Assessing students' perceptions of the effects of a new Canadian longitudinal pre-clerkship family medicine experience

Background: Despite the implementation of longitudinal community-based pre-clerkship courses in several Canadian medical schools, there is a paucity of data assessing students' views regarding their experiences. The present study sought to measure students' perceived effects of the new Lon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Education for primary care 2016-05, Vol.27 (3), p.180-187
Main Authors: Willoughby, Karen A., Rodríguez, Charo, Boillat, Miriam, Dove, Marion, Nugus, Peter, Steinert, Yvonne, Lalla, Leonora
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Canada
Clinical Clerkship
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
family medicine
Female
General Practice
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
longitudinal pre-clerkship community medical training
Longitudinal Studies
Male
primary care
Students, Medical - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Undergraduate medical education
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Despite the implementation of longitudinal community-based pre-clerkship courses in several Canadian medical schools, there is a paucity of data assessing students' views regarding their experiences. The present study sought to measure students' perceived effects of the new Longitudinal Family Medicine Experience (LFME) course at McGill University. Methods: A 34-item questionnaire called the 'LFME Survey (Student Version)' was created, and all first-year medical students completed it online. Results: The participation rate was 64% (N = 120). Eight factors were identified in the factor analysis performed: overall satisfaction, satisfaction with preceptor, knowledge, affective learning, clinical skills, teaching/feedback, professional identity/professionalism and attitude toward primary care. Factor composite scores were above 4.5/7,indicating that students had positive perceptions of the LFME. Students felt that the LFME was a valuable educational experience and that their preceptors were good role-models. The course improved students' confidence, reinforced their commitment to being a physician and increased their positive attitude toward primary care. Interpretation: Along with similar pre-clerkship courses, the LFME provides a valuable context for developing students' clinical skills, providing real-world cases, teaching patient-centred care and improving attitudes toward primary care. The LFME Survey appears to be a promising and innovative tool that deserves further validation.
ISSN:1473-9879
1475-990X
DOI:10.1080/14739879.2016.1172033