Loading…

Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings

Cannabis use disorder is the most common illicit substance use disorder in general population. Despite that, only a minority seek assistance from a health professional, but the demand for treatment is now increasing internationally. Trials of treatment have been published but to our knowledge, there...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2006-07 (3), p.CD005336
Main Authors: Denis, C, Lavie, E, Fatséas, M, Auriacombe, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d412c7f8f3e55ddd809afbb6212de891af93dd9d48e77a356bee58aa7313bc7a3
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page CD005336
container_title Cochrane database of systematic reviews
container_volume
creator Denis, C
Lavie, E
Fatséas, M
Auriacombe, M
description Cannabis use disorder is the most common illicit substance use disorder in general population. Despite that, only a minority seek assistance from a health professional, but the demand for treatment is now increasing internationally. Trials of treatment have been published but to our knowledge, there is no published systematic review . To evaluate the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for cannabis abuse or dependence. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Trials (CENTRAL) The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004; MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2004), PsycInfo (1985 to October 2004), CINAHL (1982 to October 2004), Toxibase (until September 2004) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. All randomized controlled studies examining a psychotherapeutic intervention for cannabis dependence or abuse in comparison with a delayed-treatment control group or combinations of psychotherapeutic interventions. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data Six trials involving 1297 people were included. Five studies took place in the United States, one in Australia. Studies were not pooled in meta-analysis because of heterogeneity. The six included studies suggested that counseling approaches might have beneficial effects for the treatment of cannabis dependence. Group and individual sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) had both efficacy for the treatment of cannabis dependence and associated problems, CBT produced better outcomes than a brief intervention when CBT was delivered in individual sessions. Two studies suggested that adding voucher-based incentives may enhance treatment when used in combination with other effective psychotherapeutic interventions. Abstinence rates were relatively small overall but favored the individual CBT 9-session (or more) condition. All included trials reported a statistically significant reductions in frequency of cannabis use and dependence symptoms. But other measures of problems related to cannabis use were not consistently different. The included studies were too heterogenous and could not allow to draw up a clear conclusion. The studies comparing different therapeutic modalities raise important questions about the duration, intensity and type of treatment. The generalizability of findings is also unknown because the studies have been conducted in a limited number of localities with fairly homogenous samples of treatment seekers. However, the low abstinence rat
doi_str_mv 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_16856093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16856093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d412c7f8f3e55ddd809afbb6212de891af93dd9d48e77a356bee58aa7313bc7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j9tKAzEURYMgtlZ_oeQHps1lkkkepV4qFPRBQfChnCRnbMRmhklG6N87oD5tWJu1YROy5GzFGRNrXmvFjTKrzS1jSkq96kcnzsh8KmxVW_k2I5c5fzImLefmgsy4NkozK-fk_Tmf_KErBxygx7FET2MqOHxjKrFLmbbdQD2kBC5mCm7MSCGF9UQD9pgCJo-TQrux9FDipNGMpcT0ka_IeQtfGa__ckFe7-9eNttq9_TwuLnZVV5oUapQc-Gb1rQSlQohGGahdU4LLgIay6G1MgQbaoNNA1Jph6gMQCO5dH4iC7L83Z1uHzHs-yEeYTjt_1_KH3xtV4M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Denis, C ; Lavie, E ; Fatséas, M ; Auriacombe, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Denis, C ; Lavie, E ; Fatséas, M ; Auriacombe, M</creatorcontrib><description>Cannabis use disorder is the most common illicit substance use disorder in general population. Despite that, only a minority seek assistance from a health professional, but the demand for treatment is now increasing internationally. Trials of treatment have been published but to our knowledge, there is no published systematic review . To evaluate the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for cannabis abuse or dependence. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Trials (CENTRAL) The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004; MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2004), PsycInfo (1985 to October 2004), CINAHL (1982 to October 2004), Toxibase (until September 2004) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. All randomized controlled studies examining a psychotherapeutic intervention for cannabis dependence or abuse in comparison with a delayed-treatment control group or combinations of psychotherapeutic interventions. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data Six trials involving 1297 people were included. Five studies took place in the United States, one in Australia. Studies were not pooled in meta-analysis because of heterogeneity. The six included studies suggested that counseling approaches might have beneficial effects for the treatment of cannabis dependence. Group and individual sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) had both efficacy for the treatment of cannabis dependence and associated problems, CBT produced better outcomes than a brief intervention when CBT was delivered in individual sessions. Two studies suggested that adding voucher-based incentives may enhance treatment when used in combination with other effective psychotherapeutic interventions. Abstinence rates were relatively small overall but favored the individual CBT 9-session (or more) condition. All included trials reported a statistically significant reductions in frequency of cannabis use and dependence symptoms. But other measures of problems related to cannabis use were not consistently different. The included studies were too heterogenous and could not allow to draw up a clear conclusion. The studies comparing different therapeutic modalities raise important questions about the duration, intensity and type of treatment. The generalizability of findings is also unknown because the studies have been conducted in a limited number of localities with fairly homogenous samples of treatment seekers. However, the low abstinence rate indicated that cannabis dependence is not easily treated by psychotherapies in outpatient settings.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16856093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care ; Cognitive Therapy ; Humans ; Marijuana Abuse - therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006-07 (3), p.CD005336</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d412c7f8f3e55ddd809afbb6212de891af93dd9d48e77a356bee58aa7313bc7a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16856093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavie, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatséas, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auriacombe, M</creatorcontrib><title>Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Cannabis use disorder is the most common illicit substance use disorder in general population. Despite that, only a minority seek assistance from a health professional, but the demand for treatment is now increasing internationally. Trials of treatment have been published but to our knowledge, there is no published systematic review . To evaluate the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for cannabis abuse or dependence. