Differentiating Merkel cell carcinoma of lymph nodes without a detectable primary skin tumor from other metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: The ELECTHIP criteria

• Published in: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2018-05, Vol.78 (5), p.964
• Main Authors: Kervarrec, Thibault, Zaragoza, Julia, Gaboriaud, Pauline, Le Gouge, Amélie, Beby-Defaux, Agnès, Le Corre, Yannick, Hainaut-Wierzbicka, Ewa, Aubin, Francois, Bens, Guido, Michenet, Patrick, Maillard, Hervé, Touzé, Antoine, Samimi, Mahtab, Guyétant, Serge
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1097-6787
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.037

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can present as a cutaneous tumor or a lymph node metastasis without a primary tumor. MCC presenting without a primary tumor (MCCWOPT) can be misinterpreted on histologic examination as lymph node metastasis (LNM) from another neuroendocrine carcinoma (LNMNEC). However, this distinction is crucial for therapeutic management. To determine the discriminative criteria for the differential diagnosis of MCCWOPT, LNM from cutaneous MCC, and LNMNECs. Clinical, morphologic, and immunohistochemical data (expression of cytokeratins AE1, AE3, 7, 19, and 20; chromogranin A, synaptophysin, thyroid transcription factor-1 [TTF-1]), as well as the presence of Merkel cell polyomavirus (by immunohistochemistry and PCR) were compared in patients with MCCWOPT (n = 17), LNM from a cutaneous MCC (n = 11), and LNMNEC (n = 20; 8 lung, 7 thyroid, 3 digestive tract, 2 other). MCC (including MCCWOPT and LNM from a cutaneous MCC) differed from LNMNEC by 7 discriminative criteria: 1) elderly age, 2) location of the tumor, 3) extent of the disease, 4) cytokeratin expression, 5) TTF-1 expression, 6) histologic type, and 7) Merkel cell polyomavirus detection, summarized under the acronym ELECTHIP. All MCC patients had ≥5 of the ELECTHIP criteria, whereas all patients with LNMNEC (except 1) had