Loading…

Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers

Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physics in medicine & biology 2019-05, Vol.64 (11), p.115001-115001
Main Authors: Turk, Maruša, Simon i, Urban, Roth, Alison, Valentinuzzi, Damijan, Jeraj, Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3
container_end_page 115001
container_issue 11
container_start_page 115001
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 64
creator Turk, Maruša
Simon i, Urban
Roth, Alison
Valentinuzzi, Damijan
Jeraj, Robert
description Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. Model parameters included proliferation, drug-induced death, transition and proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The model was benchmarked with imaging metrics extracted from 39 metastatic prostate cancer patients who had 18F-NaF-PET/CT scans performed at baseline and at three cycles into chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Two initial model assumptions were evaluated: considering only inter-patient heterogeneity and both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The correlation between the median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells and baseline patient-level imaging metrics was assessed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The impact of model parameters on simulated treatment response was evaluated with a sensitivity study. Treatment response after periods of six, nine, and 12 months was predicted with the model. The median predicted range of response for patients treated with both therapies was compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each patient, the time was calculated when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed a favourable response. By taking into account inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells, the model performed significantly better () than by taking into account only inter-patient heterogeneity (). The median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells showed a moderate correlation (ρ  =  0.55) with mean patient-level uptake, and a low correlation (ρ  =  0.36) with the dispersion of mean metastasis-level uptake in a patient. The sensitivity study showed a strong impact of the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells on model behaviour after three cycles of therapy. The difference in the median range of response (MRR) was not significant between cohorts at any time point (p   >  0.15). The median time when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed the favourable response was eight months, for both cohorts. The model provides an insight into inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the evolution of treatment resistance.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0924
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_30790781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2185566909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1P5DAQQC10CJaP_irk8goCYztx7BKt-JKQaKC2HGcWzG3sYDsF_55EC3RUI43ePGkeIX8ZXDBQ6pIJySrZSLi0HWhe75HVz-oPWQEIVmnWNIfkKOc3AMYUrw_IoYBWQ6vYivxfx2Gcii0-BrulQ-xxu_XhhcYNTZh9LjY4pDb01OYcnbcFe1oS2jJgKAszxpCRvmLBFF8woC8f1Ac6YLF5ETvqFkfKJ2R_Y7cZT7_mMXm-uX5a31UPj7f366uHynGlSyV5yzvRcKkakExK0XcKmEWBfV_Xou3qRgByOf_LOLKubdHV6NCC7rVWThyTfzvvmOL7hLmYwWc3_2UDxikbzlTTSKlBzyjsUJdizgk3Zkx-sOnDMDBLYrP0NEtPs0s8n5x92aduwP7n4LvpDJzvAB9H8xanNIfNv_s-AYoWhiM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185566909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers</title><source>Institute of Physics</source><creator>Turk, Maruša ; Simon i, Urban ; Roth, Alison ; Valentinuzzi, Damijan ; Jeraj, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Turk, Maruša ; Simon i, Urban ; Roth, Alison ; Valentinuzzi, Damijan ; Jeraj, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. Model parameters included proliferation, drug-induced death, transition and proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The model was benchmarked with imaging metrics extracted from 39 metastatic prostate cancer patients who had 18F-NaF-PET/CT scans performed at baseline and at three cycles into chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Two initial model assumptions were evaluated: considering only inter-patient heterogeneity and both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The correlation between the median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells and baseline patient-level imaging metrics was assessed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The impact of model parameters on simulated treatment response was evaluated with a sensitivity study. Treatment response after periods of six, nine, and 12 months was predicted with the model. The median predicted range of response for patients treated with both therapies was compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each patient, the time was calculated when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed a favourable response. By taking into account inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells, the model performed significantly better () than by taking into account only inter-patient heterogeneity (). The median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells showed a moderate correlation (ρ  =  0.55) with mean patient-level uptake, and a low correlation (ρ  =  0.36) with the dispersion of mean metastasis-level uptake in a patient. The sensitivity study showed a strong impact of the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells on model behaviour after three cycles of therapy. The difference in the median range of response (MRR) was not significant between cohorts at any time point (p   &gt;  0.15). The median time when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed the favourable response was eight months, for both cohorts. The model provides an insight into inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the evolution of treatment resistance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0924</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30790781</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; computational model ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Fluorine Radioisotopes ; Humans ; Male ; metastasis biology ; Patient-Specific Modeling - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; treatment response heterogeneity ; tumour growth ; tumour heterogeneity ; tumour modelling</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2019-05, Vol.64 (11), p.115001-115001</ispartof><rights>2019 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30790781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turk, Maruša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon i, Urban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentinuzzi, Damijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeraj, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. Model parameters included proliferation, drug-induced death, transition and proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The model was benchmarked with imaging metrics extracted from 39 metastatic prostate cancer patients who had 18F-NaF-PET/CT scans performed at baseline and at three cycles into chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Two initial model assumptions were evaluated: considering only inter-patient heterogeneity and both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The correlation between the median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells and baseline patient-level imaging metrics was assessed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The impact of model parameters on simulated treatment response was evaluated with a sensitivity study. Treatment response after periods of