Loading…

Total trapezometacarpal prostheses: concepts and classification study

This paper is an attempt to classify the different types of trapezio-metacarpal total prostheses according to their bio-mechanical principle and to compare the bio-mechanics of these prostheses to that of the normal trapeziometacarpal joint. The trapeziometacarpal joint has two approximate centres o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chirurgie de la main 2001-02, Vol.20 (1), p.48
Main Authors: Comtet, J J, Rumelhart, C
Format: Article
Language:fre
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 48
container_title Chirurgie de la main
container_volume 20
creator Comtet, J J
Rumelhart, C
description This paper is an attempt to classify the different types of trapezio-metacarpal total prostheses according to their bio-mechanical principle and to compare the bio-mechanics of these prostheses to that of the normal trapeziometacarpal joint. The trapeziometacarpal joint has two approximate centres of rotation (one in the proximal metacarpal, one in the trapezium), two degrees of freedom and two arc of mobility about 70 degrees. The mechanical model of the trapeziometacarpal joint is a universal-joint called "cardan" with three constraint forces (one axial compression force, and two shear forces, radial and posterior) and one constraint moment around the longitudinal axis. The trapeziometacarpal prostheses may be classified in two main categories: the most frequently used are the "ball and socket" prostheses. Several prostheses, including the surface replacement prostheses have the mechanical characteristics of an universal joint (cardan). Ball and socket prostheses have one centre of rotation, 3 degrees of freedom, three constraint forces in three directions and no constraint moment when "cardan" or surface prostheses have two centres of rotation and 2 degrees of freedom; three constraint forces and one constraint moment. Trapeziometacarpal prostheses may also be classified according to their arc of mobility, or according to their mode of primary fixation (cemented, non-cemented), "press-fit", expansion and to their secondary fixation (hydroxyapatite).
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_11291318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11291318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_112913183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjcsKwjAQRbNQbH38guQHCnmAr61U_IDuy5hOMdI2ITNd1K-3C127unDOgbsQuTbnY2GNsplYE72UUlYdzEpkejba6lMuyiowdJITRHyHHhkcpDiTmALxEwnpIl0YHEYmCUMjXQdEvvUO2IdBEo_NtBXLFjrC3Xc3Yn8rq-u9iOOjx6aOyfeQpvr3a_8GH3a_OV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Total trapezometacarpal prostheses: concepts and classification study</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Comtet, J J ; Rumelhart, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Comtet, J J ; Rumelhart, C</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is an attempt to classify the different types of trapezio-metacarpal total prostheses according to their bio-mechanical principle and to compare the bio-mechanics of these prostheses to that of the normal trapeziometacarpal joint. The trapeziometacarpal joint has two approximate centres of rotation (one in the proximal metacarpal, one in the trapezium), two degrees of freedom and two arc of mobility about 70 degrees. The mechanical model of the trapeziometacarpal joint is a universal-joint called "cardan" with three constraint forces (one axial compression force, and two shear forces, radial and posterior) and one constraint moment around the longitudinal axis. The trapeziometacarpal prostheses may be classified in two main categories: the most frequently used are the "ball and socket" prostheses. Several prostheses, including the surface replacement prostheses have the mechanical characteristics of an universal joint (cardan). Ball and socket prostheses have one centre of rotation, 3 degrees of freedom, three constraint forces in three directions and no constraint moment when "cardan" or surface prostheses have two centres of rotation and 2 degrees of freedom; three constraint forces and one constraint moment. Trapeziometacarpal prostheses may also be classified according to their arc of mobility, or according to their mode of primary fixation (cemented, non-cemented), "press-fit", expansion and to their secondary fixation (hydroxyapatite).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1297-3203</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11291318</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Cements ; Carpal Bones - physiology ; Hand Strength - physiology ; Humans ; Joint Prosthesis - classification ; Metacarpophalangeal Joint - physiology ; Models, Biological ; Pronation - physiology ; Prosthesis Design - classification ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Rotation ; Supination - physiology ; Thumb - physiology</subject><ispartof>Chirurgie de la main, 2001-02, Vol.20 (1), p.48</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11291318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Comtet, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumelhart, C</creatorcontrib><title>Total trapezometacarpal prostheses: concepts and classification study</title><title>Chirurgie de la main</title><addtitle>Chir Main</addtitle><description>This paper is an attempt to classify the different types of trapezio-metacarpal total prostheses according to their bio-mechanical principle and to compare the bio-mechanics of these prostheses to that of the normal trapeziometacarpal joint. The trapeziometacarpal joint has two approximate centres of rotation (one in the proximal metacarpal, one in the trapezium), two degrees of freedom and two arc of mobility about 70 degrees. The mechanical model of the trapeziometacarpal joint is a