Loading…

Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples

The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2011-01, Vol.49 (1), p.257-262
Main Authors: Stark, D, Al-Qassab, S.E, Barratt, J.L.N, Stanley, K, Roberts, T, Marriott, D, Harkness, J, Ellis, J.T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33
container_end_page 262
container_issue 1
container_start_page 257
container_title Journal of Clinical Microbiology
container_volume 49
creator Stark, D
Al-Qassab, S.E
Barratt, J.L.N
Stanley, K
Roberts, T
Marriott, D
Harkness, J
Ellis, J.T
description The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human clinical samples. A total of 472 fecal samples submitted to the Department of Microbiology at St. Vincent's Hospital were included in the study. The MT-PCR assay was compared to four real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays and microscopy by a traditional modified iron hematoxylin stain. The MT-PCR detected 28 G. intestinalis, 26 D. fragilis, 11 E. histolytica, and 9 Cryptosporidium sp. isolates. Detection and identification of the fecal protozoa by MT-PCR demonstrated 100% correlation with the RT-PCR results, and compared to RT-PCR, MT-PCR exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while traditional microscopy of stained fixed fecal smears exhibited sensitivities and specificities of 56% and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp., 38% and 99% for D. fragilis, 47% and 97% for E. histolytica, and 50% and 100% for G. intestinalis. No cross-reactivity was detected in 100 stool samples containing various other bacterial, viral, and protozoan species. The MT-PCR assay was able to provide rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection and identification of the four most important diarrhea-causing protozoan parasites that infect humans. This study also highlights the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by microscopy, and thus, molecular methods such as MT-PCR must be considered the diagnostic methods of choice for enteric protozoan parasites.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.01796-10
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_21048004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>822358688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEoqWwYw3eIDaTwZfEiTdIKB0KqBWonUrsrJPEmXHlxMHOFOa5eEEOnekAKza2fPz5Pxf_SfKc0TljvHzzqbqYU1YomTL6IDlmVJWplPTrw-SYUpWnjIniKHkS4w2lLMvy_HFyxBnNSkqz4-Tn4hbcBibrB-I7crFxkx2d-UGWMLSmJ5cGXLq0vSFfqkvS-UBOzWSae74K23HycfTBtnbTkziO8xk5tWaYoPemBtIFWFln44wsDrG1jZN328k2MCOYh5xZCK0FYofJxMkOgA_wQCpnB4QcuZq8xxV6rC0-TR514KJ5tt9Pkuv3i2X1IT3_fPaxeneeNpnKprSkMldFUxc5B5XLpiwYNMy0Qqiua-tCMQEm7wBXyUUuC6lkbkTddbXimRHiJHm70x03dW_aBpsK4PQYbA9hqz1Y_e_NYNd65W-1oJxmXKLA671A8N822JnubWyMczAYv4m6xKRFxmn-f5JjhaUsSyRnO7IJPsZgukM9jOrfhtBoCH1nCIwg_uLvHg7wvQMQeLUHIOKk8buGxsY_nCgkzrFAjuy4tV2tv9tgNMRe3zS9zpRmmt8hL3dIB17DKqDM9RWnTFCmhOA45F8Tx9WD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822358688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples</title><source>American Society for Microbiology Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Stark, D ; Al-Qassab, S.E ; Barratt, J.L.N ; Stanley, K ; Roberts, T ; Marriott, D ; Harkness, J ; Ellis, J.T</creator><creatorcontrib>Stark, D ; Al-Qassab, S.E ; Barratt, J.L.N ; Stanley, K ; Roberts, T ; Marriott, D ; Harkness, J ; Ellis, J.T</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human clinical samples. A total of 472 fecal samples submitted to the Department of Microbiology at St. Vincent's Hospital were included in the study. The MT-PCR assay was compared to four real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays and microscopy by a traditional modified iron hematoxylin stain. The MT-PCR detected 28 G. intestinalis, 26 D. fragilis, 11 E. histolytica, and 9 Cryptosporidium sp. isolates. Detection and identification of the fecal protozoa by MT-PCR demonstrated 100% correlation with the RT-PCR results, and compared to RT-PCR, MT-PCR exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while traditional microscopy of stained fixed fecal smears exhibited sensitivities and specificities of 56% and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp., 38% and 99% for D. fragilis, 47% and 97% for E. histolytica, and 50% and 100% for G. intestinalis. No cross-reactivity was detected in 100 stool samples containing various other bacterial, viral, and protozoan species. The MT-PCR assay was able to provide rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection and identification of the four most important diarrhea-causing protozoan parasites that infect humans. This study also highlights the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by microscopy, and thus, molecular methods such as MT-PCR must be considered the diagnostic methods of choice for enteric protozoan