Loading…
Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples
The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2011-01, Vol.49 (1), p.257-262 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33 |
container_end_page | 262 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 257 |
container_title | Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Stark, D Al-Qassab, S.E Barratt, J.L.N Stanley, K Roberts, T Marriott, D Harkness, J Ellis, J.T |
description | The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human clinical samples. A total of 472 fecal samples submitted to the Department of Microbiology at St. Vincent's Hospital were included in the study. The MT-PCR assay was compared to four real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays and microscopy by a traditional modified iron hematoxylin stain. The MT-PCR detected 28 G. intestinalis, 26 D. fragilis, 11 E. histolytica, and 9 Cryptosporidium sp. isolates. Detection and identification of the fecal protozoa by MT-PCR demonstrated 100% correlation with the RT-PCR results, and compared to RT-PCR, MT-PCR exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while traditional microscopy of stained fixed fecal smears exhibited sensitivities and specificities of 56% and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp., 38% and 99% for D. fragilis, 47% and 97% for E. histolytica, and 50% and 100% for G. intestinalis. No cross-reactivity was detected in 100 stool samples containing various other bacterial, viral, and protozoan species. The MT-PCR assay was able to provide rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection and identification of the four most important diarrhea-causing protozoan parasites that infect humans. This study also highlights the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by microscopy, and thus, molecular methods such as MT-PCR must be considered the diagnostic methods of choice for enteric protozoan parasites. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.01796-10 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_21048004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>822358688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEoqWwYw3eIDaTwZfEiTdIKB0KqBWonUrsrJPEmXHlxMHOFOa5eEEOnekAKza2fPz5Pxf_SfKc0TljvHzzqbqYU1YomTL6IDlmVJWplPTrw-SYUpWnjIniKHkS4w2lLMvy_HFyxBnNSkqz4-Tn4hbcBibrB-I7crFxkx2d-UGWMLSmJ5cGXLq0vSFfqkvS-UBOzWSae74K23HycfTBtnbTkziO8xk5tWaYoPemBtIFWFln44wsDrG1jZN328k2MCOYh5xZCK0FYofJxMkOgA_wQCpnB4QcuZq8xxV6rC0-TR514KJ5tt9Pkuv3i2X1IT3_fPaxeneeNpnKprSkMldFUxc5B5XLpiwYNMy0Qqiua-tCMQEm7wBXyUUuC6lkbkTddbXimRHiJHm70x03dW_aBpsK4PQYbA9hqz1Y_e_NYNd65W-1oJxmXKLA671A8N822JnubWyMczAYv4m6xKRFxmn-f5JjhaUsSyRnO7IJPsZgukM9jOrfhtBoCH1nCIwg_uLvHg7wvQMQeLUHIOKk8buGxsY_nCgkzrFAjuy4tV2tv9tgNMRe3zS9zpRmmt8hL3dIB17DKqDM9RWnTFCmhOA45F8Tx9WD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822358688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples</title><source>American Society for Microbiology Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Stark, D ; Al-Qassab, S.E ; Barratt, J.L.N ; Stanley, K ; Roberts, T ; Marriott, D ; Harkness, J ; Ellis, J.T</creator><creatorcontrib>Stark, D ; Al-Qassab, S.E ; Barratt, J.L.N ; Stanley, K ; Roberts, T ; Marriott, D ; Harkness, J ; Ellis, J.T</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human clinical samples. A total of 472 fecal samples submitted to the Department of Microbiology at St. Vincent's Hospital were included in the study. The MT-PCR assay was compared to four real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays and microscopy by a traditional modified iron hematoxylin stain. The MT-PCR detected 28 G. intestinalis, 26 D. fragilis, 11 E. histolytica, and 9 Cryptosporidium sp. isolates. Detection and identification of the fecal protozoa by MT-PCR demonstrated 100% correlation with the RT-PCR results, and compared to RT-PCR, MT-PCR exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while traditional microscopy of stained fixed fecal smears exhibited sensitivities and specificities of 56% and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp., 38% and 99% for D. fragilis, 47% and 97% for E. histolytica, and 50% and 100% for G. intestinalis. No cross-reactivity was detected in 100 stool samples containing various other bacterial, viral, and protozoan species. The MT-PCR assay was able to provide rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection and identification of the four most important diarrhea-causing protozoan parasites that infect humans. This study also highlights the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by microscopy, and thus, molecular methods such as MT-PCR must be considered the diagnostic methods of choice for enteric protozoan parasites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01796-10</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21048004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMIDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cryptosporidium ; Cryptosporidium - genetics ; Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification ; Dientamoeba - genetics ; Dientamoeba - isolation & purification ; Dientamoeba fragilis ; Entamoeba histolytica ; Entamoeba histolytica - genetics ; Entamoeba histolytica - isolation & purification ; Feces - parasitology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Giardia intestinalis ; Giardia lamblia - genetics ; Giardia lamblia - isolation & purification ; Humans ; Microbiology ; Microscopy ; Parasitology ; Parasitology - methods ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Protozoan Infections - diagnosis ; Protozoan Infections - parasitology ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011-01, Vol.49 (1), p.257-262</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020426/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020426/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,3189,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23760657$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21048004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stark, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Qassab, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barratt, J.L.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harkness, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, J.T</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples</title><title>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human clinical samples. A total of 472 fecal samples submitted to the Department of Microbiology at St. Vincent's Hospital were included in the study. The MT-PCR assay was compared to four real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays and microscopy by a traditional modified iron hematoxylin stain. The MT-PCR detected 28 G. intestinalis, 26 D. fragilis, 11 E. histolytica, and 9 Cryptosporidium sp. isolates. Detection and identification of the fecal protozoa by MT-PCR demonstrated 100% correlation with the RT-PCR results, and compared to RT-PCR, MT-PCR exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while traditional microscopy of stained fixed fecal smears exhibited sensitivities and specificities of 56% and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp., 38% and 99% for D. fragilis, 47% and 97% for E. histolytica, and 50% and 100% for G. intestinalis. No cross-reactivity was detected in 100 stool samples containing various other bacterial, viral, and protozoan species. The MT-PCR assay was able to provide rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection and identification of the four most important diarrhea-causing protozoan parasites that infect humans. This study also highlights the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by microscopy, and thus, molecular methods such as MT-PCR must be considered the diagnostic methods of choice for enteric protozoan parasites.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium - genetics</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Dientamoeba - genetics</subject><subject>Dientamoeba - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Dientamoeba fragilis</subject><subject>Entamoeba histolytica</subject><subject>Entamoeba histolytica - genetics</subject><subject>Entamoeba histolytica - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Giardia intestinalis</subject><subject>Giardia lamblia - genetics</subject><subject>Giardia lamblia - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><subject>Parasitology - methods</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Protozoan Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Protozoan Infections - parasitology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkstu1DAUhiMEoqWwYw3eIDaTwZfEiTdIKB0KqBWonUrsrJPEmXHlxMHOFOa5eEEOnekAKza2fPz5Pxf_SfKc0TljvHzzqbqYU1YomTL6IDlmVJWplPTrw-SYUpWnjIniKHkS4w2lLMvy_HFyxBnNSkqz4-Tn4hbcBibrB-I7crFxkx2d-UGWMLSmJ5cGXLq0vSFfqkvS-UBOzWSae74K23HycfTBtnbTkziO8xk5tWaYoPemBtIFWFln44wsDrG1jZN328k2MCOYh5xZCK0FYofJxMkOgA_wQCpnB4QcuZq8xxV6rC0-TR514KJ5tt9Pkuv3i2X1IT3_fPaxeneeNpnKprSkMldFUxc5B5XLpiwYNMy0Qqiua-tCMQEm7wBXyUUuC6lkbkTddbXimRHiJHm70x03dW_aBpsK4PQYbA9hqz1Y_e_NYNd65W-1oJxmXKLA671A8N822JnubWyMczAYv4m6xKRFxmn-f5JjhaUsSyRnO7IJPsZgukM9jOrfhtBoCH1nCIwg_uLvHg7wvQMQeLUHIOKk8buGxsY_nCgkzrFAjuy4tV2tv9tgNMRe3zS9zpRmmt8hL3dIB17DKqDM9RWnTFCmhOA45F8Tx9WD</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Stark, D</creator><creator>Al-Qassab, S.E</creator><creator>Barratt, J.L.N</creator><creator>Stanley, K</creator><creator>Roberts, T</creator><creator>Marriott, D</creator><creator>Harkness, J</creator><creator>Ellis, J.T</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><general>American Society for Microbiology (ASM)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples</title><author>Stark, D ; Al-Qassab, S.E ; Barratt, J.L.N ; Stanley, K ; Roberts, T ; Marriott, D ; Harkness, J ; Ellis, J.T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium - genetics</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Dientamoeba - genetics</topic><topic>Dientamoeba - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Dientamoeba fragilis</topic><topic>Entamoeba histolytica</topic><topic>Entamoeba histolytica - genetics</topic><topic>Entamoeba histolytica - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Giardia intestinalis</topic><topic>Giardia lamblia - genetics</topic><topic>Giardia lamblia - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><topic>Parasitology - methods</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Protozoan Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Protozoan Infections - parasitology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stark, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Qassab, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barratt, J.L.