Loading…

Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers

Purpose: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers. Methods: Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were perform...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2009-12, Vol.36 (12), p.5586-5594
Main Authors: McCaffrey, J. P., Mainegra-Hing, E., Shen, H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883
container_end_page 5594
container_issue 12
container_start_page 5586
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 36
creator McCaffrey, J. P.
Mainegra-Hing, E.
Shen, H.
description Purpose: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers. Methods: Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were performed to study the attenuation properties of several non-Pb metal bilayers over the x-ray energy range 30–150 keV. Metals for the layers were chosen on the basis of low cost, nontoxicity, and complementary photoelectric absorption characteristics. The EGSnrc user code cavity.cpp was used to calculate the resultant x-ray fluence spectra after attenuation by these metal layers. Air kerma attenuation was measured using commercially manufactured metal/elastomer test layers. These layers were irradiated using the primary standard calibration beams at the Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, Canada utilizing the six x-ray beam qualities recommended in the German Standard DIN 6857. Both the measurements and the calculations were designed to approximate surface irradiation as well as penetrating radiation at 10 mm depth in soft tissue. The MC modeling point and the position of the measurement detector for surface irradiation were both directly against the downstream face of the attenuating material, as recommended in DIN 6857. Results: The low-Z upstream/high-Z downstream ordering of the metal bilayers provided substantially more attenuation than the reverse order. Optimal percentages of each metal in each bilayer were determined for each x-ray radiation beam quality. Conclusions: Depending on the x-ray quality, appropriate choices of two complementary metal-embedded elastomer layers can decrease the weight of radiation shielding garments by up to 25% compared to Pb-based elastomer garments while providing equivalent attenuation.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.3260839
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_20095271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734253485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMotlYXvoAUXIjCaK4zmU1BijeotAtdhySTsZG51GSq1Kc3dcYLSF2F5Hz5Duc_ABwieI4Q4hfonOAYcpJugT6mCYkohuk26EOY0ghTyHpgz_tnCGFMGNwFPRwqDCeoD0bTRWNL-26rp2FVV9FMDZ3MrGxsXQ393JoiW5dK2RhnZeGHS7--K1vIlXF-H-zk4dUcdOcAPF5fPYxvo8n05m58OYl0DOM00oxCmRmVSRIzQo0hmsUyYRirnHJGucZKJRApzkzMuMJSMZRiRjOVUsI5GYDj1lv7xgqvbWP0XNdVZXQjcJiWU54G6qSlFq5-WRrfiNJ6bYpCVqZeepEQikN7zgJ52pLa1d47k4uFs6V0K4GgWGcqkOgyDexRZ12q0mTf5FeIAYha4M0WZrXZJO5nnXDU8us5PpPe_OdnPSKsR8yUcDIIzjYJXmv3q-Eiy_-D_876AUkzrr4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734253485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>McCaffrey, J. P. ; Mainegra-Hing, E. ; Shen, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, J. P. ; Mainegra-Hing, E. ; Shen, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers. Methods: Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were performed to study the attenuation properties of several non-Pb metal bilayers over the x-ray energy range 30–150 keV. Metals for the layers were chosen on the basis of low cost, nontoxicity, and complementary photoelectric absorption characteristics. The EGSnrc user code cavity.cpp was used to calculate the resultant x-ray fluence spectra after attenuation by these metal layers. Air kerma attenuation was measured using commercially manufactured metal/elastomer test layers. These layers were irradiated using the primary standard calibration beams at the Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, Canada utilizing the six x-ray beam qualities recommended in the German Standard DIN 6857. Both the measurements and the calculations were designed to approximate surface irradiation as well as penetrating radiation at 10 mm depth in soft tissue. The MC modeling point and the position of the measurement detector for surface irradiation were both directly against the downstream face of the attenuating material, as recommended in DIN 6857. Results: The low-Z upstream/high-Z downstream ordering of the metal bilayers provided substantially more attenuation than the reverse order. Optimal percentages of each metal in each bilayer were determined for each x-ray radiation beam quality. Conclusions: Depending on the x-ray quality, appropriate choices of two complementary metal-embedded elastomer layers can decrease the weight of radiation shielding garments by up to 25% compared to Pb-based elastomer garments