Loading…
Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review
Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.144-150 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643 |
container_end_page | 150 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 144 |
container_title | The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick Christopher, Shefali Clewley, Derek Ledbetter, Leila Cook, Christian Jaeger Cook, Chad E |
description | Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders individuals more control towards the health care they choose to receive, and has been shown to improve patient outcomes.
Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the added-value of SDM on clinical health-related outcomes in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions.
Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL.
Study selection: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. To be considered for review, the study had to meet all the following criteria: (1) prospective studies that involved treatment decision-making; (2) randomized controlled trial design; (3) involving patients faced with having to make a treatment decision; (4) comparing SDM with a control intervention and (5) including one or more of the following outcome measures: well-being, costs, health-related pain or disability measures, or quality of life.
Study appraisal: A priori, we determined to perform methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials.
Results: We did not find a single study that looked at the true effect of SDM on patient reported outcomes in a population with musculoskeletal pain.
Conclusion: For the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, in the light of the current evidence (none), we estimate that it would be wise to explore the effectiveness of SDM before forcing its large-scale implementation in rehabilitation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10669817.2017.1323607 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_28694677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1917961209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokPhEUBesklrJ44vG6AqlyJVYgNry7FPOqZOPNjOjOYxeGM8mmkFGzb24nz_fyx_CL2m5IISSS4p4VxJKi5aUg_atR0n4glatYS1DaeSP0WrA9McoDP0IuefhBDJiHyOzlrJFeNCrNDvjxEyzmuTwGEH1mcfZzyZez_f4QR5CSVjP-MBSoGE12BCWddBMKUG4lJsnGrBGFOlnN96t5iQ8c5XamP8PC4BT0u2S4j5HgIUE7DzOSYHKb_HVzjvc4HJFG9r69bD7iV6NtYKeHW6z9GPz5--X980t9--fL2-um0s47I0fe9Iy-RASG8dt-CUGhQFB4z3whBjBJGUdbzvJANGlVHdIHrjOGWj4Jx15-jdsXezDBM4C3NJJuhN8pNJex2N1_9OZr_Wd3Gre6akUH0teHsqSPHXArnoyWcLIZgZ4pI1VVQoTluiKtofUZtizgnGxzWU6INO_aBTH3Tqk86ae_P3Gx9TD_4q8OEI1J-OaTK7mILTxexDTGMyc_Wpu__v-AMim7PA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917961209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick ; Christopher, Shefali ; Clewley, Derek ; Ledbetter, Leila ; Cook, Christian Jaeger ; Cook, Chad E</creator><creatorcontrib>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick ; Christopher, Shefali ; Clewley, Derek ; Ledbetter, Leila ; Cook, Christian Jaeger ; Cook, Chad E</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders individuals more control towards the health care they choose to receive, and has been shown to improve patient outcomes.
Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the added-value of SDM on clinical health-related outcomes in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions.
Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL.
Study selection: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. To be considered for review, the study had to meet all the following criteria: (1) prospective studies that involved treatment decision-making; (2) randomized controlled trial design; (3) involving patients faced with having to make a treatment decision; (4) comparing SDM with a control intervention and (5) including one or more of the following outcome measures: well-being, costs, health-related pain or disability measures, or quality of life.
Study appraisal: A priori, we determined to perform methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials.
Results: We did not find a single study that looked at the true effect of SDM on patient reported outcomes in a population with musculoskeletal pain.
Conclusion: For the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, in the light of the current evidence (none), we estimate that it would be wise to explore the effectiveness of SDM before forcing its large-scale implementation in rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-9817</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-6186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2017.1323607</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28694677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>musculoskeletal pain ; Original Research Papers ; patient-reported outcomes measures ; Shared-decision-making ; systematic review</subject><ispartof>The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.144-150</ispartof><rights>2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9957-4175 ; 0000-0002-5763-8975 ; 0000-0002-5206-8002 ; 0000-0003-0869-8856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498795/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498795/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694677$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Shefali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clewley, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledbetter, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Christian Jaeger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Chad E</creatorcontrib><title>Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review</title><title>The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy</title><addtitle>J Man Manip Ther</addtitle><description>Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders individuals more control towards the health care they choose to receive, and has been shown to improve patient outcomes.
Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the added-value of SDM on clinical health-related outcomes in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions.
Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL.
Study selection: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. To be considered for review, the study had to meet all the following criteria: (1) prospective studies that involved treatment decision-making; (2) randomized controlled trial design; (3) involving patients faced with having to make a treatment decision; (4) comparing SDM with a control intervention and (5) including one or more of the following outcome measures: well-being, costs, health-related pain or disability measures, or quality of life.