parasites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01796-10</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21048004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMIDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cryptosporidium ; Cryptosporidium - genetics ; Cryptosporidium - isolation &amp; purification ; Dientamoeba - genetics ; Dientamoeba - isolation &amp; purification ; Dientamoeba fragilis ; Entamoeba histolytica ; Entamoeba histolytica - genetics ; Entamoeba histolytica - isolation &amp; purification ; Feces - parasitology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Giardia intestinalis ; Giardia lamblia - genetics ; Giardia lamblia - isolation &amp; purification ; Humans ; Microbiology ; Microscopy ; Parasitology ; Parasitology - methods ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Protozoan Infections - diagnosis ; Protozoan Infections - parasitology ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011-01, Vol.49 (1), p.257-262</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020426/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020426/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,3189,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23760657$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21048004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stark, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Qassab, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barratt, J.L.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harkness, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, J.T</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples</title><title>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human clinical samples. A total of 472 fecal samples submitted to the Department of Microbiology at St. Vincent's Hospital were included in the study. The MT-PCR assay was compared to four real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays and microscopy by a traditional modified iron hematoxylin stain. The MT-PCR detected 28 G. intestinalis, 26 D. fragilis, 11 E. histolytica, and 9 Cryptosporidium sp. isolates. Detection and identification of the fecal protozoa by MT-PCR demonstrated 100% correlation with the RT-PCR results, and compared to RT-PCR, MT-PCR exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while traditional microscopy of stained fixed fecal smears exhibited sensitivities and specificities of 56% and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp., 38% and 99% for D. fragilis, 47% and 97% for E. histolytica, and 50% and 100% for G. intestinalis. No cross-reactivity was detected in 100 stool samples containing various other bacterial, viral, and protozoan species. The MT-PCR assay was able to provide rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection and identification of the four most important diarrhea-causing protozoan parasites that infect humans. This study also highlights the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by microscopy, and thus, molecular methods such as MT-PCR must be considered the diagnostic methods of choice for enteric protozoan parasites.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium - genetics</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Dientamoeba - genetics</subject><subject>Dientamoeba - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Dientamoeba fragilis</subject><subject>Entamoeba histolytica</subject><subject>Entamoeba histolytica - genetics</subject><subject>Entamoeba histolytica - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Giardia intestinalis</subject><subject>Giardia lamblia - genetics</subject><subject>Giardia lamblia - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><subject>Parasitology - methods</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Protozoan Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Protozoan Infections - parasitology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEoqWwYw3eIDaTwZfEiTdIKB0KqBWonUrsrJPEmXHlxMHOFOa5eEEOnekAKza2fPz5Pxf_SfKc0TljvHzzqbqYU1YomTL6IDlmVJWplPTrw-SYUpWnjIniKHkS4w2lLMvy_HFyxBnNSkqz4-Tn4hbcBibrB-I7crFxkx2d-UGWMLSmJ5cGXLq0vSFfqkvS-UBOzWSae74K23HycfTBtnbTkziO8xk5tWaYoPemBtIFWFln44wsDrG1jZN328k2MCOYh5xZCK0FYofJxMkOgA_wQCpnB4QcuZq8xxV6rC0-TR514KJ5tt9Pkuv3i2X1IT3_fPaxeneeNpnKprSkMldFUxc5B5XLpiwYNMy0Qqiua-tCMQEm7wBXyUUuC6lkbkTddbXimRHiJHm70x03dW_aBpsK4PQYbA9hqz1Y_e_NYNd65W-1oJxmXKLA671A8N822JnubWyMczAYv4m6xKRFxmn-f5JjhaUsSyRnO7IJPsZgukM9jOrfhtBoCH1nCIwg_uLvHg7wvQMQeLUHIOKk8buGxsY_nCgkzrFAjuy4tV2tv9tgNMRe3zS9zpRmmt8hL3dIB17DKqDM9RWnTFCmhOA45F8Tx9WD</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Stark, D</creator><creator>Al-Qassab, S.E</creator><creator>Barratt, J.L.N</creator><creator>Stanley, K</creator><creator>Roberts, T</creator><creator>Marriott, D</creator><creator>Harkness, J</creator><creator>Ellis, J.T</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><general>American