while providing equivalent attenuation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.3260839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20095271</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ATTENUATION ; bilayer ; CALIBRATION STANDARDS ; DOSIMETRY ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Elastomeric polymers ; elastomers ; Emission spectra ; KERMA ; KEV RANGE 10-100 ; KEV RANGE 100-1000 ; LAYERS ; Lead ; Materials properties ; metallic thin films ; METALS ; Metals - chemistry ; Millimeter waves ; MONTE CARLO METHOD ; Monte Carlo methods ; OPTIMIZATION ; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING ; Radiation monitoring, control, and safety ; RADIATION PROTECTION ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; radiation shielding ; Radiation-Protective Agents - chemistry ; shielding ; SHIELDING MATERIALS ; shielding weight ; unleaded protective clothing ; X RADIATION ; x-ray attenuation ; X‐ray effects ; X‐ray spectra ; X‐rays</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2009-12, Vol.36 (12), p.5586-5594</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2009 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20095271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22098489$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainegra-Hing, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers. Methods: Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were performed to study the attenuation properties of several non-Pb metal bilayers over the x-ray energy range 30–150 keV. Metals for the layers were chosen on the basis of low cost, nontoxicity, and complementary photoelectric absorption characteristics. The EGSnrc user code cavity.cpp was used to calculate the resultant x-ray fluence spectra after attenuation by these metal layers. Air kerma attenuation was measured using commercially manufactured metal/elastomer test layers. These layers were irradiated using the primary standard calibration beams at the Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, Canada utilizing the six x-ray beam qualities recommended in the German Standard DIN 6857. Both the measurements and the calculations were designed to approximate surface irradiation as well as penetrating radiation at 10 mm depth in soft tissue. The MC modeling point and the position of the measurement detector for surface irradiation were both directly against the downstream face of the attenuating material, as recommended in DIN 6857. Results: The low-Z upstream/high-Z downstream ordering of the metal bilayers provided substantially more attenuation than the reverse order. Optimal percentages of each metal in each bilayer were determined for each x-ray radiation beam quality. Conclusions: Depending on the x-ray quality, appropriate choices of two complementary metal-embedded elastomer layers can decrease the weight of radiation shielding garments by up to 25% compared to Pb-based elastomer garments while providing equivalent attenuation.</description><subject>ATTENUATION</subject><subject>bilayer</subject><subject>CALIBRATION STANDARDS</subject><subject>DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Elastomeric polymers</subject><subject>elastomers</subject><subject>Emission spectra</subject><subject>KERMA</subject><subject>KEV RANGE 10-100</subject><subject>KEV RANGE 100-1000</subject><subject>LAYERS</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Materials properties</subject><subject>metallic thin films</subject><subject>METALS</subject><subject>Metals - chemistry</subject><subject>Millimeter waves</subject><subject>MONTE CARLO METHOD</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>OPTIMIZATION</subject><subject>PROTECTIVE CLOTHING</subject><subject>Radiation monitoring, control, and safety</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>radiation shielding</subject><subject>Radiation-Protective Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>shielding</subject><subject>SHIELDING MATERIALS</subject><subject>shielding weight</subject><subject>unleaded protective clothing</subject><subject>X RADIATION</subject><subject>x-ray attenuation</subject><subject>X‐ray effects</subject><subject>X‐ray spectra</subject><subject>X‐rays</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMotlYXvoAUXIjCaK4zmU1BijeotAtdhySTsZG51GSq1Kc3dcYLSF2F5Hz5Duc_ABwieI4Q4hfonOAYcpJugT6mCYkohuk26EOY0ghTyHpgz_tnCGFMGNwFPRwqDCeoD0bTRWNL-26rp2FVV9FMDZ3MrGxsXQ393JoiW5dK2RhnZeGHS7--K1vIlXF-H-zk4dUcdOcAPF5fPYxvo8n05m58OYl0DOM00oxCmRmVSRIzQo0hmsUyYRirnHJGucZKJRApzkzMuMJSMZRiRjOVUsI5GYDj1lv7xgqvbWP0XNdVZXQjcJiWU54G6qSlFq5-WRrfiNJ6bYpCVqZeepEQikN7zgJ52pLa1d47k4uFs6V0K4GgWGcqkOgyDexRZ12q0mTf5FeIAYha4M0WZrXZJO5nnXDU8us5PpPe_OdnPSKsR8yUcDIIzjYJXmv3q-Eiy_-D_876AUkzrr4</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>McCaffrey, J. P.</creator><creator>Mainegra-Hing, E.