Loading…
Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers
Purpose: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers. Methods: Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were perform...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2009-12, Vol.36 (12), p.5586-5594 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883 |
container_end_page | 5594 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 5586 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | McCaffrey, J. P. Mainegra-Hing, E. Shen, H. |
description | Purpose:
The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers.
Methods:
Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were performed to study the attenuation properties of several non-Pb metal bilayers over the x-ray energy range 30–150 keV. Metals for the layers were chosen on the basis of low cost, nontoxicity, and complementary photoelectric absorption characteristics. The EGSnrc user code cavity.cpp was used to calculate the resultant x-ray fluence spectra after attenuation by these metal layers. Air kerma attenuation was measured using commercially manufactured metal/elastomer test layers. These layers were irradiated using the primary standard calibration beams at the Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, Canada utilizing the six x-ray beam qualities recommended in the German Standard DIN 6857. Both the measurements and the calculations were designed to approximate surface irradiation as well as penetrating radiation at 10 mm depth in soft tissue. The MC modeling point and the position of the measurement detector for surface irradiation were both directly against the downstream face of the attenuating material, as recommended in DIN 6857.
Results:
The low-Z upstream/high-Z downstream ordering of the metal bilayers provided substantially more attenuation than the reverse order. Optimal percentages of each metal in each bilayer were determined for each x-ray radiation beam quality.
Conclusions:
Depending on the x-ray quality, appropriate choices of two complementary metal-embedded elastomer layers can decrease the weight of radiation shielding garments by up to 25% compared to Pb-based elastomer garments while providing equivalent attenuation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.3260839 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_20095271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734253485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMotlYXvoAUXIjCaK4zmU1BijeotAtdhySTsZG51GSq1Kc3dcYLSF2F5Hz5Duc_ABwieI4Q4hfonOAYcpJugT6mCYkohuk26EOY0ghTyHpgz_tnCGFMGNwFPRwqDCeoD0bTRWNL-26rp2FVV9FMDZ3MrGxsXQ393JoiW5dK2RhnZeGHS7--K1vIlXF-H-zk4dUcdOcAPF5fPYxvo8n05m58OYl0DOM00oxCmRmVSRIzQo0hmsUyYRirnHJGucZKJRApzkzMuMJSMZRiRjOVUsI5GYDj1lv7xgqvbWP0XNdVZXQjcJiWU54G6qSlFq5-WRrfiNJ6bYpCVqZeepEQikN7zgJ52pLa1d47k4uFs6V0K4GgWGcqkOgyDexRZ12q0mTf5FeIAYha4M0WZrXZJO5nnXDU8us5PpPe_OdnPSKsR8yUcDIIzjYJXmv3q-Eiy_-D_876AUkzrr4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734253485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>McCaffrey, J. P. ; Mainegra-Hing, E. ; Shen, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, J. P. ; Mainegra-Hing, E. ; Shen, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers.
Methods:
Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were performed to study the attenuation properties of several non-Pb metal bilayers over the x-ray energy range 30–150 keV. Metals for the layers were chosen on the basis of low cost, nontoxicity, and complementary photoelectric absorption characteristics. The EGSnrc user code cavity.cpp was used to calculate the resultant x-ray fluence spectra after attenuation by these metal layers. Air kerma attenuation was measured using commercially manufactured metal/elastomer test layers. These layers were irradiated using the primary standard calibration beams at the Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, Canada utilizing the six x-ray beam qualities recommended in the German Standard DIN 6857. Both the measurements and the calculations were designed to approximate surface irradiation as well as penetrating radiation at 10 mm depth in soft tissue. The MC modeling point and the position of the measurement detector for surface irradiation were both directly against the downstream face of the attenuating material, as recommended in DIN 6857.
Results:
The low-Z upstream/high-Z downstream ordering of the metal bilayers provided substantially more attenuation than the reverse order. Optimal percentages of each metal in each bilayer were determined for each x-ray radiation beam quality.
