Loading…

Hospital Mission and Cost Differences

The results show no significant differences on average length of stay, cost per patient day, or cost per admission among non-profit, government, and for-profit hospitals when controlling for bed capacities, occupancy rates, number of Medicare/Medicaid days, and hospitals without nurseries. For-profi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hospital topics 1989-05, Vol.67 (3), p.22-25
Main Author: Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-5d111ed6525077fead6dd365cebde0b335c5939f225ed17cc3a36a12e7561b8c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-5d111ed6525077fead6dd365cebde0b335c5939f225ed17cc3a36a12e7561b8c3
container_end_page 25
container_issue 3
container_start_page 22
container_title Hospital topics
container_volume 67
creator Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.
description The results show no significant differences on average length of stay, cost per patient day, or cost per admission among non-profit, government, and for-profit hospitals when controlling for bed capacities, occupancy rates, number of Medicare/Medicaid days, and hospitals without nurseries. For-profit hospital manhours per patient day were significantly lower than non-profit and government hospitals. This is an important finding because patient-care delivery is labor-intensive. A majority of for-profit hospitals do not have nurseries, which means that they should have more manhours per patient day. As indicated earlier, the manhours for hospitals with nurseries are higher than those for hospitals without nurseries. This indicates cost-cutting behavior on the part of a majority of for-profit hospitals. This method of limiting expenditures by decreasing labor costs associated with certain services is consistent with profit-maximization. The findings of this study with regard to cost differences among non-profit and for-profit hospitals contradict previous research. However, a recent study by Kralewski, Gifford and Porter (1988) noted that whereas ownership, when considered alone, differentiates hospitals, when evaluated within each community, most of the investor-owned and non-for-profit hospital differences disappear. Similar questions have been raised as to whether non-profit hospitals truly differ from for-profit hospitals (Pauly 1987). Caution needs to be exercised in attempting to extrapolate the findings of this study, because of the dynamic health care environment. Hospital ownership changes over time, reimbursement rules affect behavior, and internal factors in organizational operation affect outcomes. These should be considered in future studies exploring organizational mission and cost differences.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00185868.1989.10543654
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_10293600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79065205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-5d111ed6525077fead6dd365cebde0b335c5939f225ed17cc3a36a12e7561b8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_QulFb1uTTfOxx1I_KlS86DlkkwlEdjc12SL-e7NsC948DTM8M_PyIDQneEmwxPcYE8kkl0tSySqP2IpytjpDU1LRqqhKIc_RdICKgZqgq5Q-ce6FFJdoQnBZUY7xFN1uQ9r7XjeLV5-SD91Cd3axCalfPHjnIEJnIF2jC6ebBDfHOkMfT4_vm22xe3t-2ax3hSkl7gtmCSFgOSsZFsKBttzanMtAbQHXlDLDcjxXlgwsEcZQTbkmJQjGSS0NnaG78e4-hq8DpF61PhloGt1BOCQlKpyPY5ZBPoImhpQiOLWPvtXxRxGsBkHqJEgNgtRJUF6cHz8c6hbsn7XRSAbWI-A7F2Krv0NsrOr1TxOii7ozPin6z5NfNZZzvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79065205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hospital Mission and Cost Differences</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><description>The results show no significant differences on average length of stay, cost per patient day, or cost per admission among non-profit, government, and for-profit hospitals when controlling for bed capacities, occupancy rates, number of Medicare/Medicaid days, and hospitals without nurseries. For-profit hospital manhours per patient day were significantly lower than non-profit and government hospitals. This is an important finding because patient-care delivery is labor-intensive. A majority of for-profit hospitals do not have nurseries, which means that they should have more manhours per patient day. As indicated earlier, the manhours for hospitals with nurseries are higher than those for hospitals without nurseries. This indicates cost-cutting behavior on the part of a majority of for-profit hospitals. This method of limiting expenditures by decreasing labor costs associated with certain services is consistent with profit-maximization. The findings of this study with regard to cost differences among non-profit and for-profit hospitals contradict previous research. However, a recent study by Kralewski, Gifford and Porter (1988) noted that whereas ownership, when considered alone, differentiates hospitals, when evaluated within each community, most of the investor-owned and non-for-profit hospital differences disappear. Similar questions have been raised as to whether non-profit hospitals truly differ from for-profit hospitals (Pauly 1987). Caution needs to be exercised in attempting to extrapolate the findings of this study, because of the dynamic health care environment. Hospital ownership changes over time, reimbursement rules affect behavior, and internal factors in organizational operation affect outcomes. These should be considered in future studies exploring organizational mission and cost differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-5868</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00185868.1989.10543654</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10293600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Contraceptives, Oral, Combined ; Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Data Collection ; Florida ; Health administration ; Hospital Administration ; Hospital Bed Capacity, 100 to 299 ; Hospitals, Proprietary - organization &amp; administration ; Hospitals, Public - organization &amp; administration ; Hospitals, Voluntary - organization &amp; administration ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Models, Statistical ; Organization and Administration ; Organizational Objectives ; Ownership ; Regression Analysis</subject><ispartof>Hospital topics, 1989-05, Vol.67 (3), p.22-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-5d111ed6525077fead6dd365cebde0b335c5939f225ed17cc3a36a12e7561b8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-5d111ed6525077fead6dd365cebde0b335c5939f225ed17cc3a36a12e7561b8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10293600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Hospital Mission and Cost Differences</title><title>Hospital topics</title><addtitle>Hosp Top</addtitle><description>The results show no significant differences on average length of stay, cost per patient day, or cost per admission among non-profit, government, and for-profit hospitals when controlling for bed capacities, occupancy rates, number of Medicare/Medicaid days, and hospitals without nurseries. For-profit hospital manhours per patient day were significantly lower than non-profit and government hospitals. This