently inferior to its rival. We explore how the degree of output security and the laggard's capacity to absorb state-of-the-art technology affect the range of technological distances that generate such traps for each type of technology.</description><subject>CESifo Group Munich</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>ABWIU</sourceid><sourceid>AFVLS</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>AOXKD</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPDxLy0pKC1R8MwrTk0uLcosqVRIzEtR8C_PSy0qzsgsUHDJLAbKpxYrJBYrOCUWFWUCxRVK8hVCUpMz8vJz8tMrgUrS0kqLM_PzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxRakF-UUlxvJG5ibmFsaGJoYExUYoAXTs3_g</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Camacho, Oscar</creator><creator>Garfinkel, Michelle R</creator><creator>Syropoulos, Constantinos</creator><creator>Yotov, Yoto V</creator><general>CESifo Group Munich</general><scope>ABWIU</scope><scope>AFVLS</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AOXKD</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Output Insecurity and Ownership Disputes as Barriers to Technology Diffusion</title><author>Camacho, Oscar ; Garfinkel, Michelle R ; Syropoulos, Constantinos ; Yotov, Yoto V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_27478314103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>CESifo Group Munich</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Camacho, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garfinkel, Michelle R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syropoulos, Constantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yotov, Yoto V</creatorcontrib><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Policy File Index</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Camacho, Oscar</au><au>Garfinkel, Michelle R</au><au>Syropoulos, Constantinos</au><au>Yotov, Yoto V</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Output Insecurity and Ownership Disputes as Barriers to Technology Diffusion</atitle><jtitle>Policy File</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>This paper examines both the desirability and feasibility of technology transfers in a setting where institutions governing the security of output or income are imperfect. Based on a guns-versus-butter model involving two countries (a technology leader and a technology laggard), our analysis characterizes how global efficiency and the countries' preferences over transfers depend on the nature of technology, as well as on the initial technological distance between them and the degree of output security. In the case of a general-purpose technology the leader might refuse a transfer, whereas in the case of a sector-specific technology the laggard might have such an incentive. Notably, for both types of technology, our analysis reveals the possible emergence of a "low-technology trap," wherein a technology transfer to the laggard is more likely to be blocked precisely when the laggard's initial technology is sufficiently inferior to its rival. We explore how the degree of output security and the laggard's capacity to absorb state-of-the-art technology affect the range of technological distances that generate such traps for each type of technology.</abstract><pub>CESifo Group Munich</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Policy File, 2022
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_2747831410
source Policy File Index
subjects CESifo Group Munich
title Output Insecurity and Ownership Disputes as Barriers to Technology Diffusion
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A46%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AOXKD&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Output%20Insecurity%20and%20Ownership%20Disputes%20as%20Barriers%20to%20Technology%20Diffusion&rft.jtitle=Policy%20File&rft.au=Camacho,%20Oscar&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AOXKD%3E2747831410%3C/proquest_AOXKD%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_27478314103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747831410&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true