Conclusions:
Depending on the x-ray quality, appropriate choices of two complementary metal-embedded elastomer layers can decrease the weight of radiation shielding garments by up to 25% compared to Pb-based elastomer garments while providing equivalent attenuation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.3260839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20095271</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ATTENUATION ; bilayer ; CALIBRATION STANDARDS ; DOSIMETRY ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Elastomeric polymers ; elastomers ; Emission spectra ; KERMA ; KEV RANGE 10-100 ; KEV RANGE 100-1000 ; LAYERS ; Lead ; Materials properties ; metallic thin films ; METALS ; Metals - chemistry ; Millimeter waves ; MONTE CARLO METHOD ; Monte Carlo methods ; OPTIMIZATION ; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING ; Radiation monitoring, control, and safety ; RADIATION PROTECTION ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; radiation shielding ; Radiation-Protective Agents - chemistry ; shielding ; SHIELDING MATERIALS ; shielding weight ; unleaded protective clothing ; X RADIATION ; x-ray attenuation ; X‐ray effects ; X‐ray spectra ; X‐rays</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2009-12, Vol.36 (12), p.5586-5594</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2009 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20095271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22098489$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainegra-Hing, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose:
The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers.
Methods:
Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were performed to study the attenuation properties of several non-Pb metal bilayers over the x-ray energy range 30–150 keV. Metals for the layers were chosen on the basis of low cost, nontoxicity, and complementary photoelectric absorption characteristics. The EGSnrc user code cavity.cpp was used to calculate the resultant x-ray fluence spectra after attenuation by these metal layers. Air kerma attenuation was measured using commercially manufactured metal/elastomer test layers. These layers were irradiated using the primary standard calibration beams at the Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, Canada utilizing the six x-ray beam qualities recommended in the German Standard DIN 6857. Both the measurements and the calculations were designed to approximate surface irradiation as well as penetrating radiation at 10 mm depth in soft tissue. The MC modeling point and the position of the measurement detector for surface irradiation were both directly against the downstream face of the attenuating material, as recommended in DIN 6857.
Results:
The low-Z upstream/high-Z downstream ordering of the metal bilayers provided substantially more attenuation than the reverse order. Optimal percentages of each metal in each bilayer were determined for each x-ray radiation beam quality.
Conclusions:
Depending on the x-ray quality, appropriate choices of two complementary metal-embedded elastomer layers can decrease the weight of radiation shielding garments by up to 25% compared to Pb-based elastomer garments while providing equivalent attenuation.</description><subject>ATTENUATION</subject><subject>bilayer</subject><subject>CALIBRATION STANDARDS</subject><subject>DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Elastomeric polymers</subject><subject>elastomers</subject><subject>Emission spectra</subject><subject>KERMA</subject><subject>KEV RANGE 10-100</subject><subject>KEV RANGE 100-1000</subject><subject>LAYERS</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Materials properties</subject><subject>metallic thin films</subject><subject>METALS</subject><subject>Metals - chemistry</subject><subject>Millimeter waves</subject><subject>MONTE CARLO METHOD</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>OPTIMIZATION</subject><subject>PROTECTIVE CLOTHING</subject><subject>Radiation monitoring, control, and safety</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>radiation shielding</subject><subject>Radiation-Protective Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>shielding</subject><subject>SHIELDING MATERIALS</subject><subject>shielding weight</subject><subject>unleaded protective clothing</subject><subject>X RADIATION</subject><subject>x-ray attenuation</subject><subject>X‐ray effects</subject><subject>X‐ray spectra</subject><subject>X‐rays</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMotlYXvoAUXIjCaK4zmU1BijeotAtdhySTsZG51GSq1Kc3dcYLSF2F5Hz5Duc_ABwieI4Q4hfonOAYcpJugT6mCYkohuk26EOY0ghTyHpgz_tnCGFMGNwFPRwqDCeoD0bTRWNL-26rp2FVV9FMDZ3MrGxsXQ393JoiW5dK2RhnZeGHS7--K1vIlXF-H-zk4dUcdOcAPF5fPYxvo8n05m58OYl0DOM00oxCmRmVSRIzQo0hmsUyYRirnHJGucZKJRApzkzMuMJSMZRiRjOVUsI5GYDj1lv7xgqvbWP0XNdVZXQjcJiWU54G6qSlFq5-WRrfiNJ6bYpCVqZeepEQikN7zgJ52pLa1d47k4uFs6V0K4GgWGcqkOgyDexRZ12q0mTf5FeIAYha4M0WZrXZJO5nnXDU8us5PpPe_OdnPSKsR8yUcDIIzjYJXmv3q-Eiy_-D_876AUkzrr4</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>McCaffrey, J. P.</creator><creator>Mainegra-Hing, E.</creator><creator>Shen, H.