Loading…
AM 2011-002: Dual Consolidated Loss Deducted Due to SRLY cumulative register - The SRLY Rules Wag the DCL Tail, But Should They?
In a generic legal advice memorandum, AM 2011-002, issued on Aug 1, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Chief Counsel addressed whether a dual consolidated loss (DCL) incurred by a hybrid entity separate unit may be taken into account in determining US consolidated taxable income (CTI...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tax Management International Journal 2012-03, Vol.41 (3), p.127 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Tax Management International Journal |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Nelson, Elizabeth Collins, Marty |
description | In a generic legal advice memorandum, AM 2011-002, issued on Aug 1, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Chief Counsel addressed whether a dual consolidated loss (DCL) incurred by a hybrid entity separate unit may be taken into account in determining US consolidated taxable income (CTI) in the taxable year in which the DCL was incurred absent a domestic use election. As discussed in this article, the AM effectively resolves a lingering uncertainty that had arisen from the language of the 2007 regulations, which some had interpreted to permit a deduction for a current year DCL of a particular separate unit (or dual resident corporation) if the separate unit's separate return limitation year (SRLY) cumulative register equalled or exceeded the loss of the separate unit for that taxable year. By issuing the AM, the Service continues to highlight the question of whether it is appropriate to cross-reference the increasingly complicated SRLY register rules to police cross-border "double-dips." |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_927748417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2608328851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_9277484173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNis1Kw0AURgdRMP68w3XvwJ10krRuRBOLi7hpA8VVGZprG5l26ty5gjsfXUt9AFeH73znRGWmsFZjVZpTlSFOUNsS8VxdML8jmrIoxpn6fniBHI3RiPkdNOI81GHHwQ-9S9RDG5ihoV5Wh9UIQQown7WvsJKteJeGT4JI64ETRdDQbeh4z8QTw8KtIf2qpm6hc4O_hUdJMN8E8f2h_bq_UmdvzjNd__FS3UyfuvpZ72P4EOK0jLQPMfFykleVHVtTjf7T_ACj8Ut4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927748417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AM 2011-002: Dual Consolidated Loss Deducted Due to SRLY cumulative register - The SRLY Rules Wag the DCL Tail, But Should They?</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><creator>Nelson, Elizabeth ; Collins, Marty</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Elizabeth ; Collins, Marty</creatorcontrib><description>In a generic legal advice memorandum, AM 2011-002, issued on Aug 1, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Chief Counsel addressed whether a dual consolidated loss (DCL) incurred by a hybrid entity separate unit may be taken into account in determining US consolidated taxable income (CTI) in the taxable year in which the DCL was incurred absent a domestic use election. As discussed in this article, the AM effectively resolves a lingering uncertainty that had arisen from the language of the 2007 regulations, which some had interpreted to permit a deduction for a current year DCL of a particular separate unit (or dual resident corporation) if the separate unit's separate return limitation year (SRLY) cumulative register equalled or exceeded the loss of the separate unit for that taxable year. By issuing the AM, the Service continues to highlight the question of whether it is appropriate to cross-reference the increasingly complicated SRLY register rules to police cross-border "double-dips."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4600</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-0761</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Bloomberg BNA</publisher><subject>Business operations ; Consolidated tax returns ; Disregarded entities ; Income taxes ; Losses ; Net income ; Net losses ; Net operating losses ; Taxable income ; Technical advice memoranda</subject><ispartof>Tax Management International Journal, 2012-03, Vol.41 (3), p.127</ispartof><rights>Copyright Bloomberg BNA Mar 9, 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/927748417?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791,15316,36062,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Marty</creatorcontrib><title>AM 2011-002: Dual Consolidated Loss Deducted Due to SRLY cumulative register - The SRLY Rules Wag the DCL Tail, But Should They?</title><title>Tax Management International Journal</title><description>In a generic legal advice memorandum, AM 2011-002, issued on Aug 1, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Chief Counsel addressed whether a dual consolidated loss (DCL) incurred by a hybrid entity separate unit may be taken into account in determining US consolidated taxable income (CTI) in the taxable year in which the DCL was incurred absent a domestic use election. As discussed in this article, the AM effectively resolves a lingering uncertainty that had arisen from the language of the 2007 regulations, which some had interpreted to permit a deduction for a current year DCL of a particular separate unit (or dual resident corporation) if the separate unit's separate return limitation year (SRLY) cumulative register equalled or exceeded the loss of the separate unit for that taxable year. By issuing the AM, the Service continues to highlight the question of whether it is appropriate to cross-reference the increasingly complicated SRLY register rules to police cross-border "double-dips."