Children and young adults in a prolonged unconscious state due to severe brain injury: Outcome after an early intensive neurorehabilitation programme

• Published in: Brain injury 2005-06, Vol.19 (6), p.425-436
• Main Authors: Eilander, H. J., Wijnen, V. J. M., Scheirs, J. G. M., de Kort, P. L. M., Prevo, A. J. H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Age Distribution; Brain Injuries - complications; Brain Injuries - rehabilitation; Child; Child, Preschool; children; Consciousness; Critical Care - methods; early intensive neurorehabilitation; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; minimally consciousness; outcome; Persistent Vegetative State - etiology; Persistent Vegetative State - physiopathology; Persistent Vegetative State - rehabilitation; Referral and Consultation; Retrospective Studies; Severe brain injury; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Unconsciousness - etiology; Unconsciousness - physiopathology; Unconsciousness - rehabilitation; vegetative state; young adults
• ISSN: 0269-9052; 1362-301X
• DOI: 10.1080/02699050400025299

Primary objective. The Rehabilitation Centre Leijpark in the Netherlands provides an Early Intensive Neurorehabilitation Programme (EINP) to children and young adults in a prolonged unconscious state after severe brain injury. In an extensive research project the effects of EINP were studied. This part of the project focused on the outcome in terms of level of consciousness (LOC) in relation to the specific characteristics of a retrospectively studied cohort. Research design. This study was executed according to a one-group archived pre-test-post-test design. Subjects. Subjects were all consecutively admitted patients (n = 145, 72% male) between December 1987-January 2001. Inclusion criteria were: age 0-25 years, within 6 months after injury, LOC at admission vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS). One hundred and four patients (72%) suffered a traumatic injury and 41 patients (28%) a non-traumatic injury. Methods and procedures. All patients had received EINP until they reached consciousness or until it was concluded that no progress was achieved during 3 months after the start of EINP. Medical files were investigated to collect the patients' characteristics and injury data, to determine the LOC at admission and at discharge and to determine the discharge destination. Results. Almost two-thirds of the patients reached full consciousness. LOC at admission, aetiology and interval since injury were found to be significant prognostic factors. Traumatic patients had a much better outcome than non-traumatic patients. A comparison with earlier outcome studies showed a more favourable outcome than expected. It is argued that a multi-centre study is needed to confirm possible effects of EINP.