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers</title><author>McCaffrey, J. P. ; Mainegra-Hing, E. ; Shen, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>ATTENUATION</topic><topic>bilayer</topic><topic>CALIBRATION STANDARDS</topic><topic>DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Elastomeric polymers</topic><topic>elastomers</topic><topic>Emission spectra</topic><topic>KERMA</topic><topic>KEV RANGE 10-100</topic><topic>KEV RANGE 100-1000</topic><topic>LAYERS</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Materials properties</topic><topic>metallic thin films</topic><topic>METALS</topic><topic>Metals - chemistry</topic><topic>Millimeter waves</topic><topic>MONTE CARLO METHOD</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>OPTIMIZATION</topic><topic>PROTECTIVE CLOTHING</topic><topic>Radiation monitoring, control, and safety</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>radiation shielding</topic><topic>Radiation-Protective Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>shielding</topic><topic>SHIELDING MATERIALS</topic><topic>shielding weight</topic><topic>unleaded protective clothing</topic><topic>X RADIATION</topic><topic>x-ray attenuation</topic><topic>X‐ray effects</topic><topic>X‐ray spectra</topic><topic>X‐rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCaffrey, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainegra-Hing, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCaffrey, J. P.</au><au>Mainegra-Hing, E.</au><au>Shen, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5586</spage><epage>5594</epage><pages>5586-5594</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose:
The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the weight of non-Pb radiation shielding materials can be minimized by structuring the material as a bilayer composed of different metal-powder-embedded elastomer layers.
Methods:
Measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations were performed to study the attenuation properties of several non-Pb metal bilayers over the x-ray energy range 30–150 keV. Metals for the layers were chosen on the basis of low cost, nontoxicity, and complementary photoelectric absorption characteristics. The EGSnrc user code cavity.cpp was used to calculate the resultant x-ray fluence spectra after attenuation by these metal layers. Air kerma attenuation was measured using commercially manufactured metal/elastomer test layers. These layers were irradiated using the primary standard calibration beams at the Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, Canada utilizing the six x-ray beam qualities recommended in the German Standard DIN 6857. Both the measurements and the calculations were designed to approximate surface irradiation as well as penetrating radiation at 10 mm depth in soft tissue. The MC modeling point and the position of the measurement detector for surface irradiation were both directly against the downstream face of the attenuating material, as recommended in DIN 6857.
Results:
The low-Z upstream/high-Z downstream ordering of the metal bilayers provided substantially more attenuation than the reverse order. Optimal percentages of each metal in each bilayer were determined for each x-ray radiation beam quality.
Conclusions:
Depending on the x-ray quality, appropriate choices of two complementary metal-embedded elastomer layers can decrease the weight of radiation shielding garments by up to 25% compared to Pb-based elastomer garments while providing equivalent attenuation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>20095271</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.3260839</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2009-12, Vol.36 (12), p.5586-5594 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_20095271 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | ATTENUATION bilayer CALIBRATION STANDARDS DOSIMETRY Dosimetry/exposure assessment Elastomeric polymers elastomers Emission spectra KERMA KEV RANGE 10-100 KEV RANGE 100-1000 LAYERS Lead Materials properties metallic thin films METALS Metals - chemistry Millimeter waves MONTE CARLO METHOD Monte Carlo methods OPTIMIZATION PROTECTIVE CLOTHING Radiation monitoring, control, and safety RADIATION PROTECTION RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY radiation shielding Radiation-Protective Agents - chemistry shielding SHIELDING MATERIALS shielding weight unleaded protective clothing X RADIATION x-ray attenuation X‐ray effects X‐ray spectra X‐rays |
title | Optimizing non-Pb radiation shielding materials using bilayers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A28%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20non-Pb%20radiation%20shielding%20materials%20using%20bilayers&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=McCaffrey,%20J.%20P.&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5586&rft.epage=5594&rft.pages=5586-5594&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.3260839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E734253485%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6069-c540adebda36534ee3c56a7522bf48548c2bb701b85e658b2ab519254db943883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734253485&rft_id=info:pmid/20095271&rfr_iscdi=true |