Study appraisal: A priori, we determined to perform methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials.
Results: We did not find a single study that looked at the true effect of SDM on patient reported outcomes in a population with musculoskeletal pain.
Conclusion: For the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, in the light of the current evidence (none), we estimate that it would be wise to explore the effectiveness of SDM before forcing its large-scale implementation in rehabilitation.</description><subject>musculoskeletal pain</subject><subject>Original Research Papers</subject><subject>patient-reported outcomes measures</subject><subject>Shared-decision-making</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><issn>1066-9817</issn><issn>2042-6186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokPhEUBesklrJ44vG6AqlyJVYgNry7FPOqZOPNjOjOYxeGM8mmkFGzb24nz_fyx_CL2m5IISSS4p4VxJKi5aUg_atR0n4glatYS1DaeSP0WrA9McoDP0IuefhBDJiHyOzlrJFeNCrNDvjxEyzmuTwGEH1mcfZzyZez_f4QR5CSVjP-MBSoGE12BCWddBMKUG4lJsnGrBGFOlnN96t5iQ8c5XamP8PC4BT0u2S4j5HgIUE7DzOSYHKb_HVzjvc4HJFG9r69bD7iV6NtYKeHW6z9GPz5--X980t9--fL2-um0s47I0fe9Iy-RASG8dt-CUGhQFB4z3whBjBJGUdbzvJANGlVHdIHrjOGWj4Jx15-jdsXezDBM4C3NJJuhN8pNJex2N1_9OZr_Wd3Gre6akUH0teHsqSPHXArnoyWcLIZgZ4pI1VVQoTluiKtofUZtizgnGxzWU6INO_aBTH3Tqk86ae_P3Gx9TD_4q8OEI1J-OaTK7mILTxexDTGMyc_Wpu__v-AMim7PA</recordid><startdate>20170527</startdate><enddate>20170527</enddate><creator>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick</creator><creator>Christopher, Shefali</creator><creator>Clewley, Derek</creator><creator>Ledbetter, Leila</creator><creator>Cook, Christian Jaeger</creator><creator>Cook, Chad E</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-4175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-8975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-8002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-8856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170527</creationdate><title>Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review</title><author>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick ; Christopher, Shefali ; Clewley, Derek ; Ledbetter, Leila ; Cook, Christian Jaeger ; Cook, Chad E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>musculoskeletal pain</topic><topic>Original Research Papers</topic><topic>patient-reported outcomes measures</topic><topic>Shared-decision-making</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Shefali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clewley, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledbetter, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Christian Jaeger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Chad E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick</au><au>Christopher, Shefali</au><au>Clewley, Derek</au><au>Ledbetter, Leila</au><au>Cook, Christian Jaeger</au><au>Cook, Chad E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Man Manip Ther</addtitle><date>2017-05-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>144-150</pages><issn>1066-9817</issn><eissn>2042-6186</eissn><abstract>Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders individuals more control towards the health care they choose to receive, and has been shown to improve patient outcomes.
Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the added-value of SDM on clinical health-related outcomes in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions.
Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL.
Study selection: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. To be considered for review, the study had to meet all the following criteria: (1) prospective studies that involved treatment decision-making; (2) randomized controlled trial design; (3) involving patients faced with having to make a treatment decision; (4) comparing SDM with a control intervention and (5) including one or more of the following outcome measures: well-being, costs, health-related pain or disability measures, or quality of life.
Study appraisal: A priori, we determined to perform methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials.
Results: We did not find a single study that looked at the true effect of SDM on patient reported outcomes in a population with musculoskeletal pain.
Conclusion: For the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, in the light of the current evidence (none), we estimate that it would be wise to explore the effectiveness of SDM before forcing its large-scale implementation in rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>28694677</pmid><doi>10.1080/10669817.2017.1323607</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-4175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-8975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-8002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-8856</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1066-9817 |
ispartof | The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.144-150 |
issn | 1066-9817 2042-6186 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_28694677 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list); PubMed Central |
subjects | musculoskeletal pain Original Research Papers patient-reported outcomes measures Shared-decision-making systematic review |
title | Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A52%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20shared%20decision%20making%20results%20in%20better%20health%20related%20outcomes%20for%20individuals%20with%20painful%20musculoskeletal%20disorders?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20manual%20&%20manipulative%20therapy&rft.au=Tousignant-Laflamme,%20Yannick&rft.date=2017-05-27&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=144-150&rft.issn=1066-9817&rft.eissn=2042-6186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10669817.2017.1323607&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1917961209%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917961209&rft_id=info:pmid/28694677&rfr_iscdi=true |