six, nine, and 12 months was predicted with the model. The median predicted range of response for patients treated with both therapies was compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each patient, the time was calculated when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed a favourable response. By taking into account inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells, the model performed significantly better () than by taking into account only inter-patient heterogeneity (). The median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells showed a moderate correlation (ρ  =  0.55) with mean patient-level uptake, and a low correlation (ρ  =  0.36) with the dispersion of mean metastasis-level uptake in a patient. The sensitivity study showed a strong impact of the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells on model behaviour after three cycles of therapy. The difference in the median range of response (MRR) was not significant between cohorts at any time point (p   &gt;  0.15). The median time when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed the favourable response was eight months, for both cohorts. The model provides an insight into inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the evolution of treatment resistance.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>computational model</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Neoplasm</subject><subject>Fluorine Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>metastasis biology</subject><subject>Patient-Specific Modeling - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>treatment response heterogeneity</subject><subject>tumour growth</subject><subject>tumour heterogeneity</subject><subject>tumour modelling</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1P5DAQQC10CJaP_irk8goCYztx7BKt-JKQaKC2HGcWzG3sYDsF_55EC3RUI43ePGkeIX8ZXDBQ6pIJySrZSLi0HWhe75HVz-oPWQEIVmnWNIfkKOc3AMYUrw_IoYBWQ6vYivxfx2Gcii0-BrulQ-xxu_XhhcYNTZh9LjY4pDb01OYcnbcFe1oS2jJgKAszxpCRvmLBFF8woC8f1Ac6YLF5ETvqFkfKJ2R_Y7cZT7_mMXm-uX5a31UPj7f366uHynGlSyV5yzvRcKkakExK0XcKmEWBfV_Xou3qRgByOf_LOLKubdHV6NCC7rVWThyTfzvvmOL7hLmYwWc3_2UDxikbzlTTSKlBzyjsUJdizgk3Zkx-sOnDMDBLYrP0NEtPs0s8n5x92aduwP7n4LvpDJzvAB9H8xanNIfNv_s-AYoWhiM</recordid><startdate>20190523</startdate><enddate>20190523</enddate><creator>Turk, Maruša</creator><creator>Simon i, Urban</creator><creator>Roth, Alison</creator><creator>Valentinuzzi, Damijan</creator><creator>Jeraj, Robert</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190523</creationdate><title>Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers</title><author>Turk, Maruša ; Simon i, Urban ; Roth, Alison ; Valentinuzzi, Damijan ; Jeraj, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>computational model</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Neoplasm</topic><topic>Fluorine Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>metastasis biology</topic><topic>Patient-Specific Modeling - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>treatment response heterogeneity</topic><topic>tumour growth</topic><topic>tumour heterogeneity</topic><topic>tumour modelling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turk, Maruša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon i, Urban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentinuzzi, Damijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeraj, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turk, Maruša</au><au>Simon i, Urban</au><au>Roth, Alison</au><au>Valentinuzzi, Damijan</au><au>Jeraj, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2019-05-23</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>115001</spage><epage>115001</epage><pages>115001-115001</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>Metastatic cancer patients invariably develop treatment resistance. Different levels of resistance lead to observed heterogeneity in treatment response. The main goal was to evaluate treatment response heterogeneity with a computation model simulating the dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. Model parameters included proliferation, drug-induced death, transition and proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The model was benchmarked with imaging metrics extracted from 39 metastatic prostate cancer patients who had 18F-NaF-PET/CT scans performed at baseline and at three cycles into chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Two initial model assumptions were evaluated: considering only inter-patient heterogeneity and both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells. The correlation between the median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells and baseline patient-level imaging metrics was assessed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The impact of model parameters on simulated treatment response was evaluated with a sensitivity study. Treatment response after periods of six, nine, and 12 months was predicted with the model. The median predicted range of response for patients treated with both therapies was compared with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each patient, the time was calculated when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed a favourable response. By taking into account inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells, the model performed significantly better () than by taking into account only inter-patient heterogeneity (). The median proportion of intrinsically resistant cells showed a moderate correlation (ρ  =  0.55) with mean patient-level uptake, and a low correlation (ρ  =  0.36) with the dispersion of mean metastasis-level uptake in a patient. The sensitivity study showed a strong impact of the proportion of intrinsically resistant cells on model behaviour after three cycles of therapy. The difference in the median range of response (MRR) was not significant between cohorts at any time point (p   &gt;  0.15). The median time when the proportion of disease with a non-favourable response outperformed the favourable response was eight months, for both cohorts. The model provides an insight into inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in the evolution of treatment resistance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>30790781</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/ab0924</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2019-05, Vol.64 (11), p.115001-115001
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_30790781
source Institute of Physics
subjects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy
Bone Neoplasms - secondary
computational model
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Fluorine Radioisotopes
Humans
Male
metastasis biology
Patient-Specific Modeling - statistics & numerical data
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Radiopharmaceuticals
treatment response heterogeneity
tumour growth
tumour heterogeneity
tumour modelling
title Computational modelling of resistance and associated treatment response heterogeneity in metastatic cancers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20modelling%20of%20resistance%20and%20associated%20treatment%20response%20heterogeneity%20in%20metastatic%20cancers&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Turk,%20Maru%C5%A1a&rft.date=2019-05-23&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=115001&rft.epage=115001&rft.pages=115001-115001&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/ab0924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2185566909%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-6272b352685061663db801ae3edd4437b4530e2692412e1b77ec4ecea09d998c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185566909&rft_id=info:pmid/30790781&rfr_iscdi=true