Loading…

AI and the Evolution of Biological National Security Risks

Not long after COVID-19 gave the world a glimpse of the catastrophic potential of biological events, experts began warning that rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) could augur a world of bioterrorism, unprecedented superviruses, and novel targeted bioweapons. These dire warnings have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policy File 2024
Main Authors: Drexel, Bill, Withers, Caleb
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Policy File
container_volume
creator Drexel, Bill
Withers, Caleb
description Not long after COVID-19 gave the world a glimpse of the catastrophic potential of biological events, experts began warning that rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) could augur a world of bioterrorism, unprecedented superviruses, and novel targeted bioweapons. These dire warnings have risen to the highest levels of industry and government, from the CEOs of the world's leading AI labs raising alarms about new technical capabilities for would-be bioterrorists, to Vice President Kamala Harris’s concern that AI-enabled bioweapons “could endanger the very existence of humanity.”1 If true, such developments would expose the United States to unprecedented catastrophic threats well beyond COVID-19’s scope of destruction. But assessing the degree to which these concerns are warranted—and what to do about them—requires weighing a range of complex factors, including: The history and current state of American biosecurity. The diverse ways in which AI could alter existing biosecurity risks. Which emerging technical AI capabilities would impact these risks. Where interventions today are needed. This report considers these factors to provide policymakers with a broad understanding of the evolving intersection of AI and biotechnology, along with actionable recommendations to curb the worst risks to national security from biological threats.
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AOXKD</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_3108192493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3108192493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_31081924933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLBy9FRIzEtRKMlIVXAty88pLcnMz1PIT1NwyszPyU_PTE7MUfBLBAkCGcGpyaVFmSWVCkGZxdnFPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcnNNcTZQ7egKL-wNLW4JL4otSC_qKQ43tjQwMLQ0sjE0tiYKEUAnaQwQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>3108192493</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>AI and the Evolution of Biological National Security Risks</title><source>Policy File Index</source><creator>Drexel, Bill ; Withers, Caleb</creator><creatorcontrib>Drexel, Bill ; Withers, Caleb</creatorcontrib><description>Not long after COVID-19 gave the world a glimpse of the catastrophic potential of biological events, experts began warning that rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) could augur a world of bioterrorism, unprecedented superviruses, and novel targeted bioweapons. These dire warnings have risen to the highest levels of industry and government, from the CEOs of the world's leading AI labs raising alarms about new technical capabilities for would-be bioterrorists, to Vice President Kamala Harris’s concern that AI-enabled bioweapons “could endanger the very existence of humanity.”1 If true, such developments would expose the United States to unprecedented catastrophic threats well beyond COVID-19’s scope of destruction. But assessing the degree to which these concerns are warranted—and what to do about them—requires weighing a range of complex factors, including: The history and current state of American biosecurity. The diverse ways in which AI could alter existing biosecurity risks. Which emerging technical AI capabilities would impact these risks. Where interventions today are needed. This report considers these factors to provide policymakers with a broad understanding of the evolving intersection of AI and biotechnology, along with actionable recommendations to curb the worst risks to national security from biological threats.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Center for a New American Security</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Biological &amp; chemical terrorism ; Biological &amp; chemical weapons ; National security ; Threat assessment</subject><ispartof>Policy File, 2024</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3108192493?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,4490,43748,73096,73101</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3108192493?pq-origsite=primo$$EView_record_in_ProQuest$$FView_record_in_$$GProQuest</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drexel, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Withers, Caleb</creatorcontrib><title>AI and the Evolution of Biological National Security Risks</title><title>Policy File</title><description>Not long after COVID-19 gave the world a glimpse of the catastrophic potential of biological events, experts began warning that rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) could augur a world of bioterrorism, unprecedented superviruses, and novel targeted bioweapons. These dire warnings have risen to the highest levels of industry and government, from the CEOs of the world's leading AI labs raising alarms about new technical capabilities for would-be bioterrorists, to Vice President Kamala Harris’s concern that AI-enabled bioweapons “could endanger the very existence of humanity.”1 If true, such developments would expose the United States to unprecedented catastrophic threats well beyond COVID-19’s scope of destruction. But assessing the degree to which these concerns are warranted—and what to do about them—requires weighing a range of complex factors, including: The history and current state of American biosecurity. The diverse ways in which AI could alter existing biosecurity risks. Which emerging technical AI capabilities would impact these risks. Where interventions today are needed. This report considers these factors to provide policymakers with a broad understanding of the evolving intersection of AI and biotechnology, along with actionable recommendations to curb the worst risks to national security from biological threats.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Biological &amp; chemical terrorism</subject><subject>Biological &amp; chemical weapons</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Threat assessment</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>ABWIU</sourceid><sourceid>AFVLS</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>AOXKD</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLBy9FRIzEtRKMlIVXAty88pLcnMz1PIT1NwyszPyU_PTE7MUfBLBAkCGcGpyaVFmSWVCkGZxdnFPAysaYk5xam8UJqbQcnNNcTZQ7egKL-wNLW4JL4otSC_qKQ43tjQwMLQ0sjE0tiYKEUAnaQwQg</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Drexel, Bill</creator><creator>Withers, Caleb</creator><general>Center for a New American Security</general><scope>ABWIU</scope><scope>AFVLS</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AOXKD</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>AI and the Evolution of Biological National Security Risks</title><author>Drexel, Bill ; Withers, Caleb</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_31081924933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Biological &amp; chemical terrorism</topic><topic>Biological &amp; chemical weapons</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Threat assessment</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drexel, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Withers, Caleb</creatorcontrib><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Policy File Index</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drexel, Bill</au><au>Withers, Caleb</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>AI and the Evolution of Biological National Security Risks</atitle><jtitle>Policy File</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Not long after COVID-19 gave the world a glimpse of the catastrophic potential of biological events, experts began warning that rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) could augur a world of bioterrorism, unprecedented superviruses, and novel targeted bioweapons. These dire warnings have risen to the highest levels of industry and government, from the CEOs of the world's leading AI labs raising alarms about new technical capabilities for would-be bioterrorists, to Vice President Kamala Harris’s concern that AI-enabled bioweapons “could endanger the very existence of humanity.”1 If true, such developments would expose the United States to unprecedented catastrophic threats well beyond COVID-19’s scope of destruction. But assessing the degree to which these concerns are warranted—and what to do about them—requires weighing a range of complex factors, including: The history and current state of American biosecurity. The diverse ways in which AI could alter existing biosecurity risks. Which emerging technical AI capabilities would impact these risks. Where interventions today are needed. This report considers these factors to provide policymakers with a broad understanding of the evolving intersection of AI and biotechnology, along with actionable recommendations to curb the worst risks to national security from biological threats.</abstract><pub>Center for a New American Security</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Policy File, 2024
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_3108192493
source Policy File Index
subjects Artificial intelligence
Biological & chemical terrorism
Biological & chemical weapons
National security
Threat assessment
title AI and the Evolution of Biological National Security Risks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A09%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AOXKD&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=AI%20and%20the%20Evolution%20of%20Biological%20National%20Security%20Risks&rft.jtitle=Policy%20File&rft.au=Drexel,%20Bill&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AOXKD%3E3108192493%3C/proquest_AOXKD%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_31081924933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3108192493&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true