Balancing Our Perceptions of the Efficacy of Success-Based Feedback Manipulations on Motor Learning

We report two experiments evaluating the impact of success-related feedback on learning of a balance task. In Exp. 1, we studied the influence of lax and conservative outcome feedback, as well as large vs. small improvements in outcome feedback on balance learning. Despite impacts on competency, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of motor behavior 2018-11, Vol.50 (6), p.614-630
Main Authors: Ong, Nicole T., Hodges, Nicola J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
errorless learning
motivation
perceived competency
self-efficacy
social-comparison
Success
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-acb3c06508b185eb04e98f2b3b1ac25731ca7715c9f1f7fb42e3aeb86078c3de3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-acb3c06508b185eb04e98f2b3b1ac25731ca7715c9f1f7fb42e3aeb86078c3de3
container_end_page 630
container_issue 6
container_start_page 614
container_title Journal of motor behavior
container_volume 50
creator Ong, Nicole T.
Hodges, Nicola J.
description We report two experiments evaluating the impact of success-related feedback on learning of a balance task. In Exp. 1, we studied the influence of lax and conservative outcome feedback, as well as large vs. small improvements in outcome feedback on balance learning. Despite impacts on competency, there were no between-group differences in actual performance or learning. Because no comparative information was provided in Exp. 1, we tested four further groups that either did or did not receive positive or negative comparative feedback (Exp. 2). Although the manipulations influenced competency and arousal, again, there was no impact on balance outcomes. These data cast doubt on the assertions made in the OPTIMAL theory that perceptions of success are moderators of motor learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00222895.2017.1383227
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_29077547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957489667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-acb3c06508b185eb04e98f2b3b1ac25731ca7715c9f1f7fb42e3aeb86078c3de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u3CAURlHUKJmmfYRESN1048kFjMG7NFF-Kk2USGnXCPAlceIxU7BVzdvX1ky66KJsENL5Pi4cQk4ZLBloOAfgnOtaLjkwtWRCC87VAVmwuoSCAVcfyGJmihk6Jh9zfoVpKYAjcsxrUEqWakH8pe1s79v-mT6MiT5i8rgZ2thnGgMdXpBeh9B667fz-Wn0HnMuLm3Ght4gNs76N3pv-3Yzdnaf6-l9HGKiK7Spn5o_kcNgu4yf9_sJ-Xlz_ePqrlg93H6_-rYqfFnBUFjvhIdKgnZMS3RQYq0Dd8Ix67lUgnmrFJO-Diyo4EqOwqLTFSjtRYPihHzd9W5S_DViHsy6zR676YEYx2xYLVWp66pSE_rlH_Q1jqmfpjOcCSmgZBWbKLmjfIo5Jwxmk9q1TVvDwMwWzLsFM1swewtT7mzfPro1Nn9T798-ARc7oO1DTGv7O6auMYPddjGFNPvIRvz_jj-qBZW9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135304161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balancing Our Perceptions of the Efficacy of Success-Based Feedback Manipulations on Motor Learning</title><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Ong, Nicole T. ; Hodges, Nicola J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ong, Nicole T. ; Hodges, Nicola J.</creatorcontrib><description>We report two experiments evaluating the impact of success-related feedback on learning of a balance task. In Exp. 1, we studied the influence of lax and conservative outcome feedback, as well as large vs. small improvements in outcome feedback on balance learning. Despite impacts on competency, there were no between-group differences in actual performance or learning. Because no comparative information was provided in Exp. 1, we tested four further groups that either did or did not receive positive or negative comparative feedback (Exp. 2). Although the manipulations influenced competency and arousal, again, there was no impact on balance outcomes. These data cast doubt on the assertions made in the OPTIMAL theory that perceptions of success are moderators of motor learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2895</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-1027</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2017.1383227</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29077547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Routledge</publisher><subject>errorless learning ; motivation ; perceived competency ; self-efficacy ; social-comparison ; Success</subject><ispartof>Journal of motor behavior, 2018-11, Vol.50 (6), p.614-630</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2017</rights><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-acb3c06508b185eb04e98f2b3b1ac25731ca7715c9f1f7fb42e3aeb86078c3de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-acb3c06508b185eb04e98f2b3b1ac25731ca7715c9f1f7fb42e3aeb86078c3de3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3174-1146</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29077547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ong, Nicole T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Nicola J.