Loading…
Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niaga...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of economic entomology 2004-04, Vol.97 (2), p.482-489 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 489 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 482 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Trimble, R. M. Pree, D. J. Barszcz, E. S. Carter, N. J. |
description | The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niagara Peninsula farms during 2000–2002. In the integrated programs, chlorpyrifos and mating disruption with 3M Sprayable Pheromone, Isomate OFM Rosso, or Rak 5 hand-applied dispensers were used to control first-generation larvae, and mating disruption alone was used to control second- and third-generation larvae. In the conventional program, chlorpyrifos was used to control first-generation larvae, and pyrethroid insecticides were used to control larvae of the later generations. All programs were effective at maintaining fruit infestation by G. molesta below the industry tolerance level of 1%. An integrated program using sprayable pheromone required the use of more supplementary insecticide applications to control second- and third-generation larvae than a program using hand-applied dispensers. The elimination of insecticide sprays from integrated program blocks did not result in an increase in damage by plant bugs, Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) or by the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.482 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_15154471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15154471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1251-36e475c7ac7027b574fdc19dfc4667f76b0fe3db08a9cab5e1c3c2dc1fc324ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0c9O3DAQBnALtSpb6AtwqHypRA9Z_CeJN9zQ0i1Ii0DqIvUWTZxx1yixLdsrxDvxkM0KWjjNHH6akb6PkBPO5rxm8owxIQpWNrJo1FzMy4U4IDPeyEUhGv77A5n9B4fkc0oPjPFacPaJHPKKV2Wp-Iw8L_0YINrkHfWGAv0VIjxBNyC922L0o3dIVz6OuwGynRC4nm4ePb2aluIihMFi_45e2hTQJYyJGh_vE1LraN4ivXYZ_0TIk156l6Mf9v9uo0WXYaCruLOZ3vi8padrDLb3IWOEc7rxMUerbQ_4_Zh8NDAk_PI6j8j96sdmeVWsb39eLy_WRcdFxQtZY6kqrUArJlRXqdL0mje90WVdK6PqjhmUfccW0GjoKuRaajERo6UoNcgj8vXlbth1I_ZtiHaE-NT-i20C314BJA2DieC0Te9cXVeVkpNjL66zfkrnDbB232C7L6jdF9Q2qhXt1KD8C1xbjrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Trimble, R. M. ; Pree, D. J. ; Barszcz, E. S. ; Carter, N. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trimble, R. M. ; Pree, D. J. ; Barszcz, E. S. ; Carter, N. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niagara Peninsula farms during 2000–2002. In the integrated programs, chlorpyrifos and mating disruption with 3M Sprayable Pheromone, Isomate OFM Rosso, or Rak 5 hand-applied dispensers were used to control first-generation larvae, and mating disruption alone was used to control second- and third-generation larvae. In the conventional program, chlorpyrifos was used to control first-generation larvae, and pyrethroid insecticides were used to control larvae of the later generations. All programs were effective at maintaining fruit infestation by G. molesta below the industry tolerance level of 1%. An integrated program using sprayable pheromone required the use of more supplementary insecticide applications to control second- and third-generation larvae than a program using hand-applied dispensers. The elimination of insecticide sprays from integrated program blocks did not result in an increase in damage by plant bugs, Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) or by the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.482</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15154471</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlorpyrifos - administration & dosage ; Control ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; Grapholita molesta ; HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY ; Insect Control - instrumentation ; Insect Control - methods ; Insecticides - administration & dosage ; integrated pest management ; Larva ; mating disruption ; Moths ; peach ; Pheromones - administration & dosage ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; Prunus ; Pyrethrins - administration & dosage</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2004-04, Vol.97 (2), p.482-489</ispartof><rights>Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15665573$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15154471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trimble, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pree, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barszcz, E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, N. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niagara Peninsula farms during 2000–2002. In the integrated programs, chlorpyrifos and mating disruption with 3M Sprayable Pheromone, Isomate OFM Rosso, or Rak 5 hand-applied dispensers were used to control first-generation larvae, and mating disruption alone was used to control second- and third-generation larvae. In the conventional program, chlorpyrifos was used to control first-generation larvae, and pyrethroid insecticides were used to control larvae of the later generations. All programs were effective at maintaining fruit infestation by G. molesta below the industry tolerance level of 1%. An integrated program using sprayable pheromone required the use of more supplementary insecticide applications to control second- and third-generation larvae than a program using hand-applied dispensers. The elimination of insecticide sprays from integrated program blocks did not result in an increase in damage by plant bugs, Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) or by