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Trials (CENTRAL) The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004; MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2004), PsycInfo (1985 to October 2004), CINAHL (1982 to October 2004), Toxibase (until September 2004) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. All randomized controlled studies examining a psychotherapeutic intervention for cannabis dependence or abuse in comparison with a delayed-treatment control group or combinations of psychotherapeutic interventions. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data Six trials involving 1297 people were included. Five studies took place in the United States, one in Australia. Studies were not pooled in meta-analysis because of heterogeneity. The six included studies suggested that counseling approaches might have beneficial effects for the treatment of cannabis dependence. Group and individual sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) had both efficacy for the treatment of cannabis dependence and associated problems, CBT produced better outcomes than a brief intervention when CBT was delivered in individual sessions. Two studies suggested that adding voucher-based incentives may enhance treatment when used in combination with other effective psychotherapeutic interventions. Abstinence rates were relatively small overall but favored the individual CBT 9-session (or more) condition. All included trials reported a statistically significant reductions in frequency of cannabis use and dependence symptoms. But other measures of problems related to cannabis use were not consistently different. The included studies were too heterogenous and could not allow to draw up a clear conclusion. The studies comparing different therapeutic modalities raise important questions about the duration, intensity and type of treatment. The generalizability of findings is also unknown because the studies have been conducted in a limited number of localities with fairly homogenous samples of treatment seekers. However, the low abstinence rate indicated that cannabis dependence is not easily treated by psychotherapies in outpatient settings.</description><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Cognitive Therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Marijuana Abuse - therapy</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j9tKAzEURYMgtlZ_oeQHps1lkkkepV4qFPRBQfChnCRnbMRmhklG6N87oD5tWJu1YROy5GzFGRNrXmvFjTKrzS1jSkq96kcnzsh8KmxVW_k2I5c5fzImLefmgsy4NkozK-fk_Tmf_KErBxygx7FET2MqOHxjKrFLmbbdQD2kBC5mCm7MSCGF9UQD9pgCJo-TQrux9FDipNGMpcT0ka_IeQtfGa__ckFe7-9eNttq9_TwuLnZVV5oUapQc-Gb1rQSlQohGGahdU4LLgIay6G1MgQbaoNNA1Jph6gMQCO5dH4iC7L83Z1uHzHs-yEeYTjt_1_KH3xtV4M</recordid><startdate>20060719</startdate><enddate>20060719</enddate><creator>Denis, C</creator><creator>Lavie, E</creator><creator>Fatséas, M</creator><creator>Auriacombe, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060719</creationdate><title>Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings</title><author>Denis, C ; Lavie, E ; Fatséas, M ; Auriacombe, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d412c7f8f3e55ddd809afbb6212de891af93dd9d48e77a356bee58aa7313bc7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Cognitive Therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Marijuana Abuse - therapy</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denis, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavie, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatséas, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auriacombe, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denis, C</au><au>Lavie, E</au><au>Fatséas, M</au><au>Auriacombe, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2006-07-19</date><risdate>2006</risdate><issue>3</issue><spage>CD005336</spage><pages>CD005336-</pages><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Cannabis use disorder is the most common illicit substance use disorder in general population. Despite that, only a minority seek assistance from a health professional, but the demand for treatment is now increasing internationally. Trials of treatment have been published but to our knowledge, there is no published systematic review . To evaluate the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for cannabis abuse or dependence. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Trials (CENTRAL) The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004; MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2004), PsycInfo (1985 to October 2004), CINAHL (1982 to October 2004), Toxibase (until September 2004) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. All randomized controlled studies examining a psychotherapeutic intervention for cannabis dependence or abuse in comparison with a delayed-treatment control group or combinations of psychotherapeutic interventions. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data Six trials involving 1297 people were included. Five studies took place in the United States, one in Australia. Studies were not pooled in meta-analysis because of heterogeneity. The six included studies suggested that counseling approaches might have beneficial effects for the treatment of cannabis dependence. Group and individual sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) had both efficacy for the treatment of cannabis dependence and associated problems, CBT produced better outcomes than a brief intervention when CBT was delivered in individual sessions. Two studies suggested that adding voucher-based incentives may enhance treatment when used in combination with other effective psychotherapeutic interventions. Abstinence rates were relatively small overall but favored the individual CBT 9-session (or more) condition. All included trials reported a statistically significant reductions in frequency of cannabis use and dependence symptoms. But other measures of problems related to cannabis use were not consistently different. The included studies were too heterogenous and could not allow to draw up a clear conclusion. The studies comparing different therapeutic modalities raise important questions about the duration, intensity and type of treatment. The generalizability of findings is also unknown because the studies have been conducted in a limited number of localities with fairly homogenous samples of treatment seekers. However, the low abstinence rate indicated that cannabis dependence is not easily treated by psychotherapies in outpatient settings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>16856093</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1469-493X
ispartof Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006-07 (3), p.CD005336
issn 1469-493X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_16856093
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Ambulatory Care
Cognitive Therapy
Humans
Marijuana Abuse - therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
title Psychotherapeutic interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient settings
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A24%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychotherapeutic%20interventions%20for%20cannabis%20abuse%20and/or%20dependence%20in%20outpatient%20settings&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Denis,%20C&rft.date=2006-07-19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=CD005336&rft.pages=CD005336-&rft.eissn=1469-493X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub2&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E16856093%3C/pubmed%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d412c7f8f3e55ddd809afbb6212de891af93dd9d48e77a356bee58aa7313bc7a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16856093&rfr_iscdi=true