Even slight movements disturb analysis of cardiovascular dynamics

We hypothesized that spontaneous movements (postural adjustments and ideomotion) disturb analysis of heart rate and blood pressure variability and could explain the discrepancy between studies. We measured R-R intervals and systolic blood pressure in nine healthy sitting subjects during three protoc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 1999-07, Vol.277 (1), p.H261
Main Authors: Fortrat, Jacques-Olivier, Formet, Cédric, Frutoso, Jean, Gharib, Claude
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We hypothesized that spontaneous movements (postural adjustments and ideomotion) disturb analysis of heart rate and blood pressure variability and could explain the discrepancy between studies. We measured R-R intervals and systolic blood pressure in nine healthy sitting subjects during three protocols: 1) no movement allowed, 2) movements allowed but not standing, 3) movements and standing allowed. Heart rate and blood pressure were not altered by movements. Movements with or without standing produced a twofold or greater increase of the overall variability of R-R intervals and of the low-frequency components of spectral analysis of heart rate variability. The spectral exponent β of heart rate variability (1.123 at rest) was changed by movements (1.364), and the percentage of fractal noise (79% at rest) was increased by standing (91%, coarse-graining spectral analysis). Spontaneous movements could induce a plateau in the correlation dimensions of heart rate variability, but they changed its nonlinear predictability. We suggest that future studies on short-term cardiovascular variability should control spontaneous movements.
ISSN:1522-1539