universal-joint called "cardan" with three constraint forces (one axial compression force, and two shear forces, radial and posterior) and one constraint moment around the longitudinal axis. The trapeziometacarpal prostheses may be classified in two main categories: the most frequently used are the "ball and socket" prostheses. Several prostheses, including the surface replacement prostheses have the mechanical characteristics of an universal joint (cardan). Ball and socket prostheses have one centre of rotation, 3 degrees of freedom, three constraint forces in three directions and no constraint moment when "cardan" or surface prostheses have two centres of rotation and 2 degrees of freedom; three constraint forces and one constraint moment. Trapeziometacarpal prostheses may also be classified according to their arc of mobility, or according to their mode of primary fixation (cemented, non-cemented), "press-fit", expansion and to their secondary fixation (hydroxyapatite).</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Carpal Bones - physiology</subject><subject>Hand Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis - classification</subject><subject>Metacarpophalangeal Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Pronation - physiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - classification</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Supination - physiology</subject><subject>Thumb - physiology</subject><issn>1297-3203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjcsKwjAQRbNQbH38guQHCnmAr61U_IDuy5hOMdI2ITNd1K-3C127unDOgbsQuTbnY2GNsplYE72UUlYdzEpkejba6lMuyiowdJITRHyHHhkcpDiTmALxEwnpIl0YHEYmCUMjXQdEvvUO2IdBEo_NtBXLFjrC3Xc3Yn8rq-u9iOOjx6aOyfeQpvr3a_8GH3a_OV8</recordid><startdate>200102</startdate><enddate>200102</enddate><creator>Comtet, J J</creator><creator>Rumelhart, C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200102</creationdate><title>Total trapezometacarpal prostheses: concepts and classification study</title><author>Comtet, J J ; Rumelhart, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_112913183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Carpal Bones - physiology</topic><topic>Hand Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis - classification</topic><topic>Metacarpophalangeal Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Pronation - physiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - classification</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Supination - physiology</topic><topic>Thumb - physiology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comtet, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumelhart, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Chirurgie de la main</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comtet, J J</au><au>Rumelhart, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Total trapezometacarpal prostheses: concepts and classification study</atitle><jtitle>Chirurgie de la main</jtitle><addtitle>Chir Main</addtitle><date>2001-02</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><pages>48-</pages><issn>1297-3203</issn><abstract>This paper is an attempt to classify the different types of trapezio-metacarpal total prostheses according to their bio-mechanical principle and to compare the bio-mechanics of these prostheses to that of the normal trapeziometacarpal joint. The trapeziometacarpal joint has two approximate centres of rotation (one in the proximal metacarpal, one in the trapezium), two degrees of freedom and two arc of mobility about 70 degrees. The mechanical model of the trapeziometacarpal joint is a universal-joint called "cardan" with three constraint forces (one axial compression force, and two shear forces, radial and posterior) and one constraint moment around the longitudinal axis. The trapeziometacarpal prostheses may be classified in two main categories: the most frequently used are the "ball and socket" prostheses. Several prostheses, including the surface replacement prostheses have the mechanical characteristics of an universal joint (cardan). Ball and socket prostheses have one centre of rotation, 3 degrees of freedom, three constraint forces in three directions and no constraint moment when "cardan" or surface prostheses have two centres of rotation and 2 degrees of freedom; three constraint forces and one constraint moment. Trapeziometacarpal prostheses may also be classified according to their arc of mobility, or according to their mode of primary fixation (cemented, non-cemented), "press-fit", expansion and to their secondary fixation (hydroxyapatite).</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>11291318</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1297-3203
ispartof Chirurgie de la main, 2001-02, Vol.20 (1), p.48
issn 1297-3203
language fre
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_11291318
source Elsevier
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Cements
Carpal Bones - physiology
Hand Strength - physiology
Humans
Joint Prosthesis - classification
Metacarpophalangeal Joint - physiology
Models, Biological
Pronation - physiology
Prosthesis Design - classification
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Rotation
Supination - physiology
Thumb - physiology
title Total trapezometacarpal prostheses: concepts and classification study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total%20trapezometacarpal%20prostheses:%20concepts%20and%20classification%20study&rft.jtitle=Chirurgie%20de%20la%20main&rft.au=Comtet,%20J%20J&rft.date=2001-02&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.pages=48-&rft.issn=1297-3203&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E11291318%3C/pubmed%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_112913183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/11291318&rfr_iscdi=true