Simple beam models for Monte Carlo photon beam dose calculations in radiotherapy

• Published in: Medical physics (Lancaster) 2000-12, Vol.27 (12), p.2739-2747
• Main Authors: Fix, Michael K., Keller, Harald, Rüegsegger, Peter, Born, Ernst J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: beam model; dosimetry; Dosimetry/exposure assessment; Electron scattering; Electrons; Field size; modelling; Monte Carlo Method; Monte Carlo methods; Monte Carlo simulation; Particle beams; Phase space methods; photon dose calculation; Photons; Physicists; radiation therapy; Scattering, Radiation; Spatial analysis; X‐ray applications
• ISSN: 0094-2405; 2473-4209
• DOI: 10.1118/1.1318220

Monte Carlo (code GEANT) produced 6 and 15 MV phase space (PS) data were used to define several simple photon beam models. For creating the PS data the energy of starting electrons hitting the target was tuned to get correct depth dose data compared to measurements. The modeling process used the full PS information within the geometrical boundaries of the beam including all scattered radiation of the accelerator head. Scattered radiation outside the boundaries was neglected. Photons and electrons were assumed to be radiated from point sources. Four different models were investigated which involved different ways to determine the energies and locations of beam particles in the output plane. Depth dose curves, profiles, and relative output factors were calculated with these models for six field sizes from 5×5 to 40×40  cm 2 and compared to measurements. Model 1 uses a photon energy spectrum independent of location in the PS plane and a constant photon fluence in this plane. Model 2 takes into account the spatial particle fluence distribution in the PS plane. A constant fluence is used again in model 3, but the photon energy spectrum depends upon the off axis position. Model 4, finally uses the spatial particle fluence distribution and off axis dependent photon energy spectra in the PS plane. Depth dose curves and profiles for field sizes up to 10×10  cm 2 were not model sensitive. Good agreement between measured and calculated depth dose curves and profiles for all field sizes was reached for model 4. However, increasing deviations were found for increasing field sizes for models 1–3. Large deviations resulted for the profiles of models 2 and 3. This is due to the fact that these models overestimate and underestimate the energy fluence at large off axis distances. Relative output factors consistent with measurements resulted only for model 4.