Loading…

Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review

Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.144-150
Main Authors: Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick, Christopher, Shefali, Clewley, Derek, Ledbetter, Leila, Cook, Christian Jaeger, Cook, Chad E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643
container_end_page 150
container_issue 3
container_start_page 144
container_title The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy
container_volume 25
creator Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick
Christopher, Shefali
Clewley, Derek
Ledbetter, Leila
Cook, Christian Jaeger
Cook, Chad E
description Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders individuals more control towards the health care they choose to receive, and has been shown to improve patient outcomes. Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the added-value of SDM on clinical health-related outcomes in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL. Study selection: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. To be considered for review, the study had to meet all the following criteria: (1) prospective studies that involved treatment decision-making; (2) randomized controlled trial design; (3) involving patients faced with having to make a treatment decision; (4) comparing SDM with a control intervention and (5) including one or more of the following outcome measures: well-being, costs, health-related pain or disability measures, or quality of life. Study appraisal: A priori, we determined to perform methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: We did not find a single study that looked at the true effect of SDM on patient reported outcomes in a population with musculoskeletal pain. Conclusion: For the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, in the light of the current evidence (none), we estimate that it would be wise to explore the effectiveness of SDM before forcing its large-scale implementation in rehabilitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10669817.2017.1323607
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_28694677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1917961209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokPhEUBesklrJ44vG6AqlyJVYgNry7FPOqZOPNjOjOYxeGM8mmkFGzb24nz_fyx_CL2m5IISSS4p4VxJKi5aUg_atR0n4glatYS1DaeSP0WrA9McoDP0IuefhBDJiHyOzlrJFeNCrNDvjxEyzmuTwGEH1mcfZzyZez_f4QR5CSVjP-MBSoGE12BCWddBMKUG4lJsnGrBGFOlnN96t5iQ8c5XamP8PC4BT0u2S4j5HgIUE7DzOSYHKb_HVzjvc4HJFG9r69bD7iV6NtYKeHW6z9GPz5--X980t9--fL2-um0s47I0fe9Iy-RASG8dt-CUGhQFB4z3whBjBJGUdbzvJANGlVHdIHrjOGWj4Jx15-jdsXezDBM4C3NJJuhN8pNJex2N1_9OZr_Wd3Gre6akUH0teHsqSPHXArnoyWcLIZgZ4pI1VVQoTluiKtofUZtizgnGxzWU6INO_aBTH3Tqk86ae_P3Gx9TD_4q8OEI1J-OaTK7mILTxexDTGMyc_Wpu__v-AMim7PA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917961209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick ; Christopher, Shefali ; Clewley, Derek ; Ledbetter, Leila ; Cook, Christian Jaeger ; Cook, Chad E</creator><creatorcontrib>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick ; Christopher, Shefali ; Clewley, Derek ; Ledbetter, Leila ; Cook, Christian Jaeger ; Cook, Chad E</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders individuals more control towards the health care they choose to receive, and has been shown to improve patient outcomes. Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the added-value of SDM on clinical health-related outcomes in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL. Study selection: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. To be considered for review, the study had to meet all the following criteria: (1) prospective studies that involved treatment decision-making; (2) randomized controlled trial design; (3) involving patients faced with having to make a treatment decision; (4) comparing SDM with a control intervention and (5) including one or more of the following outcome measures: well-being, costs, health-related pain or disability measures, or quality of life. Study appraisal: A priori, we determined to perform methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: We did not find a single study that looked at the true effect of SDM on patient reported outcomes in a population with musculoskeletal pain. Conclusion: For the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, in the light of the current evidence (none), we estimate that it would be wise to explore the effectiveness of SDM before forcing its large-scale implementation in rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-9817</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-6186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2017.1323607</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28694677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>musculoskeletal pain ; Original Research Papers ; patient-reported outcomes measures ; Shared-decision-making ; systematic review</subject><ispartof>The Journal of manual &amp; manipulative therapy, 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.144-150</ispartof><rights>2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9957-4175 ; 0000-0002-5763-8975 ; 0000-0002-5206-8002 ; 0000-0003-0869-8856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498795/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498795/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694677$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Shefali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clewley, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledbetter, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Christian Jaeger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Chad E</creatorcontrib><title>Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review</title><title>The Journal of manual &amp; manipulative therapy</title><addtitle>J Man Manip Ther</addtitle><description>Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders individuals more control towards the health care they choose to receive, and has been shown to improve patient outcomes. Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the added-value of SDM on clinical health-related outcomes in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL. Study selection: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. To be considered for review, the study had to meet all the following criteria: (1) prospective studies that involved treatment decision-making; (2) randomized controlled trial design; (3) involving patients faced with having to make a treatment decision; (4) comparing SDM with a control intervention and (5) including one or more of the following outcome measures: well-being, costs, health-related pain or disability measures, or quality of life. Study appraisal: A priori, we determined to perform methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: We did not find a single study that looked at the true effect of SDM on patient reported outcomes in a population with musculoskeletal pain. Conclusion: For the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, in the light of the current evidence (none), we estimate that it would be wise to explore the effectiveness of SDM before forcing its large-scale implementation in rehabilitation.