</creator><creator>Shen, H.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers</title><author>McCaffrey, J. P. ; Mainegra-Hing, E. ; Shen, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>ATTENUATION</topic><topic>bilayer</topic><topic>CALIBRATION STANDARDS</topic><topic>DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Elastomeric polymers</topic><topic>elastomers</topic><topic>Emission spectra</topic><topic>KERMA</topic><topic>KEV RANGE 10-100</topic><topic>KEV RANGE 100-1000</topic><topic>LAYERS</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Materials properties</topic><topic>metallic thin films</topic><topic>METALS</topic><topic>Metals - chemistry</topic><topic>Millimeter waves</topic><topic>MONTE CARLO METHOD</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>OPTIMIZATION</topic><topic>PROTECTIVE CLOTHING</topic><topic>Radiation monitoring, control, and safety</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>radiation shielding</topic><topic>Radiation-Protective Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>shielding</topic><topic>SHIELDING MATERIALS</topic><topic>shielding weight</topic><topic>unleaded protective clothing</topic><topic>X RADIATION</topic><topic>x-ray attenuation</topic><topic>X‐ray effects</topic><topic>X‐ray spectra</topic><topic>X‐rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainegra-Hing, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCaffrey, J. P.</au><au>Mainegra-Hing, E.</au><au>Shen, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5586</spage><epage>5594</epage><pages>5586-5594</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers. Methods: Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were performed to study the attenuation properties of several non-Pb metal bilayers over the x-ray energy range 30–150 keV. Metals for the layers were chosen on the basis of low cost, nontoxicity, and complementary photoelectric absorption characteristics. The EGSnrc user code cavity.cpp was used to calculate the resultant x-ray fluence spectra after attenuation by these metal layers. Air kerma attenuation was measured using commercially manufactured metal/elastomer test layers. These layers were irradiated using the primary standard calibration beams at the Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, Canada utilizing the six x-ray beam qualities recommended in the German Standard DIN 6857. Both the measurements and the calculations were designed to approximate surface irradiation as well as penetrating radiation at 10 mm depth in soft tissue. The MC modeling point and the position of the measurement detector for surface irradiation were both directly against the downstream face of the attenuating material, as recommended in DIN 6857. Results: The low-Z upstream/high-Z downstream ordering of the metal bilayers provided substantially more attenuation than the reverse order. Optimal percentages of each metal in each bilayer were determined for each x-ray radiation beam quality. Conclusions: Depending on the x-ray quality, appropriate choices of two complementary metal-embedded elastomer layers can decrease the weight of radiation shielding garments by up to 25% compared to Pb-based elastomer garments while providing equivalent attenuation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>20095271</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.3260839</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2009-12, Vol.36 (12), p.5586-5594
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_20095271
source Wiley
subjects ATTENUATION
bilayer
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
DOSIMETRY
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
Elastomeric polymers
elastomers
Emission spectra
KERMA
KEV RANGE 10-100
KEV RANGE 100-1000
LAYERS
Lead
Materials properties
metallic thin films
METALS
Metals - chemistry
Millimeter waves
MONTE CARLO METHOD
Monte Carlo methods
OPTIMIZATION
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
Radiation monitoring, control, and safety
RADIATION PROTECTION
RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
radiation shielding
Radiation-Protective Agents - chemistry
shielding
SHIELDING MATERIALS
shielding weight
unleaded protective clothing
X RADIATION
x-ray attenuation
X‐ray effects
X‐ray spectra
X‐rays
title Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A28%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20non-Pb%20radiation%20shielding%20materials%20using%20bilayers&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=McCaffrey,%20J.%20P.&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5586&rft.epage=5594&rft.pages=5586-5594&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.3260839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E734253485%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734253485&rft_id=info:pmid/20095271&rfr_iscdi=true