Loading…

Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niaga...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic entomology 2004-04, Vol.97 (2), p.482-489
Main Authors: Trimble, R. M., Pree, D. J., Barszcz, E. S., Carter, N. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 489
container_issue 2
container_start_page 482
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 97
creator Trimble, R. M.
Pree, D. J.
Barszcz, E. S.
Carter, N. J.
description The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niagara Peninsula farms during 2000–2002. In the integrated programs, chlorpyrifos and mating disruption with 3M Sprayable Pheromone, Isomate OFM Rosso, or Rak 5 hand-applied dispensers were used to control first-generation larvae, and mating disruption alone was used to control second- and third-generation larvae. In the conventional program, chlorpyrifos was used to control first-generation larvae, and pyrethroid insecticides were used to control larvae of the later generations. All programs were effective at maintaining fruit infestation by G. molesta below the industry tolerance level of 1%. An integrated program using sprayable pheromone required the use of more supplementary insecticide applications to control second- and third-generation larvae than a program using hand-applied dispensers. The elimination of insecticide sprays from integrated program blocks did not result in an increase in damage by plant bugs, Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) or by the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).
doi_str_mv 10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.482
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_15154471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15154471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1251-36e475c7ac7027b574fdc19dfc4667f76b0fe3db08a9cab5e1c3c2dc1fc324ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0c9O3DAQBnALtSpb6AtwqHypRA9Z_CeJN9zQ0i1Ii0DqIvUWTZxx1yixLdsrxDvxkM0KWjjNHH6akb6PkBPO5rxm8owxIQpWNrJo1FzMy4U4IDPeyEUhGv77A5n9B4fkc0oPjPFacPaJHPKKV2Wp-Iw8L_0YINrkHfWGAv0VIjxBNyC922L0o3dIVz6OuwGynRC4nm4ePb2aluIihMFi_45e2hTQJYyJGh_vE1LraN4ivXYZ_0TIk156l6Mf9v9uo0WXYaCruLOZ3vi8padrDLb3IWOEc7rxMUerbQ_4_Zh8NDAk_PI6j8j96sdmeVWsb39eLy_WRcdFxQtZY6kqrUArJlRXqdL0mje90WVdK6PqjhmUfccW0GjoKuRaajERo6UoNcgj8vXlbth1I_ZtiHaE-NT-i20C314BJA2DieC0Te9cXVeVkpNjL66zfkrnDbB232C7L6jdF9Q2qhXt1KD8C1xbjrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Trimble, R. M. ; Pree, D. J. ; Barszcz, E. S. ; Carter, N. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trimble, R. M. ; Pree, D. J. ; Barszcz, E. S. ; Carter, N. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niagara Peninsula farms during 2000–2002. In the integrated programs, chlorpyrifos and mating disruption with 3M Sprayable Pheromone, Isomate OFM Rosso, or Rak 5 hand-applied dispensers were used to control first-generation larvae, and mating disruption alone was used to control second- and third-generation larvae. In the conventional program, chlorpyrifos was used to control first-generation larvae, and pyrethroid insecticides were used to control larvae of the later generations. All programs were effective at maintaining fruit infestation by G. molesta below the industry tolerance level of 1%. An integrated program using sprayable pheromone required the use of more supplementary insecticide applications to control second- and third-generation larvae than a program using hand-applied dispensers. The elimination of insecticide sprays from integrated program blocks did not result in an increase in damage by plant bugs, Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) or by the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.482</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15154471</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlorpyrifos - administration &amp; dosage ; Control ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; Grapholita molesta ; HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY ; Insect Control - instrumentation ; Insect Control - methods ; Insecticides - administration &amp; dosage ; integrated pest management ; Larva ; mating disruption ; Moths ; peach ; Pheromones - administration &amp; dosage ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Prunus ; Pyrethrins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2004-04, Vol.97 (2), p.482-489</ispartof><rights>Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15665573$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15154471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trimble, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pree, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barszcz, E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, N. