Loading…
Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital
To determine the outcome of induction of labour for women who had had previous caesarean sections, we identified all women who had induction of labour at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between January 1994 and September 2001. During the study period, there were 43 175 deliveries and 8761 inductions o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2004-04, Vol.24 (3), p.264-265 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b448266d9b6c5787b6195b961da0ce05e4e5cf36e707ce507cb20ceee56129253 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b448266d9b6c5787b6195b961da0ce05e4e5cf36e707ce507cb20ceee56129253 |
container_end_page | 265 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 264 |
container_title | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Chilaka, VN Cole, MY Habayeb, OMH Konje, JC |
description | To determine the outcome of induction of labour for women who had had previous caesarean sections, we identified all women who had induction of labour at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between January 1994 and September 2001. During the study period, there were 43 175 deliveries and 8761 inductions of labour (20.3%). Of these, 5047 (57.6%) were induced with prostaglandins and 138 women in this group had a previous caesarean section but eight were excluded from the analysis because of induction for early intrauterine death (five) and late terminations for fetal anomalies (three). The remaining 130 women formed the study group. Induction of labour resulted in spontaneous vaginal delivery in 50% of cases, with 11% requiring instrumental delivery and 39% had caesarean sections. There were no cases of uterine rupture in this series. We conclude that prostaglandins are safe for inducing labour in women with previous caesarean sections, but should be administered with caution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01443610410001660751 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_15203621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>839038111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b448266d9b6c5787b6195b961da0ce05e4e5cf36e707ce507cb20ceee56129253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVGL1TAQhYMo7t3VfyASfPCtmmmTtH1RlsVVcUEQ9zmk6XSbNW1qknrZN3-6KffCooi-zMDkOyczHEKeAXsFrGGvGXBeSWAcGGMgJasFPCA7qCQvZNNWD8luQ4rMiBNyGuPtxjHBH5MTECWrZAk78vOLjd-oH-iaMNgZaViXtAakg3fO7-18Q-3cryZZP2-Y051fQ57RvZ8wV5tGqukS8If1a6RGY9QB9UwjHkQZ1VkWbpBef6IJtRk319HHxSbtnpBHg3YRnx77Gbm-fPf14kNx9fn9x4vzq8JUQqai47wppezbThpRN3UnoRVdK6HXzCATyFGYoZJYs9qgyKUr8wOikFC2pajOyMuD7xL89xVjUpONBp3TM-bFlZQy-8omgy_-AG_zxXPeTZUgamgAIEP8AJngYww4qCXYSYc7BUxt8ai_xZNlz4_eazdhfy865pGBtwfAzoMPk9774HqV9J3zYQh6Njaq6j9fvPnNYUTt0mhyJvd3_NPgF41ssaE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215718111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Chilaka, VN ; Cole, MY ; Habayeb, OMH ; Konje, JC</creator><creatorcontrib>Chilaka, VN ; Cole, MY ; Habayeb, OMH ; Konje, JC</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the outcome of induction of labour for women who had had previous caesarean sections, we identified all women who had induction of labour at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between January 1994 and September 2001. During the study period, there were 43 175 deliveries and 8761 inductions of labour (20.3%). Of these, 5047 (57.6%) were induced with prostaglandins and 138 women in this group had a previous caesarean section but eight were excluded from the analysis because of induction for early intrauterine death (five) and late terminations for fetal anomalies (three). The remaining 130 women formed the study group. Induction of labour resulted in spontaneous vaginal delivery in 50% of cases, with 11% requiring instrumental delivery and 39% had caesarean sections. There were no cases of uterine rupture in this series. We conclude that prostaglandins are safe for inducing labour in women with previous caesarean sections, but should be administered with caution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-6893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01443610410001660751</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15203621</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOGYDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Cesarean section ; England - epidemiology ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Health risk assessment ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Induced labor ; Labor, Induced - adverse effects ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Reproductive system ; Uterine Rupture - epidemiology ; Uterine Rupture - etiology ; Vaginal Birth after Cesarean</subject><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2004-04, Vol.24 (3), p.264-265</ispartof><rights>2004 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b448266d9b6c5787b6195b961da0ce05e4e5cf36e707ce507cb20ceee56129253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b448266d9b6c5787b6195b961da0ce05e4e5cf36e707ce507cb20ceee56129253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15203621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chilaka, VN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, MY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habayeb, OMH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konje, JC</creatorcontrib><title>Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>To determine the outcome of induction of labour for women who had had previous caesarean sections, we identified all women who had induction