</creatorcontrib><title>Balancing Our Perceptions of the Efficacy of Success-Based Feedback Manipulations on Motor Learning</title><title>Journal of motor behavior</title><addtitle>J Mot Behav</addtitle><description>We report two experiments evaluating the impact of success-related feedback on learning of a balance task. In Exp. 1, we studied the influence of lax and conservative outcome feedback, as well as large vs. small improvements in outcome feedback on balance learning. Despite impacts on competency, there were no between-group differences in actual performance or learning. Because no comparative information was provided in Exp. 1, we tested four further groups that either did or did not receive positive or negative comparative feedback (Exp. 2). Although the manipulations influenced competency and arousal, again, there was no impact on balance outcomes. These data cast doubt on the assertions made in the OPTIMAL theory that perceptions of success are moderators of motor learning.</description><subject>errorless learning</subject><subject>motivation</subject><subject>perceived competency</subject><subject>self-efficacy</subject><subject>social-comparison</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>0022-2895</issn><issn>1940-1027</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u3CAURlHUKJmmfYRESN1048kFjMG7NFF-Kk2USGnXCPAlceIxU7BVzdvX1ky66KJsENL5Pi4cQk4ZLBloOAfgnOtaLjkwtWRCC87VAVmwuoSCAVcfyGJmihk6Jh9zfoVpKYAjcsxrUEqWakH8pe1s79v-mT6MiT5i8rgZ2thnGgMdXpBeh9B667fz-Wn0HnMuLm3Ght4gNs76N3pv-3Yzdnaf6-l9HGKiK7Spn5o_kcNgu4yf9_sJ-Xlz_ePqrlg93H6_-rYqfFnBUFjvhIdKgnZMS3RQYq0Dd8Ix67lUgnmrFJO-Diyo4EqOwqLTFSjtRYPihHzd9W5S_DViHsy6zR676YEYx2xYLVWp66pSE_rlH_Q1jqmfpjOcCSmgZBWbKLmjfIo5Jwxmk9q1TVvDwMwWzLsFM1swewtT7mzfPro1Nn9T798-ARc7oO1DTGv7O6auMYPddjGFNPvIRvz_jj-qBZW9</recordid><startdate>20181102</startdate><enddate>20181102</enddate><creator>Ong, Nicole T.</creator><creator>Hodges, Nicola J.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3174-1146</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181102</creationdate><title>Balancing Our Perceptions of the Efficacy of Success-Based Feedback Manipulations on Motor Learning</title><author>Ong, Nicole T. ; Hodges, Nicola J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-acb3c06508b185eb04e98f2b3b1ac25731ca7715c9f1f7fb42e3aeb86078c3de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>errorless learning</topic><topic>motivation</topic><topic>perceived competency</topic><topic>self-efficacy</topic><topic>social-comparison</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ong, Nicole T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Nicola J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of motor behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ong, Nicole T.</au><au>Hodges, Nicola J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Balancing Our Perceptions of the Efficacy of Success-Based Feedback Manipulations on Motor Learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of motor behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Mot Behav</addtitle><date>2018-11-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>614</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>614-630</pages><issn>0022-2895</issn><eissn>1940-1027</eissn><abstract>We report two experiments evaluating the impact of success-related feedback on learning of a balance task. In Exp. 1, we studied the influence of lax and conservative outcome feedback, as well as large vs. small improvements in outcome feedback on balance learning. Despite impacts on competency, there were no between-group differences in actual performance or learning. Because no comparative information was provided in Exp. 1, we tested four further groups that either did or did not receive positive or negative comparative feedback (Exp. 2). Although the manipulations influenced competency and arousal, again, there was no impact on balance outcomes. These data cast doubt on the assertions made in the OPTIMAL theory that perceptions of success are moderators of motor learning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>29077547</pmid><doi>10.1080/00222895.2017.1383227</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3174-1146</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2895
ispartof Journal of motor behavior, 2018-11, Vol.50 (6), p.614-630
issn 0022-2895
1940-1027
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_29077547
source SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects errorless learning
motivation
perceived competency
self-efficacy
social-comparison
Success
title Balancing Our Perceptions of the Efficacy of Success-Based Feedback Manipulations on Motor Learning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A25%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Balancing%20Our%20Perceptions%20of%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20Success-Based%20Feedback%20Manipulations%20on%20Motor%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20motor%20behavior&rft.au=Ong,%20Nicole%20T.&rft.date=2018-11-02&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=614&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=614-630&rft.issn=0022-2895&rft.eissn=1940-1027&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00222895.2017.1383227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1957489667%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-acb3c06508b185eb04e98f2b3b1ac25731ca7715c9f1f7fb42e3aeb86078c3de3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135304161&rft_id=info:pmid/29077547&rfr_iscdi=true