Detection of anatomical changes in lung cancer patients with 2D time-integrated, 2D time-resolved and 3D time-integrated portal dosimetry: a simulation study

• Published in: Physics in medicine & biology 2017-07, Vol.62 (15), p.6044-6061
• Main Authors: Wolfs, Cecile J A, Brás, Mariana G, Schyns, Lotte E J R, Nijsten, Sebastiaan M J J G, van Elmpt, Wouter, Scheib, Stefan G, Baltes, Christof, Podesta, Mark, Verhaegen, Frank
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: adaptive radiotherapy; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; anatomical changes; Computer Simulation; DVH metrics; Female; gamma analysis; Gamma Rays; Humans; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Lung Neoplasms - pathology; Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Male; portal dosimetry; Radiometry - instrumentation; Radiometry - methods; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
• ISSN: 0031-9155; 1361-6560; 1361-6560
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7730

The aim of this work is to assess the performance of 2D time-integrated (2D-TI), 2D time-resolved (2D-TR) and 3D time-integrated (3D-TI) portal dosimetry in detecting dose discrepancies between the planned and (simulated) delivered dose caused by simulated changes in the anatomy of lung cancer patients. For six lung cancer patients, tumor shift, tumor regression and pleural effusion are simulated by modifying their CT images. Based on the modified CT images, time-integrated (TI) and time-resolved (TR) portal dose images (PDIs) are simulated and 3D-TI doses are calculated. The modified and original PDIs and 3D doses are compared by a gamma analysis with various gamma criteria. Furthermore, the difference in the D95% (ΔD95%) of the GTV is calculated and used as a gold standard. The correlation between the gamma fail rate and the ΔD95% is investigated, as well the sensitivity and specificity of all combinations of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate threshold. On the individual patient level, there is a correlation between the gamma fail rate and the ΔD95%, which cannot be found at the group level. The sensitivity and specificity analysis showed that there is not one combination of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate threshold that can detect all simulated anatomical changes. This work shows that it will be more beneficial to relate portal dosimetry and DVH analysis on the patient level, rather than trying to quantify a relationship for a group of patients. With regards to optimizing sensitivity and specificity, different combinations of portal dosimetry method, gamma criteria and gamma fail rate should be used to optimally detect certain types of anatomical changes.