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanley, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marriott, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harkness, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, J.T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stark, D</au><au>Al-Qassab, S.E</au><au>Barratt, J.L.N</au><au>Stanley, K</au><au>Roberts, T</au><au>Marriott, D</au><au>Harkness, J</au><au>Ellis, J.T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>257-262</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><coden>JCMIDW</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to describe the first development and evaluation of a multiplex tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay for the detection and identification of 4 common pathogenic protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis, from human clinical samples. A total of 472 fecal samples submitted to the Department of Microbiology at St. Vincent's Hospital were included in the study. The MT-PCR assay was compared to four real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assays and microscopy by a traditional modified iron hematoxylin stain. The MT-PCR detected 28 G. intestinalis, 26 D. fragilis, 11 E. histolytica, and 9 Cryptosporidium sp. isolates. Detection and identification of the fecal protozoa by MT-PCR demonstrated 100% correlation with the RT-PCR results, and compared to RT-PCR, MT-PCR exhibited 100% sensitivity and specificity, while traditional microscopy of stained fixed fecal smears exhibited sensitivities and specificities of 56% and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp., 38% and 99% for D. fragilis, 47% and 97% for E. histolytica, and 50% and 100% for G. intestinalis. No cross-reactivity was detected in 100 stool samples containing various other bacterial, viral, and protozoan species. The MT-PCR assay was able to provide rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection and identification of the four most important diarrhea-causing protozoan parasites that infect humans. This study also highlights the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by microscopy, and thus, molecular methods such as MT-PCR must be considered the diagnostic methods of choice for enteric protozoan parasites.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>21048004</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.01796-10</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011-01, Vol.49 (1), p.257-262 |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_21048004 |
source | American Society for Microbiology Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidium - genetics Cryptosporidium - isolation & purification Dientamoeba - genetics Dientamoeba - isolation & purification Dientamoeba fragilis Entamoeba histolytica Entamoeba histolytica - genetics Entamoeba histolytica - isolation & purification Feces - parasitology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Giardia intestinalis Giardia lamblia - genetics Giardia lamblia - isolation & purification Humans Microbiology Microscopy Parasitology Parasitology - methods Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Protozoan Infections - diagnosis Protozoan Infections - parasitology Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Evaluation of Multiplex Tandem Real-Time PCR for Detection of Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Giardia intestinalis in Clinical Stool Samples |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A44%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Multiplex%20Tandem%20Real-Time%20PCR%20for%20Detection%20of%20Cryptosporidium%20spp.,%20Dientamoeba%20fragilis,%20Entamoeba%20histolytica,%20and%20Giardia%20intestinalis%20in%20Clinical%20Stool%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Microbiology&rft.au=Stark,%20D&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=257-262&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft.coden=JCMIDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.01796-10&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E822358688%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-806597cb752a956c871ac1ed339ffdb7913ae5fa3ae6235676965e3bffb924e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822358688&rft_id=info:pmid/21048004&rfr_iscdi=true |