</description><subject>Business operations</subject><subject>Consolidated tax returns</subject><subject>Disregarded entities</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Losses</subject><subject>Net income</subject><subject>Net losses</subject><subject>Net operating losses</subject><subject>Taxable income</subject><subject>Technical advice memoranda</subject><issn>0090-4600</issn><issn>1544-0761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNis1Kw0AURgdRMP68w3XvwJ10krRuRBOLi7hpA8VVGZprG5l26ty5gjsfXUt9AFeH73znRGWmsFZjVZpTlSFOUNsS8VxdML8jmrIoxpn6fniBHI3RiPkdNOI81GHHwQ-9S9RDG5ihoV5Wh9UIQQown7WvsJKteJeGT4JI64ETRdDQbeh4z8QTw8KtIf2qpm6hc4O_hUdJMN8E8f2h_bq_UmdvzjNd__FS3UyfuvpZ72P4EOK0jLQPMfFykleVHVtTjf7T_ACj8Ut4</recordid><startdate>20120309</startdate><enddate>20120309</enddate><creator>Nelson, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Collins, Marty</creator><general>Bloomberg BNA</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120309</creationdate><title>AM 2011-002: Dual Consolidated Loss Deducted Due to SRLY cumulative register - The SRLY Rules Wag the DCL Tail, But Should They?</title><author>Nelson, Elizabeth ; Collins, Marty</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_9277484173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Business operations</topic><topic>Consolidated tax returns</topic><topic>Disregarded entities</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Losses</topic><topic>Net income</topic><topic>Net losses</topic><topic>Net operating losses</topic><topic>Taxable income</topic><topic>Technical advice memoranda</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Marty</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Tax Management International Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Elizabeth</au><au>Collins, Marty</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AM 2011-002: Dual Consolidated Loss Deducted Due to SRLY cumulative register - The SRLY Rules Wag the DCL Tail, But Should They?</atitle><jtitle>Tax Management International Journal</jtitle><date>2012-03-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>127</spage><pages>127-</pages><issn>0090-4600</issn><eissn>1544-0761</eissn><abstract>In a generic legal advice memorandum, AM 2011-002, issued on Aug 1, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Chief Counsel addressed whether a dual consolidated loss (DCL) incurred by a hybrid entity separate unit may be taken into account in determining US consolidated taxable income (CTI) in the taxable year in which the DCL was incurred absent a domestic use election. As discussed in this article, the AM effectively resolves a lingering uncertainty that had arisen from the language of the 2007 regulations, which some had interpreted to permit a deduction for a current year DCL of a particular separate unit (or dual resident corporation) if the separate unit's separate return limitation year (SRLY) cumulative register equalled or exceeded the loss of the separate unit for that taxable year. By issuing the AM, the Service continues to highlight the question of whether it is appropriate to cross-reference the increasingly complicated SRLY register rules to police cross-border "double-dips."</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Bloomberg BNA</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4600 |
ispartof | Tax Management International Journal, 2012-03, Vol.41 (3), p.127 |
issn | 0090-4600 1544-0761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_927748417 |
source | ABI/INFORM Collection |
subjects | Business operations Consolidated tax returns Disregarded entities Income taxes Losses Net income Net losses Net operating losses Taxable income Technical advice memoranda |
title | AM 2011-002: Dual Consolidated Loss Deducted Due to SRLY cumulative register - The SRLY Rules Wag the DCL Tail, But Should They? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A28%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AM%202011-002:%20Dual%20Consolidated%20Loss%20Deducted%20Due%20to%20SRLY%20cumulative%20register%20-%20The%20SRLY%20Rules%20Wag%20the%20DCL%20Tail,%20But%20Should%20They?&rft.jtitle=Tax%20Management%20International%20Journal&rft.au=Nelson,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2012-03-09&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=127&rft.pages=127-&rft.issn=0090-4600&rft.eissn=1544-0761&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2608328851%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_9277484173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927748417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |