Loading…

Intentional Switching Between Bimanual Coordination Patterns

Previous theoretical and empirical work indicates that intentional changes in a bimanual coordination pattern depends on the stability of the bimanual coordination pattern (Kelso, Schotz, & Schöner, 1988; Scholz & Kelso, 1990). The present experiments retest this notion when online Lissajous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of motor behavior 2018-09, Vol.50 (5), p.538-556
Main Authors: Wang, Chaoyi, Kennedy, Deanna M., Panzer, Stefan, Shea, Charles H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-cc7257186ca79d5c6422aa74fece0e58b3efbf3511b6121fbac5669173fa63833
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-cc7257186ca79d5c6422aa74fece0e58b3efbf3511b6121fbac5669173fa63833
container_end_page 556
container_issue 5
container_start_page 538
container_title Journal of motor behavior
container_volume 50
creator Wang, Chaoyi
Kennedy, Deanna M.
Panzer, Stefan
Shea, Charles H.
description Previous theoretical and empirical work indicates that intentional changes in a bimanual coordination pattern depends on the stability of the bimanual coordination pattern (Kelso, Schotz, & Schöner, 1988; Scholz & Kelso, 1990). The present experiments retest this notion when online Lissajous displays are provided. Switching to and from in-phase and antiphase and to and from 90° and 270° were tested in Experiment 1. Participants were able to very effectively produce the 180°, 90°, and 270° coordination patterns although performance of the in-phase coordination task was even more stable. The data indicated that switching to in-phase from antiphase was more rapid than vice versa and that switching times between 90° to 270° were similar. Experiment 2 investigated switching between 1:2 and 2:1 bimanual coordination patterns. The results indicated that switching time was similar between the 2:1 and 1:2 coordination tasks and that increases in stability over practice resulted in additional decreases in switching times. This provides additional evidence that the attractor landscape is fundamentally different dependent on the type of information provided the performer. What remains to be done is to reconcile these results with the various theories/perspectives currently used to describe and explain bimanual coordination.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00222895.2017.1375453
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_29016257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2103353699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-cc7257186ca79d5c6422aa74fece0e58b3efbf3511b6121fbac5669173fa63833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhi3UChbKI4BW6oVLtjN2bCcSh8IKKBJSK7WcLcdrQ1DWBtvRirfH0S4cemAuc5hvZvR_hJwgLBAa-AFAKW1avqCAcoFM8pqzPTLDtoYKgcovZDYx1QQdkMOUnqCUBNgnB7QFFJTLGTm_9dn63Aevh_nfTZ_NY-8f5pc2b6z188t-rf1YRssQ4qr3eiLnf3TONvr0jXx1ekj2eNePyP311b_lr-ru983t8uKuMrWAXBkjyy9shNGyXXEjakq1lrWzxoLlTces6xzjiJ1Aiq7ThgvRomROC9YwdkTOtnefY3gZbcpq3Sdjh0F7G8aksOWADUqsC_r9P_QpjLGES4oiMMaZaNtC8S1lYkgpWqeeY0kaXxWCmvSqd71q0qt2esve6e762K3t6mPr3WcBfm6B3rsQ13oT4rBSWb8OIbqovemTYp__eAMAo4f8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2103353699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intentional Switching Between Bimanual Coordination Patterns</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Wang, Chaoyi ; Kennedy, Deanna M. ; Panzer, Stefan ; Shea, Charles H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chaoyi ; Kennedy, Deanna M. ; Panzer, Stefan ; Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous theoretical and empirical work indicates that intentional changes in a bimanual coordination pattern depends on the stability of the bimanual coordination pattern (Kelso, Schotz, &amp; Schöner, 1988; Scholz &amp; Kelso, 1990). The present experiments retest this notion when online Lissajous displays are provided. Switching to and from in-phase and antiphase and to and from 90° and 270° were tested in Experiment 1. Participants were able to very effectively produce the 180°, 90°, and 270° coordination patterns although performance of the in-phase coordination task was even more stable. The data indicated that switching to in-phase from antiphase was more rapid than vice versa and that switching times between 90° to 270° were similar. Experiment 2 investigated switching between 1:2 and 2:1 bimanual coordination patterns. The results indicated that switching time was similar between the 2:1 and 1:2 coordination tasks and that increases in stability over practice resulted in additional decreases in switching times. This provides additional evidence that the attractor landscape is fundamentally different dependent on the type of information provided the performer. What remains to be done is to reconcile these results with the various theories/perspectives currently used to describe and explain bimanual coordination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2895</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-1027</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2017.1375453</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29016257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Routledge</publisher><subject>Bimanual coordination ; Coordination ; Integrated displays ; Intentional switching ; Motor ability</subject><ispartof>Journal of motor behavior, 2018-09, Vol.50 (5), p.538-556</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2017</rights><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-cc7257186ca79d5c6422aa74fece0e58b3efbf3511b6121fbac5669173fa63833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-cc7257186ca79d5c6422aa74fece0e58b3efbf3511b6121fbac5669173fa63833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29016257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chaoyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Deanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><title>Intentional Switching Between Bimanual Coordination Patterns</title><title>Journal of motor behavior</title><addtitle>J Mot Behav</addtitle><description>Previous theoretical and empirical work indicates that intentional changes in a bimanual coordination pattern depends on the stability of the bimanual coordination pattern (Kelso, Schotz, &amp; Schöner, 1988; Scholz &amp; Kelso, 1990). The present experiments retest this notion when online Lissajous displays are provided. Switching to and from in-phase and antiphase and to and from 90° and 270° were tested in Experiment 1. Participants were able to very effectively produce the 180°, 90°, and 270° coordination patterns although performance of the in-phase coordination task was even more stable. The data indicated that switching to in-phase from antiphase was more rapid than vice versa and that switching times between 90° to 270° were similar. Experiment 2 investigated switching between 1:2 and 2:1 bimanual coordination patterns. The results indicated that switching time was similar between the 2:1 and 1:2 coordination tasks and that increases in stability over practice resulted in additional decreases in switching times. This provides additional evidence that the attractor landscape is fundamentally different dependent on the type of information provided the performer. What remains to be done is to reconcile these results with the various theories/perspectives currently used to describe and explain bimanual coordination.</description><subject>Bimanual coordination</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Integrated displays</subject><subject>Intentional switching</subject><subject>Motor ability</subject><issn>0022-2895</issn><issn>1940-1027</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhi3UChbKI4BW6oVLtjN2bCcSh8IKKBJSK7WcLcdrQ1DWBtvRirfH0S4cemAuc5hvZvR_hJwgLBAa-AFAKW1avqCAcoFM8pqzPTLDtoYKgcovZDYx1QQdkMOUnqCUBNgnB7QFFJTLGTm_9dn63Aevh_nfTZ_NY-8f5pc2b6z188t-rf1YRssQ4qr3eiLnf3TONvr0jXx1ekj2eNePyP311b_lr-ru983t8uKuMrWAXBkjyy9shNGyXXEjakq1lrWzxoLlTces6xzjiJ1Aiq7ThgvRomROC9YwdkTOtnefY3gZbcpq3Sdjh0F7G8aksOWADUqsC_r9P_QpjLGES4oiMMaZaNtC8S1lYkgpWqeeY0kaXxWCmvSqd71q0qt2esve6e762K3t6mPr3WcBfm6B3rsQ13oT4rBSWb8OIbqovemTYp__eAMAo4f8</recordid><startdate>20180903</startdate><enddate>20180903</enddate><creator>Wang, Chaoyi</creator><creator>Kennedy, Deanna M.</creator><creator>Panzer, Stefan</creator><creator>Shea, Charles H.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180903</creationdate><title>Intentional Switching Between Bimanual Coordination Patterns</title><author>Wang, Chaoyi ; Kennedy, Deanna M. ; Panzer, Stefan ; Shea, Charles H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-cc7257186ca79d5c6422aa74fece0e58b3efbf3511b6121fbac5669173fa63833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bimanual coordination</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Integrated displays</topic><topic>Intentional switching</topic><topic>Motor ability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chaoyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Deanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of motor behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Chaoyi</au><au>Kennedy, Deanna M.</au><au>Panzer, Stefan</au><au>Shea, Charles H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intentional Switching Between Bimanual Coordination Patterns</atitle><jtitle>Journal of motor behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Mot Behav</addtitle><date>2018-09-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>538</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>538-556</pages><issn>0022-2895</issn><eissn>1940-1027</eissn><abstract>Previous theoretical and empirical work indicates that intentional changes in a bimanual coordination pattern depends on the stability of the bimanual coordination pattern (Kelso, Schotz, &amp; Schöner, 1988; Scholz &amp; Kelso, 1990). The present experiments retest this notion when online Lissajous displays are provided. Switching to and from in-phase and antiphase and to and from 90° and 270° were tested in Experiment 1. Participants were able to very effectively produce the 180°, 90°, and 270° coordination patterns although performance of the in-phase coordination task was even more stable. The data indicated that switching to in-phase from antiphase was more rapid than vice versa and that switching times between 90° to 270° were similar. Experiment 2 investigated switching between 1:2 and 2:1 bimanual coordination patterns. The results indicated that switching time was similar between the 2:1 and 1:2 coordination tasks and that increases in stability over practice resulted in additional decreases in switching times. This provides additional evidence that the attractor landscape is fundamentally different dependent on the type of information provided the performer. What remains to be done is to reconcile these results with the various theories/perspectives currently used to describe and explain bimanual coordination.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>29016257</pmid><doi>10.1080/00222895.2017.1375453</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2895
ispartof Journal of motor behavior, 2018-09, Vol.50 (5), p.538-556
issn 0022-2895
1940-1027
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_29016257
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Bimanual coordination
Coordination
Integrated displays
Intentional switching
Motor ability
title Intentional Switching Between Bimanual Coordination Patterns
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T16%3A56%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intentional%20Switching%20Between%20Bimanual%20Coordination%20Patterns&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20motor%20behavior&rft.au=Wang,%20Chaoyi&rft.date=2018-09-03&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=538&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=538-556&rft.issn=0022-2895&rft.eissn=1940-1027&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00222895.2017.1375453&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2103353699%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-cc7257186ca79d5c6422aa74fece0e58b3efbf3511b6121fbac5669173fa63833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2103353699&rft_id=info:pmid/29016257&rfr_iscdi=true