Loading…

Dose-Weighted Adjusted Mantel-Haenszel Tests for Numeric Scaled Strata in a Randomized Trial

A recent three-arm parallel groups randomized clinical prevention trial had a protocol deviation causing participants to have fewer active doses of an in-office treatment than planned. The original statistical analysis plan stipulated a minimal assumption randomization-based extended Mantel-Haenszel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistics in biopharmaceutical research 2011-05, Vol.3 (2), p.266-275
Main Authors: Gansky, Stuart A., Cheng, Nancy F., Koch, Gary G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-d434de717b349ca45346148485f1bee02a35974f6e64aa94ed4af69ad70ad2763
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-d434de717b349ca45346148485f1bee02a35974f6e64aa94ed4af69ad70ad2763
container_end_page 275
container_issue 2
container_start_page 266
container_title Statistics in biopharmaceutical research
container_volume 3
creator Gansky, Stuart A.
Cheng, Nancy F.
Koch, Gary G.
description A recent three-arm parallel groups randomized clinical prevention trial had a protocol deviation causing participants to have fewer active doses of an in-office treatment than planned. The original statistical analysis plan stipulated a minimal assumption randomization-based extended Mantel-Haenszel (EMH) trend test of the high frequency, low frequency, and zero frequency treatment groups and a binary outcome. Thus, a dose-weighted adjusted EMH (DWAEMH) test was developed with an extra set of weights corresponding to the number of active doses actually available, in the spirit of a pattern mixture model. The method can easily be implemented using standard statistical software. A set of Monte Carlo simulations using a logistic model was undertaken with (and without) actual dose-response effects through 1000 replicates for empirical power estimates (and 2100 for empirical size). Results showed size was maintained and power was improved for DWAEMH versus EMH and logistic regression Wald tests in the presence of a dose effect and treatment by dose interaction.
doi_str_mv 10.1198/sbr.2011.10014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_21709814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826168554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-d434de717b349ca45346148485f1bee02a35974f6e64aa94ed4af69ad70ad2763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1v1DAQxS0Eoh9w5Yhy5JLFk0yc5IJUFWiRCkh0ERckazaetK4cu9gJqP3r8bKlKhInj-zfPL-ZJ8QLkCuAvnudNnFVSYAVSAn4SOxDj6pUNTSPH9R74iClKykVgmyeir0KWtl3gPvi-9uQuPzG9uJyZlMcmaslbYuP5Gd25SmxT7fsijWnORVjiMWnZeJoh-J8IJfB8znSTIX1BRVfyJsw2dt8vY6W3DPxZCSX-PndeSi-vn-3Pj4tzz6ffDg-OisHRDmXBms03EK7qbEfCJsaFWCHXTPChllWVDd9i6NihUQ9skEaVU-mlWSqVtWH4s1O93rZTGwG9tmU09fRThRvdCCr_33x9lJfhJ-6zjtslMwCr-4EYvix5FH1ZNPAzpHnsCQNXaVAdU2DGV3t0CGGlCKP99-A1NtIdI5EbyPRfyLJDS8fmrvH_2aQgX4HWJ_3O9GvEJ3RM924EMdIfrApG_2_-G9Rt5uG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826168554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose-Weighted Adjusted Mantel-Haenszel Tests for Numeric Scaled Strata in a Randomized Trial</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Gansky, Stuart A. ; Cheng, Nancy F. ; Koch, Gary G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gansky, Stuart A. ; Cheng, Nancy F. ; Koch, Gary G.</creatorcontrib><description>A recent three-arm parallel groups randomized clinical prevention trial had a protocol deviation causing participants to have fewer active doses of an in-office treatment than planned. The original statistical analysis plan stipulated a minimal assumption randomization-based extended Mantel-Haenszel (EMH) trend test of the high frequency, low frequency, and zero frequency treatment groups and a binary outcome. Thus, a dose-weighted adjusted EMH (DWAEMH) test was developed with an extra set of weights corresponding to the number of active doses actually available, in the spirit of a pattern mixture model. The method can easily be implemented using standard statistical software. A set of Monte Carlo simulations using a logistic model was undertaken with (and without) actual dose-response effects through 1000 replicates for empirical power estimates (and 2100 for empirical size). Results showed size was maintained and power was improved for DWAEMH versus EMH and logistic regression Wald tests in the presence of a dose effect and treatment by dose interaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1946-6315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1946-6315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1198/sbr.2011.10014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21709814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Chi-square ; Compliance ; Missing data ; Ordinal ; Pattern mixture model ; Randomization test</subject><ispartof>Statistics in biopharmaceutical research, 2011-05, Vol.3 (2), p.266-275</ispartof><rights>American Statistical Association 2011</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-d434de717b349ca45346148485f1bee02a35974f6e64aa94ed4af69ad70ad2763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-d434de717b349ca45346148485f1bee02a35974f6e64aa94ed4af69ad70ad2763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21709814$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gansky, Stuart A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Nancy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Gary G.