the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlorpyrifos - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Grapholita molesta</subject><subject>HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY</subject><subject>Insect Control - instrumentation</subject><subject>Insect Control - methods</subject><subject>Insecticides - administration & dosage</subject><subject>integrated pest management</subject><subject>Larva</subject><subject>mating disruption</subject><subject>Moths</subject><subject>peach</subject><subject>Pheromones - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>Prunus</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - administration & dosage</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpN0c9O3DAQBnALtSpb6AtwqHypRA9Z_CeJN9zQ0i1Ii0DqIvUWTZxx1yixLdsrxDvxkM0KWjjNHH6akb6PkBPO5rxm8owxIQpWNrJo1FzMy4U4IDPeyEUhGv77A5n9B4fkc0oPjPFacPaJHPKKV2Wp-Iw8L_0YINrkHfWGAv0VIjxBNyC922L0o3dIVz6OuwGynRC4nm4ePb2aluIihMFi_45e2hTQJYyJGh_vE1LraN4ivXYZ_0TIk156l6Mf9v9uo0WXYaCruLOZ3vi8padrDLb3IWOEc7rxMUerbQ_4_Zh8NDAk_PI6j8j96sdmeVWsb39eLy_WRcdFxQtZY6kqrUArJlRXqdL0mje90WVdK6PqjhmUfccW0GjoKuRaajERo6UoNcgj8vXlbth1I_ZtiHaE-NT-i20C314BJA2DieC0Te9cXVeVkpNjL66zfkrnDbB232C7L6jdF9Q2qhXt1KD8C1xbjrg</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Trimble, R. M.</creator><creator>Pree, D. J.</creator><creator>Barszcz, E. S.</creator><creator>Carter, N. J.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</title><author>Trimble, R. M. ; Pree, D. J. ; Barszcz, E. S. ; Carter, N. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1251-36e475c7ac7027b574fdc19dfc4667f76b0fe3db08a9cab5e1c3c2dc1fc324ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlorpyrifos - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Grapholita molesta</topic><topic>HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY</topic><topic>Insect Control - instrumentation</topic><topic>Insect Control - methods</topic><topic>Insecticides - administration & dosage</topic><topic>integrated pest management</topic><topic>Larva</topic><topic>mating disruption</topic><topic>Moths</topic><topic>peach</topic><topic>Pheromones - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>Prunus</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trimble, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pree, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barszcz, E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, N. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trimble, R. M.</au><au>Pree, D. J.</au><au>Barszcz, E. S.</au><au>Carter, N. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>482</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>482-489</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>The efficacy of integrated programs using a sprayable pheromone formulation or one of two hand-applied pheromone dispensers, and a conventional oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control program, was compared using 4–5-ha blocks of peach orchard at three Niagara Peninsula farms during 2000–2002. In the integrated programs, chlorpyrifos and mating disruption with 3M Sprayable Pheromone, Isomate OFM Rosso, or Rak 5 hand-applied dispensers were used to control first-generation larvae, and mating disruption alone was used to control second- and third-generation larvae. In the conventional program, chlorpyrifos was used to control first-generation larvae, and pyrethroid insecticides were used to control larvae of the later generations. All programs were effective at maintaining fruit infestation by G. molesta below the industry tolerance level of 1%. An integrated program using sprayable pheromone required the use of more supplementary insecticide applications to control second- and third-generation larvae than a program using hand-applied dispensers. The elimination of insecticide sprays from integrated program blocks did not result in an increase in damage by plant bugs, Lygus spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) or by the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>15154471</pmid><doi>10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.482</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2004-04, Vol.97 (2), p.482-489 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_15154471 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Chlorpyrifos - administration & dosage Control Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities Grapholita molesta HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Insect Control - instrumentation Insect Control - methods Insecticides - administration & dosage integrated pest management Larva mating disruption Moths peach Pheromones - administration & dosage Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Protozoa. Invertebrates Prunus Pyrethrins - administration & dosage |
title | Comparison of a Sprayable Pheromone Formulation and Two Hand-Applied Pheromone Dispensers forUse in the Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A39%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20Sprayable%20Pheromone%20Formulation%20and%20Two%20Hand-Applied%20Pheromone%20Dispensers%20forUse%20in%20the%20Integrated%20Control%20of%20Oriental%20Fruit%20Moth%20(Lepidoptera:%20Tortricidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Trimble,%20R.%20M.&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=482&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=482-489&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.482&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_pasca%3E15154471%3C/pubmed_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1251-36e475c7ac7027b574fdc19dfc4667f76b0fe3db08a9cab5e1c3c2dc1fc324ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15154471&rfr_iscdi=true |