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niagara Peninsula farms during 2000–2002. In the integrated programs, chlorpyrifos and mating disruption with 3M Sprayable Pheromone, Isomate OFM Rosso, or Rak 5 hand-applied dispensers were used to control first-generation larvae, and mating disruption alone was used to control second- and third-generation larvae. In the conventional program, chlorpyrifos was used to control first-generation larvae, and pyrethroid insecticides were used to control larvae of the later generations. All programs were effective at maintaining fruit infestation by G. molesta below the industry tolerance level of 1%. An integrated program using sprayable pheromone required the use of more supplementary insecticide applications to control second- and third-generation larvae than a program using hand-applied dispensers. The elimination of insecticide sprays from integrated program blocks did not result in an increase in damage by plant bugs, Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) or by the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlorpyrifos - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Grapholita molesta</subject><subject>HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY</subject><subject>Insect Control - instrumentation</subject><subject>Insect Control - methods</subject><subject>Insecticides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>integrated pest management</subject><subject>Larva</subject><subject>mating disruption</subject><subject>Moths</subject><subject>peach</subject><subject>Pheromones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Prunus</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpN0c9O3DAQBnALtSpb6AtwqHypRA9Z_CeJN9zQ0i1Ii0DqIvUWTZxx1yixLdsrxDvxkM0KWjjNHH6akb6PkBPO5rxm8owxIQpWNrJo1FzMy4U4IDPeyEUhGv77A5n9B4fkc0oPjPFacPaJHPKKV2Wp-Iw8L_0YINrkHfWGAv0VIjxBNyC922L0o3dIVz6OuwGynRC4nm4ePb2aluIihMFi_45e2hTQJYyJGh_vE1LraN4ivXYZ_0TIk156l6Mf9v9uo0WXYaCruLOZ3vi8padrDLb3IWOEc7rxMUerbQ_4_Zh8NDAk_PI6j8j96sdmeVWsb39eLy_WRcdFxQtZY6kqrUArJlRXqdL0mje90WVdK6PqjhmUfccW0GjoKuRaajERo6UoNcgj8vXlbth1I_ZtiHaE-NT-i20C314BJA2DieC0Te9cXVeVkpNjL66zfkrnDbB232C7L6jdF9Q2qhXt1KD8C1xbjrg</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Trimble, R. M.</creator><creator>Pree, D. J.</creator><creator>Barszcz, E. S.</creator><creator>Carter, N. J.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><author>Trimble, R. M. ; Pree, D. J. ; Barszcz, E. S. ; Carter, N. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1251-36e475c7ac7027b574fdc19dfc4667f76b0fe3db08a9cab5e1c3c2dc1fc324ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlorpyrifos - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Grapholita molesta</topic><topic>HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY</topic><topic>Insect Control - instrumentation</topic><topic>Insect Control - methods</topic><topic>Insecticides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>integrated pest management</topic><topic>Larva</topic><topic>mating disruption</topic><topic>Moths</topic><topic>peach</topic><topic>Pheromones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Prunus</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trimble, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pree, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barszcz, E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, N. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trimble, R. M.</au><au>Pree, D. J.</au><au>Barszcz, E. S.</au><au>Carter, N. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>482</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>482-489</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niagara Peninsula farms during 2000–2002. In the integrated programs, chlorpyrifos and mating disruption with 3M Sprayable Pheromone, Isomate OFM Rosso, or Rak 5 hand-applied dispensers were used to control first-generation larvae, and mating disruption alone was used to control second- and third-generation larvae. In the conventional program, chlorpyrifos was used to control first-generation larvae, and pyrethroid insecticides were used to control larvae of the later generations. All programs were effective at maintaining fruit infestation by G. molesta below the industry tolerance level of 1%. An integrated program using sprayable pheromone required the use of more supplementary insecticide applications to control second- and third-generation larvae than a program using hand-applied dispensers. The elimination of insecticide sprays from integrated program blocks did not result in an increase in damage by plant bugs, Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) or by the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>15154471</pmid><doi>10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.482</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2004-04, Vol.97 (2), p.482-489
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_15154471
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Chlorpyrifos - administration & dosage
Control
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities
Grapholita molesta
HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY
Insect Control - instrumentation
Insect Control - methods
Insecticides - administration & dosage
integrated pest management
Larva
mating disruption
Moths
peach
Pheromones - administration & dosage
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Protozoa. Invertebrates
Prunus
Pyrethrins - administration & dosage
title Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A39%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20Sprayable%20Pheromone%20Formulation%20and%20Two%20Hand-Applied%20Pheromone%20Dispensers%20forUse%20in%20the%20Integrated%20Control%20of%20Oriental%20Fruit%20Moth%20(Lepidoptera:%20Tortricidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Trimble,%20R.%20M.&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=482&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=482-489&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.482&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_pasca%3E15154471%3C/pubmed_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1251-36e475c7ac7027b574fdc19dfc4667f76b0fe3db08a9cab5e1c3c2dc1fc324ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15154471&rfr_iscdi=true