</creatorcontrib><title>Dose-Weighted Adjusted Mantel-Haenszel Tests for Numeric Scaled Strata in a Randomized Trial</title><title>Statistics in biopharmaceutical research</title><addtitle>Stat Biopharm Res</addtitle><description>A recent three-arm parallel groups randomized clinical prevention trial had a protocol deviation causing participants to have fewer active doses of an in-office treatment than planned. The original statistical analysis plan stipulated a minimal assumption randomization-based extended Mantel-Haenszel (EMH) trend test of the high frequency, low frequency, and zero frequency treatment groups and a binary outcome. Thus, a dose-weighted adjusted EMH (DWAEMH) test was developed with an extra set of weights corresponding to the number of active doses actually available, in the spirit of a pattern mixture model. The method can easily be implemented using standard statistical software. A set of Monte Carlo simulations using a logistic model was undertaken with (and without) actual dose-response effects through 1000 replicates for empirical power estimates (and 2100 for empirical size). Results showed size was maintained and power was improved for DWAEMH versus EMH and logistic regression Wald tests in the presence of a dose effect and treatment by dose interaction.</description><subject>Chi-square</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Ordinal</subject><subject>Pattern mixture model</subject><subject>Randomization test</subject><issn>1946-6315</issn><issn>1946-6315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1v1DAQxS0Eoh9w5Yhy5JLFk0yc5IJUFWiRCkh0ERckazaetK4cu9gJqP3r8bKlKhInj-zfPL-ZJ8QLkCuAvnudNnFVSYAVSAn4SOxDj6pUNTSPH9R74iClKykVgmyeir0KWtl3gPvi-9uQuPzG9uJyZlMcmaslbYuP5Gd25SmxT7fsijWnORVjiMWnZeJoh-J8IJfB8znSTIX1BRVfyJsw2dt8vY6W3DPxZCSX-PndeSi-vn-3Pj4tzz6ffDg-OisHRDmXBms03EK7qbEfCJsaFWCHXTPChllWVDd9i6NihUQ9skEaVU-mlWSqVtWH4s1O93rZTGwG9tmU09fRThRvdCCr_33x9lJfhJ-6zjtslMwCr-4EYvix5FH1ZNPAzpHnsCQNXaVAdU2DGV3t0CGGlCKP99-A1NtIdI5EbyPRfyLJDS8fmrvH_2aQgX4HWJ_3O9GvEJ3RM924EMdIfrApG_2_-G9Rt5uG</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Gansky, Stuart A.</creator><creator>Cheng, Nancy F.</creator><creator>Koch, Gary G.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Dose-Weighted Adjusted Mantel-Haenszel Tests for Numeric Scaled Strata in a Randomized Trial</title><author>Gansky, Stuart A. ; Cheng, Nancy F. ; Koch, Gary G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-d434de717b349ca45346148485f1bee02a35974f6e64aa94ed4af69ad70ad2763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Chi-square</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Ordinal</topic><topic>Pattern mixture model</topic><topic>Randomization test</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gansky, Stuart A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Nancy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Gary G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Statistics in biopharmaceutical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gansky, Stuart A.</au><au>Cheng, Nancy F.</au><au>Koch, Gary G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose-Weighted Adjusted Mantel-Haenszel Tests for Numeric Scaled Strata in a Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in biopharmaceutical research</jtitle><addtitle>Stat Biopharm Res</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>266-275</pages><issn>1946-6315</issn><eissn>1946-6315</eissn><abstract>A recent three-arm parallel groups randomized clinical prevention trial had a protocol deviation causing participants to have fewer active doses of an in-office treatment than planned. The original statistical analysis plan stipulated a minimal assumption randomization-based extended Mantel-Haenszel (EMH) trend test of the high frequency, low frequency, and zero frequency treatment groups and a binary outcome. Thus, a dose-weighted adjusted EMH (DWAEMH) test was developed with an extra set of weights corresponding to the number of active doses actually available, in the spirit of a pattern mixture model. The method can easily be implemented using standard statistical software. A set of Monte Carlo simulations using a logistic model was undertaken with (and without) actual dose-response effects through 1000 replicates for empirical power estimates (and 2100 for empirical size). Results showed size was maintained and power was improved for DWAEMH versus EMH and logistic regression Wald tests in the presence of a dose effect and treatment by dose interaction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>21709814</pmid><doi>10.1198/sbr.2011.10014</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1946-6315
ispartof Statistics in biopharmaceutical research, 2011-05, Vol.3 (2), p.266-275
issn 1946-6315
1946-6315
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_21709814
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Chi-square
Compliance
Missing data
Ordinal
Pattern mixture model
Randomization test
title Dose-Weighted Adjusted Mantel-Haenszel Tests for Numeric Scaled Strata in a Randomized Trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose-Weighted%20Adjusted%20Mantel-Haenszel%20Tests%20for%20Numeric%20Scaled%20Strata%20in%20a%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20biopharmaceutical%20research&rft.au=Gansky,%20Stuart%20A.&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=266-275&rft.issn=1946-6315&rft.eissn=1946-6315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1198/sbr.2011.10014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826168554%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-d434de717b349ca45346148485f1bee02a35974f6e64aa94ed4af69ad70ad2763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826168554&rft_id=info:pmid/21709814&rfr_iscdi=true