Loading…

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is found in 5% to 10% of men aged 65 to 79 years. The major complication is rupture which presents as a surgical emergency. The mortality after rupture is high, 80% for patients reaching hospital and 50% for those undergoing surgery for emergency repair. Currently ele...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2007-01 (2), p.CD002945
Main Authors: Cosford, P A, Leng, G C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4072-78a831690b0cff864a4931500664b31cb0a6c1f1d0133547389eab4552ca0e8a3
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page CD002945
container_title Cochrane database of systematic reviews
container_volume
creator Cosford, P A
Leng, G C
description Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is found in 5% to 10% of men aged 65 to 79 years. The major complication is rupture which presents as a surgical emergency. The mortality after rupture is high, 80% for patients reaching hospital and 50% for those undergoing surgery for emergency repair. Currently elective surgical repair is recommended for aneurysms discovered to be larger than 5.5 cm to prevent rupture. There is interest in population screening to detect, monitor and repair abdominal aortic aneurysms before rupture. To determine the effects of screening asymptomatic individuals for AAA on mortality, subsequent treatment, quality of life and cost effectiveness of screening. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Trials Register (last searched 26 January 2007) and CENTRAL (last searched Issue 1, 2007). Randomised controlled trials of population screening for AAA. Two authors independently assessed trials and extracted data. Four studies involving 127,891 men and 9,342 women were included in this review. Only one study included women. Results for men and women were analysed separately. Three to five years after screening there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between screened and unscreened groups for men or women (men, odds ratio (OR) 0.95; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.07; for women OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.21). There was a significant decrease in mortality from AAA in men (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.78), but not for women (OR 1.99; 95% CI 0.36 to 10.88). In this analysis mortality includes death from rupture and from emergency or elective surgery for aneurysm repair. There was also a decreased incidence of ruptured aneurysm in men (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.99) but not in women (OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.25 to 8.94). There was a significant increase in surgery for AAA in men (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.59). This was not reported in women. There were no data on life expectancy, complications of surgery or subjective quality of life. There is evidence of a significant reduction in mortality from AAA in men aged 65 to 79 years who undergo ultrasound screening. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate benefit in women. The cost effectiveness may be acceptable, but needs further expert analysis. These findings need careful consideration in judging whether a co-ordinated population-based screening programme should be introduced.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/14651858.CD002945.pub2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_17443519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17443519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4072-78a831690b0cff864a4931500664b31cb0a6c1f1d0133547389eab4552ca0e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0FLw0AUhBdBbK3-hZKbp8T38t5udo8StQoFDyp4K283G4k0SdnYQ_-9AfU0DAPfzCi1RigQoLxFNhqttkV9P1vHujgcfXmmlnPgcnb0sVCX0_QFQA7RXqgFVsyk0S3VzWtIMQ7d8Jm1Y8rEN2PfDbLPZEzfXchkiMd0mvordd7KforXf7pS748Pb_VTvn3ZPNd32zwwVGVeWbGExoGH0LbWsMz1qAGMYU8YPIgJ2GIDSKS5IuuieNa6DALRCq3U-pc7X-hjszukrpd02v0vph_Y9EDs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cosford, P A ; Leng, G C</creator><creatorcontrib>Cosford, P A ; Leng, G C</creatorcontrib><description>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is found in 5% to 10% of men aged 65 to 79 years. The major complication is rupture which presents as a surgical emergency. The mortality after rupture is high, 80% for patients reaching hospital and 50% for those undergoing surgery for emergency repair. Currently elective surgical repair is recommended for aneurysms discovered to be larger than 5.5 cm to prevent rupture. There is interest in population screening to detect, monitor and repair abdominal aortic aneurysms before rupture. To determine the effects of screening asymptomatic individuals for AAA on mortality, subsequent treatment, quality of life and cost effectiveness of screening. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Trials Register (last searched 26 January 2007) and CENTRAL (last searched Issue 1, 2007). Randomised controlled trials of population screening for AAA. Two authors independently assessed trials and extracted data. Four studies involving 127,891 men and 9,342 women were included in this review. Only one study included women. Results for men and women were analysed separately. Three to five years after screening there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between screened and unscreened groups for men or women (men, odds ratio (OR) 0.95; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.07; for women OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.21). There was a significant decrease in mortality from AAA in men (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.78), but not for women (OR 1.99; 95% CI 0.36 to 10.88). In this analysis mortality includes death from rupture and from emergency or elective surgery for aneurysm repair. There was also a decreased incidence of ruptured aneurysm in men (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.99) but not in women (OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.25 to 8.94). There was a significant increase in surgery for AAA in men (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.59). This was not reported in women. There were no data on life expectancy, complications of surgery or subjective quality of life. There is evidence of a significant reduction in mortality from AAA in men aged 65 to 79 years who undergo ultrasound screening. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate benefit in women. The cost effectiveness may be acceptable, but needs further expert analysis. These findings need careful consideration in judging whether a co-ordinated population-based screening programme should be introduced.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002945.pub2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17443519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Life Expectancy ; Male ; Mass Screening - economics ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sex Factors</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007-01 (2), p.CD002945</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4072-78a831690b0cff864a4931500664b31cb0a6c1f1d0133547389eab4552ca0e8a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cosford, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leng, G C</creatorcontrib><title>Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is found in 5% to 10% of men aged 65 to 79 years. The major complication is rupture which presents as a surgical emergency. The mortality after rupture is high, 80% for patients reaching hospital and 50% for those undergoing surgery for emergency repair. Currently elective surgical repair is recommended for aneurysms discovered to be larger than 5.5 cm to prevent rupture. There is interest in population screening to detect, monitor and repair abdominal aortic aneurysms before rupture. To determine the effects of screening asymptomatic individuals for AAA on mortality, subsequent treatment, quality of life and cost effectiveness of screening. