Compensator quality control with an amorphous silicon EPID

• Published in: Medical physics (Lancaster) 2003-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1816-1824
• Main Authors: Menon, Geetha V., Sloboda, Ron S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amorphous semiconductors; Ancillary equipment; a‐Si EPID; calibration; Calibration - standards; compensator; diagnostic radiography; Elemental semiconductors; EPID scatter factor; Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation; Equipment Failure Analysis - methods; Feasibility Studies; Field size; Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters; Image guided radiation therapy; ionisation chambers; Ionization chambers; phantoms; Physicists; Quality assurance; Quality assurance equipment; Quality assurance in radiotherapy; Quality Control; radiation therapy; Radiometry - instrumentation; Radiometry - methods; Radiometry - standards; Radiotherapy - instrumentation; Radiotherapy - methods; Radiotherapy - standards; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards; Reproducibility of Results; Scattering, Radiation; Sensitivity and Specificity; Silicon - radiation effects; Transducers; Units and standards; Verification; X-Ray Intensifying Screens
• ISSN: 0094-2405; 2473-4209
• DOI: 10.1118/1.1584040

The calibration and quality control of compensators is conventionally performed with an ion chamber in a water-equivalent phantom. In our center, the compensator factor and four off-axis fluence ratios are measured to verify the central axis beam modulation and orientation of the compensator. Here we report the investigation of an alternative technique for compensator quality control using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID). Preliminary experiments were performed to identify appropriate EPID operating parameters for this relative dosimetric study and also to quantify EPID operation. The pixel value versus energy fluence response of the EPID for both open and compensated fields was then determined, and expressed via calibration curves. For open fields the response was seen to be linear, whereas for compensated fields it exhibited a small quadratic component. To account for field size effects, we measured EPID scatter factors. These exhibited small but non-negligible dependencies on compensator thickness and source–detector distance. Finally, a number of test and clinical compensators were evaluated to assess the suitability of the EPID for compensator quality control. Our results indicate that the a-Si EPID can measure clinical compensator factors and off-axis energy fluence ratios to within 2% of values measured by a Farmer chamber on average, and so is a suitable ion chamber replacement.