</description><subject>musculoskeletal pain</subject><subject>Original Research Papers</subject><subject>patient-reported outcomes measures</subject><subject>Shared-decision-making</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><issn>1066-9817</issn><issn>2042-6186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokPhEUBesklrJ44vG6AqlyJVYgNry7FPOqZOPNjOjOYxeGM8mmkFGzb24nz_fyx_CL2m5IISSS4p4VxJKi5aUg_atR0n4glatYS1DaeSP0WrA9McoDP0IuefhBDJiHyOzlrJFeNCrNDvjxEyzmuTwGEH1mcfZzyZez_f4QR5CSVjP-MBSoGE12BCWddBMKUG4lJsnGrBGFOlnN96t5iQ8c5XamP8PC4BT0u2S4j5HgIUE7DzOSYHKb_HVzjvc4HJFG9r69bD7iV6NtYKeHW6z9GPz5--X980t9--fL2-um0s47I0fe9Iy-RASG8dt-CUGhQFB4z3whBjBJGUdbzvJANGlVHdIHrjOGWj4Jx15-jdsXezDBM4C3NJJuhN8pNJex2N1_9OZr_Wd3Gre6akUH0teHsqSPHXArnoyWcLIZgZ4pI1VVQoTluiKtofUZtizgnGxzWU6INO_aBTH3Tqk86ae_P3Gx9TD_4q8OEI1J-OaTK7mILTxexDTGMyc_Wpu__v-AMim7PA</recordid><startdate>20170527</startdate><enddate>20170527</enddate><creator>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick</creator><creator>Christopher, Shefali</creator><creator>Clewley, Derek</creator><creator>Ledbetter, Leila</creator><creator>Cook, Christian Jaeger</creator><creator>Cook, Chad E</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-4175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-8975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-8002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-8856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170527</creationdate><title>Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review</title><author>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick ; Christopher, Shefali ; Clewley, Derek ; Ledbetter, Leila ; Cook, Christian Jaeger ; Cook, Chad E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>musculoskeletal pain</topic><topic>Original Research Papers</topic><topic>patient-reported outcomes measures</topic><topic>Shared-decision-making</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Shefali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clewley, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledbetter, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Christian Jaeger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Chad E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of manual &amp; manipulative therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick</au><au>Christopher, Shefali</au><au>Clewley, Derek</au><au>Ledbetter, Leila</au><au>Cook, Christian Jaeger</au><au>Cook, Chad E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of manual &amp; manipulative therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Man Manip Ther</addtitle><date>2017-05-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>144-150</pages><issn>1066-9817</issn><eissn>2042-6186</eissn><abstract>Background: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a dynamic process by which the health care professional and the patient influence each other in making health-related choices or decisions. SDM is strongly embedded in today's health care approaches, and is advocated as an ideal model since it renders individuals more control towards the health care they choose to receive, and has been shown to improve patient outcomes. Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the added-value of SDM on clinical health-related outcomes in patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Data sources: PubMed and CINAHL. Study selection: PRISMA guidelines were followed for this review. To be considered for review, the study had to meet all the following criteria: (1) prospective studies that involved treatment decision-making; (2) randomized controlled trial design; (3) involving patients faced with having to make a treatment decision; (4) comparing SDM with a control intervention and (5) including one or more of the following outcome measures: well-being, costs, health-related pain or disability measures, or quality of life. Study appraisal: A priori, we determined to perform methodological quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: We did not find a single study that looked at the true effect of SDM on patient reported outcomes in a population with musculoskeletal pain. Conclusion: For the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, in the light of the current evidence (none), we estimate that it would be wise to explore the effectiveness of SDM before forcing its large-scale implementation in rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>28694677</pmid><doi>10.1080/10669817.2017.1323607</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-4175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-8975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-8002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-8856</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1066-9817
ispartof The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2017-05, Vol.25 (3), p.144-150
issn 1066-9817
2042-6186
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_28694677
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list); PubMed Central
subjects musculoskeletal pain
Original Research Papers
patient-reported outcomes measures
Shared-decision-making
systematic review
title Does shared decision making results in better health related outcomes for individuals with painful musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A52%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20shared%20decision%20making%20results%20in%20better%20health%20related%20outcomes%20for%20individuals%20with%20painful%20musculoskeletal%20disorders?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20manual%20&%20manipulative%20therapy&rft.au=Tousignant-Laflamme,%20Yannick&rft.date=2017-05-27&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=144-150&rft.issn=1066-9817&rft.eissn=2042-6186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10669817.2017.1323607&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1917961209%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55d0248b005cd6ced99b91ede4657a0aa70814365384e419a93b75ad614f76643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917961209&rft_id=info:pmid/28694677&rfr_iscdi=true