Society for Microbiology (ASM)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples</title><author>Stark, D ; Al-Qassab, S.E ; Barratt, J.L.N ; Stanley, K ; Roberts, T ; Marriott, D ; Harkness, J ; Ellis, J.T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium - genetics</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Dientamoeba - genetics</topic><topic>Dientamoeba - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Dientamoeba fragilis</topic><topic>Entamoeba histolytica</topic><topic>Entamoeba histolytica - genetics</topic><topic>Entamoeba histolytica - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Giardia intestinalis</topic><topic>Giardia lamblia - genetics</topic><topic>Giardia lamblia - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><topic>Parasitology - methods</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Protozoan Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Protozoan Infections - parasitology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stark, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Qassab, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barratt, J.L.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harkness, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, J.T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stark, D</au><au>Al-Qassab, S.E</au><au>Barratt, J.L.N</au><au>Stanley, K</au><au>Roberts, T</au><au>Marriott, D</au><au>Harkness, J</au><au>Ellis, J.T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>257-262</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><coden>JCMIDW</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human clinical samples. A total of 472 fecal samples submitted to the Department of Microbiology at St. Vincent's Hospital were included in the study. The MT-PCR assay was compared to four real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays and microscopy by a traditional modified iron hematoxylin stain. The MT-PCR detected 28 G. intestinalis, 26 D. fragilis, 11 E. histolytica, and 9 Cryptosporidium sp. isolates. Detection and identification of the fecal protozoa by MT-PCR demonstrated 100% correlation with the RT-PCR results, and compared to RT-PCR, MT-PCR exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while traditional microscopy of stained fixed fecal smears exhibited sensitivities and specificities of 56% and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp., 38% and 99% for D. fragilis, 47% and 97% for E. histolytica, and 50% and 100% for G. intestinalis. No cross-reactivity was detected in 100 stool samples containing various other bacterial, viral, and protozoan species. The MT-PCR assay was able to provide rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection and identification of the four most important diarrhea-causing protozoan parasites that infect humans. This study also highlights the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by microscopy, and thus, molecular methods such as MT-PCR must be considered the diagnostic methods of choice for enteric protozoan parasites.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>21048004</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.01796-10</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011-01, Vol.49 (1), p.257-262
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_21048004
source American Society for Microbiology Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cryptosporidium
Cryptosporidium - genetics
Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification
Dientamoeba - genetics
Dientamoeba - isolation & purification
Dientamoeba fragilis
Entamoeba histolytica
Entamoeba histolytica - genetics
Entamoeba histolytica - isolation & purification
Feces - parasitology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Giardia intestinalis
Giardia lamblia - genetics
Giardia lamblia - isolation & purification
Humans
Microbiology
Microscopy
Parasitology
Parasitology - methods
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Protozoan Infections - diagnosis
Protozoan Infections - parasitology
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A44%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Multiplex%20Tandem%20Real-Time%20PCR%20for%20Detection%20of%20Cryptosporidium%20spp.,%20Dientamoeba%20fragilis,%20Entamoeba%20histolytica,%20and%20Giardia%20intestinalis%20in%20Clinical%20Stool%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Microbiology&rft.au=Stark,%20D&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=257-262&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft.coden=JCMIDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.01796-10&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E822358688%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822358688&rft_id=info:pmid/21048004&rfr_iscdi=true