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Trials Register (last searched 26 January 2007) and CENTRAL (last searched Issue 1, 2007). Randomised controlled trials of population screening for AAA. Two authors independently assessed trials and extracted data. Four studies involving 127,891 men and 9,342 women were included in this review. Only one study included women. Results for men and women were analysed separately. Three to five years after screening there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between screened and unscreened groups for men or women (men, odds ratio (OR) 0.95; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.07; for women OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.21). There was a significant decrease in mortality from AAA in men (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.78), but not for women (OR 1.99; 95% CI 0.36 to 10.88). In this analysis mortality includes death from rupture and from emergency or elective surgery for aneurysm repair. There was also a decreased incidence of ruptured aneurysm in men (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.99) but not in women (OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.25 to 8.94). There was a significant increase in surgery for AAA in men (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.59). This was not reported in women. There were no data on life expectancy, complications of surgery or subjective quality of life. There is evidence of a significant reduction in mortality from AAA in men aged 65 to 79 years who undergo ultrasound screening. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate benefit in women. The cost effectiveness may be acceptable, but needs further expert analysis. These findings need careful consideration in judging whether a co-ordinated population-based screening programme should be introduced.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Expectancy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j0FLw0AUhBdBbK3-hZKbp8T38t5udo8StQoFDyp4K283G4k0SdnYQ_-9AfU0DAPfzCi1RigQoLxFNhqttkV9P1vHujgcfXmmlnPgcnb0sVCX0_QFQA7RXqgFVsyk0S3VzWtIMQ7d8Jm1Y8rEN2PfDbLPZEzfXchkiMd0mvordd7KforXf7pS748Pb_VTvn3ZPNd32zwwVGVeWbGExoGH0LbWsMz1qAGMYU8YPIgJ2GIDSKS5IuuieNa6DALRCq3U-pc7X-hjszukrpd02v0vph_Y9EDs</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Cosford, P A</creator><creator>Leng, G C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm</title><author>Cosford, P A ; Leng, G C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4072-78a831690b0cff864a4931500664b31cb0a6c1f1d0133547389eab4552ca0e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Expectancy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cosford, P A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leng, G C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cosford, P A</au><au>Leng, G C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><issue>2</issue><spage>CD002945</spage><pages>CD002945-</pages><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is found in 5% to 10% of men aged 65 to 79 years. The major complication is rupture which presents as a surgical emergency. The mortality after rupture is high, 80% for patients reaching hospital and 50% for those undergoing surgery for emergency repair. Currently elective surgical repair is recommended for aneurysms discovered to be larger than 5.5 cm to prevent rupture. There is interest in population screening to detect, monitor and repair abdominal aortic aneurysms before rupture. To determine the effects of screening asymptomatic individuals for AAA on mortality, subsequent treatment, quality of life and cost effectiveness of screening. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Trials Register (last searched 26 January 2007) and CENTRAL (last searched Issue 1, 2007). Randomised controlled trials of population screening for AAA. Two authors independently assessed trials and extracted data. Four studies involving 127,891 men and 9,342 women were included in this review. Only one study included women. Results for men and women were analysed separately. Three to five years after screening there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between screened and unscreened groups for men or women (men, odds ratio (OR) 0.95; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.07; for women OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.21). There was a significant decrease in mortality from AAA in men (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.78), but not for women (OR 1.99; 95% CI 0.36 to 10.88). In this analysis mortality includes death from rupture and from emergency or elective surgery for aneurysm repair. There was also a decreased incidence of ruptured aneurysm in men (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.99) but not in women (OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.25 to 8.94). There was a significant increase in surgery for AAA in men (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.59 to 2.59). This was not reported in women. There were no data on life expectancy, complications of surgery or subjective quality of life. There is evidence of a significant reduction in mortality from AAA in men aged 65 to 79 years who undergo ultrasound screening. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate benefit in women. The cost effectiveness may be acceptable, but needs further expert analysis. These findings need careful consideration in judging whether a co-ordinated population-based screening programme should be introduced.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>17443519</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD002945.pub2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1469-493X
ispartof Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007-01 (2), p.CD002945
issn 1469-493X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_17443519
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnosis
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - mortality
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Humans
Life Expectancy
Male
Mass Screening - economics
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Sex Factors
title Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20for%20abdominal%20aortic%20aneurysm&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Cosford,%20P%20A&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=CD002945&rft.pages=CD002945-&rft.eissn=1469-493X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002945.pub2&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E17443519%3C/pubmed%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4072-78a831690b0cff864a4931500664b31cb0a6c1f1d0133547389eab4552ca0e8a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/17443519&rfr_iscdi=true