Loading…
Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers
Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistan...
Saved in:
Published in: | Physics in medicine & biology 2019-05, Vol.64 (11), p.115001-115001 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3 |
container_end_page | 115001 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 115001 |
container_title | Physics in medicine & biology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Turk, Maruša Simon i, Urban Roth, Alison Valentinuzzi, Damijan Jeraj, Robert |
description | Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. Model parameters included proliferation, drug-induced death, transition and proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The model was benchmarked with imaging metrics extracted from 39 metastatic prostate cancer patients who had 18F-NaF-PET/CT scans performed at baseline and at three cycles into chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Two initial model assumptions were evaluated: considering only inter-patient heterogeneity and both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The correlation between the median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells and baseline patient-level imaging metrics was assessed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The impact of model parameters on simulated treatment response was evaluated with a sensitivity study. Treatment response after periods of six, nine, and 12 months was predicted with the model. The median predicted range of response for patients treated with both therapies was compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each patient, the time was calculated when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed a favourable response. By taking into account inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells, the model performed significantly better () than by taking into account only inter-patient heterogeneity (). The median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells showed a moderate correlation (ρ = 0.55) with mean patient-level uptake, and a low correlation (ρ = 0.36) with the dispersion of mean metastasis-level uptake in a patient. The sensitivity study showed a strong impact of the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells on model behaviour after three cycles of therapy. The difference in the median range of response (MRR) was not significant between cohorts at any time point (p > 0.15). The median time when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed the favourable response was eight months, for both cohorts. The model provides an insight into inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the evolution of treatment resistance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0924 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_30790781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2185566909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1P5DAQQC10CJaP_irk8goCYztx7BKt-JKQaKC2HGcWzG3sYDsF_55EC3RUI43ePGkeIX8ZXDBQ6pIJySrZSLi0HWhe75HVz-oPWQEIVmnWNIfkKOc3AMYUrw_IoYBWQ6vYivxfx2Gcii0-BrulQ-xxu_XhhcYNTZh9LjY4pDb01OYcnbcFe1oS2jJgKAszxpCRvmLBFF8woC8f1Ac6YLF5ETvqFkfKJ2R_Y7cZT7_mMXm-uX5a31UPj7f366uHynGlSyV5yzvRcKkakExK0XcKmEWBfV_Xou3qRgByOf_LOLKubdHV6NCC7rVWThyTfzvvmOL7hLmYwWc3_2UDxikbzlTTSKlBzyjsUJdizgk3Zkx-sOnDMDBLYrP0NEtPs0s8n5x92aduwP7n4LvpDJzvAB9H8xanNIfNv_s-AYoWhiM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185566909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers</title><source>Institute of Physics</source><creator>Turk, Maruša ; Simon i, Urban ; Roth, Alison ; Valentinuzzi, Damijan ; Jeraj, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Turk, Maruša ; Simon i, Urban ; Roth, Alison ; Valentinuzzi, Damijan ; Jeraj, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. Model parameters included proliferation, drug-induced death, transition and proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The model was benchmarked with imaging metrics extracted from 39 metastatic prostate cancer patients who had 18F-NaF-PET/CT scans performed at baseline and at three cycles into chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Two initial model assumptions were evaluated: considering only inter-patient heterogeneity and both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The correlation between the median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells and baseline patient-level imaging metrics was assessed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The impact of model parameters on simulated treatment response was evaluated with a sensitivity study. Treatment response after periods of six, nine, and 12 months was predicted with the model. The median predicted range of response for patients treated with both therapies was compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each patient, the time was calculated when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed a favourable response. By taking into account inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells, the model performed significantly better () than by taking into account only inter-patient heterogeneity (). The median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells showed a moderate correlation (ρ = 0.55) with mean patient-level uptake, and a low correlation (ρ = 0.36) with the dispersion of mean metastasis-level uptake in a patient. The sensitivity study showed a strong impact of the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells on model behaviour after three cycles of therapy. The difference in the median range of response (MRR) was not significant between cohorts at any time point (p > 0.15). The median time when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed the favourable response was eight months, for both cohorts. The model provides an insight into inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the evolution of treatment resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0924</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30790781</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; computational model ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Fluorine Radioisotopes ; Humans ; Male ; metastasis biology ; Patient-Specific Modeling - statistics & numerical data ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; treatment response heterogeneity ; tumour growth ; tumour heterogeneity ; tumour modelling</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine & biology, 2019-05, Vol.64 (11), p.115001-115001</ispartof><rights>2019 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30790781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turk, Maruša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon i, Urban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentinuzzi, Damijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeraj, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers</title><title>Physics in medicine & biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. Model parameters included proliferation, drug-induced death, transition and proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The model was benchmarked with imaging metrics extracted from 39 metastatic prostate cancer patients who had 18F-NaF-PET/CT scans performed at baseline and at three cycles into chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Two initial model assumptions were evaluated: considering only inter-patient heterogeneity and both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The correlation between the median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells and baseline patient-level imaging metrics was assessed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The impact of model parameters on simulated treatment response was evaluated with a sensitivity study. Treatment response after periods of six, nine, and 12 months was predicted with the model. The median predicted range of response for patients treated with both therapies was compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each patient, the time was calculated when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed a favourable response. By taking into account inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells, the model performed significantly better () than by taking into account only inter-patient heterogeneity (). The median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells showed a moderate correlation (ρ = 0.55) with mean patient-level uptake, and a low correlation (ρ = 0.36) with the dispersion of mean metastasis-level uptake in a patient. The sensitivity study showed a strong impact of the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells on model behaviour after three cycles of therapy. The difference in the median range of response (MRR) was not significant between cohorts at any time point (p > 0.15). The median time when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed the favourable response was eight months, for both cohorts. The model provides an insight into inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the evolution of treatment resistance.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>computational model</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Neoplasm</subject><subject>Fluorine Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>metastasis biology</subject><subject>Patient-Specific Modeling - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>treatment response heterogeneity</subject><subject>tumour growth</subject><subject>tumour heterogeneity</subject><subject>tumour modelling</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1P5DAQQC10CJaP_irk8goCYztx7BKt-JKQaKC2HGcWzG3sYDsF_55EC3RUI43ePGkeIX8ZXDBQ6pIJySrZSLi0HWhe75HVz-oPWQEIVmnWNIfkKOc3AMYUrw_IoYBWQ6vYivxfx2Gcii0-BrulQ-xxu_XhhcYNTZh9LjY4pDb01OYcnbcFe1oS2jJgKAszxpCRvmLBFF8woC8f1Ac6YLF5ETvqFkfKJ2R_Y7cZT7_mMXm-uX5a31UPj7f366uHynGlSyV5yzvRcKkakExK0XcKmEWBfV_Xou3qRgByOf_LOLKubdHV6NCC7rVWThyTfzvvmOL7hLmYwWc3_2UDxikbzlTTSKlBzyjsUJdizgk3Zkx-sOnDMDBLYrP0NEtPs0s8n5x92aduwP7n4LvpDJzvAB9H8xanNIfNv_s-AYoWhiM</recordid><startdate>20190523</startdate><enddate>20190523</enddate><creator>Turk, Maruša</creator><creator>Simon i, Urban</creator><creator>Roth, Alison</creator><creator>Valentinuzzi, Damijan</creator><creator>Jeraj, Robert</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190523</creationdate><title>Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers</title><author>Turk, Maruša ; Simon i, Urban ; Roth, Alison ; Valentinuzzi, Damijan ; Jeraj, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>computational model</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Neoplasm</topic><topic>Fluorine Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>metastasis biology</topic><topic>Patient-Specific Modeling - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>treatment response heterogeneity</topic><topic>tumour growth</topic><topic>tumour heterogeneity</topic><topic>tumour modelling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turk, Maruša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon i, Urban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentinuzzi, Damijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeraj, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine & biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turk, Maruša</au><au>Simon i, Urban</au><au>Roth, Alison</au><au>Valentinuzzi, Damijan</au><au>Jeraj, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine & biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2019-05-23</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>115001</spage><epage>115001</epage><pages>115001-115001</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. Model parameters included proliferation, drug-induced death, transition and proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The model was benchmarked with imaging metrics extracted from 39 metastatic prostate cancer patients who had 18F-NaF-PET/CT scans performed at baseline and at three cycles into chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Two initial model assumptions were evaluated: considering only inter-patient heterogeneity and both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The correlation between the median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells and baseline patient-level imaging metrics was assessed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The impact of model parameters on simulated treatment response was evaluated with a sensitivity study. Treatment response after periods of six, nine, and 12 months was predicted with the model. The median predicted range of response for patients treated with both therapies was compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each patient, the time was calculated when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed a favourable response. By taking into account inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells, the model performed significantly better () than by taking into account only inter-patient heterogeneity (). The median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells showed a moderate correlation (ρ = 0.55) with mean patient-level uptake, and a low correlation (ρ = 0.36) with the dispersion of mean metastasis-level uptake in a patient. The sensitivity study showed a strong impact of the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells on model behaviour after three cycles of therapy. The difference in the median range of response (MRR) was not significant between cohorts at any time point (p > 0.15). The median time when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed the favourable response was eight months, for both cohorts. The model provides an insight into inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the evolution of treatment resistance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>30790781</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/ab0924</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9155 |
ispartof | Physics in medicine & biology, 2019-05, Vol.64 (11), p.115001-115001 |
issn | 0031-9155 1361-6560 1361-6560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_30790781 |
source | Institute of Physics |
subjects | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy Bone Neoplasms - secondary computational model Drug Resistance, Neoplasm Fluorine Radioisotopes Humans Male metastasis biology Patient-Specific Modeling - statistics & numerical data Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Radiopharmaceuticals treatment response heterogeneity tumour growth tumour heterogeneity tumour modelling |
title | Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20modelling%20of%20resistance%20and%20associated%20treatment%20response%20heterogeneity%20in%20metastatic%20cancers&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Turk,%20Maru%C5%A1a&rft.date=2019-05-23&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=115001&rft.epage=115001&rft.pages=115001-115001&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/ab0924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2185566909%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185566909&rft_id=info:pmid/30790781&rfr_iscdi=true |