Who does she think she is? Women, leadership and the 'B'(ias) word

Objective: Despite the increasing number of women in professional fields, women are under-represented in leadership roles. The goal of this paper is to identify potential explanations for the gender gap in leadership. Method: The academic literature with respect to gender roles, leadership, and orga...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical neuropsychologist 2018-02, Vol.32 (2), p.235-251
Main Author: Kubu, Cynthia S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Altruism
bias
Culture
Female
Gender
Gender Identity
Humans
Leadership
Male
Neuropsychology - trends
Organizations
professionalism
Sexism
Women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: Despite the increasing number of women in professional fields, women are under-represented in leadership roles. The goal of this paper is to identify potential explanations for the gender gap in leadership. Method: The academic literature with respect to gender roles, leadership, and organizational expectations; gender differences in leadership; and the potential role of second generation bias was reviewed. Results: Women are as effective as male leaders in a variety of organizational settings. The role congruity theory suggests that women are placed in a double bind: maintenance of their gender role may result in a failure to meet the requirements of a leader role whereas conforming to a leader role may result in the failure to conform to their gender role. Second generation, or implicit, bias also influences women's leadership opportunities. This is further complicated by expectations that women will engage in more altruistic organizational citizenship behaviors or be penalized. Conclusion: Differences in ability do not account for the gender gap in leadership. Cultural factors, including gender role and leadership expectations, organizational demands, and second-generation bias impact women's ability to lead. Pragmatic recommendations to increase women's influence and representation in leadership are provided.
ISSN:1385-4046
1744-4144
DOI:10.1080/13854046.2017.1418022