is an important finding because patient-care delivery is labor-intensive. A majority of for-profit hospitals do not have nurseries, which means that they should have more manhours per patient day. As indicated earlier, the manhours for hospitals with nurseries are higher than those for hospitals without nurseries. This indicates cost-cutting behavior on the part of a majority of for-profit hospitals. This method of limiting expenditures by decreasing labor costs associated with certain services is consistent with profit-maximization. The findings of this study with regard to cost differences among non-profit and for-profit hospitals contradict previous research. However, a recent study by Kralewski, Gifford and Porter (1988) noted that whereas ownership, when considered alone, differentiates hospitals, when evaluated within each community, most of the investor-owned and non-for-profit hospital differences disappear. Similar questions have been raised as to whether non-profit hospitals truly differ from for-profit hospitals (Pauly 1987). Caution needs to be exercised in attempting to extrapolate the findings of this study, because of the dynamic health care environment. Hospital ownership changes over time, reimbursement rules affect behavior, and internal factors in organizational operation affect outcomes. These should be considered in future studies exploring organizational mission and cost differences.</description><subject>Contraceptives, Oral, Combined</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Hospital Administration</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity, 100 to 299</subject><subject>Hospitals, Proprietary - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Hospitals, Public - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Hospitals, Voluntary - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Organization and Administration</subject><subject>Organizational Objectives</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><issn>0018-5868</issn><issn>1939-9278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_QulFb1uTTfOxx1I_KlS86DlkkwlEdjc12SL-e7NsC948DTM8M_PyIDQneEmwxPcYE8kkl0tSySqP2IpytjpDU1LRqqhKIc_RdICKgZqgq5Q-ce6FFJdoQnBZUY7xFN1uQ9r7XjeLV5-SD91Cd3axCalfPHjnIEJnIF2jC6ebBDfHOkMfT4_vm22xe3t-2ax3hSkl7gtmCSFgOSsZFsKBttzanMtAbQHXlDLDcjxXlgwsEcZQTbkmJQjGSS0NnaG78e4-hq8DpF61PhloGt1BOCQlKpyPY5ZBPoImhpQiOLWPvtXxRxGsBkHqJEgNgtRJUF6cHz8c6hbsn7XRSAbWI-A7F2Krv0NsrOr1TxOii7ozPin6z5NfNZZzvA</recordid><startdate>198905</startdate><enddate>198905</enddate><creator>Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198905</creationdate><title>Hospital Mission and Cost Differences</title><author>Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-5d111ed6525077fead6dd365cebde0b335c5939f225ed17cc3a36a12e7561b8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Contraceptives, Oral, Combined</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Hospital Administration</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity, 100 to 299</topic><topic>Hospitals, Proprietary - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Hospitals, Public - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Hospitals, Voluntary - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Organization and Administration</topic><topic>Organizational Objectives</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hospital topics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sorrentino, Elizabeth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hospital Mission and Cost Differences</atitle><jtitle>Hospital topics</jtitle><addtitle>Hosp Top</addtitle><date>1989-05</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>22-25</pages><issn>0018-5868</issn><eissn>1939-9278</eissn><abstract>The results show no significant differences on average length of stay, cost per patient day, or cost per admission among non-profit, government, and for-profit hospitals when controlling for bed capacities, occupancy rates, number of Medicare/Medicaid days, and hospitals without nurseries. For-profit hospital manhours per patient day were significantly lower than non-profit and government hospitals. This is an important finding because patient-care delivery is labor-intensive. A majority of for-profit hospitals do not have nurseries, which means that they should have more manhours per patient day. As indicated earlier, the manhours for hospitals with nurseries are higher than those for hospitals without nurseries. This indicates cost-cutting behavior on the part of a majority of for-profit hospitals. This method of limiting expenditures by decreasing labor costs associated with certain services is consistent with profit-maximization. The findings of this study with regard to cost differences among non-profit and for-profit hospitals contradict previous research. However, a recent study by Kralewski, Gifford and Porter (1988) noted that whereas ownership, when considered alone, differentiates hospitals, when evaluated within each community, most of the investor-owned and non-for-profit hospital differences disappear. Similar questions have been raised as to whether non-profit hospitals truly differ from for-profit hospitals (Pauly 1987). Caution needs to be exercised in attempting to extrapolate the findings of this study, because of the dynamic health care environment. Hospital ownership changes over time, reimbursement rules affect behavior, and internal factors in organizational operation affect outcomes. These should be considered in future studies exploring organizational mission and cost differences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><pmid>10293600</pmid><doi>10.1080/00185868.1989.10543654</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-5868
ispartof Hospital topics, 1989-05, Vol.67 (3), p.22-25
issn 0018-5868
1939-9278
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_10293600
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate
subjects Contraceptives, Oral, Combined
Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data
Data Collection
Florida
Health administration
Hospital Administration
Hospital Bed Capacity, 100 to 299
Hospitals, Proprietary - organization & administration
Hospitals, Public - organization & administration
Hospitals, Voluntary - organization & administration
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Models, Statistical
Organization and Administration
Organizational Objectives
Ownership
Regression Analysis
title Hospital Mission and Cost Differences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A00%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hospital%20Mission%20and%20Cost%20Differences&rft.jtitle=Hospital%20topics&rft.au=Sorrentino,%20Elizabeth%20A.&rft.date=1989-05&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=22-25&rft.issn=0018-5868&rft.eissn=1939-9278&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00185868.1989.10543654&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79065205%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-5d111ed6525077fead6dd365cebde0b335c5939f225ed17cc3a36a12e7561b8c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79065205&rft_id=info:pmid/10293600&rfr_iscdi=true