of labour at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between January 1994 and September 2001. During the study period, there were 43 175 deliveries and 8761 inductions of labour (20.3%). Of these, 5047 (57.6%) were induced with prostaglandins and 138 women in this group had a previous caesarean section but eight were excluded from the analysis because of induction for early intrauterine death (five) and late terminations for fetal anomalies (three). The remaining 130 women formed the study group. Induction of labour resulted in spontaneous vaginal delivery in 50% of cases, with 11% requiring instrumental delivery and 39% had caesarean sections. There were no cases of uterine rupture in this series. We conclude that prostaglandins are safe for inducing labour in women with previous caesarean sections, but should be administered with caution.</description><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Induced labor</subject><subject>Labor, Induced - adverse effects</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive system</subject><subject>Uterine Rupture - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Rupture - etiology</subject><subject>Vaginal Birth after Cesarean</subject><issn>0144-3615</issn><issn>1364-6893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkVGL1TAQhYMo7t3VfyASfPCtmmmTtH1RlsVVcUEQ9zmk6XSbNW1qknrZN3-6KffCooi-zMDkOyczHEKeAXsFrGGvGXBeSWAcGGMgJasFPCA7qCQvZNNWD8luQ4rMiBNyGuPtxjHBH5MTECWrZAk78vOLjd-oH-iaMNgZaViXtAakg3fO7-18Q-3cryZZP2-Y051fQ57RvZ8wV5tGqukS8If1a6RGY9QB9UwjHkQZ1VkWbpBef6IJtRk319HHxSbtnpBHg3YRnx77Gbm-fPf14kNx9fn9x4vzq8JUQqai47wppezbThpRN3UnoRVdK6HXzCATyFGYoZJYs9qgyKUr8wOikFC2pajOyMuD7xL89xVjUpONBp3TM-bFlZQy-8omgy_-AG_zxXPeTZUgamgAIEP8AJngYww4qCXYSYc7BUxt8ai_xZNlz4_eazdhfy865pGBtwfAzoMPk9774HqV9J3zYQh6Njaq6j9fvPnNYUTt0mhyJvd3_NPgF41ssaE</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Chilaka, VN</creator><creator>Cole, MY</creator><creator>Habayeb, OMH</creator><creator>Konje, JC</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital</title><author>Chilaka, VN ; Cole, MY ; Habayeb, OMH ; Konje, JC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b448266d9b6c5787b6195b961da0ce05e4e5cf36e707ce507cb20ceee56129253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Induced labor</topic><topic>Labor, Induced - adverse effects</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive system</topic><topic>Uterine Rupture - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Rupture - etiology</topic><topic>Vaginal Birth after Cesarean</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chilaka, VN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, MY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habayeb, OMH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konje, JC</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chilaka, VN</au><au>Cole, MY</au><au>Habayeb, OMH</au><au>Konje, JC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>264</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>264-265</pages><issn>0144-3615</issn><eissn>1364-6893</eissn><coden>JOGYDW</coden><abstract>To determine the outcome of induction of labour for women who had had previous caesarean sections, we identified all women who had induction of labour at the Leicester Royal Infirmary between January 1994 and September 2001. During the study period, there were 43 175 deliveries and 8761 inductions of labour (20.3%). Of these, 5047 (57.6%) were induced with prostaglandins and 138 women in this group had a previous caesarean section but eight were excluded from the analysis because of induction for early intrauterine death (five) and late terminations for fetal anomalies (three). The remaining 130 women formed the study group. Induction of labour resulted in spontaneous vaginal delivery in 50% of cases, with 11% requiring instrumental delivery and 39% had caesarean sections. There were no cases of uterine rupture in this series. We conclude that prostaglandins are safe for inducing labour in women with previous caesarean sections, but should be administered with caution.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>15203621</pmid><doi>10.1080/01443610410001660751</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-3615 |
ispartof | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2004-04, Vol.24 (3), p.264-265 |
issn | 0144-3615 1364-6893 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_15203621 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Cesarean section England - epidemiology Female Gestational Age Health risk assessment Hospitals, Teaching Humans Induced labor Labor, Induced - adverse effects Obstetrics Pregnancy Reproductive system Uterine Rupture - epidemiology Uterine Rupture - etiology Vaginal Birth after Cesarean |
title | Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A30%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20of%20uterine%20rupture%20following%20induction%20of%20labour%20in%20women%20with%20a%20previous%20caesarean%20section%20in%20a%20large%20UK%20teaching%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Chilaka,%20VN&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=264&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=264-265&rft.issn=0144-3615&rft.eissn=1364-6893&rft.coden=JOGYDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01443610410001660751&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E839038111%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b448266d9b6c5787b6195b961da0ce05e4e5cf36e707ce507cb20ceee56129253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215718111&rft_id=info:pmid/15203621&rfr_iscdi=true |